Search

A man in his early 50s on regular follow-up for a stable non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) presented with decreased vision, worsening of retinal pathology and macular oedema in both eyes. His corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 6/9 in the right eye and 6/15 in the left eye and fundus examination showed multiple intraretinal haemorrhages in all quadrants. His systemic workup revealed a severe thrombocytopaenia, which prompted a further detailed systemic evaluation revealing him to be positive for HIV with retinopathy complicating the pre-existing NPDR. Given the significant inflammation and macular oedema, a cocktail of intravitreal bevacizumab, ganciclovir and dexamethasone was administered. The retinopathy and macular oedema resolved and the CDVA improved to 6/6 in both eyes over a 6-month follow-up period. Any sudden worsening of fundus findings in a patient with diabetes necessitates immediate and detailed ocular and systemic evaluation, especially when the immune status is unknown., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

A 69-year-old male patient presented to the retina clinic with a sudden decrease in vision in his right eye since 1 day. He was a known case of granulomatosis with polyangiitis and was on systemic immunosuppression for the past 3 years. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in his right eye was 20/60 and he has no perception of light in the left eye. Fundus examination revealed the presence of retinitis lesions in the right eye and total optic atrophy in the left eye. A vitreous biopsy was done and the PCR was found to be positive for cytomegalovirus (CMV). He was treated with intravitreal ganciclovir injections. Subsequently, the retinitis lesions regressed and BCVA in the right eye improved to 20/40.This case report elaborates on the risks of the development of opportunistic ocular infections in patients receiving long-term systemic immunosuppressants and the need for regular ocular examinations in such cases., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Patients with AIDS-related cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis receiving combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), but not specific anti-CMV therapy, consistently showed active retinitis for several months. Delayed diagnosis and treatment of CMV retinitis may have severe consequences. Patients first entering care with advanced HIV infection and vulnerability to reactivation of latent CMV infection should be screened immediately for CMV retinitis by dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy and treated with specific anti-CMV therapy without delay, in addition to cART., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Aims: To determine if early dilated fundus examination for cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis leads to better visual outcomes in areas with limited HIV care, where patients may have long-standing retinitis before they are diagnosed with HIV., Methods: Twenty-four eyes of 17 patients with CMV retinitis who were seen at an urban HIV clinic in Chiang Mai, Thailand, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Participants were divided into two groups based on the amount of time from the first documented CD4 count below 100 cells/mm 3 to the first eye examination for CMV retinitis. Average visual acuity in each group was calculated at the time CMV retinitis was first detected, and then at 3, 6 and 12 months after diagnosis., Results: The group of patients who received an eye examination within approximately 4 months of the initial low CD4 count measurement had better baseline visual acuity (median 20/30,IQR 20/20 to 20/60) compared with patients who presented later (median 20/80, 20/60 to hand motion); p=0.03). Visual acuity did not change significantly during the 12-month study period in either the early group (p=0.69) or late group (p=0.17)., Conclusion: In this study, patients who were examined sooner after a low CD4 count had better vision than patients who were examined later. Routine early screening of patients with CD4 counts under below 100 cells/mm 3 may detect earlier disease and prevent vision loss., Competing Interests: Competing interests: GNH has served on advisory boards for the following companies: Genentech (South San Francisco, CA), Novartis (Basel, Switzerland), Santen (Emeryville, CA) and Xoma (Berkeley, CA). TPM has pending intellectual property with the University of California (Berkeley, CA) describing a mobile phone camera for retinal imaging. At the current time this intellectual property has no financial value., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Aim: To determine if poor access to healthcare is associated with increased cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis risk among patients with HIV with CD4 counts of <100 cells/μL screened in a resource-limited setting., Methods: This is a prospective cross-sectional study. Patients with known HIV and a CD4 count of <100 cells/μL attending an HIV clinic in Chiang Mai, Thailand, completed a standardised questionnaire and underwent dilated fundus examination. Participants without CMV retinitis were invited for repeated examinations every 3 months until their CD4 count exceeded 100 cells/μL. The relationship between various potential risk factors and CMV retinitis was assessed with logistic regression., Results: 103 study participants were enrolled. At enrolment, the mean age was 37.5 (95% CI 35.7 to 39.2) years, 61.2% (95% CI 51.6% to 70.7%) were male and the mean CD4 count was 29.5 (95% CI 25.9 to 33.1) cells/μL. 21 eyes from 16 (15.5%) participants were diagnosed with CMV retinitis. In multivariate analyses, CMV retinitis was significantly associated with lower CD4 count (OR 1.42 per 10-cell decrement, 95%CI 1.05 to 1.93), longer travel time to clinic (OR 3.85 for those with >30-min travel time, 95% CI 1.08 to 13.8) and lower income (OR 1.22 per US$50 less income, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.47)., Conclusions: CD4 count, low income and longer travel time to clinic were significant risk factors for CMV retinitis among patients with HIV in a resource-limited setting. These results suggest that reducing blindness from CMV retinitis should focus on increasing accessibility of screening examinations to poor and hard-to-reach patients., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/)

A 40-year-old man presented to the emergency service of the Department of Ophthalmology, Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander, Floridablanca, Colombia, with blurred vision in his right eye. Anamnesis revealed that he also had newly diagnosed stage C HIV. He had recently started highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Examination disclosed intraocular inflammation, along with plain white peripheral non-exudative lesions with sparse haemorrhaging. The differential diagnosis included cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis and immune recovery uveitis (IRU). On follow-up, the patient's left eye presented with decreased visual acuity and increased vitreous haze. A vitrectomy with vitreous tap was performed for microbiological studies. PCR for CMV in the vitreous sample was negative. The patient was discharged with the final diagnosis of IRU. In HIV patients with uveitis, the knowledge of characteristic signs and symptoms of particular entities such as opportunistic infections and IRU will enable the clinician to give the appropriate treatment., (2015 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.)

A 54-year-old woman, a known case of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in complete remission, presented with floaters and diminution of vision in her left eye. The eye had vitritis with non-haemorrhagic retinitis mimicking intraocular lymphoma and acute retinal necrosis. A vitreous sample was positive for cytomegalovirus (CMV) and herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) DNA by PCR. The possibility of intraocular lymphoma was not confirmed by the immunohistochemistry of the vitreous sample. The patient had a relapse of NHL along with rapid deterioration of vision in her left eye to no perception of light, due to optic nerve involvement. The right eye developed a new patch of focal haemorrhagic retinitis threatening the fovea. Based on the laboratory results and the clinical findings, she was successfully managed as a case of bilateral CMV retinitis and the vision in her right eye was salvaged., (2015 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.)

Acute retinal necrosis (ARN), also known as Kirisawa-type uveitis, is an uncommon condition caused by infection of the retina by one of the herpes family of viruses, most typically varicella zoster virus or herpes simplex virus and less commonly cytomegalovirus. Clinical diagnosis can be challenging and is often aided by PCR-based analysis of ocular fluids. Treatment typically involves extended use of one or more antiviral agents. Long term retinal detachment risk is high. We review the literature on ARN and present an approach to the diagnosis and management of this serious condition.

We report a case of a 40-year-old seropositive-HIV patient with a CD4 count of 120 who presented with fever, severe headache and neck stiffness. Suspecting a case of tubercular meningitis (TBM; as tuberculosis is the commonest opportunistic infection in HIV/AIDS patients in India), a lumbar puncture was performed and a cerebrospinal fluid study revealed TBM. The patient was started on combination antitubercular drug therapy from directly observed treatment, short course (DOTS) (Cat 1 regimen) along with pyridoxine 40 mg/day and adjunctive corticosteroid therapy. However, despite adequate antitubercular therapy for 4 weeks, the patient did not show any improvement in his clinical condition. On the contrary, in the process he developed cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis. So we question our learned readers if the coinfection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and CMV should be implicated for the failure to respond to isolated antitubercular therapy contrary to our expectation.

Purpose: To determine the aetiology and clinical characteristics of patients with uveitis in a tertiary ophthalmology centre in northern Thailand., Methods: Standard ophthalmological examination and laboratory screening blood tests were performed in 200 consecutive new patients with uveitis. Patients were classified according to the location and aetiology of the uveitis. Specific clinical characteristics were recorded., Design: Prospective case series., Results: The case series included 106 male and 94 female patients with a mean age of 38 years. HIV-associated uveitis was noted in 31% (62/200), and included mostly patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis (85%, 53/62). In the non-HIV group, the most common anatomical type was anterior uveitis (34%, 47/138). Infectious uveitis was diagnosed in 22% (30/138) of non-HIV patients, and toxoplasmosis was the most common infection (12/138, 8.7%). The most common non-infectious clinical entities were Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (20%, 22/108) and HLA-B27-associated acute anterior uveitis (9%, 10/108)., Conclusions: The spectrum of uveitis in northern Thailand included 27% of HIV-infected patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis. Causes of non-HIV uveitis were similar to those often observed in the Far East, but the specific prevalences of these disorders were distinct from that found in India and Japan.

Aims: Viral uveitis and retinitis, usually caused by herpesviruses, are common in immunosuppressed patients. The diagnosis of viral anterior uveitis and retinitis is usually clinical. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been used for the diagnosis of some viral infections, especially those caused by herpesviruses. This paper reports the use of PCR in the diagnosis of viral retinitis in vitreous samples from Brazilian patients., Methods: PCR was used for the diagnosis of necrotising retinitis in vitreous samples from patients from the Hospital São Geraldo, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil. The vitreous samples were collected by paracentesis and stored until analysis. Samples were analysed by PCR using specific primers designed to amplify herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1), varicella zoster virus (VZV), or human cytomegalovirus (HCMV). In a case of anterior uveitis, PCR was performed with a sample from the anterior chamber., Results: Herpesvirus DNA was amplified in 11 of 17 samples. HCVM DNA was detected in nine samples but DNA from HSV-1 and VZV were detected only once each., Conclusion: These results strongly suggest that PCR could be used for a rapid complementary diagnosis of viral uveitis and retinitis. A prospective study to evaluate the PCR results, clinical evolution, and treatment is imperative to corroborate the real value of PCR in diagnosis and how it could help the clinicians' approach.

Background: Many patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMVR) are unaware of visual disturbance so screening is advocated for patients with HIV and low CD4 counts. Many tests of retinal function have been recommended but few are effective at detecting CMVR. We assess the potential of chromatic discrimination thresholds and achromatic contrast sensitivity as screening tests for patients with CMVR., Method: 11 HIV+ patients with CMVR, 16 age matched HIV+ patients, and 29 age matched controls were recruited. Visual acuity, chromatic discrimination thresholds, and achromatic contrast sensitivity were measured. Fundal examination was performed by slit lamp biomicroscopy for HIV+ patients. Those with CMVR were photographed and the CMVR graded from the photographs., Results: Loss of chromatic discrimination was found in patients with CMVR (tritan p<0.0005, red/green p<0.05). The same group had deterioration in achromatic contrast sensitivity at 2.2, 3.4, and 10 cpd (p<0.05). There was correlation between the zone of CMVR with chromatic gratings (tritan r=0.83, p<0.005). No statistically significant difference was found between the HIV+ patients and the controls for all tests (p>0.1)., Conclusions: HIV+ patients with CMVR have a loss of chromatic discrimination and achromatic contrast sensitivity and this may be used to screen HIV+ patients for CMVR.

Objectives: To compare histological with genome detection methods for diagnosis of herpesvirus infection in eye and brain of HIV infected patients undergoing necropsy and to correlate these findings with both antemortem clinical findings and postmortem evidence of extraocular herpesvirus infection, especially in the CNS., Methods: A prospective study of 31 consecutive HIV infected patients undergoing necropsy. In life 11 patients had been assessed by an ophthalmologist because of ocular symptoms. Ocular and brain samples were examined for herpesviruses by conventional histological methods and by nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR) for all eight human herpesviruses; evidence of extraneural herpesvirus infection was sought by histological methods., Results: Although only 12 out of 31 patients (39%) had antemortem clinical evidence of ocular or CNS herpesvirus associated disease, herpesviruses were detected by nPCR in eye and brain from 26 (84%) patients; six patients had more than one herpesvirus infection. There was concordance between ocular and CNS findings in 15 of 19 patients (79%) with CMV infection. 17 of 31 patients (55%) had extraocular or CNS CMV infection at necropsy. Genome detection using nPCR was superior to histological methods for diagnosis of ocular and CNS herpesvirus infection., Conclusion: Herpesvirus infection of eye and brain was a frequent finding at necropsy in this group of HIV infected patients; almost a fifth were co-infected by more than one herpesvirus. This was more than twice the incidence predicted from clinical evidence before death. Genome detection using nPCR was superior to histological methods for diagnosis of ocular and CNS herpesvirus infection.

Background: The utility of cytomegalovirus (CMV) urine cultures was checked in patients with HIV (a) to identify those at risk for CMV retinitis and (b) to guide clinical decisions on treatment and prophylaxis of CMV retinitis., Methods: HIV infected patients were tested for CMVuria by shell vial cell cultures. The prevalence of CMVuria was related to CD4 count, HIV risk group, and time before and after diagnosis of CMV retinitis., Results: A total of 639 shell vial cell cultures were obtained from 266 HIV infected ophthalmic patients. Only 4% of all patients with a CD4 count > 400 x 10(6)/l shed CMV in their urine compared with 42% with a CD4 count < or = 50 x 10(6)/l. Twenty three of 25 patients with CMV retinitis had a CD4 count < or = 50 x 10(6)/l. Among 130 patients with a CD4 count < or = 50 x 10(6)/l (a) those who were CMVuric had a nearly sevenfold risk (p < 0.0001) of developing CMV retinitis (35%) compared with those who did not shed CMV in their urine (5%), and (b) CMVuria and CMV retinitis were more frequent in homosexuals (58%/25%) than in intravenous drug users (23%/15%). More than 1 year before diagnosis of CMV retinitis 18% of patients were CMVuric compared with 83% of patients who were CMV culture positive in the last 3 months. CMVuria under virustatic maintenance therapy is associated with worsening of retinitis in two thirds of cases., Conclusion: Ophthalmic screening of patients with HIV should include those with a CD4 count < or = 50 x 10(6)/l and focus on the subgroup with additional CMVuria. Screening of other patients can be dropped without undue risk in order to spare AIDS patients unnecessary hospital visits. CMVuria as a single finding, however, does not justify antiviral prophylaxis of CMV retinitis.

Aim: To determine the value of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique and the analysis of intraocularly produced antibodies by calculating a Goldmann-Witmer quotient (GWq) as diagnostic assays in the confirmation of a clinically diagnosed cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis in a group of unselected AIDS patients., Methods: Eleven samples of undiluted ocular fluid, obtained from nine AIDS patients with a clinically diagnosed CMV retinitis were analysed for the presence of genomic DNA from CMV, HSV-1, VZV, and EBV by PCR. Nine of these samples were analysed for the presence of locally produced IgG antibodies against these herpesviruses by calculating a GWq. Ten samples obtained from patients with various entities of clinical non-herpetic uveitis and 17 samples of aqueous humour obtained at cataract surgery were used as controls., Results: In 10 out of 11 samples from AIDS patients (91%) the presence of CMV DNA was demonstrated. In four out of nine (44%) patients this was accompanied by CMV DNA in the blood indicating a CMV viraemia. In one sample, VZV DNA was detected and in another sample both CMV and VZV DNA were detected. No HSV-1 or EBV DNA could be demonstrated in these 11 samples. In contrast, simultaneous analysis of locally produced IgG antibodies against herpesviruses could not confirm the initial diagnosis of CMV retinitis. Ocular fluid samples obtained from 10 control uveitis patients were negative for DNA from CMV, VZV, and EBV by PCR. In one of 10 uveitis control samples HSV-1 DNA was detected; antibody analysis did not confirm this. In the uveitis control group, a significant GWq was calculated in one sample for HSV-1 and in another sample for VZV. The cataract control samples were all herpesvirus DNA negative by PCR., Conclusions: To establish the diagnosis of CMV retinitis in AIDS patients, ophthalmoscopic examination is a sensitive method. In confirming a diagnosis in indistinctive cases, application of a PCR assay detecting CMV DNA is a more sensitive method than analysis of locally produced antibodies by calculating a GWq. In clinical non-herpetic uveitis, secondary release of HSV-1 and VZV should be considered requiring additional therapeutic anticipation.