1. Sensibility to change of mindfulness attention awareness scale (MAAS).
- Author
-
Pinto García, A., Muñoz-Sanjose, A., Vidal-Villegas, M. P., Mediavilla, R., García, A., Orosa-Duarte, Á., Palao, Á., Bayon, C., Lahera, G., and Rodríguez-Vega, B.
- Subjects
MINDFULNESS ,AWARENESS ,PSYCHOSES ,MENTAL health ,SCHIZOPHRENIA - Abstract
Introduction: The action mechanisms that explain how Mindfulness Based Interventions (MBIs) improve the well-being of people with mental disorders remain unclear (Alsubaie et al., 2017). This question leads us to ask how we measure mindfulness as a construct. Only two questionnaires are available nowadays in Spanish: the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) (Cebolla et al., 2012) and the Mindfulness Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS) (Brown and Ryan, 2003). In the Spanish validation of the MAAS (Soler et al., 2012) the authors report a lack of sensibility to change that may render it inadequate to be used for the purpose of measuring the influence over mindfulness of a given intervention. Objectives: To test if a MBI (SocialMIND®) increases mindfulness, as measured by MAAS. Methods: A prospective single group clinical trial including participants with psychotic disorders was carried out. Mindfulness disposition was measured with the MAAS after 8 weeks of treatment. Results: 33 participants were included. MAAS scores did not increase after SocialMIND® (t=0.005, p=1). Conclusions: These results seem to support previous evidence which points towards the lack of sensibility to change of the MAAS (MacKillop et al., 2007; Soler et al., 2012). MAAS does not discriminate between non meditators and novice meditators. This is highly important in psychotic population because they have troubles acquiring habits, such as meditation. MAAS might be a valid instrument for studies where intense meditation practice is made, so a pre-post intervention change may be detected. More sensible instruments or new specific ones must be validated in Spanish. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020