Search

Summary The golden jackal of Africa ( Canis aureus ) has long been considered a conspecific of jackals distributed throughout Eurasia, with the nearest source populations in the Middle East. However, two recent reports found that mitochondrial haplotypes of some African golden jackals aligned more closely to gray wolves ( Canis lupus ) [ 1, 2 ], which is surprising given the absence of gray wolves in Africa and the phenotypic divergence between the two species. Moreover, these results imply the existence of a previously unrecognized phylogenetically distinct species despite a long history of taxonomic work on African canids. To test the distinct-species hypothesis and understand the evolutionary history that would account for this puzzling result, we analyzed extensive genomic data including mitochondrial genome sequences, sequences from 20 autosomal loci (17 introns and 3 exon segments), microsatellite loci, X- and Y-linked zinc-finger protein gene ( ZFX and ZFY ) sequences, and whole-genome nuclear sequences in African and Eurasian golden jackals and gray wolves. Our results provide consistent and robust evidence that populations of golden jackals from Africa and Eurasia represent distinct monophyletic lineages separated for more than one million years, sufficient to merit formal recognition as different species: C. anthus (African golden wolf) and C. aureus (Eurasian golden jackal). Using morphologic data, we demonstrate a striking morphologic similarity between East African and Eurasian golden jackals, suggesting parallelism, which may have misled taxonomists and likely reflects uniquely intense interspecific competition in the East African carnivore guild. Our study shows how ecology can confound taxonomy if interspecific competition constrains size diversification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Species is the fundamental taxonomic unit in biology and its delimitation has implications for conservation. In giraffe (Giraffa spp.), multiple taxonomic classifications have been proposed since the early 1900s. 1 However, one species with nine subspecies has been generally accepted, 2 likely due to limited in-depth assessments, subspecies hybridizing in captivity, 3,4 and anecdotal reports of hybrids in the wild. 5 Giraffe taxonomy received new attention after population genetic studies using traditional genetic markers suggested at least four species. 6,7 This view has been met with controversy, 8 setting the stage for debate. 9,10 Genomics is significantly enhancing our understanding of biodiversity and speciation relative to traditional genetic approaches and thus has important implications for species delineation and conservation. 11 We present a high-quality de novo genome assembly of the critically endangered Kordofan giraffe (G. camelopardalis antiquorum) 12 and a comprehensive whole-genome analysis of 50 giraffe representing all traditionally recognized subspecies. Population structure and phylogenomic analyses support four separately evolving giraffe lineages, which diverged 230–370 ka ago. These lineages underwent distinct demographic histories and show different levels of heterozygosity and inbreeding. Our results strengthen previous findings of limited gene flow and admixture among putative giraffe species 6,7,9 and establish a genomic foundation for recognizing four species and seven subspecies, the latter of which should be considered as evolutionary significant units. Achieving a consensus over the number of species and subspecies in giraffe is essential for adequately assessing their threat level and will improve conservation efforts for these iconic taxa. [Display omitted] • Comprehensive whole-genome analysis of 50 individuals from all giraffe subspecies • Results show four separate giraffe lineages with distinct demographic histories • Luangwa giraffe should be treated as its own separate subspecies of Masai giraffe • Chromium de novo genome assembly of the critically endangered Kordofan giraffe Coimbra et al.'s assessment on giraffe taxonomy uses genome data from all traditionally recognized subspecies. Population genomic and phylogenomic analyses support four separately evolving giraffe lineages that underwent distinct demographic histories. Their current genomic diversity will inform targeted conservation efforts for these iconic taxa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]