1. Prognostic factors for survival with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer in real-life practice: the ANICE-PaC study.
- Author
-
Fernández A, Salgado M, García A, Buxò E, Vera R, Adeva J, Jiménez-Fonseca P, Quintero G, Llorca C, Cañabate M, López LJ, Muñoz A, Ramírez P, González P, López C, Reboredo M, Gallardo E, Sanchez-Cánovas M, Gallego J, Guillén C, Ruiz-Miravet N, Navarro-Pérez V, De la Cámara J, Alés-Díaz I, Pazo-Cid RA, and Carmona-Bayonas A
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Albumins administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Comorbidity, Deoxycytidine administration & dosage, Deoxycytidine analogs & derivatives, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Staging, Paclitaxel administration & dosage, Pancreatic Neoplasms pathology, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Gemcitabine, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Pancreatic Neoplasms drug therapy, Pancreatic Neoplasms mortality
- Abstract
Background: Treatment with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine increases survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. However, the assessment of treatment efficacy and safety in non-selected patients in a real-life setting may provide useful information to support decision-making processes in routine practice., Methods: Retrospective, multicenter study including patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, who started first-line treatment with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine between December 2013 and June 2015 according to routine clinical practice. In addition to describing the treatment pattern, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed for the total sample and the exploratory subgroups based on the treatment and patients' clinical characteristics., Results: All 210 eligible patients had a median age of 65.0 years (range 37-81). Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma was recurrent in 46 (21.9%) patients and de novo in 164 (78.1%); 38 (18%) patients had a biliary stent. At baseline, 33 (18.1%) patients had an ECOG performance status ≥2. Patients received a median of four cycles of treatment (range 1-21), with a median duration of 3.5 months; 137 (65.2%) patients had a dose reduction of nab-paclitaxel and/or gemcitabine during treatment, and 33 (17.2%) discontinued treatment due to toxicity. Relative dose intensity (RDI) for nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and the combined treatment was 66.7%. Median OS was 7.2 months (95% CI 6.0-8.5), and median PFS was 5.0 months (95% CI 4.3-5.9); 50 patients achieved either a partial or complete response (ORR 24.6%). OS was influenced by baseline ECOG PS, NLR and CA 19.9, but not by age ≥ 70 years and/or the presence of hepatobiliary stent or RDI < 85%. All included variables, computed as dichotomous, showed a significant contribution to the Cox regression model to build a nomogram for predicting survival in these patients: baseline ECOG 0-1 vs. 2-3 (p = 0.030), baseline NLR > 3 vs. ≤ 3 (p = 0.043), and baseline CA 19.9 > 37 U/mL vs. ≤37 U/mL (p = 0.004)., Conclusions: Nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine remain effective in a real-life setting, despite the high burden of dose reductions and poorer performance of these patients. A nomogram to predict survival using baseline ECOG performance status, NLR and CA 19.9 is proposed.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF