Search

Aim: The aim of the study is to retrospectively evaluate the anatomical success rate and functional results of 25G+ PPV in the treatment of newly diagnosed rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD)., Material and Methods: The set consists of 152 eyes of 152 patients, of which 71 (47%) were men, average age 54 years, operated on by one surgeon for RRD at the Eye Clinic of the University Hospital and Medical Faculty of Masaryk University Brno from 1.7.2019 to 4.5.2021 using the 25G+ PPV technique. 25G+ PPV with pre-equatorial cerclage was performed on 7 patients. The patients' anamnesis included blunt ocular trauma and uncomplicated cataract surgery with implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. The cause of RRD was retinal tear/s, regardless of their number and location. The transparency of the anterior segment of the eye enabled reliable visualization of the posterior segment. Preoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) grade A-D2 was admissible. Patients with a history of penetrating ocular trauma were excluded. The postoperative findings and functional outcomes of the patients were evaluated 1-3 months after PPV. The operation was anatomically successful if the retina was fully attached. Final visual acuity (VA) was evaluated for each patient. The final visual acuity examination was carried out typically on a Snellen optotype, either without correction, with the patient's own spectacle correction or with correction according to the current values on the autorefractometer. The arithmetic average was used for the numerical expression of the attained results, and the numerical values were also expressed in percentages. Since the different groups were not compared with each other, no statistical test was necessary to analyze the results., Results: In 150 (98.7%) of the 152 patients in the group, we achieved complete retinal reattachment, in 2 (1.3%) patients the retina remained detached, and we recorded anatomical failure of the treatment. Fifty (33%) patients achieved VA ≥ 4/8., Conclusion: In 133 (87.5%) patients, we are able to state anatomical success even without the presence of intraocular tamponade in the operated eye. These patients can be considered completely cured. 25G+ PPV has demonstrated its contribution to resolving RRD.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare the effect of three initial doses of the anti-VEGF ranibizumab and aflibercept medication on serous pigment epithelial detachment (PED), subretinal fluid (SRF) and intraretinal fluid (IRF) in the macula of treatment naive neovascular AMD (nvAMD) patients., Material and Methods: The cohort consists of 148 patients, of which 74 patients were treated with ranibizumab (51 females and 23 males) and 74 with aflibercept (46 females and 28 males). The data was recorded prospectively from the moment of diagnosis and start of treatment for a period of 3 months. At the moment of diagnosis and 3 months later, an OCT examination (Spectralis OCT, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) was performed. The OCT examination included a macular scan with 25 scans. Using the OCT instrument software, we measured the maximum anterior-posterior elevation of serous PED, the highest thickness of SRF and the largest diameter of the intraretinal cystic space. The statistical significance of differences between groups was evaluated using the t-test for continuous data and the Fisher exact test for categorical data. Changes in values of continuous variables over time were evaluated using the Wilcoxon paired test. Paired comparisons of binary parameters were determined by the McNemar test., Results: Full regression of PED, SRF and IRF occurred in 3 (4.1%), 25 (39%) and 20 (51%) patients treated with ranibizumab, and in 5 (7.9%, p = 0.470), 28 (47%, p = 0.470) and 25 (57%, p = 0.827) patients treated with aflibercept, respectively. The average regression of PED, SRF and IRF was -60.4 μm (median -37.5 μm), -84.3 μm (median -85 μm) and -109.3 μm (median -81 μm) in patients treated with ranibizumab, and -46.3 μm (median -30 μm, p = 0.389), -127.7 μm (median -104 μm, p = 0.096) and -204.4 μm (median -163 μm, p = 0.005) in patients treated with aflibercept, respectively. We did not show a statistically significant difference in the regression rates of PED, SRF and IRF between the ranibizumab and aflibercept groups. (in patients with IRF after adjustment of the higher baseline IRF volumes in patients treated with aflibercept, p = 0.891)., Conclusion: We are convinced that ranibizumab and aflibercept have the same effect on serous PED, SRF and IRF in the macula in patients with treatment naive nvAMD during the initial loading phase.

Aim: To establish the conjunctival sac bacterial flora structure in patients with wet form of the age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) indicated for the intravitreal application of Ranibizumab (Lucentis, Novartis Pharma AG). To evaluate the efficacy of combined local preparation with broad-spectrum antibiotic moxifloxacine 0.5% (Vigamox, Alcon) and povidone iodine solution, 5% (Betadine, Egis Pharmaceuticals, LTD.) and to evaluate subjective toleration of moxifloxacin., Materials and Methods: In a prospective, non-randomized study were evaluated 20 eyes of 20 patients treated by means of intravitreally-applied ranibizumab. In all patients, the swabs from the conjunctival sac of the treated eye were repeatedly taken in a given time-schedule--before the start of using moxifloxacin, on the day of the intravitreal application of ranibizumab--before the irrigation of the conjunctival sac with povidone iodine solution, 5%, further after the irrigation--immediately before the injection and the control was token three days after the intravitreal injection. At the same time, the moxifloxacine toleration was evaluated by a questionnaire., Results: The samples taken from the conjunctival sac of the treated eye before the application of moxifloxacine had positive bacterial culture in 17 eyes (85%) and negative culture in 3 eyes (15 %). Furthermore, in 2 eyes with positive culture, there was established resistance to moxifloxacine. After 3 days of moxifloxacine application, there was negative culture in 13 eyes (65%), in 7 eyes (35%) was the bacterial cultivation positive. After the irrigation with povidone iodine 5% solution was the cultivation negative in 17 eyes (85%), positive cultivation was in 3 eyes (15%); in all three cases, the cultures were susceptible to moxifloxacine. Three days after the intravitreal injection, the negative cultivation from the conjunctival sac was found in 13 eyes (65%), and in 7 eyes was the cultivation positive; the cultivated bacteria were moxifloxacine susceptible. Subjective symptoms after moxifloxacine application were reported by 10 patients altogether; 5 patients were without symptoms and 5 patients did not return the questionnaire. On average, the symptoms started the second day of moxifloxacine treatment and the average grade of symptoms was 1.6 on the scale from 0 to 5., Conclusion: In our group we found a broad spectrum of microorganisms colonizing the conjunctival sac of patients indicated to the ARMD intravitreal treatment. After the prophylaxis with moxifloxacine, the incidence of positive bacterial cultivation decreased and the povidone iodine 5% solution irrigation this effect increased. The most common pathogen species was Staphylococcus coagulasis negative. Although the resistance to moxifloxacine in two different bacteria in two eyes in the beginning of observation was established, after moxifloxacine treatment, the cultivation of these bacteria in both eyes was negative, and in all other cases the cultivated bacteria were susceptible to moxifloxacine.