Search

Objective Triage with HPV genotyping has some caveats and debates for HPV positive cases other than 16 and 18. The Swede score colposcopic scoring system has not previously been evaluated in this group of patients. Objective To use the Swede score colposcopic scoring system to compare scores and final histopathological results in women who have undergone colposcopy owing to infection with high risk-HPVs other than HPV16 and 18 and to establish new cut-off values to predict pre-malignant lesions in this group of patients. Methods This study was conducted in 613 women undergoing colposcopic evaluation because of abnormal cervical cytology together with high-risk HPV infection. All patients referred were evaluated by an expert colposcopist, given a Swede score (using the Swede score colposcopic scoring system) by using five variables (acetowhiteness, margins plus surface, vessel pattern, lesion size, and iodine staining), and had at least one biopsy procedure (either colposcopically directed or by a loop electrical excision procedure). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, likelihood ratio values, and receiver operating characteristic curves for each clinico-pathological variable to detect low-grade and high-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions, and any squamous cell abnormality (low-grade + high-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions) were evaluated individually. Results Final histopathological results of the patients were normal in 53.2% of cases, low-grade lesions in 32.5% of cases, and high-grade lesions in 14.4% of cases. Swede score was >8 (median 7.97) for high-grade lesions and >5 (median 5.06) for low-grade lesions. The area under the curve values (95% CI) of Swede scores for low-grade and high-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions, and low-grade + high grade lesions were 0.92, 0.98, and 0.96, respectively. A Swede score cut-off value ≥6 had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratios of 92%, 98%, 93%, 98%, and 50 (22.6 to 110.8), respectively, for high-grade lesions at the final pathology (P<0.001). One high-risk HPV type (except 16 and 18) was no better than another for calculating the median Swede score during colposcopy (P=0.43). Conclusions The Swede score colposcopic scoring system appears to be a useful tool for evaluating atypical cervical cytology in women with high-risk HPV infection other than HPV types 16 and 18. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare Mayo and Milwaukee risk stratification models for predicting lymphatic dissemination in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: A total of 904 patients with EC underwent surgical treatment between 2004 and 2016 at Hacettepe University Hospital, and clinicopathological data of patients were retrieved from the computerized database of the Hacettepe University. Patients who did not undergo lymphadenectomy and who had nonendometrioid histology, stage-IV disease, and synchronous epithelial ovarian and EC were excluded. All slides of the cases were reviewed by the same gynecologic pathology subspecialist. Results: The study group consisted of 307 consecutive patients with a mean age of 59.4 years (range, 26–86 years). Lymph node metastasis was detected in 28 subjects (9.1%). Primary tumor diameter, depth of myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, and cervical stromal and glandular involvement were associated with lymph node metastasis. Patients with low-risk histological features based on Mayo risk stratification system in our study group had a 0% rate of lymph node positivity. However, of the 28 patients with lymph node metastasis, 3 (10.7%) had low-risk features based on Milwaukee model. The sensitivity, specificity, false negative rate (FNR) and false positive rate of Mayo and Milwaukee risk stratification models for predicting lymphatic dissemination among women with endometrioid EC were 100%, 27.3%, 0%, and 72.7%; and 89.3%, 61.3%, 10.7%, and 38.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Although Milwaukee risk stratification model had a lower false positive rate and can decrease the number of lymphadenectomies, FNR of this new model was found as 10.7% in the present study. Furthermore, we found that Mayo model had a lower FNR and higher sensitivity. Therefore, Mayo model still looks more beneficial to predict lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrioid EC and Milwaukee risk stratification model still requires external validation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological features and factors associated with recurrence in patients with uterine smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP). Methods: Forty-six cases diagnosed between 2000 and 2014 from 2 tertiary centers underwent blind slide review. Initial diagnosis included smooth muscle tumors with equivocal diagnosis, STUMPs, and cases that were named as leiomyosarcomas (LMS) or low-grade LMS despite not fulfilling the Stanford criteria. Results: In total, 21 patients with a final diagnosis of STUMP were available. Fifteen (68.1%) of 22 patients with an initial diagnosis of STUMP, 4 (22.2%) of 18 cases with an equivocal smooth muscle tumor diagnosis, and 2 (33.3%) of 6 cases with an initial diagnosis of LMS were interpreted as STUMP after slide review. The mean age at diagnosis was 43 years (range, 20-64 years). The mean follow-up time was 65.9 months (range, 10-154 months). Four patients (19.0%) developed recurrent disease. Recurrent tumors were LMS in 3 patients (75%). One patient (4.8%) with recurrence succumbed to disease. There was no difference in patients' age (P = 1.0) or type of initial surgery (uterus conserving versus hysterectomy) (P = 0.57) between patients who recurred and did not recur. Conclusions: Uterine STUMPs can harbor significant uncertainty regarding the original diagnosis and clinical outcomes. Recurred cases may have an aggressive clinical course associated with multiple relapses and death. Uterine mesenchymal tumors other than ordinary myomas and overt sarcomas deserve a second opinion in centers with experience because the real diagnosis may vary significantly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different surgical approaches, adjuvant therapy, and pathological characteristics on oncological outcomes in patients with 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage II endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: A multicenter, retrospective department database review was performed to identify patients with FIGO 2009 stage II EC who underwent surgical staging between 2002 and 2015 at 5 gynecologic oncology centers in Turkey. Results: Original pathology reports of 4867 patients who underwent surgical treatment for EC were analyzed. The study group consisted of 250 FIGO stage II patients. Of these patients, 203 (81.2%) had endometrioid and 47 (18.8%) had nonendometrioid histologic subtype of EC. Whereas 199 patients (79.6%) underwent type I hysterectomy, the remaining 51 patients (20.4%) underwent radical hysterectomy. Of the 250 patients, 208 patients (83.2%) had adjuvant therapy including radiotherapy (pelvic external beam radiotherapy and/or vaginal brachytherapy [VBT]) and/or platinum-based chemotherapy. Disease recurred in 29 patients (11.6%). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort were 82%and 85%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that only adjuvant treatment (P = 0.001; hazard ratio, 4.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-9.36) was significantly associated with DFS. According to multivariate analysis, only age older than 60 years (P =0.01; hazard ratio, 3.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-7.04) was identified as an independent risk factor for OS. However, there were no differences in OS when evaluated by grade, histology, tumor size, type of hysterectomy, or adjuvant treatment. Conclusions: In stage II EC, adjuvant external beam radiotherapy T VBT were associated with increased DFS but not OS. However, the benefit of VBT alone on DFS could not be demonstrated. Only age was an independent risk factor for OS. Type of hysterectomy and histologic subtype of the tumor for patients with uterus-confined disease improved neither DFS nor OS in our study group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The study aims to investigate effect of tumor size on lymphatic spread in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: This study included patients with EC who underwent staging surgery with systematic lymphadenectomy between 2002 and 2015 at the Hacettepe University Hospital. Patients with grade 1 or 2 endometrioid type tumor who had 50%or lower myometrial invasion were included. Patients who had no myometrial invasion or had uterine high-risk features (nonendometrioid histology, grade 3, and deep myometrial invasion) were excluded. Results: The study group consisted of 191 patients, and the mean age of the patients was 57.8 years. Of these patients, 124 (64.9%) had tumor size of more than 2 cm and 67 (35.1%) had tumor size of 2 cm or less. Lymph node metastasis was detected in 12 (9.7%) of the 124 patients with tumor size of more than 2 cm. On the other hand, none of the 67 patients (0%) with tumor size of 2 cm or less was found to have lymphatic involvement. Of the factors analyzed for correlation with lymph node metastasis in patients with low-risk EC, the presence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and primary tumor size were found to be significant predictors of lymphatic spread in univariate analysis (P < 0.001 and P = 0.009, respectively). In multivariate analysis, tumor size (odds ratio, 6.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.007-infinite; P < 0.05) and LVSI (odds ratio, 14.261; 95% confidence interval, 3.4-59.6; P < 0.001) were 2 independent predictors associated with lymphatic involvement. Conclusions: Our trial supports that tumor size of more than 2 cm and LVSI are 2 independent factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with low-risk EC. Both factors can be used together to select patients with traditional low-risk histologic features who would absolutely benefit from lymph node dissection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to investigate the frequency of extrauterine metastasis and to evaluate the importance of surgical staging and adjuvant treatment among patients with noninvasive uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) of the endometrium. Materials and Methods: A multicenter, retrospective department database review was performed to identify patients with UPSC of the endometrium who underwent surgical staging between 2000 and 2015 at 4 Gynecologic Oncology Centers in Turkey. Demographic, clinicopathological, and survival data were collected. Results: A total of 182 patients with primary UPSC of the endometrium were identified. Of these, 33 (18.1%) had tumors limited to the endometrium with no myometrial invasion. Twenty (60.6%) of these 33 patients had no extrauterine involvement and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage 1A disease was diagnosed after complete staging. The remaining 13 (39.4%) patients had disease beyond the uterine corpus including 5 with omental, 3 with adnexal, 1 with cervical stromal involvement, 1 with disease in the pelvic lymph nodes, and 1 with isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Two patients had metastases in more than one location including omentum/adnexa/pelvic–para-aortic lymph nodes and omentum/pelvic–para-aortic lymph nodes, respectively. Of the 20 patients with disease confined to the endometrium, 6 (30%) patients received adjuvant treatment. Conclusions: Noninvasive UPSC has a high tendency for extrauterine spread and omentum is the most commonly involved location. Therefore, comprehensive surgical staging including omentectomy and pelvic–para-aortic lymph node dissection is mandatory in this group of patients. Risk of extrauterine spread is significantly associated with the presence of lymphovascular space invasion, elevated preoperative CA 125 levels, and positive peritoneal cytology. Adjuvant therapy for women with endometrium-confined disease improves neither progression-free survival nor overall survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this surgical video is to demonstrate en bloc radical removal of uterus and vagina in a patient with clinical early-stage vaginal cancer. Surgical treatment was offered to our patient for clinical early-stage primary vaginal cancer. An en bloc radical hysterectomy, systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy, and total abdominal vaginectomy were performed. Postoperative adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy was not recommended for completely resected pathologic stage I disease with no lymph node involvement and negative surgical margins. Radical surgery can be a treatment option for selected patients with primary vaginal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]