1. Design and methodology of SNAP-1: a Sprint National Anaesthesia Project to measure patient reported outcome after anaesthesia
- Author
-
Martin Tinker, Sujesh Bansal, Daniel Conway, David Saunders, Matt Oliver, VIKAS KAURA, Richard Pugh, Samantha Warnakulasuriya, Cherish Paul, Tom Lawton, Iain Moppett, Mamoon Yusaf, Lorelle Brownlee, Prakash Krishnan, Dominic Nielsen, Geoffrey Wigmore, Tim Peters, James Sheehan, Danielle Franklin, Johnny Kenth, Sally Humphreys, Shaman Jhanji, Denny Levett, Angus Royal, Ahmed Mesbah, Matthew Creed, Suneetha Ramani Moonesinghe, Agnieszka Skorko, Akshay Shah, and Michael Grocott
- Subjects
Anesthesia awareness ,business.industry ,Epidemiology ,Research ,Patient satisfaction ,Perioperative ,Patient recruitment ,Anesthesia ,Cohort ,Medicine ,Patient-reported outcome ,business ,Cohort study ,Case report form - Abstract
Background Patient satisfaction is an important metric of health-care quality. Accidental awareness under general anaesthesia (AAGA) is a serious complication of anaesthesia care which may go unrecognised in the immediate perioperative period but leads to long-term psychological harm for affected patients. The SNAP-1 study aimed to measure patient satisfaction with anaesthesia care and the incidence of AAGA, reported on direct questioning within 24 h of surgery, in a large multicentre cohort. A secondary aim of SNAP-1 was to test the effectiveness of a new network of Quality Audit and Research Coordinators in NHS anaesthetic departments, to achieve widespread study participation and high patient recruitment rates. This manuscript describes the study methodology. Methods SNAP-1 was a prospective observational cohort study. The study protocol was approved by the National Research Ethics Service. All UK NHS hospitals with anaesthetic departments were invited to participate. Adult patients undergoing any type of non-obstetric surgery were recruited in participating hospitals on 13th and 14th May 2014. Demographic data were collected by anaesthetists providing perioperative care. Patients were then approached within 24 h of surgery to complete two questionnaires—the Bauer patient satisfaction questionnaire (to measure patient reported outcome) and the modified Brice questionnaire (to detect possible accidental awareness). Completion of postoperative questionnaires was taken as evidence of implied consent. Results were recorded on a standard patient case report form, and local investigators entered anonymised data into an electronic database for later analysis by the core research team. Results Preliminary analyses indicate that over 15,000 patients were recruited across the UK, making SNAP-1 the largest NIHR portfolio-adopted study in anaesthesia to date. Both descriptive and analytic epidemiological analyses will be used to answer specific questions about the patient perception of anaesthesia care overall and in surgical sub-specialties and to determine the incidence of AAGA. Conclusions The SNAP-1 study recruited a large number of UK hospitals and thousands of perioperative patients using newly established networks in the UK anaesthetic profession. The results will provide benchmarking information to aid interpretation of patient satisfaction data and also determine the incidence of AAGA reported on a single postoperative visit. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13741-015-0011-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
- Published
- 2015