Search

Copyright of Environmental Reviews is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Environmental Reviews is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Forest Research is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Much of Canada's terrestrial biodiversity is supported by boreal forests. Natural resource development in boreal forests poses risks to this biodiversity. This paper reviews the scientific literature to assess the effects of natural resource development on terrestrial biodiversity in Canadian boreal forests. We address four questions: (1) To what extent have Canadian boreal forests changed due to natural resource development? (2) How has biodiversity responded to these changes? (3) Will the biodiversity of second-growth forests converge with that of primary boreal forests? (4) Are we losing species from boreal forests? We focus on trees, understory plants, insects, fungi, selected mammals, and songbirds because these groups have been most studied. We review more than 600 studies and found that changes in community composition are prevalent in response to large-scale conversion of forest types, changes in stand structures and age distributions, and altered landscape structure resulting from forest management and habitat loss associated with other developments such as oil and gas, hydroelectric, and mining. The southern boreal forest has been more highly impacted than the north due to more extensive forest management and the cumulative effects of multiple forms of development. There is abundant evidence that most species are not in danger of being extirpated from the boreal forest due to these anthropogenic changes. A few species, including woodland caribou ( Rangifer tarandus) and grizzly bear ( Ursus arctos), have, however, undergone long-term range contractions. Significant gaps in our ability to assess the effects of natural resource development on biodiversity in the boreal zone are the lack of long-term spatial and population data to monitor the impact of forest changes on ecosystems and species. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Conservation efforts to sustain water resources and aquatic biodiversity in boreal watersheds will require reliable information on the recent status of various indicator species and an improved understanding of the risks to aquatic biodiversity posed by resource development activities. We reviewed the recent state of knowledge on the responses of aquatic biodiversity to forest management, pulp and paper mill effluents, hydroelectric impoundments, mining of minerals and metals, oil sands extractions, and peat mining and offer a prognosis for aquatic biodiversity under each of these environmental stressors. Despite the prevalence of natural resource development in Canada's largest forest ecosystem, there was a limited amount of published literature on the effects of many of the disturbance types on various indicators of aquatic biodiversity, making it difficult to produce a current and reliable status assessment. Across most of the boreal zone, there is a lack of coordinated, consistent data collection for many of the bioindicators and disturbance types discussed in this review. Forecasting the future state of aquatic biodiversity across the boreal zone is challenged by increasing natural resource development and its interactions with other stressors, especially climate change. The cumulative effects of multiple stressors coupled with resource development activities in boreal watersheds remain largely unknown. More importantly, the ecological thresholds for these cumulative effects (that is, the point at which aquatic ecosystems and their biodiversity cannot recover to a desired state within a reasonable time frame) are also unknown and remain gaps in our knowledge. The recent literature identifies a number of risks to aquatic biodiversity at local (tens of square kilometres) to regional (hundreds of square kilometres) scales associated with natural resource development. There are indications that many of these risks can be minimized by 'greener' technologies for resource development and reclamation, practical conservation planning and regulation, and increased stewardship in watershed management, although the effectiveness of many of these measures cannot yet be assessed from the published literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Provides information on the 4th International Workshop on Disturbance Dynamics in Boreal Forest held at the University of Northern British Columbia on August 9 to 12, 2002. Issues involving forest management discussed at the event; Keynote speakers who were present in the workshop; Discussion on the importance and role of disturbance in shaping boreal forest.

Copyright of Environmental Reviews is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This paper examines the impact that climatic change over the last millennium has had on aggradation and degradation of permafrost peatlands and the associated change in organic matter accumulation. Permafrost reached its southernmost Holocene extent in boreal continental western Canada during the Little Ice Age with 28 800 km2 of permafrost peatland present within a sensitive zone demarcated by permafrost degradation. Subsequent degradation of permafrost has occurredin response to warming, with forested bogs changing to nonforested poor fens, associated with rising water levels. In conjunction with this ecosystem change, long-term net organic matter accumulation increases. As permafrost is in disequilibrium with climate, much of the permafrost that remains is in a relict state. Mapping of past and present permafrost distribution from peatland landforms indicates only 9% has degraded since the Little Ice Age, resulting in a 5% increase in long-term net organic matter accumulation. Of the permafrost that remains, 22% is in disequilibrium, located largely in the northern part of the sensitive zone. Additional loss of forested lands will occur inthe future in boreal continental western Canada under present-day climatic conditions as permafrost approaches equilibrium, with a further 11% increase in long-term net organic matter accumulation predicted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Forest Research is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Zoology is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Forest Research is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Forest Research is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Forest Research is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

We studied the short-term impact of cutting with the protection of regeneration (CPR) on ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) and its habitat.Drumming males were surveyed in the boreal forest of western Quebec between 1990 and 1994 in 5 control stands and 10 stands that were cutin 1992. Cutting caused a 50% decline in total density and basal area of trees. In harvested stands, shrubs were less abundant than in control stands. Lateral cover between 1 and 2 m and canopy closure werealso lower in cut stands. In the harvested stands, the density varied between 14.1 and 22.6 drummers/km2 between 1990 and 1992before the CPR. In 1993, density declined to 10.1 but was reestablished at 21.5 in 1994. Densities did not differ significantly before orafter the CPR nor between cut and uncut stands (p > 0.05). After theCPR, the grouse generally established their drumming sites in the periphery of cut areas. There they found lateral cover and canopy closure similar to those measured in control stands by choosing sites where deciduous shrubs were more abundant than in the remainder of the stand. However, the characteristics of the tree stratum were not optimal; their overall density, that of Betulaceae, and that of Salicaceae were higher near drumming sites located in control stands than those in harvested stands. In harvested stands, drumming sites had a lower total basal area of trees, and namely that of deciduous trees, than in control sites. To maintain ruffed grouse populations immediately after cutting in mixed and deciduous stands of public lands, we suggestthat CPRs be in 15-ha blocks while maintaining a basal area of at least 7.5 m2/ha, half of which should be in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) and paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Wet boreal forests occur primarily in Atlantic Canada especially in Newfoundland, but examples are also found in Quebec and the northeastern U.S.A. These forests are dominated by balsam fir (Abies balsamea), which is susceptible to fire but flourishes in wetter environments where fire is absent. The major stand disturbances are caused by insects, primarily spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana) and hemlock looper (Lambdina fiscellaria), followed by root rots and blowdown. Stands in Newfoundland were characterized by large amounts of dead standing and fallen wood, as a result of self-thinning processes and insect attacks. A comparison of 40-, 60-, and >= 80-year-old forests in Newfoundland indicated that the oldest stage of balsam fir forests had a distinctly different structure, including more large dead and fallen wood, a more irregular canopy including gaps, a more diverse ground flora, more moss ground cover, a more variable tree height, taller snags, fewer white birch snags, and fewer deciduous small trees. These differences were reflected in various plant and animal faunas that were distinct in the old forest including: flowering plants, beetles, Collembola, oribatid mites, mammals, and birds. Several species of plants and animals were only found in the oldest forest stands, including a high percentage among the arthropods. Suggested indicator species at the stand level include black-backed woodpeckers (Picoides arcticus) and marten (Martes americana). Logging results in a larger mean patch size than that caused by natural insect disturbances, possibly affecting dispersal by soil organisms and plants within the new landscape. A portion of the landscape, keyed to species with the largest area requirements to maintain their populations, including marten, black-backed woodpeckers, and (or) boreal owls (Aegolius funereus) could guide the amount of old forest, and individual patch sizes, required across a landscape over time. Key words: old growth, biodiversity, species richness, forest management, balsam fir.Les forêts boréales humides se trouvent principalement dans les provinces canadiennes de l'Atlantique, surtout à Terre-Neuve. Il en existe également au Québec et dans le Nord-Est des États-Unis. Dans ces forêts domine le sapin baumier (Abies balsamea), sensible au feu, qui prospère dans les milieux plus humides où le feu est absent. Les principales sources de perturbation des peuplements sont les insectes, plus particulièrement la tordeuse des bourgeons de l'épinette (Choristoneura fumiferana) et l'arpenteuse de la pruche ( Lambdina fiscellaria), puis les pourridiés et les chablis. À Terre-Neuve, les peuplements se caractérisent par des quantités importantes d'arbres morts sur pied et de bois au sol résultant des processus d'éclaircie naturelle et des attaques d'insectes. Une comparaison de forêts terre-neuviennes de 40, 60 et 80+ ans a indiqué que, par rapport aux peuplements de 40 ou 60 ans, les sapinières les plus âgées présentent une structure nettement différente, se caractérisant, entre autres, par une plus grande quantité de gros bois morts, un étage supérieur plus irrégulier avec des trouées, une flore au sol plus diversifiée, une strate muscinée plus abondante, une hauteur des arbres plus variable, des chicots de plus grande hauteur, moins de chicots de bouleau à papier et moins de petits arbres feuillus. Ces différences se reflètent dans diverses composantes de la flore et de la faune qui sont distinctes dans la vieille forêt (plantes à fleurs, coléoptères, collemboles, acariens oribates, mammifères et oiseaux, entre autres). Plusieurs espèces végétales et animales, dont un pourcentage élevé d'arthropodes, n'ont été trouvées que dans les peuplements forestiers les plus âgés. Le pic à dos noir (Picoides arcticus) et la martre (Martes americana) sont suggérés en tant qu'espèces indicatrices au niveau du peuplement. La récolte forestière crée des trouées en moyenne plus grandes que celles résultant des perturbations naturelles causées par les insectes, ce qui pourrait affecter la dispersion par les organismes du sol et les plantes dans le nouveau paysage. Une portion du paysage déterminée en fonction d'espèces ayant besoin de plus d'espace pour maintenir leurs populations, incluant la nyctale boréale (Aegolius funereus), pourrait servir de guide pour établir la quantité requise de vieille forêt, et la taille appropriée des parcelles, dans un paysage en fonction du temps. Mots clés : forêts anciennes, biodiversité, richesse des espèces, gestion des forêts, sapin baumier. [Traduit par la rédaction] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]