Search

Objectives: To evaluate the Neisseria gonorrhoeae Becton Dickinson (BD) ProbeTec strand displacement assay (SDA) on female endocervical swab and male first void urine against culture for Neisseria gonorrhoeae on female endocervical and urethral swab for the diagnosis of N gonorrhoeae infection in genitourinary medicine (GUM) attendees. To determine an algorithm for implementation of N gonorrhoeae infection screening by SDA in these patients taking account of the desirability of having a N gonorrhoeae isolate in people with N gonorrhoeae infection., Methods: Initially, 1582 patients attending the GUM clinic were tested for N gonorrhoeae infection by SDA and routine microscopy, and culture. On the basis of the results, a protocol for diagnosis of N gonorrhoeae infection by SDA, with culture specimens only from patients with a listed risk factor for acquiring N gonorrhoeae infection, was devised and implemented. A post implementation audit was done to assess the effectiveness of this protocol for routine service use., Results: There was good concurrence between the N gonorrhoeae SDA and culture results with a N gonorrhoeae infection prevalence rate of 3.4% by both methods. All men and 85% of women with N gonorrhoeae infection had an identifiable risk factor for acquiring infection. Overall, 38% men and 60% women attending the GUM clinic had this listed risk factor for acquiring N gonorrhoeae. Post implementation audit confirmed the initial findings., Conclusion: Nucleic acid amplification techniques like the SDA are sensitive and specific for diagnosis of N gonorrhoeae. We were able to list certain risk factors, which were predictive of those patients most likely to have N gonorrhoeae infection. To obtain timely sensitivity data, a culture specimen should also be submitted at the same time from patients deemed to have a listed risk factor for acquiring Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection.

Aim: To study changes in the seroprevalence of varicella zoster virus (VZV) antibody over the past 25 years with a view to determining the target age group for any future vaccination strategy., Methods: Stored sera collected from different age groups over a period of 25 years were tested by a commercial VZV IgG enzyme immunoassay at a four year time interval. Data were analysed by logistic regression to investigate the evidence for changes in incidence and hence seroprevalence over that period., Results: There was a significant rise in VZV antibody prevalence in the 1-4 year age group during the study period., Conclusions: A universal childhood VZV vaccination strategy will need to take account of the increase in incidence of VZV infection in children under the age of 4 years; hence, the suggested target age would be between 12 and 18 months---soon after the disappearance of maternal antibody.

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male undergraduates and to investigate whether prevalence increases with time spent at university. To investigate the feasibility of screening men for C trachomatis by self sampling and posting of urine specimens., Methods: The study design was a postal survey undertaken by the Department of Genito-Urinary Medicine (GUM) and Student University Health Service (SUHS) in SHEFFIELD: 2607 male undergraduates from the SUHS patient list were invited to participate in the study by providing a first void urine specimen and posting it to the laboratory. The main outcome measure was the detection of C trachomatis infection., Results: 758 students participated in the study, a response rate of 29.1%. Nine students (1.2%) tested positive for C trachomatis. The prevalence of infection in the first, second, and third year of study was 0.7%, 1.5%, and 1.6% of participants respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in prevalence of infection between first and third year students (chi(2) test, p = 0.32). However, students with chlamydia had a higher median age (Mann-Whitney U test, p < or = 0.05). Contact tracing identified four further cases of C trachomatis infection., Conclusion: Screening for C trachomatis infection by postal survey is feasible. However, the response rate in this study was poor and the estimated sample size was not reached. Therefore, it has not been possible to determine the true prevalence of infection in this population or to accurately assess changes in prevalence with time spent at university.

In a prospective study eight (47%) heart transplant recipients had recurrent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Of these, five had received hearts from seropositive donors. Neither serology nor virus isolation from urine was reliably associated with clinical CMV infection, but a high CMV IgM index correlated with CMV infection.

An amplified enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for herpes simplex virus (Novo Nordisk) was compared with cell culture in 853 genital specimens from a genito-urinary medicine clinic. The sensitivity of the EIA was 86% and its specificity 99.6%. The sensitivity increased to 94% for lesion swabs but decreased to 68% for cervical swabs. Sensitivity for urethral and vulval swabs was 83% and 82%, respectively. It is concluded that the EIA is specific and quick and easy to perform. It will be suitable for testing for genital herpes simplex infections in laboratories without access to local cell culture facilities.

A commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection of adenoviruses in stool samples was compared with the use of electron microscopy and isolation in Graham 293 cells. Although specific, the ELISA was less sensitive than both electron microscopy and isolation. The ELISA had an overall sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 100%. The sensitivity was related to the amount of virus particles present in the stool sample, increasing to 90% with about 10(7) viral particles/ml of stool. The ELISA was easy to perform, requiring no instrumentation, and is a useful first line test for detection of adenoviruses in stool samples, especially in laboratories without access to an electron microscope. Wider use of ELISAs should help in evaluating the role of adenoviruses in viral gastroenteritis.