Search

Background: Our study aimed to establish 'real-world' performance and cost-effectiveness of ovarian cancer (OC) surveillance in women with pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 variants who defer risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO)., Methods: Our study recruited 875 female BRCA1/2 -heterozygotes at 13 UK centres and via an online media campaign, with 767 undergoing at least one 4-monthly surveillance test with the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm (ROCA) test. Surveillance performance was calculated with modelling of occult cancers detected at RRSO. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated using Markov population cohort simulation., Results: Our study identified 8 OCs during 1277 women screen years: 2 occult OCs at RRSO (both stage 1a), and 6 screen-detected; 3 of 6 (50%) were ≤stage 3a and 5 of 6 (83%) were completely surgically cytoreduced. Modelled sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) for OC were 87.5% (95% CI, 47.3 to 99.7), 99.9% (99.9-100), 75% (34.9-96.8) and 99.9% (99.9-100), respectively. The predicted number of quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained by surveillance was 0.179 with an ICER cost - saving of -£102,496/QALY., Conclusion: OC surveillance for women deferring RRSO in a 'real-world' setting is feasible and demonstrates similar performance to research trials; it down-stages OC, leading to a high complete cytoreduction rate and is cost-saving in the UK National Health Service (NHS) setting. While RRSO remains recommended management, ROCA-based surveillance may be considered for female BRCA -heterozygotes who are deferring such surgery., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The project was co-funded by Abcodia Ltd and North Central London Cancer Alliance. Abcodia Ltd had no role in the design of the project, nor in the interpretation of the findings or the drafting/editing of the manuscript. Sue Philpott has previously held a consulting role with Abcodia Ltd Adam Rosenthal has previously held a consulting role with Abcodia Ltd and Everything Genetic Ltd. Ranjit Manchanda has received funding from Yorkshire Cancer Research, GSK, Eve Appeal, Cancer Research UK, NHS Innovation Accelerator (NIA), Barts & the London Charity, Rose Trees Trust outside this work for research related to genetic testing and honorarium for advisory board membership or lectures from Astrazeneca/MSD/GSK/EGL. Naveena Singh has served on advisory boards for Astra-Zeneca-MSD and Glaxo SmithKline. Gareth Evans has a consultancy role with AstraZeneca. Helen Hanson has served on advisory boards for AstraZeneca. Steve Skates works at Massachusetts General Hospital which has co-licensed the software for early detection of ovarian cancer to Abcodia and has served on clinical advisory boards for Guardant Health and LUNGevity, has collaborated on early detection research with Freenome, participates in the Independent Data Monitoring Committee for GRAIL and has stock option for serving on the scientific Advisory Board for SISCAPA Assay Technologies. The other authors declare no competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Germline pathogenic variants (GPVs) in the cancer predisposition genes BRCA1 , BRCA2 , MLH1 , MSH2 , MSH6 , BRIP1 , PALB2 , RAD51D and RAD51C are identified in approximately 15% of patients with ovarian cancer (OC). While there are clear guidelines around clinical management of cancer risk in patients with GPV in BRCA1 , BRCA2 , MLH1 , MSH2 and MSH6 , there are few guidelines on how to manage the more moderate OC risk in patients with GPV in BRIP1 , PALB2 , RAD51D and RAD51C , with clinical questions about appropriateness and timing of risk-reducing gynaecological surgery. Furthermore, while recognition of RAD51C and R AD51D as OC predisposition genes has been established for several years, an association with breast cancer (BC) has only more recently been described and clinical management of this risk has been unclear. With expansion of genetic testing of these genes to all patients with non-mucinous OC, new data on BC risk and improved estimates of OC risk, the UK Cancer Genetics Group and CanGene-CanVar project convened a 2-day meeting to reach a national consensus on clinical management of BRIP1 , PALB2 , RAD51D and RAD51C carriers in clinical practice. In this paper, we present a summary of the processes used to reach and agree on a consensus, as well as the key recommendations from the meeting., Competing Interests: Competing interests: HH received honoraria from AstraZeneca for advisory roles. CT received honoraria from AstraZeneca and Roche for advisory roles, which were donated in full to charity (https://tukongote.com/, registration number 11511580, charity number 1186151). RM declares research funding from Barts & the London Charity, Rosetrees Trust, GSK, Eve Appeal, CRUK and Yorkshire Cancer Research outside this work; and honorarium for advisory board membership from AstraZeneca/MSD/GSK/EGL. DME was in receipt of research funding from AstraZeneca. ANR had prior consultancy arrangements with Abcodia and Everything Genetic. ACA was listed as a creator of BOADICEA, which was licensed by Cambridge Enterprise for commercial purposes., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Clinical testing with chromosomal microarray (CMA) is most commonly undertaken for clinical indications such as intellectual disability, dysmorphic features and/or congenital abnormalities. Identification of a structural aberration (SA) involving a cancer susceptibility gene (CSG) constitutes a type of incidental or secondary finding. Laboratory reporting, risk communication and clinical management of these structural aberrations with secondary implications (SASIs) is currently inconsistent. We undertake meta-analysis of 18 622 instances of CMA performed for unrelated indications in which 106 SASIs are identified involving in total 40 different CSGs. Here we present the recommendations of a joint UK working group representing the British Society of Genomic Medicine, UK Cancer Genetics Group and UK Association for Clinical Genomic Science. SASIs are categorised into four groups, defined by the type of SA and the cancer risk. For each group, recommendations are provided regarding reflex parental testing and cancer risk management., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)