1. Expanding laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy to pancreatic-head and periampullary malignancy: major findings based on systematic review and meta-analysis
- Author
-
Yu Pan, Xian-Fa Wang, Ke Chen, Hendi Maher, and Xiao-long Liu
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Ampulla of Vater ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Common Bile Duct Neoplasms ,Operative Time ,Blood Loss, Surgical ,030230 surgery ,Adenocarcinoma ,Malignancy ,Gastroenterology ,Pancreaticoduodenectomy ,03 medical and health sciences ,Pancreatic Fistula ,0302 clinical medicine ,Postoperative Complications ,Statistical significance ,Internal medicine ,hemic and lymphatic diseases ,medicine ,Humans ,lcsh:RC799-869 ,Laparoscopy ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,General Medicine ,Hepatology ,Length of Stay ,medicine.disease ,Survival Analysis ,Pancreatic Neoplasms ,Meta-analysis ,Pancreatic fistula ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Lymphatic Metastasis ,lcsh:Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology ,Morbidity ,business ,Research Article - Abstract
Background Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) remains to be established as a safe and effective alternative to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) for pancreatic-head and periampullary malignancy. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare LPD with OPD for these malignancies regarding short-term surgical and long-term survival outcomes. Methods A literature search was conducted before March 2018 to identify comparative studies in regard to outcomes of both LPD and OPD for the treatment of pancreatic-head and periampullary malignancies. Morbidity, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), mortality, operative time, estimated blood loss, hospitalization, retrieved lymph nodes, and survival outcomes were compared. Results Among eleven identified studies, 1196 underwent LPD, and 8247 were operated through OPD. The pooled data showed that LPD was associated with less morbidity (OR = 0.57, 95%CI: 0.41~ 0.78, P
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF