Search

Objectives: To investigate how uptake of cancer rehabilitation services is affected by information provision and whether it is influenced by people's perception and attitudes towards rehabilitation interventions and therapies., Design: This study followed a realist informed mixed-methods design. Descriptive secondary analysis of a cancer rehabilitation database containing information about number of people attending services, their diagnosis and sex and semi-structured interviews with people affected by cancer (PABC) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) were conducted., Setting: Cancer rehabilitation services located in two cancer centres in South Wales, UK., Participants: PABC who received care from any of the included cancer rehabilitation services. HCPs providing cancer rehabilitation at any of the included services., Interventions: Exercise-based cancer rehabilitation, fatigue management, acupuncture and allied health professional support were provided as cancer rehabilitation., Results: Twenty HCPs and 15 PABC were recruited for semi-structured interviews across the two services. The number of database records used for the secondary analysis ranged from 212 to 347 between 2014 and 2017. Based on descriptive analysis of these records and thematic analysis of HCPs' interviews, uptake of cancer rehabilitation services often fluctuated. This could be attributed to PABC reporting issues with information provision on available services. Based on PABC's accounts, they learnt about cancer rehabilitation in various ways, often by chance via word of mouth. Information provision was influenced by several issues including lack of consensus on what cancer rehabilitation means, the wider multidisciplinary team's (MDT) perception and knowledge on cancer rehabilitation, the prevailing medical model in healthcare and the lack of routine provision of services. The perception and attitude of PABC did not seem to inhibit uptake and information provision., Conclusions: To modify these inhibiting issues, the education of the wider MDT regarding the aim, modalities and importance of cancer rehabilitation is crucial., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Long-term and late effects of cancer treatments can cause functional limitations and reduce quality of life. Cancer rehabilitation services, which can comprise physical exercise, psychological support and educational interventions depending on the individual's needs, have been found to have a positive effect on health-related quality of life worldwide. However, accessibility or the lack of awareness on available help can act as barriers and influence the uptake of services, resulting in people having unmet rehabilitation needs. In Wales, UK, 41% of people, who have had health and social care needs resulting from cancer and its treatments, reported that they did not receive care when needed. The reason for this lack of support has not yet been fully investigated. The aim of this study is to investigate the conditions in which cancer rehabilitation services work and their underpinning mechanisms in South Wales, UK, specifically addressing barriers, facilitators and costs., Methods and Analysis: Realist evaluation, which explains for whom a service works in what circumstances and how through context-mechanism-outcome pattern conjunctions, will be used in three phases to investigate the conditions in which cancer rehabilitation services work and their underpinning mechanisms. Phase 1 will be secondary analysis of a cancer rehabilitation database from a local Health Board to give context to who are accessing rehabilitation. Phase 2 will be thematic analysis of face-to-face, semistructured rehabilitation participant (n=20) and healthcare professional (n=20) interviews to explore the mechanisms of how cancer rehabilitation works. Phase 3 will be two case studies and cost-consequences analysis of cancer rehabilitation services., Ethics and Dissemination: This study received favourable ethical opinion from London South-East Research Ethics Committee (17/LO/2123) in December 2017. This project is part of the author's PhD thesis and it is expected that the findings will be disseminated in academic journals and at local and international conferences., Competing Interests: Competing interests: This study will be carried out as part of JKC’s PhD candidature and will contribute to the doctoral thesis., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)