Search

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). This article has been retracted at the request of the editors. This correction has been retracted because the article that it relates to has now been retracted at the request of the editors.

Constitutive NF-κB signaling promotes survival in multiple myeloma (MM) and other cancers; however, current NF-κB-targeting strategies lack cancer cell specificity. Here, we identify the interaction between the NF-κB-regulated antiapoptotic factor GADD45β and the JNK kinase MKK7 as a therapeutic target in MM. Using a drug-discovery strategy, we developed DTP3, a D-tripeptide, which disrupts the GADD45β/MKK7 complex, kills MM cells effectively, and, importantly, lacks toxicity to normal cells. DTP3 has similar anticancer potency to the clinical standard, bortezomib, but more than 100-fold higher cancer cell specificity in vitro. Notably, DTP3 ablates myeloma xenografts in mice with no apparent side effects at the effective doses. Hence, cancer-selective targeting of the NF-κB pathway is possible and, at least for myeloma patients, promises a profound benefit., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). This article has been retracted at the request of the editors. This article was published on October 19, 2010, and Figures 4A and 7A were later corrected on August 8, 2016. In January 2021, The Ohio State University notified the Cancer Cell editors that an internal investigation concluded that Figures 1E, 4A, 4D, 5A, and 7A were falsified and that part of Figure 1E of the article is the same as part of Figure 1F in the correction of another article (Pichiorri et al., 2017, J. Exp. Med., 214, 1557, https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.2012095001172017c) and recommended retraction of the article. The editors no longer have confidence in the validity of the data and are retracting the article. S.-S. S. agrees with the retraction, and F.P., C.H., A.P., and C.M.C. disagree with the retraction; all other authors couldn't be reached or didn't respond., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)