Search

This short communication introduces the reader to challenges faced by a cat rescue organization (Dingo-Venezia ONLUS) operating in the Venice area during and after the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. The area around Venice houses more than 1,500 cat colonies, in the mainland and in a number of densely inhabited isles. During COVID-19 restrictions, providing for animals was recognized as a legitimate cause to circulate, but there was uncertainty about the procedure to obtain such recognition. Volunteers chose to go and feed the animals nonetheless, even with the risk of incurring legal consequences. During restrictions, there was an increase of cat adoption demands, but also in cat relinquishment, and a general decrease in donations due to the economic crisis. Although not reporting experimentally sourced data, this paper affords the reader an informed insight into the challenges due to COVID-19 restriction, directly from the experience of an established Italian cat rescue organization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Domestic dogs tested in a free-choice task between two sets of food prefer that of a larger quantity. A recent study pointed out the critical role of the first trial. Dogs succeeded only after being allowed at least once to eat the selected food. Here we explore the importance of the actual experience of consuming the selected reward on dogs' capability to redirect their choice to solve numerical discriminations. Dogs tested in the 2 vs 4 and 1 vs 8 comparisons could never consume the quantity selected but always obtained a single dogs' treat. Despite never experiencing a difference in the eaten quantity, dogs discriminated between the two sets, preferring the larger. Whereas they behaved at chance at first choice, they successfully redirected their preference toward the larger set already on their second trial. We discuss our results in terms of motivational biases toward the larger quantity that can bear relevant ecological value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]