Search

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Plant Science is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Plant Science is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Plant Science is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Plant Science is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The Dof transcription factor (TF) family belongs to a class of plant-specific TFs and is involved in plant growth, development, and response to abiotic stresses. However, there are only very limited reports on the characterization of Dof TFs in moso bamboo ( Phyllostachys edulis). In the present research, PheDof TFs showed specific expression profiles based on RNA-seq data analyses. The co-expression network indicated that PheDof12, PheDof14, and PheDof16 might play vital roles during flower development. Cis-regulatory element analysis of these PheDof genes suggested diverse functions. Expression patterns of 12 selected genes from seven different classes under three abiotic stresses (cold, salt, and drought) are further investigated by quantitative real-time PCR. This work will provide useful information for functional analysis and regulation mechanisms of Dof TFs in moso bamboo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Plant Science is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Plant Science is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Plant Science is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article presents a study on freezing injuries to flower buds and their effect on the yield of apricot or Prunus armeniaca L. and peach or Prunus persica L. The researchers evaluated the degree of freezing injury to overwintering flower buds of selected cultivars and clones of apricot and peach at the Dabrowice Research Institute of the Horticulture Experimental Orchard in Skierniewice, Poland.

The herbaceous perennial weed Euphorbia esula L. (Euphorbiaceae) reproduces by vegetative and sexual means, characteristics that are key to its persistence and survival. In this study, we examined environmental effects on regrowth and flowering under controlled conditions to further validate field observations and set the stage for the future identification of molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of these processes. Shoot cuttings were exposed to different combinations of decreasing temperatures, decreasing photoperiods, and vernalization, in growth chambers. Subsequently, shoots were removed and regrowth and flowering from new shoots were monitored in a warm temperature greenhouse under long-day conditions. Vernalization alone has no effect on regrowth and flowering. Plants required decreasing temperature followed by vernalization for rapid regrowth and flowering. Decreasing photoperiod at a constant temperature with or without vernalization had no significant effect on regrowth and flowering. In conjunction with previous field research, the results suggest that a gradually decreasing temperature is required as one of the components for flowering competence and vernalization is determinate for reproductive development under long-day conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine the variation in flowering among species and the contribution of flowering to the recovery of forest herbs, we counted the flowering shoots, vegetative shoots, and first-year seedlings in old-growth forests affected by tephra from the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens. Using permanent 1 m2 plots with either undisturbed tephra or with the tephra removed, we obtained 2–9 years of flowering data during 1980–2000 for six sites that received 2–15 cm of tephra. Flowering was infrequent for most species. Most of the 12 commonest species had 2%–4% of their shoots flowering (range 0%–15%). Among growth forms, deciduous nonclonal species flowered most. Flowering percentage increased with plant density; thus microsites favorable for growth were also favorable for flowering. Flowering varied considerably among sampling years. Incidence of flowering was higher on shallow than on deep tephra, and higher on natural tephra than in cleared plots. Seedlings were more common on shallow than on deep tephra. The 20-year increase in shoot density on tephra (ratio of 2000 to 1981 values) was positively related among species to the number of seedlings produced per previous-year flowering shoot. Our results indicate how species vary in the quantity and timing of flowering and also in their reliance on seedling establishment versus clonal growth for population increase following disturbance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Plants growing in vegetative shade are subjected to reductions in both red to far-red (R/FR) light ratio and in irradiance levels of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). In this report we have attempted to uncouple the reduced R/FR ratio- and low PAR-mediated effects of shade on flowering in the ramets of Stellaria longipes Goldie s.l. (Caryophyllaceae) ecotypes collected from alpine “sun” and lower elevation prairie “shade” habitats. Both ecotypes were also tested for their flowering response (defined as the number of open flowers per ramet) to daylength. The alpine ecotype plants can best be classified as day-neutral, whereas prairie ecotype plants require long-days (LD). Under a low PAR of 115 μmol m–2·s–1 given under LD conditions at a reduced (0.7) R/FR ratio, alpine ecotype plants flowered significantly later relative to plants grown under the low PAR at a normal (1.22) R/FR ratio. In contrast, plants of the prairie ecotype flowered earlier under the reduced R/FR ratio combined with the same low PAR. Flower number per ramet differed significantly between the two ecotypes, with alpine ecotype plants developing fewer flowers under a low PAR (109 μmol m–2·s–1 irradiance) relative to a high PAR of 611 μmol m–2·s–1 (both given at a normal R/FR ratio). The prairie ecotype plants responded differently and had similar flower numbers under both low and high PARs at the normal (1.22) R/FR ratio. However, growing the prairie ecotype plants under a reduced R/FR ratio at a low PAR showed a significant increase in number of flowers. In contrast, plants grown under high (2.7) and normal (1.9) R/FR ratios combined with low PAR produced many more flowers than the alpine ecotype. Thus, the two components of shade, reduced R/FR ratio and low PAR can cause distinctly different flowering responses in sun and shade plants of S. longipes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to investigate (1) whether the reproductive phenology of Psychotria tenuinervis Muell. Arg. is influenced by climatic conditions (precipitation and temperature); (2) whether there are differences in the reproductive phenology of P. tenuinervis between fragments (fragment scale); and (3) whether there are differences in the reproductive phenology of P. tenuinervis among anthropogenic edges, natural edges, and in the forest interior within a fragment (habitat scale). The patterns of flowering and fruiting found in 2002 and 2003 were similar between forest fragments, and proximate factors were not very important in determining the reproductive phenology of P. tenuinervis. There was phenological similarity among the three habitats on a habitat scale, probably because of the extensive heterogeneity within each habitat, with the percentage of flowering and fruiting individuals and the intensity and duration of these phenophases varying among the sample plots. This high variability within habitats indicated that factors other than the distance from the edges (i.e., gaps, matrix composition, and edge age) probably had a greater influence on the reproductive phenology of P. tenuinervis. These results also indicate that heterogeneity within fragmented habitats needs to be considered in conservation and management programs for fragmented landscapes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]