1. Diagnostic performance of deep learning-based vascular extraction and stenosis detection technique for coronary artery disease
- Author
-
Qing Tao, Ximing Wang, Feirong Yao, Guangyu Hao, Chune Ma, Chunhong Hu, Xujie Cheng, Ning Guo, Su Hu, and Meng Chen
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Computed Tomography Angiography ,MEDLINE ,CAD ,Coronary Artery Disease ,Imaging patients with stable chest pain special feature: Full Paper ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Coronary Angiography ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Coronary artery disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,Deep Learning ,0302 clinical medicine ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Humans ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Deep learning ,Coronary Stenosis ,Angiography, Digital Subtraction ,Retrospective cohort study ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Stenosis ,ROC Curve ,Predictive value of tests ,Angiography ,Female ,Artificial intelligence ,Radiology ,business - Abstract
Objective: To investigate the diagnostic performance of deep learning (DL)-based vascular extraction and stenosis detection technology in assessing coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: The diagnostic performance of DL technology was evaluated by retrospective analysis of coronary computed tomography angiography in 124 suspected CAD patients, using invasive coronary angiography as reference standard. Lumen diameter stenosis ≥50% was considered obstructive, and the diagnostic performances were evaluated at per-patient, per-vessel and per-segment levels. The diagnostic performances between DL model and reader model were compared by the areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUCs). Results: In patient-based analysis, AUC of 0.78 was obtained by DL model to detect obstructive CAD [sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 63%, positive predictive value of 94%, and negative predictive value of 59%], While AUC by reader model was 0.74 (sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 50%, positive predictive value of 93%, negative predictive value of 73%). In vessel-based analysis, the AUCs of DL model and reader model were 0.87 and 0.89 respectively. In segment-based analysis, the AUCs of 0.84 and 0.89 were obtained by DL model and reader model respectively. It took 0.47 min to analyze all segments per patient by DL model, which is significantly less than reader model (29.65 min) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The DL technology can accurately and effectively identify obstructive CAD, with less time-consuming, and it could be a reliable diagnostic tool to detect CAD. Advances in knowledge: The DL technology has valuable prospect with the diagnostic ability to detect CAD.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF