Search

Background: The aim of present study was to evaluate the effects of one-hour discussion on the choice of dialysis modality at the outpatient clinic., Methods: Charts of consecutive patients who had started maintenance dialysis from May 2013 to April 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Characteristics at the start of dialysis were compared between patients participated and not participated in the discussion., Results: Of the 620 incident dialysis patients, 128 patients had participated in the discussion. After propensity score matching (1:1), 127 patients who participated in the discussion tended to have fewer urgent hospitalizations (13.4% vs. 21.3%, p = 0.068). In addition, more patients who initiated peritoneal dialysis (PD) (30.7% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, participation in the discussion (OR 4.81, 95% CI 2.807-8.24; p < 0.001) was related to PD initiation., Conclusion: One-hour discussion on the choice of dialysis modality may increase PD initiations and decrease the number of urgent hospitalizations., (© 2022 International Society for Apheresis and Japanese Society for Apheresis.)

Introduction: As the number of elderly end-stage renal disease patients lacking suitable vessels for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is increasing, indications for tunnel cuffed catheters (TCCs) may be expanding. This study aimed to clarify changes over time in the number of patients with TCC and indications for TCCs., Methods: This single-center retrospective study analyzed 143 catheters for 95 patients who inserted TCCs between July 2005 and July 2017. Patients were divided into two groups (early- and late-phase groups) based on the median observational period. Demographic data and clinical information were then compared., Findings: Fifty TCCs were inserted in the early phase group, and 93 TCCs were inserted in the late-phase group. The late-phase group was older (77 vs. 70 years; P = 0.003) and showed a higher frequency of hypertensive nephropathy (29% vs. 14%; P < 0.05) and a lower frequency of a history of cardiovascular disease (52.7% vs. 70.0%; P = 0.045). In the late-phase group, indications for bridge vascular access (0% vs. 11.8%; P < 0.05) or severe cardiac dysfunction (8.0% vs. 20.5%; P < 0.05) were increased. In addition, the late-phase group showed increases in percentage of patients with the catheter inserted in the femoral vein (10.0% vs. 23.7%; P = 0.047), nephrologists performing catheter insertion (56.0% vs. 87.1%; P < 0.001), and the patients who underwent superficialization of the brachial artery (28.0% vs. 46.2%; P = 0.034). Significant differences in catheter survival, incidence of complications, reasons for catheter removal, or incidence of catheter-related infection were not observed between groups., Discussion: Patients with indications for TCC may be increasing due to an increase in elderly end-stage renal disease patients whose activities of daily living have decreased. In addition, indications for bridge vascular access were widely accepted in the late-phase group., (© 2018 International Society for Hemodialysis.)

Multiple studies have shown that Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) has been a major cause of death in hemodialysis patients. We examined whether SAB is a risk for mortality among chronic hemodialysis patients in Japan where the standard vascular access is arteriovenous fistula (AVF). This was a multicenter, retrospective study of maintenance hemodialysis patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) from 2011 to 2013 at tertiary care centers in Japan. The endpoint was hospital mortality. Our cohort contained 32 SAB cases (14 MRSA and 18 MSSA) and 42 non-SAB cases. Hospital mortality was higher among SAB cases than non-SAB cases (46.9% vs. 23.8%, P = 0.038). In patients with BSI, SAB was significantly associated with hospital mortality after adjustment for potential confounders, including type of vascular access (OR 3.26). S. aureus was the leading cause of BSI and hospital mortality among this cohort. Therefore, initial empiric treatment should cover for S. aureus., (© 2017 International Society for Apheresis, Japanese Society for Apheresis, and Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy.)