Search

Epistaxis is common, impacting more than half the population, and can require procedural intervention in approximately 10% of cases. With an aging population and increasing use of antiplatelets and anticoagulants, severe epistaxis is likely to increase in frequency significantly over the next two decades. Sphenopalatine artery embolization is rapidly becoming the most common type of procedural intervention. The efficacy of endovascular embolization is dependent on a refined understanding of the anatomy and collateral physiology of this circulation as well as the impact of temporizing measures such as nasal packing and inflation of a nasal balloon. Likewise, safety is dependent on a detailed appreciation of collateralization with the internal carotid artery and ophthalmic artery. Cone beam CT imaging has the resolution to enable a clear visualization of the anatomy and collateral circulation associated with the arterial supply to the nasal cavity, in addition to assisting with hemorrhage localization. We present a review of epistaxis treatment, a detailed description of anatomic and physiologic considerations informed by cone beam CT imaging, and a proposed protocol for sphenopalatine embolization for which there is currently no standard.

BackgroundCerebral aneurysm rupture is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Detecting aneurysms at high risk of rupture is critical in management decision making. Rupture risk has traditionally been associated with size—measured as a maximum dimension. However, aneurysms are morphologically dynamic, a characteristic ignored by large prospective aneurysm risk studies. Manual measurement is challenging and fraught with error. We used an artificial intelligence (AI) measurement tool to study aneurysms that ruptured during conservative management to detect changes in size not appreciated by manual linear measurement.MethodsA single practice database with >5000 aneurysms was queried. Patients followed conservatively for an unruptured aneurysm were identified using appropriate diagnosis codes. This cohort was screened for subsequent rupture using procedure codes. Only patients with two vascular imaging studies before rupture were included.ResultsFive patients met the criteria. All patients had aneurysm enlargement, two of which were not detected from manual linear measurements, including adjudication and analysis, during a multidisciplinary neurovascular conference in a high volume practice. Maximum dimension increased at a minimum of 1.8% (range 1.8–63.3%) from the first scan to the last, and aneurysm volume increased at a minimum of 5.9% (5.9–385.5%), highlighting the importance of volumetric measurement.ConclusionsAI-enabled volumetric measurements are more sensitive to changes in size and detected enlargement in all aneurysms that ruptured during conservative management. This finding has major implications for clinical practice and methods used for interval aneurysm measurement in patients being conservatively followed.