Search

Abstract Introduction Antigen identification impacts diagnosis as well as prognosis in patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis. An antigen may also be present in other etiologies of interstitial lung disease, however it is unknown whether identification impacts survival. Methods We evaluated a retrospective cohort in order to determine if antigen identification affects transplant free survival in patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, connective tissue disease interstitial lung disease, and interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features. Only patients with definite or high probability of hypersensitivity pneumonitis by American Thoracic Society guidelines were included in the analysis. Results Transplant free survival was improved with antigen identification in patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis but not in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, connective tissue disease interstitial lung disease, and interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features. Conclusion Our study suggests that removal of identified antigen in interstitial lung diseases other than hypersensitivity pneumonitis may not be impactful. Additionally, it further suggests that definitive diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis with bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial biopsy may be beneficial prior to recommending antigen removal.

Abstract Background The distinction between hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) was thought to be important due to the difference in mortality between the conditions as well as the response to treatment. However, recent work suggests that the clinical diagnosis may matter less than certain radiographic features, namely usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether radiographic honeycombing is more predictive of transplant-free survival (TFS) than other clinical, radiographic, or histologic findings that distinguish HP from IPF in the current guidelines and to evaluate the impact of radiographic honeycombing on the efficacy of immunosuppression in fibrotic HP. Methods We retrospectively identified IPF and fibrotic HP patients evaluated between 2003 and 2019. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was performed for patients with fibrotic HP and IPF to evaluate TFS. To assess the impact of treatment with immunosuppression on TFS in fibrotic HP, a cox proportional hazard model adjusted for known predictors of survival in HP including age, gender, and baseline pulmonary function testing results was constructed, and p-interaction for the presence of honeycombing on high resolution computed tomography and use of immunosuppression was calculated. Results Our cohort included 178 with IPF and 198 with fibrotic HP. In a multivariable analysis, the presence of honeycombing had a greater impact on the TFS than the diagnosis of HP vs. IPF. Among the criteria used in the HP diagnostic guidelines, only typical HP scan impacted survival in a multivariable model, while identification of antigen and surgical lung biopsy findings had no impact on survival. We identified a trend toward worse survival on immunosuppression in those with HP with radiographic honeycombing. Conclusion Our data suggests that honeycombing and baseline pulmonary function testing have a greater impact on TFS than the clinical diagnosis of IPF vs. fibrotic HP and that radiographic honeycombing is a predictor of poor TFS in fibrotic HP. We suggest that invasive diagnostic testing including surgical lung biopsy may not be useful in predicting mortality in HP patients with honeycombing and may potentially increase risk of immunosuppression.