Search

Background: A study was undertaken to determine whether montelukast, a new potent cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, attenuates exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. The relationship between the urinary excretion of LTE4 and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction was also investigated., Methods: Nineteen non-smoking asthmatic patients with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of > or = 65% of the predicted value and a reproducible fall in FEV1 after exercise of at least 20% were enrolled. Subjects received placebo and montelukast 100 mg once daily in the evening or 50 mg twice daily, each for two days, in a three-period, randomised, double blind, crossover design. In the evening, approximately 20-24 hours after the once daily dose or 12 hours after the twice daily dose, a standardised exercise challenge was performed. Data from 14 patients were available for complete analysis., Results: The mean (SD) maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 after exercise was 29.6 (16.0), 17.1 (8.2), and 14.0 (9.4) for placebo, once daily, and twice daily regimens, respectively. The mean (95% CI) percentage protection was 37 (15 to 59) for the group who received 50 mg twice daily and 50 (31 to 69) for those who received 100 mg once daily. Active treatments were not different from each other. The mean (SD) plasma concentrations of montelukast were higher after the twice daily regimen (1.27 (0.81) microgram/ml) than after the once daily regimen (0.12 (0.09) microgram/ml); there was no correlation between the percentage protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and plasma concentrations. After exercise urinary excretion of LTE4 increased significantly during placebo treatment (from 34.3 to 73.7 pg/mg creatinine; p < 0.05) but did not correlate with the extent of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction., Conclusions: Montelukast protects similarly against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction between plasma concentrations of 0.12 and 1.27 micrograms/ml. The increase in the urinary excretion of LTE4 after exercise and the protection from exercise-induced bronchoconstriction with a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist provide further evidence of the role of leukotrienes in the pathogenesis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

Background: Intravenous infusion of atrial natriuretic peptide has been shown to cause bronchodilatation in patients with asthma and endogenous atrial natriuretic peptide is known to rise with exercise. Whether an aberration in release of atrial natriuretic peptide is concerned in the pathogenesis of exercise induced bronchoconstriction has not been studied., Methods: The atrial natriuretic peptide response to exercise was studied in eight men with exercise induced asthma and eight age matched non-asthmatic men. Subjects exercised to exhaustion on a treadmill, using the Bruce protocol. Atrial natriuretic peptide and catecholamines were measured at the end of each stage of exercise and oxygen consumption and heart rate were monitored throughout., Results: Both groups showed a 3.5 fold increase in plasma atrial natriuretic peptide during exercise (mean (SE): normal subjects 25 (4) pmol/l; asthmatic subjects 24 (5) pmol/l), with no difference between the two groups. There was a close correlation between plasma atrial natriuretic peptide concentrations and oxygen uptake, catecholamine release, and heart rate in both groups. The catecholamine response was similar in the asthmatic and normal subjects, both groups showing a four fold rise in plasma adrenaline and a 4-5 fold rise in plasma noradrenaline., Conclusion: A defect in the release of circulating atrial natriuretic peptide does not account for exercise induced asthma; the concentrations of the circulating peptide that were achieved may effect a small reduction in airway reactivity. Our data do not support the idea that asthmatic patients have abnormal sympathoadrenal activity.

Peak expiratory flow (PEF) and plasma concentrations of platelet factor 4 and beta thromboglobulin were measured before and after exercise in nine asthmatic patients and 12 non-asthmatic volunteers. Exercise was preceded by administration in random order of either placebo, salbutamol 200 micrograms, or sodium cromoglycate 2 mg from a pressurised inhaler. In control subjects there were minimal changes in PEF and plasma concentrations of platelet factor 4 and beta thromboglobulin. In the asthmatic patients the typical changes in PEF were seen on exercise; plasma concentrations of platelet factor 4 and beta thromboglobulin rose significantly in parallel, the rise preceding the fall in PEF. The changes in peak flow and platelet activation induced by exercise were attenuated by prior administration of salbutamol or cromoglycate. These results indicate that exercise induced asthma is associated with a rise in platelet release products similar to that observed in antigen induced asthma.

Eight asthmatic patients and two normal subjects performed two identical exercise tests 140 minutes apart (first test preceded by inhalation of saline and the second by terbutaline sulphate). A ninth asthmatic patient exercised twice after placebo 40 minutes apart. Arterial plasma levels of histamine and cyclic AMP, expiratory flow rates and volumes were measured at rest and during and after exercise. After the first test the mean +/- SEM fall in PEFR was 45.2 +/- 2.6%. In five asthmatics there was an increase in plasma histamine (mean +/- SEM 14.8 +/- 3.3 pmol ml-1) coinciding with exercise-induced asthma (EIA). Histamine levels returned to pre-exercise values within 30 minutes. After terbutaline these five patients had histamine levels greater than those observed before, during, or after the first test. This effect may have been the result of changes in pulmonary microcirculation. After the second test the levels decreased indicating no further release of histamine in response to exercise. No EIA occurred in these patients after terbutaline. The other patients and the two normal subjects had little or no change in histamine throughout the study. The one patient in whom exercise was repeated after placebo demonstrated less histamine release and less EIA after the second test.

Arterial plasma histamine concentrations were measured after exercise in 10 subjects with extrinsic atopic asthma, 10 who were non-atopic and non-asthmatic and seven who were atopic but non-asthmatic, by a single isotope radioenzymatic assay. Significantly higher plasma histamine concentrations were found in the asthmatic subjects before exercise than in the non-atopic controls (p less than 0.05). The mean histamine concentration rose after exercise in all groups but the increased levels were not significantly different from pre-exercise values. Similarly, mean circulating basophil counts increased in all groups after exercise, and a highly significant correlation was found between basophil counts and whole blood histamine concentrations (p less than 0.001). In vitro studies showed that there was a significant correlation between the number of basophils added to plasma samples and the concentrations of histamine subsequently detected. Although the mean concentrations of plasma histamine and whole blood histamine and number of basophils in the atopic control group were intermediate between those found in the atopic asthmatic and non-atopic controls, none of the differences was significant. Venous plasma histamine concentrations after exercise were measured in a further five subjects with extrinsic atopic asthma and five non-atopic, non-asthmatic subjects before and after exercise with the more sensitive and specific double isotope radioenzymatic assay. Concentrations of plasma histamine measured by this assay were about one tenth of those measured by the single isotope radioenzymatic assay. Although a small rise in mean plasma histamine concentration occurred in both groups after exercise there was no significant difference in these levels either between or within the groups. We find no evidence from these studies on measurement of peripheral blood histamine to support the hypothesis that mast cell mediator release is implicated in the pathogenesis of exercise induced asthma.

Plasma levels of adrenaline and noradrenaline during and after submaximal exercise in patients with bronchial asthma were investigated. Three groups were studied comprising 10 patients with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), 10 asthmatic patients without EIB and four normal control subjects. Plasma catecholamines were measured at rest, at the end of exercise, and five and 15 minutes after exercise. Changes in airway resistance were assessed by measuring peak expiratory flow rate. Significant differences in catecholamine levels between reacting and non-reacting patients were found. In 10 patients developing EIB adrenaline and noradrenaline levels had risen significantly by the end of exercise and remained elevated up to the fifth minute of recovery. The rise in catecholamine levels in non-reacting asthmatics was insignificant. In control subjects noradrenaline had increased significantly by the end of exercise.

Concentrations of endogenous opioid peptides in the plasma are increased during exercise and these substances have been implicated in the pathogenesis of asthma induced by chloropropramide and alcohol in diabetic patients. This work was undertaken to determine whether exercise induced asthma might be mediated by endogenous opioids. Plasma beta endorphin, met-enkephalin, and adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) concentrations were measured in five asthmatic patients and five normal volunteers breathing cold air during exercise. In four of the patients the effect of an infusion of naloxone on FEV1 was also measured during exercise induced asthma. Exercise produced acute bronchoconstriction in all asthmatics, characterised by a fall in FEV1; whereas no change occurred in normal subjects. There was no difference in plasma met-enkephalin, beta endorphin, and ACTH concentration between the two groups. Infusion of naloxone neither prevented nor worsened exercise induced asthma. These data suggest that endogenous opioids probably do not play a part in the development of exercise induced asthma.

The influence of circulating noradrenaline (in this context primarily a non-selective alpha agonist) and the alpha 1 selective agonist phenylephrine on bronchial tone, blood pressure, and heart rate was studied in eight patients with exercise induced asthma and eight age and sex matched controls. All subjects refrained from taking treatment for at least one week before the trial. The agonists were infused intravenously in stepwise increasing doses of 0.04, 0.085, 0.17, and 0.34 micrograms/kg a minute for noradrenaline and 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 micrograms/kg a minute for phenylephrine. At the highest dose the plasma concentration of noradrenaline was about 30 nmol/l, resembling the concentrations found during intense exercise, and that of phenylephrine was about 400 nmol/l. Both agonists caused dose dependent and similar increases in blood pressure in the two groups. Despite clearcut cardiovascular effects (systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased by about 40-50/25-30 mm Hg), neither agonist altered lung function, as assessed by measurements of specific airway compliance (sGaw), peak expiratory flow (PEF), or end expiratory flow rate, in either group. It is concluded that circulating alpha agonists, whether alpha 1 selective (phenylephrine) or non-selective (noradrenaline), fail to alter basal bronchial tone in patients with exercise induced asthma or in healthy subjects.

It is known that sympatho-adrenal control of airways is increased in asthma since beta blockade can cause severe bronchoconstriction in asthmatic individuals. It has not been established whether an altered catecholamine response to exercise plays any part in the production of the common symptom of exercise-induced asthma (EIA). We have investigated this indirectly by measuring arterial plasma cyclic nucleotide levels in 10 subjects with EIA and five normal subjects. Cyclic AMP, which in this context reflects beta stimulation, rose significantly by 25.4% in the normal subjects during exercise, while there was no significant change during or after exercise (less than 5%) in the asthmatic subjects. Cyclic GMP rose significantly after exercise in the asthmatic subjects. Six normal subjects repeated the protocol before and after inhalation of salbutamol aerosol, 1600 microgram daily for 18 days. This did not reduce the cAMP response to exercise, and we conclude that the diminished cAMP response of the asthmatic subjects was not caused by their medication. The results may indicate either impaired catecholamine production or endogenous beta receptor hyporesponsiveness in some asthmatic subjects and this may contribute to the development of EIA.

Plasma noradrenaline, adrenaline, and cyclic 3'5' AMP (cAMP) were measured in seven asthmatic patients with known exercise-induced bronchospasm and six matched non-atopic control subjects during a standard treadmill exercise test and then during matched isocapnic hyperventilation. Normal subjects showed a 5.5 fold rise in noradrenaline and a 3.2 fold rise in adrenaline during exercise compared with a 2.1 fold rise in noradrenaline and no significant rise in adrenaline in asthmatics who all developed bronchoconstriction after exercise (mean fall in peak flow rate 28.4 +/- 5.8%). Plasma cAMP rose 1.4 fold in controls but showed no significant rise in asthmatics. This reduced sympatho-adrenal response to exercise in asthmatics is difficult to explain. The failure of circulating catecholamines to rise and stimulate beta adrenoceptors on the mast cell may facilitate the release of bronchoconstrictor mediators. Matched hyperventilation produced bronchospasm in asthmatics (mean fall in peak flow rate 29.0 +/- 4.4%) but no change in catecholamines in either group suggesting that circulating catecholamines have no direct role in exercise-induced bronchospasm but may play a permissive role via the mast cell.

A failure of the usual increase in plasma adrenaline and noradrenaline concentrations during submaximal exercise has been suggested as a contributory cause of exercise induced asthma. Six normal subjects and six asthmatic patients underwent a standard graded maximal exercise test. Measurements of oxygen consumption, minute ventilation, exercise time, blood lactate concentration, and heart rate indicated that the two groups achieved similarly high work loads during exercise. Mean FEV1 fell by 20% in asthmatic patients after exercise. Basal plasma adrenaline concentrations (nmol/l) increased in normal subjects from 0.05 to 2.7 and in asthmatic patients from 0.12 to 1.6 at peak exercise. Noradrenaline concentrations (nmol/l) increased in normal subjects from 2.0 to 14.3 and in asthmatic patients from 1.9 to 13.7 at peak exercise. The increases in adrenaline and noradrenaline in the asthmatic patients did not differ significantly from the increases in normal subjects. Thus a reduced sympathoadrenal response to exercise seems unlikely to be an important mechanism in the pathogenesis of exercise induced asthma.

Serum potassium concentrations were measured before, during, and after exercise in 32 patients with asthma (12 with exercise induced asthma), and in seven normal subjects. The changes in serum potassium in response to exercise did not differ significantly in the two groups or between those with and without exercise induced asthma. The potassium response to exercise is unlikely to be relevant to the mechanism underlying exercise induced bronchoconstriction.