1. [Safety of umeclidinium/vilanterol in Chinese patients in a real-world setting: a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, observational study].
- Author
-
Mu XD, Li XM, He XP, Jia LH, Guan YH, An FC, Chen LP, Jia Q, Xiao AL, Zhang LC, Xiao ZH, Wang YM, Guan W, Liu TT, and Su L
- Subjects
- Humans, Prospective Studies, Aged, Male, Female, China, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive drug therapy, Middle Aged, East Asian People, Benzyl Alcohols administration & dosage, Benzyl Alcohols adverse effects, Chlorobenzenes adverse effects, Chlorobenzenes administration & dosage, Quinuclidines adverse effects, Quinuclidines administration & dosage
- Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the safety of umeclidinium/vilanterol in Chinese participants in a real-world setting. Methods: This was a 24-week, prospective, multicenter, single-arm, observational study that enrolled participants treated with umeclidinium/vilanterol in real-world settings from 14 sites in China from 14 December 2020 to 30 January 2022. The primary outcomes were the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) at week 24. Results: A total of 887 participants on umeclidinium/vilanterol were enrolled. The mean (±SD) age of these participants was 67.5 (±9.6) years, with more men (77.7%) enrolled. The majority of the participants (98.1%) had been diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 67.6% of them reported comorbidities. More than half of the participants (52.8%) were taking concomitant medication in addition to the study treatment. AEs were reported in 59 (6.7%) participants and were predominantly mild to moderate in severity. SAEs were reported in 21 (2.4%) participants, including 9 fatal SAEs, 10 reported non-fatal SAEs, and 2 reported both non-fatal and fatal SAEs. None of the SAEs, including the fatal events, were considered by the investigators to be related to umeclidinium/vilanterol. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 6 (0.7%) participants with 4 preferred terms (PTs), all of which were considered mild in severity. Of these PTs, 2 were known ADRs of umeclidinium/vilanterol. Three participants (0.3%) reported AEs that were part of serious identified/potential hazards, all of which were considered by the investigators to be unrelated to umeclidinium/vilanterol. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that umeclidinium/vilanterol was well tolerated in Chinese participants in a real-world setting and no new drug-related safety signals were observed.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF