Search

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare surgical complexity, post-operative complications, and survival outcomes between patients with minimal residual disease (completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score) CC-1 at the time of primary debulking surgery and those with complete cytoreduction (CC-0) at the time of interval debulking surgery., Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted of patients with advanced ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC-IV) who underwent cytoreductive surgery achieving either minimal or no residual disease between January 2008 and December 2015. Patients underwent either primary or interval debulking surgery after receiving ≥3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The sub-group of patients with primary debulking surgery/CC-1 was compared with those with interval debulking surgery/CC-0. Overall survival and disease-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: A total of 549 patients were included, with upfront surgery performed in 175 patients (31.9%) and 374 patients (68.1%) undergoing interval debulking surgery. After primary debulking surgery, 157/175 (89.7%) had complete cytoreduction and 18/175 (10.3%) had minimal residual disease (primary debulking surgery/CC-1 group), while after interval debulking surgery, 324/374 (86.6%) had complete cytoreduction (interval debulking surgery/CC-0 group) and 50/374 (13.4%) had minimal residual disease. The rate of patients with peritoneal cancer index >10 was 14/17 (82.4%) for the primary debulking surgery/CC-1 group and 129/322 (40.1%) for the interval debulking surgery/CC-0 (p<0.001). The rate of patients with an Aletti score of ≥8 was 11/18 (61.1%) and 132/324 (40.7%), respectively (p=0.09) and the rate of major post-operative complications was 5/18 (27.8%) and 64/324 (19.8%), respectively (p=0.38). Overall median disease-free and overall survival were 19.4 months (95% CI 18.0 to 20.6) and 56.7 months (95%CI 50.2 to 65.8), respectively. Median disease-free survival for the primary debulking surgery/CC-1 group was 16.7 months (95% CI 13.6 to 20.0) versus 18.2 months (95% CI 16.4 to 20.0) for the interval debulking surgery/CC-0 group (p=0.56). Median overall survival for the primary debulking surgery/CC-1 group was 44.7 months (95% CI 34.3 to not reached) and 49.4 months (95% CI 46.2 to 57.3) for the interval debulking surgery/CC-0 group (p=0.97)., Conclusions: Patients with primary debulking surgery with minimal residual disease and those with interval debulking surgery with no residual disease had similar survival outcomes. Interval surgery should be considered when achieving absence of residual disease is challenging at upfront surgery, given the lower tumor burden found during surgery., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: Our study aimed to evaluate the association between timing of cytoreductive surgery and pattern of presentation of the first recurrence in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. We also aimed to assess the impact of the pattern of recurrence on post-relapse overall survival according to surgical timing., Methods: This retrospective multicenter study evaluated patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer. Patients had undergone either primary debulking surgery, early interval debulking surgery after 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or delayed debulking surgery after 6 cycles, with minimal or no residual disease, between January 2008 and December 2015. Survival analyses were conducted using the Log-rank test and the Cox model. Cumulative incidences of the different patterns of recurrence were estimated using a competing risks methodology., Results: A total of 549 patients were included: 175 (31.9%) patients had primary, 224 (40.8%) early interval, and 150 (27.3%) delayed debulking surgery. The cumulative incidence of peritoneal recurrences at 2 years was higher with increasing neoadjuvant cycles (24.4%, 30.9% and 39.2%; p=0.019). For pleural or pulmonary recurrences, it was higher after early interval surgery (9.9%, 13.0% and 4.1%; p=0.022). Median post-relapse overall survival was 33.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) (24.3 to 44.2)), 26.8 months (95% CI (22.8 to 32.6)), and 24.5 months (95% CI (18.6 to 29.4)) for primary, early interval, and delayed debulking surgery groups, respectively (p=0.025). The pattern of recurrence in a lymph node (hazard ratio (HR) 0.42, 95% CI (0.27 to 0.64)), delayed surgery (HR 1.53, 95% CI (1.11 to 2.13)) and time to first recurrence (HR 0.95, 95% CI (0.93 to 0.96)) were associated with post-relapse overall survival. For primary and early interval surgery, lymph node recurrences were associated with significantly longer post-relapse overall survival., Conclusions: The pattern of first recurrence was associated with timing of surgery, with peritoneal recurrences being more frequent with the increasing number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Lymph node recurrences were associated with better prognosis, having higher post-relapse overall survival. This improved prognosis of lymphatic recurrences was not observed in patients who underwent delayed surgery., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: We sought to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy response score according to the number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, on disease-free survival and overall survival, in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer ineligible for primary debulking surgery., Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent 3-4 or 6 cycles of a platinum and taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by complete cytoreduction surgery (CC-0) or cytoreduction to minimal residual disease (CC-1), between January 2008 and December 2015, in four institutions. Disease-free survival and overall survival were assessed according to the histological response to chemotherapy defined by the validated chemotherapy response score., Results: A total of 365 patients were included: 219 (60.0%) received 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 146 (40.0%) had 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before cytoreductive surgery. There were no significant differences in early relapses, disease-free survival, and overall survival according to the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles. However, regardless of the number cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, persistent extensive histological disease (chemotherapy response score 1-2) was significantly associated with a higher peritoneal cancer index, minimal residual disease (CC-1), and early relapses. Median disease-free survival in patients with complete or near-complete response (score 3) was 28.3 months (95% CI 21.6 to 36.8), whereas it was 16.3 months in patients with chemotherapy response score 1-2 (95% CI 14.7 to 18.0, p<0.001)., Conclusion: In our cohort, the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles was not associated with disease-free survival or overall survival. Chemotherapy response score 3 improved oncological outcome regardless of the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The pre-operative differential diagnosis between a uterine leiomyoma and a sarcoma can be a challenge. Available diagnostic tools have difficulty distinguishing between the two pathologies., Primary Objective: Τo evaluate the possibility of a pre-operative pathological diagnosis of atypical uterine muscle tumors by vaginal ultrasound-guided biopsy (VUGB)., Study Hypothesis: Diagnostic performance of ultrasound-guided biopsy will be capable of differentiating a leiomyoma from a sarcoma with a sensitivity of >90%., Trial Design: A prospective multi-center interventional study will be performed at 10 tertiary French centers. Vaginal ultrasound Doppler examination and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging will be performed before surgery. VUGB will then be performed by a specialist radiologist. The biopsy will be obtained by performing transvaginal ultrasound under local anesthesia with lidocaine using a 16G needle. At least 4-5 specimens will be obtained in order to provide a histopathological diagnosis. All patients included in the study will be operated by laparotomy. All patients included in the study will be followed up for the subsequent 3 years according to their pathological results., Major Inclusion/exclusion Criteria: All patients >35 years old diagnosed with a suspicious uterine tumor will be included., Primary Endpoint: Sensitivity of VUGB on pathological diagnosis., Sample Size: Considering a sensitivity of 90% (H0) as acceptable and a sensitivity of 95% (H1) as excellent, a sample size of 250 evaluable patients will be necessary to achieve 80% statistical power with a 5% type 1 statistical error., Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting Results: Accrual will be completed in December 2024 with results presented in December 2029., Trial Registration: Institutional Review Board (Ethic Committee of Paris Ile de France 6) no 2018-A02343-52., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection has been shown to be accurate in detecting lymph node involvement in early-stage cervical cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of frozen section examination in the assessment of SLN status, with the aim of adequately driving the intra-operative decision., Methods: We designed a retrospective study including patients from two comprehensive cancer centers between January 2001 and December 2018 with early-stage cervical cancer (IA1-IB2 according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018) undergoing SLN dissection. The SLN procedure was performed using a cervical injection with technetium-99m combined with blue dye or indocyanine green in most cases., Results: A total of 176 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria. Bilateral mapping was detected in 153 (86.7%) of them. Nineteen of these patients (12.4%) had SLN involvement: 13 with macrometastases, three with micrometastases and three with isolated tumor cells (ITC). Macrometastatic disease was missed on frozen section in 3/13 FIGO 2018 stage IIIC patients. The three patients with ITC were also missed by frozen section examination.Considering only macrometastases as lymph node involvement, frozen section sensitivity was 76.9% (95% CI 49.7 to 91.8) and negative predictive value (NPV) was 97.9% (95% CI 94.0 to 99.3) in patients with bilateral detection. Including micrometastases, sensitivity was 81.2% (95% CI 57.0 to 93.4) and NPV remained at 97.9% (95% CI 93.9 to 99.3)., Conclusions: With a prevalence of final-stage IIIC in patients with pre-operative early-stage cervical cancer of the order of 10% in this series, the NPV of frozen section examination of SLN is very high, with an inferior limit of the CI superior to 94%. Diagnostic accuracy remains acceptable even if micrometastases are considered. The impact of missed ITC has not been established. Frozen section examination can be incorporated in the intra-operative decision algorithm., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Pelvic exenteration and its reconstructive techniques have been associated with high postoperative morbidity and a negative impact on patient quality of life. The aim of our study was to compare postoperative complications and quality of life in patients undergoing continent compared with non-continent urinary diversion after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies., Methods: We designed a multicenter study of patients from 10 centers who underwent an anterior or total pelvic exenteration with urinary reconstruction for histologically confirmed persistent or recurrent gynecologic malignancy after previous treatment with radiotherapy. From January 2005 to September 2008, we included patients retrospectively, and from September 2008 to May 2009, patients were included prospectively which allowed collection of quality of life data. Demographic, surgical, and follow-up data were analyzed. Postoperative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Quality of life was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-QLQ-C30 (V.3.0) and EORTC-QLQ-OV28 quality of life questionnaires. We compared patients who underwent a continent urinary diversion with those who underwent a non-continent reconstruction., Results: We included 148 patients, 92 retrospectively and 56 prospectively. Among them, 77.4% had recurrent disease and 22.6% persistent disease after the primary treatment. In 70 patients, a urinary continent diversion was performed, and 78 patients underwent a non-continent diversion. Median age of the continent and incontinent groups was 53.5 (range 33-78) years and 57 (26-79) years, respectively. There were no significant differences between the continent and non-continent groups in median length of hospitalization (28.5 vs 26 days, P=0.19), postoperative grade III-IV complications (42.9% vs 42.3%, P=0.95), complications needing surgical (27.9% vs 34.6%, P=0.39) or radiological (14.7% vs 12.8%, P=0.74) intervention, and complication type (digestive (23.2% vs 16.7%, P=0.32) and urinary (15.9% vs 16.7%, P=0.91)). There were no significant differences between the groups in global health, global quality of life, and body image perception scores 1 year after surgery., Conclusion: Continent and incontinent urinary reconstructions are equivalent in terms of postoperative complications and quality of life scores., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Primary cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy has been considered standard management for patients with advanced ovarian cancer over decades. An alternative approach of interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy was subsequently reported by two randomized phase III trials (EORTC-GCG, CHORUS), which were criticized owing to important limitations, especially regarding the rate of complete resection., Primary Objective: To clarify the optimal timing of surgical therapy in advanced ovarian cancer., Study Hypothesis: Primary cytoreductive surgery is superior to interval cytoreductive surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for overall survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer., Trial Design: TRUST is an international open, randomized, controlled multi-center trial investigating overall survival after primary cytoreductive surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent interval cytoreductive surgery in patients with FIGO stage IIIB-IVB ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma. To guarantee adequate surgical quality, participating centers need to fulfill specific quality assurance criteria (eg, ≥50% complete resection rate in upfront surgery for FIGO IIIB-IVB patients, ≥36 debulking-surgeries/year) and agree to independent audits by TRUST quality committee delegates. Patients in the primary cytoreductive surgery arm undergo surgery followed by 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, whereas patients in the interval cytoreductive surgery arm undergo 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy after histologic confirmation of the disease, followed by interval cytoreductive surgery and subsequently, 3 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. The intention of surgery for both groups is complete tumor resection according to guideline recommendations., Major Inclusion/exclusion Criteria: Major inclusion criteria are suspected or histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube carcinoma, or primary peritoneal carcinoma FIGO stage IIIB-IVB (IV only if resectable metastasis). Major exclusion criteria are non-epithelial ovarian malignancies and borderline tumors; prior chemotherapy for ovarian cancer; or abdominal/pelvic radiotherapy., Primary Endpoint: Overall survival., Sample Size: 772 patients., Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting Results: Accrual completion approximately mid-2019, results are expected after 5 years' follow-up in 2024., Trial Registration: NCT02828618., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AdB reports personal fees from Roche, Astra Zeneca, BIOCAD, Genmab, Clovis, Tesaro, PharmaMar, Pfizer, outside the submitted work. PH reports grants and personal fees from Astra Zeneca, Roche, Tesaro, Public funding (ASCO, DKH, DFG), personal fees from Sotio, Stryker, Zai Lab, MSD, Clovis, Immunogen, grants from GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medac, Genmab, outside the submitted work. CF reports personal fees from Roche, Tesaro, Astra Zeneca, Olympus, Ethicon, outside the submitted work. A Reinthaller reports research grants from Roche; honoraria as a speaker and for advisory boards from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, MSD, PharmaMar, Roche, Tesaro, Vifor Pharma; travel expenses from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, PharmaMar, Roche, Tesaro. FH reports personal fees from Astra Zeneca, Roche, PharmaMar, Tesaro, Clovis, outside the submitted work. DSC reports personal fees from Bovie Medical Co., Verthermia Inc. (now Apyx Medical Corp.), C Surgeries, Biom ‘Up, other from Intuitive Surgical, Inc., TransEnterix, Inc., outside the submitted work. SM reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Medac, MSD, PharmaMar, Roche, Tesaro, Teva, personal fees from Clovis, Novartis, Olympus Europa, Sensor Kinesis, outside the submitted work., (© IGCS and ESGO 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to document the need of including the perigastric area when performing omentectomy in patients with stage III to IV serous epithelial ovarian tumors., Patients and Methods: Patients undergoing omentectomy in the setting of surgery for advanced epithelial serous ovarian cancer between February and September 2015 were included. Patients with macroscopic involvement of the perigastric area, nonepithelial serous tumors, and recurrences of ovarian cancer were excluded. The perigastric area was isolated and comprehensively processed for pathological examination., Results: Twenty-four patients were included. Six patients underwent primary debulking surgery, and 18 patients underwent an interval debulking surgery. The mean number of pathologic blocks in the perigastric area was 24 (range, 8-41). Microscopic involvement of the perigastric omentum area was found in 62.5% of the cases. One patient had a low-grade serous carcinoma, with microscopic involvement of the perigastric area. Among the 23 patients with a high-grade serous carcinoma, 10 (83%) of 12 patients with a gross involvement of the rest of the omentum had a microscopic involvement of the perigastric area. The presence of microscopic disease in the perigastric arcade was found in 4 (36.3%) of 11 patients with a macroscopically normal omentum., Conclusions: In this study, evidence is given that total omentectomy including the perigastric area is a necessary component of complete cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer, whatever the macroscopic appearance of the omentum.

Recently, there has been an intense discussion about the issue of fibroid and uterine morcellation in relation to the risk of unrecognized uterine sarcoma spread. Morcellation can negatively influence the prognosis of patients, and transecting the specimen into pieces prevents the pathologist from performing proper disease staging. Many societies have published their statements regarding this issue. The European Society for Gynecological Oncology has established a working group of clinicians involved in diagnostics and treatment of oncogynecological patients to provide a statement from the oncological point of view. Leiomyosarcomas and undifferentiated endometrial sarcomas have generally dismal prognosis, whereas low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas and adenosarcomas have variable prognosis based on their stage. A focus on the detection of patients at risk of having a sarcoma should be mandatory before every surgery where morcellation is planned by evaluation of risk factors (African American descent, previous pelvic irradiation, use of tamoxifen, rapid lesion growth particularly in postmenopausal patients) and exclusion of patients with any suspicious ultrasonographic signs. Preoperative endometrial biopsy should be mandatory, although the sensitivity to detect sarcomas is low. An indication for myomectomy should be used only in patients with pregnancy plans; otherwise en bloc hysterectomy is preferred in both symptomatic and postmenopausal patients. Eliminating the technique of morcellation could lead to an increased morbidity in low-risk patients; therefore, after thorough preoperative evaluation and discussion with patients, morcellation still has its place in the armamentarium of gynecologic surgery.

Objective: Robotic surgical techniques are known to be expensive, but they can decrease the cost of hospitalization and improve patients' outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the costs and clinical outcomes of conventional laparoscopy vs robotic-assisted laparoscopy in the gynecologic oncologic indications., Methods: Between 2007 and 2010, 312 patients referred for gynecologic oncologic indications (endometrial and cervical cancer), including 226 who underwent conventional laparoscopy and 80 who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopy, were included in this prospective multicenter study. The direct costs, operating theater costs, and hospital costs were calculated for both surgical strategies using the microcosting method., Results: Based on an average number of 165 surgical cases performed per year with the robot, the total extra cost of using the robot was €1456 per intervention. The robot-specific costs amounted to €2213 per intervention, and the cost of the robot-specific surgical supplies was €957 per intervention. The cost of the surgical supplies specifically required by conventional laparoscopy amounted to €1432, which is significantly higher than that of the robotic supplies (P < 0.001). Hospital costs were lower in the case of the robotic strategy (€2380 vs €2841, P < 0.001) because these patients spent less time in intensive care (0.38 vs 0.85 days). Operating theater costs were higher in the case of the robotic strategy (€1490 vs €1311, P = 0.0004) because the procedure takes longer to perform (4.98 hours vs 4.38 hours)., Conclusions: The main driver of additional costs is the fixed cost of the robot, which is not compensated by the lower hospital room costs. The robot would be more cost-effective if robotic interventions were performed on a larger number of patients per year or if the purchase price of the robot was reduced. A shorter learning curve would also no doubt decrease the operating theater costs, resulting in financial benefits to society.

Objectives: To perform a cartography of lymph node metastases in epithelial ovarian cancer and to determine predictive factors of lymph node metastases., Method: The charts of 355 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent lymphadenectomy during a primary (n = 252) or secondary debulking surgery (n = 103) were analyzed. The topography of the lymph node metastases was notified for the whole group according to the stage of the disease, the histological type, and the moment of surgery. In patients who underwent a primary surgery before chemotherapy, independent prognostic variables for the risk of lymph node involvement were tested with a multivariate analysis. Independent prognostic factors were combined to determine risk profiles in individual patients., Results: The main area of the lymph node metastases was para-aortic. Isolated pelvic lymph node involvement was 10%. Three variables independently predicted lymph node invasion: advanced T stage, high-risk histological profile, and metastases., Conclusions: When lymphadenectomy is recommended, systematic lymph node dissections in the aortic and pelvic areas are warranted. An isolated pelvic lymph node assessment, particularly in the early stages, is inappropriate. By combining independent risk factors, a useful tool for individual risk assessment of lymph node involvement could be established, helping to decide whether to perform a lymph node dissection, especially at restaging surgery.