Search

Background: There is a scarcity of evidence regarding the potential relationship between the size and location of necrotic lesions, which must be understood to provide optimal joint-preserving treatment. The purpose of this study was to characterize the distribution patterns of necrotic lesions of varying sizes in early-stage osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH) with the use of three-dimensional mapping. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated clinical CT images of the hips that were performed in the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2018 to December 2022 and collected all CT images diagnosed with stage I and II ONFH. Three-dimensional structures that included both necrotic lesions and normal areas of the femoral heads were reconstructed and divided into eight regions to record their size and location. CT images for all lesions were superimposed onto a standard template, and three-dimensional mapping was created to determine the presence of concentrated areas of lesions. Results: In a cohort of 143 patients with stage I and II ONFH, a total of 150 hips were reviewed. For lesions with less than 15% of the femoral head volume, necrotic lesions predominantly involve regions I, III, and V, with region I showing concentration. For lesions with volumes ranging from 15 to 30%, necrotic lesions exhibited a wider distribution across regions I, II, III, IV, V, and VII, with significant concentrations in regions I, III, and V. For lesions exceeding 30% of the femoral head volume, the necrotic lesions were extensively distributed across nearly the entire femoral head, with a notable expansion of the concentrated necrotic areas. Conclusions: The distribution of necrotic lesions varies with lesion size, with smaller lesions primarily concentrated in the anterior and medial regions of the femoral head, particularly in the anterosuperior region, while larger lesions expand to the lateral and inferior regions. These findings enhance existing classification systems and provide crucial insights for guiding hip-preserving surgical planning and approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Denis and Ferguson et al.'s three-column spinal theory has been widely accepted and applied. However, this three-column theory was proposed based solely on observation and experience without thorough documented data and analysis. The aim of this study was to analyze and improve Denis and Ferguson et al.'s three-column spinal theory to propose a novel three-column concept in epidemiology, morphology and biomechanics.Methods: A retrospective analysis of the computed tomography imaging data of patients with a diagnosis of T11-L5 vertebral fractures was conducted between February 2010 and December 2018. Three-dimensional (3D) distribution maps of fracture lines of all subjects were obtained based on 3D mapping techniques. In addition, a 25-year-old health male volunteer was recruited for the vertebral finite element force analysis.Results: The present study enrolled 459 patients (age: 48 ± 11.42 years), containing a total of 521 fractured vertebrae. The fracture lines peaked in the upper and the outer third sections of the vertebra, starting from the anterior part of the vertebral pedicles in 3-D maps. Regarding flexion and extension of the spine, the last third of the vertebral body in front of the spinal canal was one main stress center in the finite element analysis. The stress on the vertebral body was greater in front of the pedicles in the lateral bending.Conclusion: The study reveals that the posterior one-third of the vertebral body in front of the spinal canal and the posterior one-third of the vertebral body in front of the pedicle are very different in terms of fracture characteristics and risks to spinal canal (3D maps and stress distributing graphs), therefore, they should be classified as different columns. We provide strong evidence that Su's three-column theory complies with the characteristics of vertebral physiological structure, vertebral fracture, and vertebral biomechanics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]