Search

Aim: To examine the usefulness of dual-phase 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET) for the evaluation of thyroid incidentalomas., Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, cases with focal thyroid lesions seen incidentally at FDG PET in which the histopathological diagnosis was available and in which dual-phase FDG PET imaging was performed at 1 and 2 h after FDG injection were reviewed. In the included cases, the 1 and 2 h maximal standard uptake value (1-hour maximal SUV and 2-hour maximal SUV, respectively) and retention index (RI) were calculated, and the differences between benign and malignant thyroid incidentalomas were analysed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the ability of 1-hour maximal SUV, 2-hour maximal SUV, and RI to discriminate benign from malignant lesions., Results: A total of 39 patients (25 females, 14 males) with 45 lesions (17 malignant, 28 benign) were included. In malignant thyroid incidentalomas, the average 1-hour maximal SUV, 2-hour maximal SUV, and RI were 5.20, 5.72, and 7.67%, respectively, and in benign thyroid incidentalomas the values were 4.67, 4.97, and 7.38%, respectively. There were no significant differences in 1-hour maximal SUV, 2-hour maximal SUV, and RI between benign and malignant lesions. The area under the ROC curve did not differ from 0.5., Conclusion: Dual-phase FDG PET is not useful for differentiating benign from malignant thyroid incidentalomas., (2011 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: The accuracy of bone scintigraphy in diagnosing symptomatic accessory navicular bones has not been well studied. We conducted a retrospective study to explore the results and use of scintigraphy in symptomatic and asymptomatic accessory navicular bones., Materials and Methods: Thirteen patients with a total of 13 symptomatic and 10 asymptomatic accessory navicular bones were included in the study. We used a scoring system to grade the scintigraphic abnormalities. The patients' symptoms and scintigraphic findings were recorded., Results: Though focally increased radiopharmaceutical uptake was observed in all symptomatic accessory naviculars, half of the asymptomatic accessory navicular bones had the same manifestations. The scoring system was of no value in differentiating symptomatic from asymptomatic accessory navicular bones., Conclusion: Bone scintigraphy is a sensitive but not a specific tool for diagnosing a symptomatic accessory navicular., (Copyright 2000 The Royal College of Radiologists.)