Search

Patients and Methods: A longitudinal study was carried out in 255 children from 10 centres in nine developing countries over 5 years to assess the musculoskeletal outcome of children on episodic factor replacement. Outcome was documented by assessment of the annual joint bleeding rate (AJBR), WFH clinical and Pettersson radiological joint scores as well as the FISH score for activities. Of the 203 patients for whom data was available at the end of 5 years, 164 who had received only episodic treatment are included in this report., Results: The median age at the beginning of the study was 10 years (IQR 7-12). The median clotting factor concentrate (CFC) usage was 662 IU kg -1 year -1 (IQ range: 280-1437). The median AJBR was 10 (IQ range: 5-17). The median AJBR was higher in the older children with the median being 5 for the 5 year old child, while it was 9 for the 10 year old and 11 for children older than 15. Given the episodic nature of the replacement therapy, those with a higher AJBR used significantly greater annual CFC doses (P < 0.001); The median change in WFH clinical score and Pettersson radiological score over the 5 years was 0.4/year for each, while the FISH deteriorated at a rate of 0.2/year with poor correlation of these changes with CFC dose. WFH and FISH scores were significantly worse in those with an AJBR of >3 per year (P = 0.001). The change in the Pettersson score was significantly more in those with an AJBR of >5 per year (P = 0.020). Significant changes in FISH scores were only noted after 10 years of age., Conclusion: Episodic CFC replacement over a large range of doses does not alter the natural course of bleeding in haemophilia or the musculoskeletal deterioration and should not be recommended as a long term option for treatment. Prophylaxis is the only way to preserve musculoskeletal function in haemophilia., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: This study was undertaken to determine the correlation between the radiological changes in haemophilic arthropathy [X-ray, Ultrasound (US) and MRI] and clinical assessment as determined by the Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS); and to document the US and MRI changes in joints that appear normal on plain X-ray and clinical evaluation., Materials and Methods: Of 55 study joints (22 knees and 33 ankles) in 51 patients with haemophilia/von Willebrand disease, with a median age of 15 years (range: 5-17) were assessed using X-rays (Pettersson score) and clinical examination (HJHS) at two centres (Toronto, Canada; Vellore, India). MRI and ultrasonographic scoring was done through a consensus assessment by imagers at both centres using the IPSG MRI and US scores., Results: The HJHS had a good correlation with the Pettersson score (r s = 0.66). Though the HJHS had moderate correlation with the osteochondral component of the MRI and US scores (r s 0.51, 0.45 respectively), its correlation with the soft tissue component was poor (r s 0.19; 0.26 respectively). Of the 18 joints with a Pettersson score of zero, 88.9% had changes that were detected clinically by the HJHS. Osteochondral abnormalities were identified in 38.9% of these joints by the MRI, while US images of the same joints were deemed abnormal in 83.3% by the current criteria. US identified haemosiderin and other soft tissue changes in all of the joints, while the same changes were noted in 94.4% of these joints on MRI. There were four joints with a HJHS of zero, all of which had soft tissue changes on MRI (score 1-7) and US (score 2-7). Osteochondral changes were detected in three of these joints by US and in 2 by MRI. There were four joints with an MRI score of 0-1 that had significant US scores (3-5) and HJHS scores (0-6)., Conclusion: US and MRI are able to identify pathological changes in joints with normal X-ray imaging and clinical examination. However, further studies are required to be able to differentiate early abnormalities from normal. Clinical (HJHS) and radiological assessment (US/MRI) provide complimentary information and should be considered conjointly in the assessment of early joint arthropathy., (© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Assessment of musculoskeletal function in individuals with haemophilia has been attempted with clinimetric instruments, which use predetermined domains for assessing the same. This study introduces the application of an instrument, the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), which is an open-ended questionnaire that allows patients to prioritize their needs and rate their performance in different tasks of daily living as well as their satisfaction in performing them. To study the utility of COPM in evaluating the musculoskeletal functional status of patients with haemophilia and to assess its effectiveness in planning individualized management plans for them. COPM was administered to 67 individuals with haemophilia aged 10-55 years and the data were compared with functional deficits identified through FISH (Functional Independence Score for Haemophilia). A total of 31 performance difficulties in the areas of self-care (62%), productivity (21%) and leisure (17%) were identified by COPM. All eight domains of FISH were identified in COPM as problems in self-care. In addition to these, COPM identified problems in the areas of productivity and leisure. In 78% of the responses on COPM, there was concordance between the performance and satisfaction scores. However, there was discordance between the two in the remaining 22% of responses. COPM is a useful tool for assessment of musculoskeletal dysfunction in haemophilia. It provides a greater insight into the needs of each patient and helps in planning individualized intervention strategies., (© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Joint morbidity in haemophilia has traditionally been measured using clinical and radiological scores. There have been no reliable, validated tools for the assessment of functional independence in persons with haemophilia till recently. The Functional Independence Score in Haemophilia (FISH) has been developed as a performance based assessment tool to address this need. The FISH is designed to measure the patient's independence in performing activities of daily living (grooming and eating, bathing and dressing), transfers (chair and floor), and mobility (walking, step climbing and running). On assessment of its psychometric properties in 63 patients with haemophilia (mean age 14 years), FISH was found to have good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.85). It had moderate correlation with the World Federation of Hemophilia clinical score (r = -0.61), and a correlation with the Pettersson score of -0.38. It had good correlation with other self-rated functional scores, such as the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (r = -0.75); the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (r = -0.66) and the Haemophilia Activities List (HAL) (r = -0.66). It had good reliability with a pooled intra class correlation of 0.98. On assessing responsiveness following treatment of flexion deformities of the knee in 12 patients, the FISH showed significant changes in the score with a standardized responsiveness mean of -1.93. In conclusion, the FISH was found to be a reliable and valid tool with good internal consistency and responsiveness to therapy, for the assessment of functional independence in persons with haemophilia.

Assessment of impairment and function is essential in order to monitor joint status and evaluate therapeutic interventions in patients with haemophilia. The improvements in the treatment of haemophilia have required the development of more sensitive tools to detect the more minor dysfunctions that may now be apparent. This paper outlines some of the recent developments in this field. The Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) provides a systematic and robust measure of joint impairment. The MRI Scoring System has been designed to provide a comprehensive scoring system combining both progressive and additive scales. The Functional Independence Score for Haemophilia (FISH) has been developed to assess performance of functional activities and can be used in conjunction with the Haemophilia Activities List (HAL) which provides a self report measure of function. It is recommended that both measures are evaluated as these tools measure different constructs. Further refinement and testing of the psychometric properties of all of these tools is in progress. More widespread use of these tools will enable the sharing of data across the world so promoting best practice and ultimately enhancing patient care.

Morbidity in haemophilia has been described predominantly in terms of musculoskeletal dysfunction and assessed by the clinical and radiological joint scores. These scores document changes in a particular joint, but do not reflect the impact of these changes on the individual in terms of his overall musculoskeletal function. Several self-assessment instruments have been used to measure musculoskeletal function but none have been specifically validated for use in haemophilia. In order to objectively assess musculoskeletal function of patients with haemophilia, we developed Functional Independence Score in Hemophilia (FISH), a performance-based instrument. FISH measures the patient's independence in performing seven activities under three categories: self-care (grooming and eating, bathing and dressing), transfers (chair and floor) and mobility (walking and step climbing). Each function is graded from 1 to 4 depending on the amount of assistance needed in performing the function. We evaluated 35 patients who were over 10 years old and had had at least three major bleeds per year. All subjects were scored for clinical (World Federation of Hemophilia, WFH score) and radiological changes (Pettersson's score). Functional independence of the patient was assessed using the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and the FISH. Correlation of the FISH score was modest with both the WFH clinical score (r = -0.68) and the radiological score (r = -0.44). While there was good correlation between FISH and HAQ (r = -0.90), FISH had better internal consistency than HAQ (Cronbach's alpha 0.83 vs. 0.66). FISH appears to be a promising disease-specific instrument for assessing overall musculoskeletal function in haemophilia. It requires evaluation in different patient populations.

Severe haemophilia (factor [F]VIII/FIX activity < 0.01 IU mL(-1)) is characterized by repeated haemarthroses resulting in severe arthropathy in adulthood. In 1958, Professor Nilsson in Sweden introduced prophylactic infusions with clotting factor concentrates at regular intervals in order to maintain clotting factor levels above 0.01 IU mL(-1) and to prevent bleeding. Since then, evidence of the long-term beneficial effects of prophylactic treatment for severe haemophilia has been increasing and it has become the recommended treatment strategy for children with severe haemophilia by both the World Health Organization and the US National Hemophilia Foundation Medical and Scientific Advisory Committee. However, the implementation of this recommendation has been hampered by issues of cost and venous access. The high costs of prophylaxis have largely prevented its use in major parts of the world. The question therefore is whether the current models of replacement of clotting factor concentrates, while certainly being effective, are also optimal. Can the data on outcome at different levels of factor replacement be used to assess their cost-effectiveness?