We study hyperbolized versions of cohomological equations that appear with cocycles by isometries of the euclidean space. These (hyperbolized versions of) equations have a unique continuous solution. We concentrate in to know whether or not these solutions converge to a genuine solution to the original equation, and in what sense we can use them as good approximative solutions. The main advantage of considering solutions to hyperbolized cohomological equations is that they can be easily described, since they are global attractors of a naturally defined skew-product dynamics. We also include some technical results about twisted Birkhoff sums and exponential averaging. In dynamical systems, problems involving a lot of hyperbolicity, in the sense of that there is a good amount of expansiveness and contractiveness, are in general much more accessible than problems where hyperbolicity is absent (for instance, in the dynamics of isometries, of indifferent fixed points, etc.) A naive, nevertheless fruitful, strategy for tackling these non-hyperbolic problems is to consider small perturbations of the maps such that the situation falls into a hyperbolic setting. In the case that this hyperbolized version of the problem presents good answers, it is natural to ask whether or not these provide us with some information about the original unperturbed problem, when the perturbation (hence the hyperbolicity) tends to disappear. One call this strategy the hyperbolization technique. This technique has been exploited successfully in many circumstances. For instance, Yoccoz [17] uses this technique for offering an extremely simple proof that almost every indifferent quadratic polynomial is linearizable. In the context of cohomological equations, Bousch [2] applies the hyperbolization technique in the proof of his expansive Mane’s Lemma. Afterwards, Jenkinson [9] employs the technique for finding normal forms in the setting of ergodic optimization. In a context that is directly related to our current work, Jorba and Tatjer [10] study the fractalization of invariant curves for the hyperbolized version of real one-dimensional translation cocycles over a rotation of the circle. 1 Framework and problems Let T : X → X be a homeomorphism of a compact metric space X, and H be a metric space. A cocycle by isometries of H over T is a map I : Z×X → Isom(H) defined from Z×X to the group of isometries of H verifying the cocycle relation I(n +m,x) = I(n, Tx)I(m,x) for every n,m ∈ Z. The above relation allows to uniquely determine the cocycle using the values of I(·) := I(1, ·) by the recursive relation I(n, x) = I(n− 1, Tx)I(x). Given a subgroup G ⊂ Isom(H), one of the most important problems in the study of cocycles is to know whether or not there exists a map B : X → Isom(H) so that the conjugacy B(Tx) ◦ I(x) ◦ B(x)−1 is a cocycle taking values in G. The study of cocycles (and this problem in particular) is closely related with the study of the following induced skew-product dynamical system F : X ×H −→ X ×H (x, v) 7−→ (Tx, I(x)v). 1 In this work we are concerned with the case of continuous cocycles acting on the euclidian space R, for l ≥ 1. Every isometry I ∈ Isom(R) can be written (in a unique way) as Iv = Ψv + ρ, with Ψ ∈ U(l), the orthogonal group R, and ρ ∈ R. Hence, a cocycle by isometries will be defined by two continuous functions Ψ : X → U(l) , ρ : X → R so that I(x)v = Ψ(x)v + ρ(x) for every v ∈ R. Let us explore the conjugacy problem proposed above in the case G = U(l). The existence of a continuous (resp. measurable) conjugacy B : X → Isom(R) so that B(Tx) ◦ I(x) ◦B(x)−1 belongs to U(l) for every x ∈ X is equivalent to the existence of a continuous (resp. measurable) invariant section for the induced skew-product dynamics F . Namely, if there exists such B, then we can conjugate F by B(x, v) := (x,B(x)v) in order to obtain a skew-product dynamics in the form B ◦ F ◦ B(x, v) = (Tx, Ψ(x)v), for some continuous (resp. measurable) function Ψ : X → U(l). The zero section X × {0} is invariant by B ◦ F ◦ B−1 and then the section B−1(X × {0}) is a continuous (resp. measurable) invariant section for F . In the other hand, if there exists u : X → R a continuous (resp. measurable) invariant section for F , that is, F (x, u(x)) = (Tx, u(Tx)) for every x ∈ X, then we can write B(x)v := v − u(x). A simple computation yiels B(Tx)I(x)B(x)0 = 0 for all x ∈ X. Hence, the isometry B(Tx)I(x)B(x)−1 belongs to U(l) and B is the desired continuous (resp. measurable) conjugacy that solves the problem. The existence of a continuous (resp. measurable) invariant section u : X → R for F is equivalent to the existence of a continuous (resp. measurable) solution to the twisted cohomological equation u(Tx)−Ψ(x)u(x) = ρ(x) for all x ∈ X. (1) If we assume that there exists a continuous invariant section for F , then it is easy to see that every orbit remains a constant distance away from the invariant section and in particular, that every orbit is bounded. In [4], D. Coronel, A. Navas and M. Ponce shown that under the additional assumption that T is a minimal homeomorphism, the existence of a continuous invariant section is equivalent to the existence of a bounded orbit. In the case that a continuous invariant section exists one says that the cocycle is a continuous coboundary. There is a big amount of results concerning the existence, regularity and rigidity of solutions to the untwisted version of the cohomological equation (that is, Ψ ≡ idRl). The survey [13] by A. Katok and E.A. Robinson is a mandatory reference in the field. However, the classical Gottschalk-Hedlund’s Theorem [7] is the first reference whenever T is minimal. In case T is hyperbolic there is a whole line of research concerning the periodic orbit obstruction, that started with the work by Livsic [14] and has been extended to more complex target groups by many authors (see for instance [6], [11] and references therein contained). In the last years, a lot of attention has been payed to the resolution of the untwisted cohomological equation in the context of partially hyperbolic dynamics (mainly motivated by the works by A. Katok and A. Kononenko [12] and A. Wilkinson [16]). Another situation that also allows to get a good amount of information about the dynamics of F is that of the existence of a sequence {un : X → R }n≥0 of continuous sections that are almost invariant, in the sense that lim n→∞ |un(Tx)−Ψ(x)un(x)− ρ(x)| = 0 (2) uniformly in x ∈ X. In this case one says that F is a coboundary in reduced cohomology.