Search

Objective: The association of adrenal hyperactivity with ovarian dysfunction may involve direct inhibition of ovarian steroidogenesis by glucocorticoids. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to investigate the direct effects of cortisol on luteinizing hormone (LH) action in human granulosa-lutein cells and the modulation of this interaction by ovarian 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11 beta HSD)., Design and Patients: Effects were investigated in cultured human granulosa-lutein cells isolated from the follicular aspirates of 14 patients undergoing oocyte collection for in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer., Measurements: Pregnenolone production and 3H-cortisol oxidation to 3H-cortisone (11 beta HSD activity) by cultured cells were measured., Results: In cells from nine (of 14) patients, cortisol inhibited LH-stimulated steroidogenesis in a concentration dependent manner with an ID50 of 1250 +/- SEM 377 nmol/l. In these cultures, the 11 beta HSD activities were high (133 +/- SEM 23 pmol/mg protein/4h) and inhibition of the enzyme with carbenoxolone potentiated the action of cortisol. Conversely, cells from the remaining five patients lacked detectable 11 beta HSD activity and exhibited an increased sensitivity to the inhibitory action of cortisol (ID50 = 158 +/- SEM 41 nmol/l in the absence of carbenoxolone)., Conclusions: Cortisol acts directly in human granulosa-lutein cells to inhibit the support of steroidogenesis by LH and this interaction is modulated by ovarian 11 beta HSD in the majority of patients.

Eighty-eight clomiphene citrate-resistant infertile patients with oligomenorrhoea or amenorrhoea attributable to polycystic ovarian disease were divided at random into three groups. Twenty-nine patients were treated with ovarian electrocautery, 30 with human menopausal gonadotrophins (hMG) and 29 with pure follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). Successful ovulation was induced in 71.4, 70.6 and 66.7% of the cycles in the groups respectively. Ten patients conceived after electrocautery and pure FSH therapy while 15 conceived after hMG medication (chi-squared = 1.6464, P = 0.439). The six-cycle cumulative pregnancy rate in the three consecutive groups was 52.1, 55.4, and 38.3%. Four further pregnancies were achieved after treating 10 patients in the electrocautery group with clomiphene citrate (100 mg/day for 5 days) for 25 cycles. The rate of pregnancy wastage in the corresponding groups was 21.4, 53.3 and 40% (chi-squared = 3.127, P = 0.2039). Ovarian electrocautery is equally effective as hMG and pure FSH in the treatment of PCO patients resistant to clomiphene citrate therapy.

Eleven patients with polycystic ovarian disease (PCO) were treated by laparoscopic ovarian electrocautery and nine with a long-acting luteinizing hormone releasing agonist (LHRH-A) for 8 weeks. Both groups showed equivalent significant decreases in their 6-h mean values of luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone (T) measured in 25 samples collected every 15 min. Patients treated with ovarian electrocautery showed significant increases in their 6-h mean values of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and insulin with variable oestradiol (E2) responses. The magnitude of change following treatment was significantly greater for LH than for FSH. Buserelin medication did not cause persistent significant changes in the levels of insulin or FSH but it did cause a significant reduction in the 6-h mean values of E2. We conclude that LH is the gonadotrophin primarily affected after pituitary desensitization and ovarian electrocautery. Furthermore, there is no direct correlation between the levels of circulating insulin and testosterone in patients with PCO.

Thirteen premenopausal women who each received 400 micrograms three times daily of intranasal buserelin for 6 months as treatment for endometriosis participated in this study. Cortical bone mineral content (BMC) in the mid-shaft of the right femur measured by dual photon densitometry, and trabecular bone density (TBD) in the lumbar vertebrae (L2-4) measured by quantitative computed tomography, were evaluated prior to, at the end of 6 months' buserelin treatment and after 6 months off treatment. Significant hypo-oestrogenism (P less than 0.001) was sustained during the period on treatment. The significant reduction in the mean lumbar vertebral TBD of 5.9% (P less than 0.02) observed at the end of treatment with buserelin was regained within 6 months following resumption of ovarian activity. There was a marginally significant (P = 0.07) reduction of only 0.9% in the mean femoral cortical BMC at the end of treatment. Six months after the end of treatment cortical BMC values were not significantly different from the pretreatment values. There was no significant correlation between the degree of hypo-oestrogenism and the corresponding change in vertebral TBD, (r = 0.20; P less than 0.10).

Twenty-two normal, regularly menstruating female subjects had an LHRH test performed before and after pretreatment with 0.5 mg, 1 mg. or 2.5 mg of oestradiol benzoate during the follicular phase of their menstrual cyclees (days 4-8). Two further women acted as controls and received no oestrogen; they showed identical responses for both LH and FSH release when LHRH tests were performed at intervals of 48 h. Oestrogen pretreatment induced a biphasic effect upon subsequent LHRH response. Four subjects retested 20 h after 0.5 mg oestradiol benzoate showed either no change or a slight suppression of LH and FSH release. Fifteen of the eighteen women pretreated with oestradiol benzoate and retested 44 h later showed significantly increased LH release and fourteen significantly increased FSH release when compared to their control responses. The responses appeared to be dose related with a positive correlation between sum of LH increments and basal oestradiol levels (R = 0.61; P less than 0.001) and a similar correlation (r = 0.67; P less than 0.001) between sum of FSH increments and basal oestradiol levels. The physiological significance of this biphasic action of oestrogen upon pituitary sensitivity is discussed in relation to the control of the menstrual cycle.

The effect of the administration of oestradiol benzoate and of progesterone on the subsequent response to LHRH has been investigated in women with hyperprolactinaemia. There was an amplification in the release of LH in four out of ten patients and of FSH in one out of ten patients at 44 h after the administration of 2-5 mg oestradiol benzoate. The average amount of LH released before and after oestrogen did not change, but there was a significant decrease in the amount of FSH released. There was no correlation between the LH released and the oestradiol concentration in serum at the time of the LHRH tests but there was a negative correlation between the FSH released and the oestradiol concentration (r = 0-507;P less than 0-05). These results contrast with those obtained in normal subjects in the follicular phase of the cycle when there is a positive correlation of oestrogen concentrations and the amount of LH and FSH released. As in normal subjects, however, a significant suppression of basal FSH concentrations, persisting until 44 h, was produced by the oestrogen (P less than 0-01). Seven out of eleven patients showed an amplification of LH response and six out of eleven an FSH response 20 h after the administration of 25 mg progesterone. The mean amplifications are not significantly different from those of normal subjects tested in the early follicular phase of the cycle, but are significantly less than those tested in the mid follicular phase of the cycle (LH P less than 0-001; FSH P less than 0-01). This may be related to the serum concentrations of oestradiol which in patients with hyperprolactinaemia are significantly less than those found in the mid follicular phase of the cycle (P less than 0-05). These results indicate that in women with hyperprolactinaemia oestrogen negative feedback, necessary for cycle initiation, is normal: failure of ovulation may be related to failure of positive feedback to oestroen. Oestrogen-negative feedback is unopposed and this may explain the follicullar development and lack of oestrogen in the mid-follicular phase.

An LHRH test was performed on twenty-eight regularly menstruating females during follicular phase of their cycles. Twenty-four were then given an intramuscular injection of progesterone in oil and retested with LHRH 20 or 44 h later, the remaining four received no pretreatment and acted as controls. The twelve subjects retested 20 h after the progesterone injection showed marked changes in response. The greatest increase in gonadotrophin release after LHRH was seen when subjects were tested between days 8 and 10 of the menstrual cycle. In contrast, the twelve studied 44 h after receiving the steroid showed no change in release.

The response to synthetic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone was studied in eighteen patients with the polycystic ovary syndrome. The release of follicle-stimulating hormone was similar to that found in normal women. The mean response of luteinizing hormone was similar to that found in the luteal phase, but significantly greater (P less than 0-02) than that found in the early follicular phase of the normal menstrual cycle. Basal serum levels of FSH and LH, estimated in twenty-five patients, were similar to those found in normal subjects. The sex hormone binding globulin capacity was reduced in twenty-four of them. Basal serum testosterone levels were elevated in twelve of twenty-two patients and the mean level was significantly greater (P less than 0-01) than the mean level of normal women. Basal serum androstenecione levels were elevated in nine of twenty-two patients and the mean level was also significantly greater (P leess than 0-001) between basal testosterone and LH levels. These data suggest the pituitary gland of patients with the polycystic ovary syndrome contains adequate amounts of LH but that the ovulatory surge of LH which occurs in normal women is inhibited by testosterone acting on either the pituitary or, more probably, on the hypothalamus.

Exogenously administered oestradiol or progesterone was found to induce augmentation of LH and FSH release in response to LHRH administration in patients with the polycystic ovary (PCO) syndrome. The effect of oestradiol upon LH release in the patients was significantly less than the augmented release induced in normal women (P less than 0-02). In contrast, progesterone induced a significantly greater LH release in PCO patients than normal women studied during the early follicular phase (P less than 0-001) but less than that in normal women studied during the mid-follicular phase of the cycle (P less than 0-01). The effects on FSH release in the PCO patients were less marked but similar to those in normal women with comparable basal steroid levels. The results suggest that both oestradiol and progesterone can modify the hypothalamic-pituitary axis in the PCO syndrome in a manner similar to that observed in normal women and a failure of these 'positive feedback' mechanisms does not appear to be the cause of the ovulatory deficiency in this syndrome.

The aim of this study was to see whether the pathophysiology of polycystic ovary syndrome could be altered by suppressing the abnormal cycle of events associated with abnormal gonadotrophins and androgens. Fifteen women with polycystic ovary syndrome were treated with the GnRH agonist Nafarelin at a dosage of 200 micrograms twice daily intranasally for a period of 3 or 6 months. Eight of these women also had a dexamethasone suppression test 0.5 mg four times daily for 48 h before and after treatment with Nafarelin, in order to differentiate between an adrenal and ovarian source for the excess androgens. Gonadotrophins and androgens were well suppressed, LH to a mean of 1.5 IU/l, testosterone to 1.1 nmol/l and androstenedione to 6.4 nmol/l. Three months after discontinuing Nafarelin, all these hormones had returned to pretreatment levels. The ultrasound appearance of the ovaries showed no consistent reduction in ovarian volume or the disappearance of ovarian follicles. Hirsutism showed slight improvement in four out of seven patients. After treatment one patient out of the eight complaining of infertility, conceived spontaneously and one patient ovulated on a reduced dosage of clomiphene. There was no change in the menstrual pattern of the others. Despite the achievement of good hormonal suppression, there was no change in the condition after therapy was discontinued suggesting that whatever the cause of the condition it remains a permanent situation.

A 44-year old man presented with loss of sexual interest and erectile failure and together with his wife was treated successfully with sexual counselling. He was subsequently found to have been hyperprolactinaemic before and after sex therapy. Comparison of bromocriptine with placebo in two double blind studies showed a modest increase in sexual interest when his prolactin levels fell to normal. In this case, the principal effect of hyperprolactinaemia was on sexual interest. His main problems, erectile impotence and decline in sexual activity, resulted from his and his wife's psychological reaction to this modest hormonal effect. Hyperprolactinaemia appears to have a similar effect to testosterone deficiency in men.

The oestrogen feedback and gonadotrophin release in ten amenorrhoeic women were investigated, using intramuscular injection of 1 mg oestradiol benzoate. Serial estimations of serum oestradiol and gonadotrophins (LH and FSH) were made over a period of 72 h following the injection. Five patients demonstrated positive feedback release of LH to the oestrogen stimulus with elevated levels of LH significantly above baseline (P less than 0.001), which occurred between 48 and 72 h after the injection. Two of the five patients also demonstrated elevated FSH levels accompanying these LH peaks, The hypothalamic-pituitary axis was postulated to be intact in these five patients, and all ovulated on clomiphene. None of the remaining five subjects showed any increase in serum gonadotrophin levels in response to oestradiol and none ovulated on clomiphene when given a dose of up to 200 mg daily x5 days. This 'oestrogen provocation test" seems to be a useful means of evaluating the functional capacity of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis for gonadotrophin release and has proved useful in predicting responsiveness to clomiphene in amenorrhoeic women.