1. Diaphragm assessment by two dimensional speckle tracking imaging in normal subjects
- Author
-
Andrea J. Boon, Hector R. Villarraga, Sam R. Orde, Hiroshi Sekiguchi, and Daniel G. Firth
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Pathology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Diaphragm ,Diaphragmatic breathing ,Pilot Projects ,Inspiratory Capacity ,Contractility ,03 medical and health sciences ,Young Adult ,0302 clinical medicine ,Ultrasound ,medicine ,Humans ,Single-Blind Method ,Expiration ,Respiratory system ,Speckle tracking imaging ,Speckle tracking ,Ultrasonography ,2. Zero hunger ,Observer Variation ,business.industry ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,Repeatability ,Healthy Volunteers ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,Echocardiography ,Female ,business ,Nuclear medicine ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Research Article - Abstract
Background Conventionally, ultrasonographic assessment of diaphragm contractility has involved measuring respiratory changes in diaphragm thickness (thickening fraction) using B-mode or caudal displacement with M-mode. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking has been increasingly used to assess muscle deformation (‘strain’) in echocardiography. We sought to determine in a pilot study if this technology could be utilized to analyze diaphragmatic contraction. Methods Fifty healthy adult volunteers with normal exercise capacity underwent ultrasound imaging. A linear array transducer was used for the assessment of diaphragm thickness, thickening fraction (TF), and strain in the right anterior axillary line at approximately the ninth intercostal space. A phased array transducer was applied subcostally for the assessment of diaphragm displacement on the right mid-clavicular line. Diaphragmatic images were recorded from the end of expiration through the end of inspiration at 60 % maximal inspiratory capacity. Diaphragm strain was analyzed off-line by speckle tracking imaging. Blinded inter- and intra-rater variability was tested in 10 cases. Results Mean right diaphragm thickness at end-expiration (±SD: standard deviation) was 0.24 cm (±0.1), with TF of 45.1 % (±12) at 60 % peak inspiratory effort. Mean right diaphragm caudal displacement was 4.9 cm (±1). Mean right diaphragm strain was -40.3 % (±9). A moderate correlation was seen between longitudinal strain and TF (R2 0.44, p
- Published
- 2016