Search

The liver plays a major role in the regulation of glucose metabolism: plasma glucose concentration is the result of peripheral glucose utilization and liver production. Several hormones, including insulin, glucagon, growth hormone, cortisol, and catecholamines contribute to the regulation of glucose metabolism by the liver. In this review, we examine hepatic glucose metabolism, in particular the actions of insulin and contrainsular hormones on glucose hepatic uptake and production in patients with diabetes or chronic liver disease. The most frequent patterns of hepatic involvement that take place during diabetes, i.e. nuclear glycogenesis, steatosis, portal fibrosis, and diabetic steatonecrosis, are discussed. Also considered are anomalies of glucose homeostasis observed in chronic liver disease, including glucose intolerance, diabetes, and hypoglycemias. There is a strong correlation between diabetes mellitus and the liver: diabetic patients have typical histological lesions, while several glucose metabolism alterations are commonly found in subjects with chronic liver disease. The pathogenesis of impaired glucose metabolism during chronic liver disease has not yet been fully understood: further clinical and experimental studies should clarify this issue.

The role of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) as a major cause of chronic liver disease is now accepted worldwide. This study was aimed at evaluating the natural history of the disease in patients with virus-induced chronic active hepatitis or cirrhosis, and the influence played by age, sex and etiology, liver function tests and by the occurrence of different complications. We retrospectively examined the clinical records of 506 inpatients: 194 were affected by chronic active hepatitis (125 males, 69 females, mean age 45 +/- 11 years, 146 HCV- and 48 HBV-related), and 312 by cirrhosis without clinical evidence of portal hypertension (178 males, 134 females, mean age 53 +/- 9 years, 249 HCV- and 63 HBV-related). The occurrence of cirrhosis in the chronic active hepatitis group was then calculated, together with the occurrence of complications and the cumulative mortality rate of established cirrhosis. During follow-up 93 patients with chronic hepatitis developed cirrhosis. The cumulative probability of developing cirrhosis in this group was 6.64% at 5 years, 56.1% at 10 years and 86.8% at 15 years. These patients were therefore included in the cirrhosis group for the final analysis, so that a total of 405 cirrhotic patients were evaluated: these patients had a cumulative survival rate of 99.1% at 5, 76.8% at 10 and 49.4% at 15 years. Comparing the age-adjusted death rate of our patients with the general Italian population, we observed that in patients with liver cirrhosis it was 3.14 and 2.84 times higher in men and women, respectively. Bilirubin was an independent indicator of survival. Several complications, such as esophageal varices, ascites, jaundice, hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy and hepatocellular carcinoma significantly reduced the survival rate and were indicated as major complications, while thrombocytopenia, cholelithiasis and diabetes did not affect survival and thus were called minor complications. Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma was very high especially in males, without correlation with etiology. In conclusion, the progression of virus-induced chronic active hepatitis to cirrhosis is not influenced by sex and etiology. Similarly, the different etiology does not modify the natural history of cirrhosis while the occurrence of one or more major complications significantly shortens survival. The longer survival rate observed in patients with cirrhosis included in this study is probably due to the selective inclusion of patients with early disease and no evidence of portal hypertension.

Refractory ascites, that is ascites which cannot be mobilized by low sodium diet and maximal doses of diuretics (up to 400 mg spironolactone or potassium canrenoate and 160 mg furosemide per day), occurs in 5% of cirrhotic patients with ascites. The development of refractory ascites is mainly related to the progression of arterial vasodilation-mediated vascular underfilling and to the imbalance between reduced synthesis of renal vasodilating factors (especially renal prostaglandins) and extreme activation of vasoconstricting systems. Further features include increased sodium reabsorption in the proximal tubule and altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of diuretics. In patients with impaired renal function (as is the case for most patients with refractory ascites), the marked reduction of renal perfusion and glomerular filtration rate, with the consequent decrease of filtered sodium load, becomes the main pathogenetic factor. The principal therapeutic options for refractory ascites include repeated paracentesis and implantation of the LeVeen shunt. Paracentesis is a rapid and safe procedure to remove ascites, but it does not correct sodium retention. Ascites recurrence, therefore, may occur after a brief interval. The LeVeen shunt allows for better long-term control of ascites, but severe complications may supervene, and shunt occlusion is common. Neither therapeutic procedure improves survival. Different experimental therapeutic procedures have been proposed. Administration of ornipressin corrects hyperdynamic circulation and improves renal function. Thromboxane synthase inhibitors, by reducing renal synthesis of thromboxane A2, potentiate the diuretic and natriuretic response to furosemide. More invasive procedures, including portosystemic shunt and transjugular intrahepatic stent, are rarely used in the treatment of refractory ascites.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)