Search

Introduction Children represent a large and vulnerable patient group. However, the evidence base for most paediatric diagnostic and therapeutic procedures remains limited or is often inferred from adults. There is an urgency to improve paediatric healthcare provision based on real-world evidence generation. Digital transformation is a unique opportunity to shape a data-driven, agile, learning healthcare system and deliver more efficient and personalised care to children and their families. The goal of Paediatric Personalized Research Network Switzerland (SwissPedHealth) is to build a sustainable and scalable infrastructure to make routine clinical data from paediatric hospitals in Switzerland interoperable, standardised, quality-controlled, and ready for observational research, quality assurance, trials and health-policy creation. This study describes the design, aims and current achievements of SwissPedHealth.Methods and analysis SwissPedHealth was started in September 2022 as one of four national data streams co-funded by the Swiss Personalized Health Network (SPHN) and the Personalized Health and Related Technologies (PHRT). SwissPedHealth develops modular governance and regulatory strategies and harnesses SPHN automatisation procedures in collaboration with clinical data warehouses, the Data Coordination Center, Biomedical Information Technology Network, and other SPHN institutions and funded projects. The SwissPedHealth consortium is led by a multisite, multidisciplinary Steering Committee, incorporating patient and family representatives. The data stream contains work packages focusing on (1) governance and implementation of standardised data collection, (2) nested projects to test the feasibility of the data stream, (3) a lighthouse project that enriches the data stream by integrating multi-omics data, aiming to improve diagnoses of rare diseases and 4) engagement with families through patient and public involvement activities and bioethics interviews.Ethics and dissemination The health database regulation of SwissPedHealth was approved by the ethics committee (AO_2022-00018). Research findings will be disseminated through national and international conferences and publications in peer-reviewed journals, and in lay language via online media and podcasts.

Objectives In trials of acute severe infections or inflammations frequent administration of non-randomised treatment (ie, intercurrent event) in response to clinical events is expected. These events may affect the interpretation of trial findings. Swissped-RECOVERY was set up as one of the first randomised controlled trials worldwide, investigating the comparative effectiveness of anti-inflammatory treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone or intravenous immunoglobulins in children and adolescents with Paediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome Temporally Associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS). We present one approach towards improving the interpretation of non-randomised treatment in a randomised controlled trial.Design This is a pre-planned ancillary analysis of the Swissped-RECOVERY trial, a randomised multicentre open-label two-arm trial.Setting 10 Swiss paediatric hospitals (secondary and tertiary care) participated.Participants Paediatric patients hospitalised with PIMS-TS.Interventions All patient-first intercurrent events, if applicable, were presented to an independent adjudication committee consisting of four international paediatric COVID-19 experts to provide independent clinical adjudication to a set of standardised questions relating to whether additional non-randomised treatments were clinically indicated and disease classification at the time of the intercurrent event.Results Of 41 treatments in 75 participants (24/41 (59%) and 17/41 (41%) in the intravenous methylprednisolone and immunoglobulin arms of the trial, respectively), two-thirds were considered indicated. The most common treatment (oral glucocorticoids, 14/41, 35%) was mostly considered not indicated (11/14, 79%), although in line with local guidelines. Intercurrent events among patients with Shock-like PIMS-TS at baseline were mostly considered indicated. A significant proportion of patients with undifferentiated PIMS-TS at baseline were not attributed to the same group at the time of the intercurrent event (6/12 unchanged, 4/12 Kawasaki disease-like, 2/12 Shock-like).Conclusion The masked adjudication of intercurrent events contributes to the interpretation of results in open-label trials and should be incorporated in the future.Trial registration numbers SNCTP000004720 and NCT 04826588.