Search

Objectives: Prevalence of malnutrition among ambulatory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients in Singapore is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of ambulatory IBD patients at risk of malnutrition (ARMN) using Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and its clinical outcomes., Methods: IBD patients were recruited from March to June 2018 and followed up for 6 months. ARMN patients were defined as having a MUST score of 2 or more compared with those not at risk (non-ARMN)., Results: Altogether 217 patients were recruited, including 128 (59.0%) with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 89 (41.0%) with Crohn's disease (CD). The mean body mass index (BMI) was 23.5 ± 4.5 kg/m 2 ; 35 (16.1%) patients were on biologics, and 52 (24.0%) were on steroids. Among them 25 (11.5%) patients were ARMN, with a predominance of UC (n = 15, 60.0%). The majority of ARMN patients were underweight (n = 23, 92.0%) while 114 (59.4%) non-ARMN patients were overweight. ARMN patients had a significantly lower albumin (38.3 g/L vs 41.9 g/L) and a significantly increased proportion of patients with C-reactive protein ≥5 mg/L (36.0% vs 19.3%). There was a trend towards longer hospital stay among ARMN patients, although this was not statistically significant. Use of biologics or immunomodulators and albumin levels were associated with being ARMN., Conclusion: Using MUST, 11.5% of our ambulatory IBD patients in Singapore were identified to be ARMN. Among ARMN patients, a trend was demonstrated towards a longer hospital stays for admitted patients. This underscores the need to actively screen ambulatory IBD patients for malnutrition., (© 2023 Chinese Medical Association Shanghai Branch, Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objective: There is debate on the best method of colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to examine how gastroenterologists around the world practice CRC surveillance and manage dysplastic lesions in IBD., Methods: A 22-question survey was emailed to gastroenterologists from 34 countries. It included questions on resources for, frequency and mode of CRC surveillance, and management of colorectal dysplasia. Fisher's exact test and logistic regression were used to evaluate the differences among respondents in various domains., Results: There were 217 eligible responses, with most gastroenterologists working in public hospitals (76%), and treating >10 patients with IBD weekly (71%). High-definition white light endoscopy (HDWLE) was available in 93.1% of the centers. The preferred mode of surveillance was HDWLE with dye-spray chromoendoscopy and targeted biopsies (41.2%). Fewer than 50% of physicians reported using chromoendoscopy in >50% of cases, citing time as the limiting factor (73.7%). Of these gastroenterologists 63% infrequently (<25% of cases) performed random biopsies during chromoendoscopy. They would attempt endoscopic mucosal resection for polypoid lesions >10 mm (67.2%), including >20 mm lesions with low grade dysplasia (49.8%), and non-polypoid lesions >10 mm without dysplasia (56.9%). For non-polypoid lesions >20 mm with low- and high-grade dysplasia, referral to expert endoscopists was the preferred option., Conclusion: The preferred method of CRC surveillance was HDWLE with chromoendoscopy and targeted biopsies. Random biopsies were infrequently performed. The uptake of chromoendoscopy for surveillance in practice was low. Physicians varied in their approach in removing endoscopically resectable dysplastic lesions., (© 2021 Chinese Medical Association Shanghai Branch, Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objective: Preventing the postoperative recurrence (POR) of Crohn's disease (CD) poses a significant challenge to clinicians. With the advent of biologics, various studies have observed a reduction of recurrence after surgery. Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the rate of POR at different time points in the era of biologic use., Methods: We performed a literature search using Medline and Embase databases for studies investigating biologics in preventing the POR of CD. Data were extracted, and a single-arm meta-analysis with generalized linear mixed model and Clopper-Pearson method for confidence interval (CI) was performed to identify endoscopic, clinical and surgical recurrence rates at 6 months and 1, 2 and 5 years postoperatively., Results: Altogether 24 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The endoscopic, clinical and surgical POR rate with the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents at 1 year was 21.72% (95% CI 16.28%-28.37%), 13.06% (95% CI 8.18%-18.92%) and 3.76% (95% CI 1.37%-9.91%), respectively. The 5-year recurrence rate was 84.21% (95% CI 72.35%-91.57%) and 17.49% (95% CI 9.17%-30.80%) for endoscopic and surgical recurrence, respectively. Subgroup analyses at 1 year for the type of anti-TNF-α agent or the timing of initiation after surgery showed no significant difference in endoscopic, clinical and surgical recurrence rates., Conclusions: Anti-TNF-α agents are effective at preventing clinical, endoscopic and surgical POR of CD. The timing of initiating biological therapy after surgery has no significant effect on the rate of POR. The efficacy of infliximab and adalimumab for postoperative recurrence prevention is similar., (© 2021 Chinese Medical Association Shanghai Branch, Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)