Search

Abstract Background Hepatic insulin clearance (HIC) is an important pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). HIC was reported to decrease in patients with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. HIC is originally calculated by post-load insulin and C-peptide from the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). However, OGTT or meal tolerance tests are a burden for patients, and OGTT is not suitable for overt diabetes due to the risk of hyperglycemia. If we can calculate the HIC from the fasting state, it is preferable. We hypothesized that fasting HIC correlates with postprandial HIC in both participants with T2DM and without diabetes. We investigated whether fasting HIC correlates with postprandial HIC in overt T2DM and nondiabetes subjects (non-DM) evaluated by using glucose clamp and meal load. Methods We performed a meal tolerance test and hyperinsulinemic–euglycemic clamp in 70 subjects, 31 patients with T2DM and 39 non-DM subjects. We calculated the postprandial C-peptide AUC-to-insulin AUC ratio as the postprandial HIC and the fasting C-peptide-to-insulin ratio as the fasting HIC. We also calculated whole-body insulin clearance from the glucose clamp test. Results The fasting HIC significantly correlated with postprandial HIC in T2DM (r_S = 0.82, P

Abstract Background Hemodynamic stabilization is a core component in the resuscitation of septic shock. However, the optimal target blood pressure remains debatable. Previous randomized controlled trials suggested that uniformly adopting a target mean arterial pressure (MAP) higher than 65 mmHg for all adult septic shock patients would not be beneficial; however, it has also been proposed that higher target MAP may be beneficial for elderly patients, especially those with arteriosclerosis. Methods A multicenter, pragmatic single-blind randomized controlled trial will be conducted to compare target MAP of 80–85 mmHg (high-target) and 65–70 mmHg (control) in the resuscitation of septic shock patients admitted to 28 hospitals in Japan. Patients with septic shock aged ≥65 years are randomly assigned to the high-target or control groups. The target MAP shall be maintained for 72 h after randomization or until vasopressors are no longer needed to improve patients’ condition. To minimize the adverse effects related to catecholamines, if norepinephrine dose of ≥ 0.1 μg/kg/min is needed to maintain the target MAP, vasopressin will be initiated. Other therapeutic approaches, including fluid administration, hydrocortisone use, and antibiotic choice, will be determined by the physician in charge based on the latest clinical guidelines. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at 90 days after randomization. Discussion The result of this trial will provide great insight on the resuscitation strategy for septic shock in the era of global aged society. Also, it will provide the better understanding on the importance of individualized treatment strategy in hemodynamic management in critically ill patients. Trial registration UMIN Clinical Trials Registry; UMIN000041775. Registered 13 September 2020.

Abstract Background Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4i) is an effective medicine for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Some articles reported DPP4i improves insulin secretion and insulin resistance. However, these effects are not well established by glucose clamp test and test meal in Japanese. We investigated the effect of DPP4i on insulin resistance and insulin secretion by using the glucose clamp test and meal tolerance test (MTT). Methods We performed a MTT, and the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp in 8 Japanese patients with T2DM. This study was a single-arm study. We measured fasting and postprandial glucose, insulin, incretins, and glucagon levels. We also measured serum adiponectin levels. Results HbA1c was significantly decreased after 3 months. The fasting and postprandial glucose levels were significantly decreased. Fasting and postprandial insulin levels were not changed. The insulin resistance derived from the glucose clamp test was significantly improved. HOMA-IR was not significantly changed. GLP-1 and GIP were significantly increased but glucagon did not change. Adiponectin was not significantly changed. Conclusions Although the number of patients was very small, these results suggested that DPP4i treatment might improve insulin resistance without changing insulin secretion.