Search

Introduction: Recent studies have demonstrated that left ventricular (LV) pacing site is a critical parameter in optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The present study evaluates the effect of pacing from different LV locations on QRS duration (QRSd) and their relationship to acute hemodynamic response in congestive heart failure patients., Methods and Results: Thirty-five patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block referred for CRT device implantation were studied. Eleven predetermined LV pacing sites were systematically assessed in random order: epicardial: coronary sinus (CS); endocardial: basal and mid-cavity (septal, anterior, lateral, and inferior), apex, and the endocardial site facing the CS pacing site. For each patient QRSd and +dP/dtmax during baseline (AAI) and DDD LV pacing at 2 atrioventricular delays were compared. Response to CRT was significantly better in patients with wider baseline QRSd (≥150 milliseconds). Hemodynamic response was inversely correlated to increase of QRSd during LV pacing (short atrioventricular [AV] delay: r = 0.44, P < 0.001; long AV delay: r = 0.59, P < 0.001). Compared to baseline, LV pacing at the site of shortest QRSd significantly improved +dP/dtmax (+18 ± 25%, P < 0.001) but was not superior to other conventional strategy (lateral wall, CS pacing, and echo-guided) and was inferior to a hemodynamically guided strategy., Conclusions: In our study, we have demonstrated that changes of QRSd during LV pacing correlated with acute hemodynamic response and that LV pacing location was a primary determinant of paced QRSd. Although QRSd did not predict the maximum hemodynamic response, our results confirm the link between electrical activation and hemodynamic response of the LV during CRT., (© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: The relationship between depression and heart failure is neither coincidental nor trivial, since depression is a powerful predictor of re-hospitalization and mortality. We prospectively studied the prevalence and impact of depression on the clinical outcomes of patients attending for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We specifically examined whether patients with depression have a different rate of response to CRT and whether CRT has an effect on depressive symptoms., Methods: Sixty-eight recipients of CRT systems were included. The depressive status was evaluated before implant and after 6 months by a structured diagnostic interview measuring Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria of major depression and by a self-report questionnaire (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, CES-D). The CRT response was assessed at 6 months by a clinical composite score., Results: At inclusion, DSM-IV criteria of major depression were identified in 41% of the population, while using the self-report questionnaire 65% were observed to have mild to major depressive symptoms (CES-D ≥ 16). Only 4 patients were taking antidepressants. At 6 months, 75% were considered responders to CRT. Response to CRT did not differ between those with and without depression at baseline. The rate of patients with depression at 6 months was significantly lower in responders to CRT compared with nonresponders., Conclusions: We found a high prevalence of depressive symptoms in patients receiving CRT systems. Patients with depression should not be excluded from CRT, because they demonstrate a similar rate of response than the persons without depression and the responders are less likely to be depressed at 6 months., (© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: A QRS >120 ms remains the recommended criterion for the selection of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidates. However, the reproducibility of this measurement has not been studied thoroughly., Methods: QRS duration was measured by 3 experienced cardiologists and by automatic measurement on 228 electrocardiograms (ECGs) randomly collected from 188 subjects, including neonates, healthy adults, patients with complete and incomplete bundle branch block, and CRT candidates. All ECGs were recorded at a 25 mm/s sweep speed. Forty recordings were duplicated and 50 ECGs were recorded at both 25 and 50 mm/s., Results: Significant interobserver differences (P < 0.001) were found between each combination of paired observers, with an up to 50-ms absolute variability between cardiologists and low concordance with computerized measurements. Intraobserver absolute variability was also significant (P < 0.01) for the 3 observers. These significant differences persisted (P < 0.01) when focusing our interest on the ECGs in the 100-140 ms range (defined as at least one out of the 4 measures in this range). Considering the 120 ms limit, 22 (27.5%) ECGs were differently classified by at least one of the cardiologists. We observed similar interobserver differences between each combination of paired observers with a 50 mm/s sweep speed., Conclusion: Manual QRS duration measurements were associated with significant inter- and intraobserver variability and low concordance with computerized measurements. The measurement of QRS is, therefore, operator-dependent and a reevaluation of the measurement methods may be essential to develop clinical and investigative standards.

Introduction: Recent expert consensus guidelines mention that one of the principles for infected device replacement following removal is to "reevaluate carefully if there is a continued need for a new cardiac device replacement." This is a Class I recommendation, which nevertheless suffers from a very low level of evidence (level of evidence C), since no study has revisited the systematic practice of reimplanting the same device based on a meticulous clinical reassessment. In the present paper, we examined the safety of withholding the implantation of pacing systems in selected patients., Methods and Results: Between January 2005 and December 2007, 188 consecutive patients underwent extractions of infected pacing systems at 2 medical centers. "Low-risk" patients were identified by (1) a spontaneous heart rate >45 bpm, (2) no symptomatic asystole during monitoring, (3) QRS duration <120 ms when history of AV block was noted, (4) no high-degree AV block during continuous monitoring. They remained device-free, unless an adverse clinical event occurred mandating the reimplantation. The primary study endpoint was rate of sudden death and syncope after a 12-month follow-up. Among the 74 (39.4%) "low-risk" patients, a single patient suffered a bradycardia-related syncopal event corresponding to a 1.3% (95% CI, 0.0-3.9) rate of primary endpoint. Pacing systems were also reimplanted in 24 patients (32.4%) for syncope (n = 1), nonsevere bradycardia-reated symptoms (n = 17), cardiac resynchronization (n = 2), and for reassurance in 4 asymptomatic patients., Conclusion: After removal of infected pacing systems, these preliminary data demonstrated that a strategy of nonsystematic device reimplantation associated with close surveillance was safe in "low-risk" patients, allowing the administration of antimicrobials in a device-free state.

Introduction: Pacemaker implants are associated with a high cumulative exposure of the operators to radiation. Standard radiation protection with lead aprons is incomplete and the cause of spine disorders. A radiation protection cabin offers complete protection by surrounding the operator, without requiring a lead apron., Methods: We randomly and evenly assigned 60 patients undergoing implantations of permanent pacemakers or cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) with (a) a radiation protection cabin (cabin group, n = 30) versus (b) standard protection with a 0.5 mm lead-equivalent apron (control group, n = 30). Radiation exposure was measured using personal electronic dosimeters placed on the thorax, back, and head of the operator., Results: The patient, procedural, and device characteristics of the 2 study groups were similar. All procedures in the cabin group were performed as planned without increase in duration or complication rate compared with the control group. The mean radiation dose to the head, normalized for fluoroscopy duration, was significantly lower in the cabin (0.040 +/- 0.032 microSv/min) than in the control (1.138 +/- 0.560 microSv/min) group (p < 0.0001). The radiation doses to the thorax (0.043 +/- 0.027 vs 0.041 +/- 0.040 microSv/min) and back (0.038 +/- 0.029 vs 0.033 +/- 0.018 microSv/min) in the cabin versus control group (under the apron) were similar., Conclusions: The use of a radiation protection cabin markedly decreased the exposure of the operator to radiation, and eliminated the need to wear a lead apron, without increasing the procedural time or complication rate during implantation of pacemaker and ICD.

Introduction: The peak of endocardial acceleration (PEA) is an index of myocardial contractility. We aimed to (1) demonstrate that the PEA measured by the noninvasive cutaneous precordial application of an accelerometer sensor is related to left ventricular (LV) dP/dt max and (2) assess the usefulness of PEA monitoring during graded ischemia and during different configurations of sequential biventricular pacing., Methods and Results: Measurements of invasive LV dP/dt max were compared with measurements of transcutaneous PEA in seven pigs at baseline and during acute drug infusions; increased heart rate; right, left, biventricular and sequential biventricular pacing before and after graded ischemia induced by the constriction of the left anterior descending coronary artery. A consistent PEA signal was obtained in all animals. PEA changes were highly related to LV dP/dt max changes (r= 0.93; P < 0.001). The changes of LV contractility induced by the different pacing configurations were detected by PEA analysis in the absence of ischemia (r= 0.94; P < 0.001) and in the presence of ischemic LV dysfunction (r= 0.91; P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Noninvasive PEA measurement allows monitoring of left ventricular contractility and may be a useful tool to detect global effect of ventricular ischemia and to optimize the choice of both pacing site and pacing configuration.

Introduction: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) can be performed using different types of ablation catheter. Gold tip electrodes have the theoretical advantage of creating bigger lesions than standard platinum-iridium electrode. This prospective, randomized study compares the clinical efficacy of 8-mm gold tip catheter, externally irrigated and 8-mm platinum-iridium tip (Pt tip) catheters., Methods and Results: Sixty consecutive patients (51 men, 60 +/- 10 years) undergoing de novo CTI ablation for documented typical atrial flutter were randomized to one of the following ablation catheters: 8-mm gold tip catheter, an externally irrigated-tip (Irr. tip) catheter, or an 8-mm Pt tip catheter. The procedural endpoint was achievement of bidirectional isthmus conduction block with < or = 20 minutes of RF energy application. The latter was achieved equally with the 3 catheters (95% for gold tip, 100% for irrigated tip, 95% for Pt tip) and the durations of RF (10 +/- 6, 10 +/- 4, 13 +/- 8 minutes), fluoroscopy (12 +/- 6, 12 +/- 7, 15 +/- 12 minutes) and the procedure (34 +/- 23, 38 +/- 24, 40 +/- 30 minutes) were similar in all groups. The maximal targeted power could not be reached in at least one location in 40% of patients with gold tip and in 35% of patients with Pt tip catheters whereas it was always achieved with an Irr. tip catheter (P = 0.003, P = 0.008). The reduction in impedance during RF delivery was greater with Irr. tip (11 +/- 7 ohms) than with gold (7 +/- 4 ohms, P = 0.02) or Pt tip (5 +/- 3 ohms, P = 0.001) catheters., Conclusion: This study demonstrates equivalent efficacies of gold, platinum-iridium and externally Irr. tip catheters for successful de novo ablation of the CTI.

The search for a mechanism to explain atrial fibrillation (AF) has lasted for over a century and continues. Significant progress in understanding this arrhythmia accelerated with the era of operative treatment of this arrhythmia and intensified with the advent of catheter ablation. Through considerable trial and some error, effective "curative" therapies have evolved for paroxysmal AF and are evolving for persistent AF. It is becoming clear that no single mechanism suffices to explain AF in all its forms and multiple mechanisms are playing a role in the most complicated cases.

Background: Noninducibility of sustained atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been shown to be associated with a better clinical outcome. We evaluated the role of clinical variables that could predict noninducibility of sustained AF after PVI., Methods and Results: Data were collected prospectively from 181 patients (153 male; age 54 +/- 9 years) referred for ablation of drug-refractory symptomatic paroxysmal AF (duration < or =7 days). Clinical variables were evaluated with regard to their ability of predicting noninducibility of sustained AF (< or =10 minutes) after PVI. Univariate analysis was performed on all collected variables followed by multivariate analysis for variables showing a P value <0.1. After PVI, sustained AF was noninducible in 97 (54%) patients. The following clinical variables showed a significant difference between the groups: body weight, longest AF episode, duration of AF history, presence or absence of structural heart disease, left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, prior cardioversion, left atrial (LA) parasternal, and longitudinal diameters and LV diameters. On multivariate analysis, three independent predictors of noninducibility were identified: a shorter duration of AF episodes (AF <12 hours: RR 0.01 (0.002-0.06), P < 0.001; AF 12-48 hours: RR 0.07 (0.01-0.37), P = 0.001); LA longitudinal diameter <57 mm (RR 0.33 (0.13-0.82), P = 0.016); and absence of LV hypertrophy (RR 0.15 (0.04-0.63), P = 0.01)., Conclusions: Shorter AF episodes, smaller LA longitudinal diameter, and absence of LV hypertrophy are independent predictors of noninducibility of sustained AF after PVI.

Introduction: We conducted an acute echocardiographic study comparing hemodynamic and ventricular dyssynchrony parameters during left ventricular pacing (LVP) and biventricular pacing (BVP). We sought to clarify the mechanisms responsible for similar hemodynamic improvement despite differences in electrical activation., Methods and Results: Thirty-three patients underwent echocardiography prior to implantation with a multisite pacing device (spontaneous rhythm [SR]) and 2 days after implantation (BVP and LVP). Interventricular dyssynchrony (pulsed-wave Doppler), extent of myocardium displaying delayed longitudinal contraction (%DLC; tissue tracking), and index of LV dyssynchrony (pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging) were assessed. Compared to SR, BVP and LVP caused similar significant improvement of cardiac output (LVP: 3.2 +/- 0.5, BVP: 3.1 +/- 0.7, SR: 2.3 +/- 0.6 L/min; P < 0.01) and mitral regurgitation (LVP: 25.1 +/- 10, BVP: 24.7 +/- 11, baseline: 37.9 +/- 14% jet area/left atria area; P < 0.01). LVP resulted in a smaller index of LV dyssynchrony than BVP (29 +/- 10 vs 34 +/- 14; P < 0.05). However, LVP exhibited a longer aortic preejection delay (220 +/- 34 vs 186 +/- 28 msec; P < 0.01), longer LV electromechanical delays (244.5 +/- 39 vs 209.5 +/- 47 msec; P < 0.05), greater interventricular dyssynchrony (56.6 +/- 18 vs 31.4 +/- 18; P < 0.01), and higher%DLC (40.1 +/- 08 vs 30.3 +/- 09; P < 0.05), leading to shorter LV filling time (387 +/- 54 vs 348 +/- 44 msec; P < 0.05) compared to BVP., Conclusion: Although LVP and BVP provide similar hemodynamic improvement, LVP results in more homogeneous but substantially delayed LV contraction, leading to shortened filling time and less reduction in postsystolic contraction. These data may influence the choice of individual optimal pacing configuration.