1. Validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events
- Author
-
Shan-Shan Yang, Lei Chen, Ying Liu, Hai-Jun Lu, Bo-Jie Huang, Ai-Hua Lin, Ying Sun, Jun Ma, Fang-Yun Xie, and Yan-Ping Mao
- Subjects
Patient-reported outcomes ,PRO-CTCAE ,Chinese ,Validity ,Reliability ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,RC254-282 - Abstract
Abstract Background The psychometric properties of the simplified Chinese version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) have not been assessed. Therefore, we aimed to assess its validity, reliability, and responsiveness. Patients and methods A Chinese version of the PRO-CTCAE and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) were distributed to 1580 patients from four cancer hospitals in China. Validity assessments included construct validity, measured by Pearson’s correlations and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and known-groups validity, measured by t-tests. The assessment of reliability included internal consistency, measured by Cronbach’s ɑ, and test-retest reliability, measured by the intraclass correlation (ICC). Responsiveness was assessed by standardized response means (SRMs). Results Data from 1555 patients who completed the instruments were analyzed. The correlations were high between PRO-CTCAE items and parallel QLQ-C30 symptom scales (r > 0.60, p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF