Search

Background: Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is an acute abdominal disease characterized by pancreatic necrosis and systemic disease. In a previous study, we showed that bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) can reduce SAP by secreting microRNA (miR)-9; however, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. The present study investigated the mechanism underlying BMSC-induced pancreatic regeneration. Methods: BMSCs were isolated, and miR-9 modified/antagonized BMSCs (pri-miR-9-BMSCs/TuD-BMSCs) were generated and injected into SAP rats. The levels of inflammatory cytokines and histopathologic changes were examined using ELISA and H&E staining. Angiogenesis was analyzed by qRT-PCR, western blotting, and immunohistochemistry. Cell function tests, dual luciferase reporter assays, cell co-culture, western blotting, and cell tracing were used to explore the mechanisms underlying miR-9 induced angiogenesis. Results: Pri-miR-9-BMSCs induced angiogenesis in SAP rats (Ang-1↑, TIE-2↑, and CD31↑) and repaired damaged vascular endothelial cells (VECs) in vitro, promoting angiogenesis (Ang-1↑, TIE-2↑, PI3K↑, AKT↑, p-AKT↑, CD31↑, and CD34↑). Pri-miR-9-BMSCs released miR-9 into VECs or injured pancreatic tissue, targeting the VE-cadherin gene and promoting PI3K/AKT signaling to treat SAP (VE-cadherin↓, β-catenin↓, PI3K↑, p-AKT↑), whereas antagonizing miR-9 in BMSCs did not alleviate or aggravated SAP. Conclusions: Pri-miR-9-BMSCs can repair injured pancreatic tissue by secreting miR-9 and promoting angiogenesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bacillus thuringiensis GabR is a Sigma 54-dependent transcriptional activator containing three typical domains, an N-terminal regulatory domain Per-ARNT-Sim (PAS), a central AAA(+) (ATPases associated with different cellular activities) domain and a C-terminal helix-turn-helix (HTH) DNA binding domain. GabR positively regulates the expression of the gabT gene of the gab gene cluster, which is responsible for the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) shunt., Results: Purified GabR was shown to specifically bind to a repeat region that mapped 58 bp upstream of the gabT start codon. The specific signal factors GABA and succinic semialdehyde (SSA) activated gabT expression, whereas GABA- and SSA-inducible gabT transcription was abolished in sigL and gabR mutants. GABA and SSA did not induce the expression of either SigL or GabR. Deletion of the PAS domain of GabR resulted in increased gabT transcriptional activity, both in the presence and absence of GABA., Conclusions: This study identified the GabR-binding site on the gabT promoter; however, GabR does not bind to its own promoter. gabT transcription is induced by GABA and SSA, and inducible expression is dependent on SigL and activated by GabR. The PAS domain in GabR is repressing its enhancer transcriptional activity on the gabT promoter. Repression is released upon GABA addition, whereupon transcription is induced.