1. [Carotid endarterectomy using the classical technique and by eversion].
- Author
-
Coppi G, Vecchiati E, Nora A, Tusini N, and Moratto R
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Endarterectomy, Carotid adverse effects, Endarterectomy, Carotid mortality, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Arteriosclerosis surgery, Carotid Artery Diseases surgery, Endarterectomy, Carotid methods
- Abstract
After a brief introduction on the history of the surgical treatment of carotid stenosis the authors illustrate both the classical endarterectomy and the eversion endarterectomy. The constant search for a technique which could be of easy execution and also reduce the risk of complication (especially late ones, such as restenosis), brought the authors to adopt the eversion endarterectomy with reimplantation of internal carotid artery. From 1990 through 1995, 1034 carotid endarterectomies were performed, of which 611 with eversion technique and 423 with others techniques. The average follow-up was 38 months. The eversion endarterectomy group had lower neurological morbidity and mortality rates, both early and late. Even more important, they had a lower incidence rate of hemodynamically relevant restenosis (0.37% in the eversion endarterectomy group vs 1.97% in the other group).
- Published
- 1997