Search

A deterministic bio-economic model was used to investigate the impact of different heifer replacement breeding systems for beef suckler cow production in different environments. It was shown that measures of cow efficiency were highly correlated with profitability in suckled calf production. However, where significant genotype differences exist in final output value due to issues of carcass quality, then more complete characterization of system profitability is recommended. In systems utilizing a terminal sire mating policy for all matings in excess of replacement heifer requirements the proportion of terminal sire matings made are affected by female fertility. Reduced cow fertility combined with late attainment of puberty in heifers and low heifer fertility has a substantial negative effect on the proportion of terminal sire matings made. This illustrates an aspect of production that can be improved by the use of crossbreeding to exploit heterosis in reproductive traits. The time frame of impacts of the different systems was seen to vary. Grading up to a pure breed allowed exploitation of heterosis in the early years of the transition leading to a boost in profitability but this boost was lost as the herd became purebred. Composite and rotational crossing systems were seen to create a steady rise in financial margin to the point where they became stable in breed proportion and heterosis. The effect of cow size was evaluated in three different environments, representing UK lowland, upland and hill. It was found that small cows became more profitable in relation to large cows as food resources became more limiting. In a non-limiting environment large cows were more profitable than small cows. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A deterministic method of predicting numbers of each animal class present over time in a beef cow herd with multiple calving seasons per year is described. Breeding cow classes are defined according to the number of generations of descent from the cows in the herd prior to the introduction of a specific heifer replacement breeding policy. Cow classes are further divided into subgroups defined according to age of cow, calving interval and whether or not the cow was last mated to a terminal sire. The method is demonstrated by showing the evolution of herd breed make-up with several alternative replacement female breeding policies including grading-up, two-breed rotation and three-breed rotation breeding policies. For an example herd, the first generation of replacements peaked at approximately 0.4 of the herd at 6 years after the first matings for a new breeding system. Later generations of replacements reached equivalent proportions of the herd to the previous generation approximately 3.3 years later, with peak proportions at approximately 0.25 of the herd. Differences in the relative levels of expression of heterosis for grade up versus rotational replacement policies increased steadily from 5 years onwards with 0.17 of the heterosis expected in a herd of F1 cows remaining 20 years after the first matings of the new breeding system. The two-breed grading-up system showed less heterosis than the three-breed grading-up system only after 8 years, with the difference increasing to 0.16 of the heterosis in an F1 herd after 20 years. Results are also presented showing the difference in contributions of breeds to the herd gene pool over time with the different breeding systems. With the rotational systems, breeds lag by approximately 3 years in the timing of their contribution according to the order of their introduction to the rotation. The effects of faster heifer replacement rates on results were also discussed. It is concluded that short-to medium-term impacts of... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In a lifetime study of spring born cattle managed in a 20-month beef system, four feeding treatments were imposed during the 5-month winter period and two grass heights (low 6 to 8 cm, high 8 to 10 cm) during the subsequent grazing period. Three slaughter weights were imposed over the grazing period, early, mid and late, at an average of 67,110 and 154 days post turn-out. A multi-factorial design was used with three animal factors — maturity (early maturing Hereford crosses v. late maturing Charolais crosses), sex (heifer v. steer) and method of rearing (suckled calves v. bucket-reared calves). There were significant differences in growth rate for both sex and maturity (P < 0·001) and a highly significant negative effect of winter food level on summer growth rate (P < 0·001), the growth rate of food treatment 4 being proportionately 0·61 of that treatment 1.Sward height significantly influenced summer growth rate (P < 0·001) but showed no interaction with winter food level in any of the three grazing periods. Growth rates increased over the summer but differences between winter food treatments decreased with daily gains for food treatment 4 being proportionately 0·44, 0·81 and 0·84 of food treatment 1 as the grazing season progressed.Eliminating winter feeding treatment as a factor and including condition score at turn-out as a co-variate improved the variation explained and reduced differences in growth rate for the main effects with only the main effect of grass height remaining significant. This suggests that the condition of animals at turn-out in conjunction with the subsequent grazing sward height provides a simple practical guide to subsequent animal performance. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]