Search

Background: Failed restorations in primary teeth are not always re-restored. Is re-restoration not required anymore?, Objective: To compare survival rates of primary molars with intact and defective amalgam and ART restorations., Methods: A total of 649 restored primary molars, of which 162 were assessed with defective restorations for mechanical reasons, from a cluster-randomised controlled clinical trial, were followed up over a period of 3.5 years. Restored primary molars, extracted because of dental sepsis or toothache, were considered a failure. Primary molars with defective restorations were followed up from the time they were assessed defective. Data were analysed using PHREG model with frailty correction, Wald test, t-test, and jackknife procedure., Results: The survival rate of primary molars with intact restorations (96.3%) was statistically significantly higher than that of primary molars with defective restorations (75.9%) over a 3-year period (P < 0.0001). Neither the effect of treatment protocol (amalgam or ART) (P = 0.05) nor the type of surface (single or multiple) (P = 0.73) was observed with respect to the survival rate of restored primary molars., Conclusions: Survival rates for primary molars with intact and defective amalgam and ART restorations were high. The 3-year survival rate of primary molars with intact restorations was significantly higher than that of primary molars with defective restorations., (© 2015 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aim:   To compare the effect of several materials on the attachment of periodontal ligament (PDL) fibroblasts to experimentally perforated root surfaces., Methodology:   Root specimens (size 5 × 5 mm) were obtained from extracted human molar teeth and perforations with a 1 mm diameter were created. One group was kept as a control and the rest were repaired with the following materials: Amalgam, Dyract, IRM, Super Bond C&B and Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). PDL fibroblasts were placed at a density of 8 × 10(4) cells on the root specimens, incubated on tissue culture inserts (48 h) and then transferred to 48 well-plates. MTT assays were performed at 48 and 96 h for PDL fibroblast survival. Cell attachment was observed using confocal microscopy on days 2 and 5. Total RNAs from the root specimens were isolated on day 5 and type I collagen (COL I) and Runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) mRNA expressions were checked using Quantitative-Polymerase Chain Reaction (QPCR). For the MTT assay and QPCR, one-way analysis of variance (anova) and Tukey HSD multiple comparison tests were used to compare the groups., Results: Mineral trioxide aggregate resulted in a significantly higher cell density (P < 0.001). Dyract, IRM and Super Bond C&B groups had a lower cell density when compared with the control and MTA groups at 48 h (P < 0.001). Confocal microscopy revealed that, among the experimental groups, the MTA group had the largest viable cell population over the restoration site when compared with the other materials; however, reduced cell attachment was noted in all groups when compared with the control. Increased Runx2 mRNA expressions were noted in MTA (P < 0.001) and IRM (P < 0.01) groups when compared with control and other tested materials. COL I transcripts were increased in IRM (P < 0.01), D, C&B and MTA (P < 0.001) when compared with the control., Conclusion: Mineral trioxide aggregate provided a more favorable environment for PDL cell adhesion and growth., (© 2011 International Endodontic Journal.)

The aim of the current investigation was to compare the marginal adaptation and internal porosity of a gallium (Ga)-based alloy (Galloy) with a high copper amalgam (Permite C DP) when used in moderately sized conventional class II cavities. Ten dentists placed two restorations of each material in standardized class II cavities in typodont teeth set in a phantom head. The proximal surfaces of the restored teeth were subsequently examined using an optical microscope and colour photographs were taken. The teeth were then serially sectioned before being re-examined microscopically and re-photographed. Three dentists rated the photographs of the restorations on two occasions, 2 weeks apart, for marginal adaptation and internal porosity using a six and five point scoring criteria, respectively. Inter- and intra-examiner agreements were assessed with weighted kappa statistics. The Ga-based alloy exhibited inferior marginal adaptation and a significantly higher level of porosity and internal defects compared with the dental amalgam. Marginal defects were mainly concentrated at the gingival third of the proximal boxes for both alloys. The poor marginal adaptation and extensive internal porosity detected for the Ga-based alloy was attributed to the difficulty in the alloy condensation related mainly to the 'stickiness' of the alloy to the condensers and to the rapid change in the plasticity of the alloy during condensation. This could possibly be a factor in the post-operative complications reported with the clinical use of this alloy.

This study assessed in vitro marginal leakage of class V cavities prepared by turbine and Er:YAG laser and restored with different materials. Sixty cavities with enamel and dentine margins were prepared and assigned to six groups: I, II, III by turbine and IV, V, VI by Er:YAG laser. The following restorative systems were used: groups I and IV: Bond 1 + Alert; II and V: Fuji II LC; III and VI: SBMP + Dispersalloy. After finishing, specimens were thermocycled for 8 h and 45 min (500 cycles), isolated, immersed in a 0.2% Rhodamine B solution, sectioned oro-facially and analysed for leakage. The dye penetration means (%) were: occlusal I: 10.09 (+/- 21.28), II: 3.25 (+/- 10.27), III: 0, IV: 41.77 (+/- 42.48), V: 23.37 (+/- 33.79), VI: 12.66 (+/- 24.06); cervical I: 16.49 (+/- 26.67), II: 4.34 (+/- 13.71), III: 0, IV: 37.71 (+/- 30.47), V: 39.56 (+/- 43.35) and VI: 72.53 (+/- 37.79). The use of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation yielded higher degree of marginal leakage, as compared with the use of conventional air-turbine. The enamel interface provided better marginal sealing, comparing with dentine/cementum margin. As to the cavity preparation device (i.e. laser or bur), the analysis of the results showed that bonded amalgam and Fuji II LC provided less infiltration, than Alert. On the other hand, for lased cavities, Alert provided the best results, similar to those of Fuji II LC and superior to those reached by bonded amalgam.

The short-term tissue responses to two potential root-end filling materials, a light-cured glass ionomer cement (Vitrebond) and a reinforced zinc oxide-eugenol cement (Kalzinol), were compared with that to amalgam using a previously devised experimental model. In 24 premolar teeth of beagle dogs (47 roots), a collection of endodontic pathogenic bacteria was first inoculated into the root canals to induce periradicular lesions. On each root, an apicoectomy was performed and root-end cavities prepared to receive fillings of each material. The teeth and surrounding jaw were removed after 2 weeks (23 roots) and 1 week (24 roots); they were then prepared for histological examination. The tissue response to amalgam fillings after 2 weeks and 1 week was marked by moderate or severe inflammation on all roots, and extended to < or = 0.5 mm or > 0.5 mm in 15 out of 16 roots. In contrast, after 2 weeks, the majority of roots filled with Kalzinol showed little or moderate inflammation, while the tissue response to Vitrebond was the best of the three materials, and was also the least extensive. After 1 week, the overall best tissue response was with Vitrebond, followed by Kalzinol. The differences between materials for both time periods with either none or few inflammatory cells when compared with that with either moderate or severe inflammation were not statistically significant (P < 0.02). However, the differences between materials for both time periods with no inflammation or inflammation extending < 0.2 mm when compared with that with inflammation extending > 0.2 mm (< or = 0.5 mm or > 0.5 mm) were statistically significant (P < 0.01). Apart from amalgam, in which healing was marked by the persistence of a localized focus of inflammation adjacent to the root-end filling, even though there were intersample variations, there was little overall difference in the temporal and qualitative healing response to Vitrebond and Kalzinol. Both Vitrebond and Kalzinol have potential as root-end filling materials, as the tissue response was considerably more favourable than that to amalgam even in the short-term.

The 4-year evaluation of a randomized controlled clinical trial to the functioning of Extensive Amalgam Restorations (EAR) is reported. In this trial 300 EAR were made by three operators on molar teeth. Five different auxiliary retention methods were used to retain these restorations. In the evaluation a differentiation in 'absolute' and 'relative' failures was made. After 4 years seven absolute failures (EAR dislodged or removed) were encountered (2%). When relative failures (endodontic treatment or restoration at margin) are also taken into account the number of failures increased to 31 (10%). Due to the low number of failures, no significant influences from experimental variables (c.q. retention method or operator) could be detected. It may be concluded that the results of this interim analysis of the clinical functioning of EAR are promising. It is thought that careful evaluation of cusp strength and reducing weak cusps diminishes clinical failure and as a result, it is not necessary to protect an EAR with a cast restoration in the first 4 years of its clinical life.