7 results on '"van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F."'
Search Results
2. Development of an online patient decision aid for kidney failure treatment modality decisions
- Author
-
Engels, Noel, van der Nat, Paul B., Ankersmid, Jet W., Prick, Janine C. M., Parent, Ellen, The, Regina, Takahashi, Asako, Bart, Hans A. J., van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F., Stiggelbout, Anne M., Bos, Willem J. W., and van den Dorpel, Marinus A.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Self-management support and eHealth for patients and informal caregivers confronted with advanced cancer: an online focus group study among nurses.
- Author
-
Slev, Vina N., Pasman, H. Roeline W., Francke, Anneke L., Eeltink, Corien M., van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F., and Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
- Subjects
ATTENTION ,CANCER patient psychology ,CAREGIVERS ,FOCUS groups ,NURSES' attitudes ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,HEALTH self-care ,TELEMEDICINE ,TUMORS ,SOCIAL support ,THEMATIC analysis - Abstract
Background: Self-management by patients and informal caregivers confronted with advanced cancer is not self-evident. Therefore they might need self-management support from nurses. This article reports on nurses' perspectives on self-management support for people confronted with advanced cancer, and nurses' experiences with eHealth in this context. Methods: Six online focus groups were organized, with a total of 45 Dutch nurses with different educational levels and working in different care settings. Nurses were asked how they support patients and informal caregivers facing advanced cancer in managing physical and psychosocial problems in their daily life. Questions were also asked regarding the nurses' experiences with eHealth. Transcripts of the online focus group discussions were analyzed qualitatively following the principles of thematic analysis. The main themes derived from the analyses were ordered according to the elements in the 5 A's Behavior Change Model. Results: Within the scope of self-management support, nurses reported that they discuss the background, personal situation, wishes, and needs of advanced cancer patients ('Assess' in the 5 A's model), and they provide information about cancer and specifically the advanced type ('Advise'). However, nurses hardly give any advice on how patients can manage physical and psychological problems themselves and/or pay any attention to collaborative goal-setting ('Agree'). Neither do they explain how follow-up can be arranged ('Arrange'). In addition, they do not appear to pay much attention to self-management support for informal caregivers. Nurses' attitudes towards eHealth within the scope of self-management support are positive. They see many advantages, such as allowing advanced cancer patients to stay in charge of their own care and lives. However, nurses also explicitly stressed that eHealth can never be a substitute for personal contact between nurses and patients. Conclusions: Nurses value self-management support and eHealth for advanced cancer patients and their informal caregivers. However, they seem to disregard important elements in the support of self-management, such as providing practical advice, collaborative goal-setting, and arrangement of follow-up. We recommend further promoting and clarifying the essence and importance of self-management support, including self-management support for informal caregivers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Efficacy, cost-utility and reach of an eHealth self-management application 'Oncokompas' that helps cancer survivors to obtain optimal supportive care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
van der Hout, Anja, van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F., Witte, Birgit I., Coupé, Veerle M. H., Jansen, Femke, Leemans, C. René, Cuijpers, Pim, van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V., and Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
- Subjects
- *
CANCER patient care , *SELF-management (Psychology) , *RANDOMIZED controlled trials , *COLON cancer diagnosis , *BREAST cancer diagnosis - Abstract
Background: Cancer survivors have to deal with a wide range of physical symptoms, psychological, social and existential concerns, and lifestyle issues related to cancer and its treatment. Therefore, it is essential that they have access to optimal supportive care services. The eHealth self-management application Oncokompas was developed to support cancer survivors with where they need to turn to for advice and guidance, as well as to increase their knowledge on the availability of optimal support. A randomised controlled trial will be conducted to assess the efficacy, cost-utility and reach of Oncokompas as an eHealth self-management application compared with care as usual among cancer survivors.Methods/design: Adult cancer survivors diagnosed with breast, colorectal or head and neck cancer or lymphoma who are at 3 months to 5 years since curative treatment will be included. In total, 544 cancer survivors will be randomly assigned to the intervention group or a wait-list control group. The primary outcome measure is patient activation. Secondary outcome measures include self-efficacy, personal control, perceived patient-physician interaction, need for supportive care, mental adjustment to cancer and health-related quality of life. Furthermore, cost-utility outcomes will be assessed. Reach is defined as the percentage of cancer survivors who get access to Oncokompas within the context of this trial. Questionnaires will be administered at baseline, post-intervention and at 3- and 6-month follow-up.Discussion: In this study, we will evaluate the efficacy and cost-utility of Oncokompas among cancer survivors, as well as the reach of Oncokompas. These are essential first steps in the translation of research into practice and contribute to sustainable adoption, implementation and maintenance of an evidence-based Oncokompas.Trial Registration: Netherlands Trial Register identifier: NTR5774 . Registered on 8 March 2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Effectiveness and cost-utility of a guided self-help exercise program for patients treated with total laryngectomy: protocol of a multi-center randomized controlled trial.
- Author
-
Jansen, Femke, Cnossen, Ingrid C., Eerenstein, Simone E. J., Coupé, Veerle M. H., Witte, Birgit I., van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F., Doornaert, Patricia, Braunius, Weibel W., De Bree, Remco, Hardillo, José A. U., Honings, Jimmie, Halmos, György B., Leemans, C. René, Leeuw, Irma M. Verdonck-de, and Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M
- Subjects
LARYNGECTOMY ,PHYSICAL training & conditioning ,SHOULDER exercises ,LARYNGECTOMEES ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,EXERCISE therapy ,COMPARATIVE studies ,COST effectiveness ,DEGLUTITION disorders ,EXPERIMENTAL design ,LONGITUDINAL method ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,PATIENT education ,QUALITY of life ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,RESEARCH ,HEALTH self-care ,SPEECH disorders ,EVALUATION research ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,ECONOMICS - Abstract
Background: Total laryngectomy with or without adjuvant (chemo)radiation often induces speech, swallowing and neck and shoulder problems. Speech, swallowing and shoulder exercises may prevent or diminish these problems. The aim of the present paper is to describe the study, which is designed to investigate the effectiveness and cost-utility of a guided self-help exercise program built into the application "In Tune without Cords" among patients treated with total laryngectomy.Methods/design: Patients, up to 5 years earlier treated with total laryngectomy with or without (chemo)radiation will be recruited for participation in this study. Patients willing to participate will be randomized to the intervention or control group (1:1). Patients in the intervention group will be provided access to a guided self-help exercise program and a self-care education program built into the application "In Tune without Cords". Patients in the control group will only be provided access to the self-care education program. The primary outcome is the difference in swallowing quality (SWAL-QOL) between the intervention and control group. Secondary outcome measures address speech problems (SHI), shoulder disability (SDQ), quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35 and EQ-5D), direct and indirect costs (adjusted iMCQ and iPCQ measures) and self-management (PAM). Patients will be asked to complete these outcome measures at baseline, immediately after the intervention or control period (i.e. at 3 months follow-up) and at 6 months follow-up.Discussion: This randomized controlled trial will provide knowledge on the effectiveness of a guided self-help exercise program for patients treated with total laryngectomy. In addition, information on the value for money of such an exercise program will be provided. If this guided self-help program is (cost)effective for patients treated with total laryngectomy, the next step will be to implement this exercise program in current clinical practice.Trial Registration: NTR5255 Protocol version 4 date September 2015. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Improving care after colon cancer treatment in The Netherlands, personalised care to enhance quality of life (I CARE study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Duineveld, Laura A. M., Wieldraaijer, Thijs, van Asselt, Kristel M., Nugteren, Ineke C., Donkervoort, Sandra C., van de Ven, Anthony W. H., Smits, Anke B., van Geloven, Anna A. W., Bemelman, Willem A., Beverdam, Frederique H., van Tets, Willem F., Govaert, Marc J. P. M., Bosmans, Judith E., Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M., van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F., van Weert, Henk C. P. M., and Wind, Jan
- Subjects
COLON cancer treatment ,QUALITY of life ,SECONDARY care (Medicine) ,ELECTRONIC health records ,PATIENT aftercare ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,COLON tumors ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL quality control ,MEDICAL cooperation ,RESEARCH protocols ,RESEARCH ,EVALUATION research ,PSYCHOLOGY ,TUMOR treatment - Abstract
Background: It is expected that in 2020 more than 17,000 cases of colorectal cancer will be diagnosed in The Netherlands. To date, patients are included in a surgeon-led follow-up programme whose main focus is recurrence detection. However, patients often experience multiple physical and psychosocial problems. Currently, these problems are not always encountered. More care by a generalist is suggested as a solution. Furthermore, patients prefer to undergo rehabilitation in their own environment and to be more involved in their own health care. eHealth applications might enhance this. Oncokompas(2.0) is an online self-management application which facilitates access to supportive care. This study aims to evaluate primary care follow-up and aftercare in comparison with secondary care follow-up and aftercare for patients with colon cancer. Second, the added value of Oncokompas(2.0) to care will be assessed.Methods/design: This is a multi-centre 2 × 2 factorial randomised controlled trial with a calculated sample size of 300 patients. Patients with stage I, II, or III colon carcinoma are eligible. Patients will be randomly assigned in four groups: (1) usual follow-up visits and aftercare provided in secondary care, (2) usual follow-up visits and aftercare provided in secondary care with additional use of Oncokompas(2.0), (3) follow-up and aftercare in primary care, and (4) follow-up and aftercare in primary care with additional use of Oncokompas(2.0). The primary outcome is quality of life. Secondary outcomes include physical outcomes, psychosocial outcomes, number of investigations, referrals and related communication between secondary and primary care, (time of) recurrence detection and protocol adherence, attention to preventive care, self-management of patients, patient satisfaction, and preference of care at the end of the trial. Data collection will be done by questionnaires and extractions from electronic medical records.Discussion: The results of this study will provide evidence, which has been scarce to date, on prominent general practitioner involvement in care for colon cancer patients after initial treatment. Also, it evaluates the efficacy of an eHealth application to enhance patient empowerment.Dutch Trial Register: NTR4860 (registered on 2 October 2014). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of meaning-centered group psychotherapy in cancer survivors: protocol of a randomized controlled trial.
- Author
-
van der Spek, Nadia, Vos, Joël, van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F., Breitbart, William, Cuijpers, Pim, Knipscheer-Kuipers, Kitty, Willemsen, Vincent, Tollenaar, Rob AEM, van Asperen, Christi J., and Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
- Subjects
COST effectiveness ,PSYCHOTHERAPY ,CANCER treatment ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,HOSPITALS - Abstract
Background Meaning-focused coping may be at the core of adequate adjustment to life after cancer. Cancer survivors who experience their life as meaningful are better adjusted, have better quality of life and psychological functioning. Meaning-Centered Group Psychotherapy for Cancer Survivors (MCGP-CS) was designed to help patients to sustain or enhance a sense of meaning and purpose in their lives. The aim of the proposed study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MCGP-CS. Methods/design Survivors diagnosed with cancer in the last 5 years and treated with curative intent, are recruited via several hospitals in the Netherlands. After screening, 168 survivors are randomly assigned to one of the three study arms: 1. Meaning-Centered Group Psychotherapy (MCGP-CS) 2. Supportive group psychotherapy (SGP) 3. Care as usual (CAU). Baseline assessment takes place before randomisation, with follow up assessments post-intervention and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up. Primary outcome is meaning making (PMP, PTGI, SPWB). Secondary outcome measures address quality of life (EORTC-30), anxiety and depression (HADS), hopelessness (BHS), optimism (LOT-R), adjustment to cancer (MAC), and costs (TIC-P, EQ-5D, PRODISQ). Discussion Meaning-focused coping is key to adjustment to life after cancer, however, there is a lack of evidence based psychological interventions in this area. Many cancer survivors experience feelings of loneliness and alienation, and have a need for peer support, therefore a group method in particular, can be beneficial for sustaining or enhancing a sense of meaning. If this MCGP-CS is effective for cancer survivors, it can be implemented in the practice of psycho- oncology care. Trial registration NTR3571 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.