Search

BackgroundDuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB (GEN1046) is a class-defining, bispecific immunotherapy designed to induce an antitumor immune response by simultaneous and complementary PD-L1 blockade and conditional 4-1BB stimulation. Encouraging clinical activity and manageable safety were observed during dose escalation in the ongoing phase 1/2a trial in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT03917381). We report exploratory pharmacodynamic analyses and potential biomarkers of response in an expansion cohort of patients with PD-(L)1–R/R NSCLC.MethodsPatients with metastatic/unresectable NSCLC who had multiple lines of prior systemic therapy, including a checkpoint inhibitor, received flat-dose DuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB (100 mg) intravenously every 3 weeks. Immunophenotyping of peripheral blood and measurements of soluble immune mediators were evaluated in serial blood samples in cycles 1–2. Tumor PD-L1 and 4-1BB expression and additional immune markers were evaluated by immunohistochemistry in core needle tumor biopsy specimens collected before treatment and at cycle 2.ResultsAs of May 2021, 40 patients with PD-(L)1–R/R NSCLC were enrolled (median age, 63 years). Treatment with DuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB elicited pharmacodynamic modulation of immune endpoints within the first 2 cycles. Induction of peripheral IFN-y, CXCL9/10, and expansion of peripheral CD8+ effector memory T cells and activated NK cells were observed starting at cycle 1 (>2-fold from baseline) and maintained or increased through cycle 2. Based on 9 paired tumor biopsy samples, increased PD-L1 and 4-1BB expression and cytotoxic CD8+/GZMB+ cell density were detected following treatment. In a subset of patients with clinical response (n=5 confirmed PRs), a trend of greater induction of IFN-y, CXCL9/10, and activated NK cells was observed vs nonresponders. Disease control rates were higher in patients who had progressed on prior anti–PD-1 therapy within 8 months (64% [16/25]) from the first dose of DuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB. As expected, among patients with evaluable baseline tumors (n=26), most with any degree of tumor reduction (best change, ConclusionsIn patients with NSCLC who progressed on PD-(L)1 therapy, DuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB elicited pharmacodynamic effects consistent with its proposed mechanism of action. Relationships between disease control and PD-L1 tumoral expression, as well as time from last prior anti–PD-1 therapy, were observed. These findings support that patient selection and/or anti–PD-1 combination therapy may lead to improved clinical efficacy. Further analyses are ongoing and updated results will be presented.AcknowledgementsThe authors thank Hrefna Kristin Johannsdottir, Lei Pang, and Kate Sasser at Genmab A/S and Friederike Gieseke at BioNTech SE for their valuable contributions. This trial was funded by Genmab A/S and BioNTech SE.Trial RegistrationNCT03917381Ethics ApprovalThis trial is undertaken following full approval of the final protocol, amendments, informed consent form, applicable recruiting materials, and subject compensation programs by the Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board.ConsentWritten informed consent, in accordance with principles that originated in the Declaration of Helsinki 2013, current ICH guidelines including ICH-GCP E6(R2), applicable regulatory requirements, and sponsor policy, was provided by the patients.

BackgroundGrowth and differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) is a TGF-β superfamily member physiologically expressed mainly in placenta and linked to feto-maternal tolerance. Under pathophysiologic conditions, prevention of excessive immune cell infiltration during tissue damage and cachexia induction have been ascribed to GDF-15. Recent research has though indicated a prominant role in modulation of the tumor microenvironment and the immune synapse, too1 2 indicating that GDF-15 may be a major tumor-derived immunosuppressant. Importantly, several cancer entities secrete high levels of GDF-15, correlating with poor prognosis and reduced overall survival [Front Immunol 2020 May 19;11:951]. To block this effect the GDF-15 neutralizing antibody CTL-002 was generated. In preclinical models CTL-002 demonstrated potent effector T cell shifting into tumor tissue by neutralizing GDF-15.MethodsThis is a phase 1, first-in-human (FIH), two-part, open-label clinical trial of intravenous (IV) administration of CTL-002 given as monotherapy and in combination with an anti-PD-1 antibody in subjects with advanced-stage, relapsed/refractory solid tumors who relapsed or were refractory to a prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Eligible subjects have exhausted all available approved standard treatments, including prior anti-PD1/-PD-L1 treatment, and present with a biopsy-accessible tumor for serial biopsy taking. The trial is termed GDFATHER, for ”GDF-15 Antibody-mediaTed Effector cell Relocation”.Main endpoints are safety of CTL-002 monotherapy and CTL-002 combination with an anti-PD-1 antibody, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (e.g. degree of GDF-15 neutralization achieved and change in immune-cell number and composition in the tumor tissue) as well as preliminary clinical efficacy (tumor mass reduction; anticachexia effect)In part A of the trial (dose escalation) up to 24 subjects will receive escalating doses of CTL-002 IV (0.3 – 20 mg/kg) in a ”mono-followed-by-combination”-design with CTL-002 given as monotherapy and followed by combination with an anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor. In part B (expansion) up to 5 cohorts with up to 25 subjects per cohort with defined tumor entities expected to be GDF-15 dependent will be treated to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and further evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy of CTL-002 monotherapy and the combination.The study was initiated in December 2020 and enrolled the first patient on Dec 09, 2020. Cohort 4 is ongoing at time of submission (07/2021) and so far no DLT has occurred. Updated safety, biomarker and response assessments will be reported at the meeting. The ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier is NCT04725474. For more information please contact info@catalym.com.Trial RegistrationNCT04725474ReferencesWischhusen J, Wistuba-Hamprecht K, Harter PN, Cheng P, Martens A, Gogolla F, Nonomura Y, Romer P, Koch SD, Haake M, Schuberth-Wagner C, Rudiger M, Leo E, Mittelbronn M, Levesque MP, Hackl H, Dummer R, Weide B. Identifying GDF-15 as potential novel immunotherapeutic target linked to immune cell exclusion in tumors and resistance to anti-PD-1 treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27–28 and Jun 22–24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl): Abstract nr 2161.Hurt E, Thomas S, Mulgrew K, Blackmore S, Moynihan J, Cusdin F, Dodd R, Cariuk P, Sigurdardottir A, Brannigan E, Dobson C, Kumar R, Cobbold M. AZD8853: A novel antibody targeting GDF15 for immunotherapy refractory tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10–15 and May 17–21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl): Abstract nr 1828.Ethics ApprovalAll participants gave informed consent prior to participation. EC approval by Gobierno de Navarra, Departamento de Salud, EC_2020/30, Dated: Oct 13, 2020 in Pamplona, Spain. Respective additional national lead EC approvals for Germany (Ethikkommission der Universität Würzburg, 203–20ff of Oct 26, 2020) and Switzerland (Kantonale Ethikkommission Zürich, 2020–02308 of Nov 24, 2020).

BackgroundDespite recent advances in exome and RNA sequencing to identify tumor-rejection antigens including neoantigens, the existing techniques fail to identify the vast majority of antigens targeted by tumor-reactive cells. A growing number of studies suggest that HLA-I peptides derived from non-canonical (nonC) open reading frames or derived from allegedly non-coding regions can contribute to tumor immunogenicity. Here we use proteogenomics to identify personalized candidate canonical and non-canonical tumor-rejection antigens and to evaluate their contribution to cancer immune surveillance in patients.MethodsWhole exome sequencing was performed to identify the non-synonymous somatic mutations (NSM) and immunopeptidomics to identify the HLA-I presented peptides (pHLA) in 9 patient-derived tumor cell lines (TCL). Peptid-PRISM proteogenomics pipeline was used to identify both canonical and non-canonical pHLA, including those derived from NSM in coding regions. All peptides containing mutations and derived from either cancer-testis (CTA) or tumor-associated antigens (TAA) were selected as candidate tumor antigens. For nonC peptides, an immunopeptidomics healthy dataset containing several tissues and HLA-allotypes was used to eliminate those derived from normal ORFs and select nonC peptides preferentially expressed in tumor cells (nonC-TE). The selected candidate peptides were synthesized, pulsed onto autologous APCs and co-cultured with tumor-reactive ex vivo expanded lymphocytes to assess immune recognition (figure 1).ResultsNonC-TE peptides were identified in all TCL studied, ranging from 0.5% to 5.4% of the total HLA-I presented peptides (n= 506). As described previoulsy, 5’UTR were the main source. Of note, the tumor type did not have an impact on the frequency of presented nonC peptides, but rather the presence of HLA-A*11:01 and HLA-A*03:01 was a major determinant. T cell responses were detected against at least 13/33 putative neoantigens, 2/24 CTA and 2/61 TAA. On the contrary, none of the 471 nonC-TE candidate peptides tested thus far, including one containing a NSM were able to elicit a recall immune response. Nevertheless, T cells recognizing at least 3 of them were detected through in vitro sensitization of non-autologous PBMCs.Abstract 912 Figure 1Workflow diagramTumor biopsies and blood samples are obtained from cancer patients (left panel). Patient-derived tumor cell lines are generated in vitro, the peptides presented on HLA molecules are further isolated and analyzed in a mass-spectrometer (top panel). Whole exome sequencing (WES) from matched tumor and healthy tissue is performed to identify the non-synonymous somatic mutations (NSM) (middle panel). Peptide-PRISM proteogenomics pipeline combines the information from the immunopeptidomics data and WES to identify pHLA sequences from both canonical and non-canonical candidate tumor antigens (top right panel). Lymphocyte populations either TILs or sorted PBMCs are expanded and further screened for pre-existing T cell responses (bottom panel) against the candidate epitopes by co-culturing the T cells with peptide-pulsed autologous APC. The recognition is assessed by measuring IFNg release by elispot and the upregulation of activation surface markers by FACS (bottom right panel).ConclusionsOur results show that although HLA-I nonC peptides were frequently presented in all TCLs studied and they can be immunogenic, neoantigens derived from mutations in canonical coding regions were preferentially recognized by tumor-reactive lymphocytes, suggesting T cells targeting the latter are primed more efficiently. The identification of mutated nonC antigens using whole genome sequencing to identify mutations in non-coding regions warrants further examination. Still, the specificity of many tumor-reactive TILs remains unknown.Ethics Approval”This study was approved by the ”Comité de Ética de Investigación con Medicamentos del Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron” institution’s Ethics Board; approval number PR(AG)537/2019.”

Background Gamma9 Delta2 (γ9δ2) T cells are an important component of the innate anti-tumor immune response whose infiltration into solid tumors has been associated with a positive prognosis, making γ9δ2 T cells an attractive target for the next generation of cancer immunotherapy. Butyrophilins (BTNs) are a family of immune checkpoint molecules that regulate γ9δ2 T cell activity, including BTN3A that is a potent endogenous activator of γ9δ2 T cells following phosphoantigen (pAg) binding to the intracellular domain of BTN3A1. This observation led to the design and development of ICT01, a humanized, monoclonal antibody that binds all 3 isoforms of BTN3A1/A2/A3 and induces pAg-independent γ9δ2 T cell activation, for the treatment of patients with solid or hematologic tumors. Methods EVICTION (www. clinicaltrials.gov NCT04243499; EudraCT Number: 2019-003847-31) is a first-in-human, two-part, open-label, clinical study to assess the safety, tolerability and activity of intravenous doses of ICT01 as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab, in patients with advanced-stage, relapsed/refractory cancer. Following Competent Authority and Ethics Committee approvals, the study is being conducted at cancer centers in France, Belgium, Spain, Germany, and the UK. Patients provide signed informed consent prior to screening. Eligible patients receive ICT01 (Range: 20 µg to 200 mg) every 3 weeks with blood samples collected at multiple timepoints for immunophenotyping and cytokine analysis (IFNγ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-13, TNFα). Tumor biopsies are collected at baseline and Day 28 and stained by immunohistochemistry for BTN3A, γ9δ2 T cells and other markers of anti-tumor immunity. Results Cohort 1 comprising 6 patients with solid tumors (3 Colorectal, 1 Pancreatic, 1 Ovarian, 1 Melanoma) has been enrolled and treated with ICT01 doses ranging from 20 to 700 µg. No dose-limiting toxicities or related SAEs have been reported. Target occupancy on T cells at 4 hours post first dose was 10% at 70 µg (n=1), 31% at 200 µg (n=2) and 34% at 700 µg (n=2), which was reflected at 24 hours post dose by a 73%, 91% and 97% decrease from baseline in the number of circulating γ9δ2 T cells, respectively. On Day 7, γ9δ2 T cells remained decreased by 37%, 75% and 76%, respectively. There were no effects on CD4 or CD8 T cells, NK cells, or B cells. Transient increases in IFNγ, secreted by activated γ9δ2 T cells, were observed in 4/6 patients. No cytokine release syndrome was observed. Data from the paired tumor biopsies are still being generated and will be presented. Conclusions The preliminary results demonstrate that ICT01 has the potential to safely activate the innate anti-tumor potential of γ9δ2 T cells through BTN3A. Acknowledgements . Trial Registration www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT04243499; EudraCT Number: 2019-003847-31 Ethics Approval This study was approved by the following Ethics Committees: COMITE DE PROTECTION DES PERSONNES, Sud-Mediterranee V (Gustave Roussy, IPC), Comite d’Ethique Institut Jules Bordet, COMITE DE ETICA DE INVESTIGACION CLINICA CON MEDICAMENTOS del Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Ethikkommission an der TU Dresden, HRA London-Surrey Borders Research Ethics Committee. Consent Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this abstract and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Auditory hallucinations are uncommon paediatric presentations, but they can be alarming and lead to emergency consultations. This review outlines the phenomenology of auditory hallucinations, their assessment and clinical significance. Auditory hallucinations are seen in the course of acute medical disorders, often together with decreased levels of consciousness, as in febrile illness and in toxic, neurologically compromised states; they can also be a feature of episodic neurological conditions such as migraine and temporal lobe epilepsy. Auditory hallucinations are key symptoms in psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenic and other psychotic states, but they can also present with depressive and anxiety disorders, and in the context of virtually every psychiatric disorder of childhood. In fact hallucinations--usually simple and transient--are common in the general child populations. Auditory hallucinations become clinically significant when they occur as part of a medical disorder or in the context of acute psychotic states and schizophrenia, when they are frequent, complex, distressing and cause impairment. The treatment of clinically relevant hallucinations is that of the primary medical or psychiatric disorder. Occasionally they require treatment in their own right with psychological treatments, and only when these have been tried and fail, a careful trial of antipsychotic medication may be appropriate.