Search

Objective: International guidelines recommend amiodarone for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF). While early appropriate interventions have been shown to improve OHCA survival, the association between time to amiodarone and survival remains to be established., Methods: Included were adult OHCA in refractory VF, between January 2015 and December 2019, who received a resuscitation attempt with amiodarone from Queensland Ambulance Service paramedics. Patient characteristics and survival outcomes were described. Factors associated with survival were investigated, with a focus on time from arrest to amiodarone administration. Optimal time window for amiodarone administration was determined, and factors influencing whether amiodarone was given within the optimal time window were examined., Results: A total of 502 patients were included. The average (range) time from arrest to amiodarone was 25 (4-83) min. Time to amiodarone was negatively associated with survival (adjusted odds ratio 0.93 for event survival; 95% confidence interval 0.89-0.97). The optimal time window for amiodarone was within 23 min following arrest. Patients receiving amiodarone within the optimal time had significantly better survival than those receiving it outside this window (event survival 38.3% vs 20.6%, P < 0.001; discharge survival 25.5% vs 9.7%, P < 0.001; 30-day survival 25.1% vs 9.7%, P < 0.001). Paramedic response time (adjusted odds ratio 0.96; 95% confidence interval 0.92-0.99) and time from arrest to intravenous access (0.71; 0.67-0.76) were independent factors determining whether patients received amiodarone within the optimal time., Conclusions: Earlier amiodarone administration was associated with improved survival. Strategies aimed at reducing delay to amiodarone administration have the potential to improve outcome., (© 2021 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine.)

Objectives: To describe the characteristics and outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)-induced consciousness patients from a large database of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)., Methods: Included were adult patients, attended between January 2007 and December 2018 by the Queensland Ambulance Service, where resuscitation was attempted by paramedics. Manual review of records was undertaken to identify CPR-induced consciousness cases. Patients exhibiting purposeful limb/body movement during CPR, with or without displaying other signs, were considered to be CPR-induced consciousness. Characteristics and outcomes of CPR-induced consciousness patients were compared to those without CPR-induced consciousness., Results: A total of 23 011 OHCA patients were included; of these, 52 (0.23%) were CPR-induced consciousness. This translates into an incidence rate of 2.3 cases per 1000 adult resuscitation attempts over 12 years. Combativeness/agitation was the most common sign of CPR-induced consciousness, described in 34.6% (18/52) of patients. CPR-induced consciousness patients had numerically higher rates of return of spontaneous circulation on hospital arrival (51.9% vs 28.6%), discharge survival (46.2% vs 15.1%) and 30-day survival (46.2% vs 14.7%), than those without CPR-induced consciousness; however, CPR-induced consciousness was not found to be an independent predictor of survival. Higher proportions of CPR-induced consciousness patients had arrest witnessed by paramedics, occurring in public places, of cardiac aetiology and initial shockable rhythm, than patients without CPR-induced consciousness., Conclusions: CPR-induced consciousness in OHCA appears to be associated with higher survival rates. Standardised guidelines on recognition and management of CPR-induced consciousness remain to be established., (© 2020 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine.)