185 results on '"McColl, Elaine"'
Search Results
2. A collaborative approach to develop an intervention to strengthen health visitors’ role in prevention of excess weight gain in children
- Author
-
Ray, Devashish, Sniehotta, Falko, McColl, Elaine, Ells, Louisa, O’Neill, Gill, and McCabe, Karen
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Emesis in pregnancy – a qualitative study on trial recruitment failure from the EMPOWER internal pilot
- Author
-
Lie, Mabel Leng Sim, McParlin, Catherine, McColl, Elaine, Graham, Ruth H., and Robson, Stephen C.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Advancing cluster randomised trials in children’s therapy: a survey of the acceptability of trial behaviours to therapists and parents
- Author
-
Armitage, Samantha, Rapley, Tim, Pennington, Lindsay, McAnuff, Jennifer, McColl, Elaine, Duff, Catherine, Brooks, Rob, and Kolehmainen, Niina
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. A randomised controlled feasibility study of interpersonal art psychotherapy for the treatment of aggression in people with intellectual disabilities in secure care
- Author
-
Hackett, Simon S., Zubala, Ania, Aafjes-van Doorn, Katie, Chadwick, Thomas, Harrison, Toni Leigh, Bourne, Jane, Freeston, Mark, Jahoda, Andrew, Taylor, John L., Ariti, Cono, McNamara, Rachel, Pennington, Lindsay, McColl, Elaine, and Kaner, Eileen
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Correction to: A randomised controlled feasibility study of interpersonal art psychotherapy for the treatment of aggression in people with intellectual disabilities in secure care
- Author
-
Hackett, Simon S., Zubala, Ania, Aafjes-van Doorn, Katie, Chadwick, Thomas, Harrison, Toni Leigh, Bourne, Jane, Freeston, Mark, Jahoda, Andrew, Taylor, John L., Ariti, Cono, McNamara, Rachel, Pennington, Lindsay, McColl, Elaine, and Kaner, Eileen
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Children and parents’ perspectives on the acceptability of three management strategies for dental caries in primary teeth within the ‘Filling Children’s Teeth: Indicated or Not’ (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial – a qualitative study
- Author
-
El-Yousfi, Sarab, Innes, Nicola P. T., Holmes, Richard D., Freeman, Ruth, Cunningham, Kathryn B., McColl, Elaine, Maguire, Anne, Douglas, Gail V. A., Clarkson, Janet E., and Marshman, Zoe
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Dental professionals’ experiences of managing children with carious lesions in their primary teeth – a qualitative study within the FiCTION randomised controlled trial
- Author
-
Marshman, Zoe, Kettle, Jennifer E., Holmes, Richard D., Cunningham, Kathryn B., Freeman, Ruth, Gibson, Barry J., McColl, Elaine, Maguire, Anne, Douglas, Gail V. A., Clarkson, Janet E., and Innes, Nicola P. T.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Cost-effectiveness of child caries management: a randomised controlled trial (FiCTION trial)
- Author
-
Homer, Tara, Maguire, Anne, Douglas, Gail V. A., Innes, Nicola P., Clarkson, Jan E., Wilson, Nina, Ryan, Vicky, McColl, Elaine, Robertson, Mark, and Vale, Luke
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. A feasibility study with embedded pilot randomised controlled trial and process evaluation of electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation in patients with periodontitis
- Author
-
Holliday, Richard, Preshaw, Philip M., Ryan, Vicky, Sniehotta, Falko F., McDonald, Suzanne, Bauld, Linda, and McColl, Elaine
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 1 - development of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT)
- Author
-
Rapley, Tim, Girling, Melissa, Mair, Frances S., Murray, Elizabeth, Treweek, Shaun, McColl, Elaine, Steen, Ian Nicholas, May, Carl R., and Finch, Tracy L.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 2 - validation of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT)
- Author
-
Finch, Tracy L., Girling, Melissa, May, Carl R., Mair, Frances S., Murray, Elizabeth, Treweek, Shaun, McColl, Elaine, Steen, Ian Nicholas, Cook, Clare, Vernazza, Christopher R., Mackintosh, Nicola, Sharma, Samridh, Barbery, Gaery, Steele, Jimmy, and Rapley, Tim
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Preoperative Behavioural Intervention versus standard care to Reduce Drinking before elective orthopaedic Surgery (PRE-OP BIRDS): protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial
- Author
-
Snowden, Christopher, Lynch, Ellen, Avery, Leah, Gerrand, Craig, Gilvarry, Eilish, Goudie, Nicola, Haighton, Catherine, Hall, Lesley, Howe, Nicola, Howel, Denise, McColl, Elaine, Prentis, James, Stamp, Elaine, and Kaner, Eileen
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Promoting Alcohol Reduction in Non-Treatment Seeking parents (PAReNTS): a protocol for a pilot feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of alcohol screening and brief interventions to reduce parental alcohol use disorders in vulnerable families
- Author
-
McGovern, Ruth, Stamp, Elaine, Javanbakht, Mehdi, McColl, Elaine, Hickman, Matthew, and Kaner, Eileen
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. A checklist for clinical trials in rare disease: obstacles and anticipatory actions—lessons learned from the FOR-DMD trial
- Author
-
Crow, Rebecca A., Hart, Kimberly A., McDermott, Michael P., Tawil, Rabi, Martens, William B., Herr, Barbara E., McColl, Elaine, Wilkinson, Jennifer, Kirschner, Janbernd, King, Wendy M., Eagle, Michele, Brown, Mary W., Hirtz, Deborah, Lochmuller, Hanns, Straub, Volker, Ciafaloni, Emma, Shieh, Perry B., Spinty, Stefan, Childs, Anne-Marie, Manzur, Adnan Y., Morandi, Lucia, Butterfield, Russell J., Horrocks, Iain, Roper, Helen, Flanigan, Kevin M., Kuntz, Nancy L., Mah, Jean K., Morrison, Leslie, Darras, Basil T., von der Hagen, Maja, Schara, Ulrike, Wilichowski, Ekkehard, Mongini, Tiziana, McDonald, Craig M., Vita, Giuseppe, Barohn, Richard J., Finkel, Richard S., Wicklund, Matthew, McMillan, Jr, Hugh J., Hughes, Imelda, Pegoraro, Elena, Bryan Burnette, W., Howard, James F., Thangarajh, Mathula, Campbell, Craig, Griggs, Robert C., Bushby, Kate, and Guglieri, Michela
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Problems recruiting and retaining postnatal women to a pilot randomised controlled trial of a web-delivered weight loss intervention
- Author
-
Haste, Anna, Adamson, Ashley J., McColl, Elaine, Araujo-Soares, Vera, and Bell, Ruth
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Invasive urodynamic testing prior to surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence in women: cost-effectiveness and value of information analyses in the context of a mixed methods feasibility study
- Author
-
Homer, Tara, Shen, Jing, Vale, Luke, McColl, Elaine, Tincello, Douglas G., Hilton, Paul, and on behalf of the INVESTIGATE-I studies group
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Is reviewing trial protocols on clinicaltrials.gov a feasible method of compiling a long-list for a core outcome set?
- Author
-
Fabricius, Michael, Pickard, Robert, and McColl, Elaine
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Using vignettes to understand variations in patient screening and recruitment
- Author
-
McColl, Elaine, Hilton, Paul, and Brennand, Cath
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Challenges of the set-up process for academic led international studies of rare diseases
- Author
-
McColl, Elaine, Bushby, Kate, Guglieri, Michela, Davis, Becky, Watson, Gillian, Griggs, Robert, and Hart, Kim
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Development of a series of patient information leaflets for constipation using a range of cognitive interview techniques: LIFELAX
- Author
-
Lake, Amelia A, Speed, Chris, Brookes, Anna, Heaven, Ben, Adamson, Ashley J, Moynihan, Paula, Corbett, Sally, and McColl, Elaine
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Acceptability of financial incentives for health behaviour change to public health policymakers: a qualitative study
- Author
-
Giles, Emma L., Sniehotta, Falko F., McColl, Elaine, Adams, Jean, Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, and Adams, Jean [0000-0002-5733-7830]
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Motivation ,lcsh:Public aspects of medicine ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,Health Policy ,Health Behavior ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,lcsh:RA1-1270 ,Administrative personnel ,Health Promotion ,Middle Aged ,Trust ,England ,Reward ,Qualitative research ,Health behaviour ,Humans ,Female ,Public Health Administration ,Research Article - Abstract
$\textbf{Background:}$ Providing financial incentives contingent on healthy behaviours is one way to encourage healthy behaviours. However, there remains substantial concerns with the acceptability of health promoting financial incentives (HPFI). Previous research has studied acceptability of HPFI to the public, recipients and practitioners. We are not aware of any previous work that has focused particularly on the views of public health policymakers. Our aim was to explore the views of public health policymakers on whether or not HPFI are acceptable; and what, if anything, could be done to maximise acceptability of HPFI. $\textbf{Methods:}$ We recruited 21 local, regional and national policymakers working in England via gatekeepers and snowballing. We conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with participants exploring experiences of, and attitudes towards, HPFI. We analysed data using the Framework approach. $\textbf{Results:}$ Public health policymakers working in England acknowledged that HPFI could be a useful behaviour change tool, but were not overwhelmingly supportive of them. In particular, they raised concerns about effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, potential 'gaming', and whether or not HPFI address the underlying causes of unhealthy behaviours. Shopping voucher rewards, of smaller value, targeted at deprived groups were particularly acceptable to policymakers. Participants were particularly concerned about the response of other stakeholders to HPFI - including the public, potential recipients, politicians and the media. Overall, the interviews reflected three tensions. Firstly, a tension between wanting to trust individuals and promote responsibility; and distrust around the potential for 'gaming the system'. Secondly, a tension between participants' own views about HPFI; and their concerns about the possible views of other stakeholders. Thirdly, a tension between participants' personal distaste of HPFI; and their professional view that they could be a valuable behaviour change tool. $\textbf{Conclusions:}$ There are aspects of design that influence acceptability of financial incentive interventions to public health policymakers. However, it is not clear that even interventions designed to maximise acceptability would be acceptable enough to be recommended for implementation. Further work may be required to help policymakers understand the potential responses of other stakeholder groups to financial incentive interventions.
- Published
- 2016
23. Identifying continence options after stroke (ICONS): a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial
- Author
-
Thomas, Lois H., Watkins, Caroline Leigh, Sutton, Christopher J., Forshaw, Denise, Leathley, Michael J., French, Beverley, Burton, Christopher R., Cheater, Francine, Roe, Brenda, Britt, David, Booth, Jo, McColl, Elaine, Carter, Bernadette, Rodgers, Helen, Brittain, Katie, Walker, Andrew, Barrett, James, Whiteley, Gemma, Brand, Pat, Griffiths, May, Helvin, Philip, James, Brian, Pearl, Gill, Whitewood, Jane, Vella, Jacqui, Childs, Audrey, Childs, Richard, Crosby, Sean, Hall, Steve, Lewin, Anj, Royle, Liz, Scott, Carole, and Wright, Jean
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Urinary Bladder ,Psychological intervention ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,Urinary incontinence ,B700 ,law.invention ,Cognition ,Randomized controlled trial ,Quality of life ,law ,Odds Ratio ,Medicine ,Humans ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Functional ability ,Cluster randomised controlled trial ,Stroke ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Wales ,urinary incontinence ,Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ,business.industry ,Patient Selection ,Research ,Odds ratio ,Recovery of Function ,medicine.disease ,stroke ,Urodynamics ,Treatment Outcome ,England ,Sample Size ,Physical therapy ,Quality of Life ,Feasibility Studies ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,business ,cluster randomised controlled trial ,feasibility - Abstract
Background Urinary incontinence (UI) affects half of patients hospitalised after stroke and is often poorly managed. Cochrane systematic reviews have shown some positive impact of conservative interventions (such as bladder training) in reducing UI, but their effectiveness has not been demonstrated with stroke patients. Methods We conducted a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial of a systematic voiding programme (SVP) for the management of UI after stroke. Stroke services were randomised to receive SVP (n = 4), SVP plus supported implementation (SVP+, n = 4), or usual care (UC, n = 4). Feasibility outcomes were participant recruitment and retention. The main effectiveness outcome was presence or absence of UI at six and 12 weeks post-stroke. Additional effectiveness outcomes included were the effect of the intervention on different types of UI, continence status at discharge, UI severity, functional ability, quality of life, and death. Results It was possible to recruit patients (413; 164 SVP, 125 SVP+, and 124 UC) and participant retention was acceptable (85% and 88% at six and 12 weeks, respectively). There was no suggestion of a beneficial effect on the main outcome at six (SVP versus UC: odds ratio (OR) 0.94, 95% CI: 0.46 to 1.94; SVP+ versus UC: OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.28 to 1.37) or 12 weeks (SVP versus UC: OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.54 to 1.93; SVP+ versus UC: OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.54 to 2.09). No secondary outcomes showed a strong suggestion of clinically meaningful improvement in SVP and/or SVP+ arms relative to UC at six or 12 weeks. However, at 12 weeks both intervention arms had higher estimated odds of continence than UC for patients with urge incontinence. Conclusions The trial has met feasibility outcomes of participant recruitment and retention. It was not powered to demonstrate effectiveness, but there is some evidence of a potential reduction in the odds of specific types of incontinence. A full trial should now be considered. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN08609907, date of registration: 7 July 2010. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-509) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
- Published
- 2014
24. A psychosocial intervention for the management of functional dysphonia: complex intervention development and pilot randomised trial.
- Author
-
Deary, Vincent, McColl, Elaine, Carding, Paul, Miller, Tracy, and Wilson, Janet
- Subjects
- *
VOICE disorder treatment , *SPEECH therapy , *COGNITIVE therapy , *PSYCHOSOCIAL factors , *RANDOMIZED controlled trials - Abstract
Background: Medically unexplained loss or alteration of voice--functional dysphonia--is the commonest presentation to speech and language therapists (SLTs). Besides the impact on personal and work life, functional dysphonia is also associated with increased levels of anxiety and depression and poor general health. Voice therapy delivered by SLTs improves voice but not these associated symptoms. The aims of this research were the systematic development of a complex intervention to improve the treatment of functional dysphonia, and the trialling of this intervention for feasibility and acceptability to SLTs and patients in a randomised pilot study Methods: A theoretical model of medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) was elaborated through literature review and synthesis. This was initially applied as an assessment format in a series of patient interviews. Data from this stage and a small consecutive cohort study were used to design and refine a brief cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) training intervention for a SLT. This was then implemented in an external pilot patient randomised trial where one SLT delivered standard voice therapy or voice therapy plus CBT to 74 patients. The primary outcomes were of the acceptability of the intervention to patients and the SLT, and the feasibility of changing the SLT's clinical practice through a brief training. This was measured through monitoring treatment flow and through structured analysis of the content of intervention for treatment fidelity and inter-treatment contamination. Results: As measured by treatment flow, the intervention was as acceptable as standard voice therapy to patients. Analysis of treatment content showed that the SLT was able to conduct a complex CBT formulation and deliver novel treatment strategies for fatigue, sleep, anxiety and depression in the majority of patients. On pre-post measures of voice and quality of life, patients in both treatment arms improved. Conclusion: These interventions were acceptable to patients. Emotional and psychosocial issues presented routinely in the study patient group and CBT techniques were used, deliberately and inadvertently, in both treatment arms. This CBT "contamination" of the voice therapy only arm reflects the chief limitation of the study: one therapist delivered both treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Understanding variations in patient screening and recruitment in a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial: a vignette-based study.
- Author
-
Hilton, Paul, Buckley, Brian S., McColl, Elaine, Howel, Denise, Tincello, Douglas G., and Brennand, Catherine
- Subjects
URINARY incontinence treatment ,MEDICAL screening ,URODYNAMICS ,HEALTH outcome assessment ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials - Abstract
Background: The INVESTIGATE-I study was designed to inform a future definitive randomised trial of invasive urodynamic testing, compared to basic clinical assessment with noninvasive tests prior to surgical treatment, in women with stress urinary incontinence or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence. In a pilot randomised controlled trial, women from seven participating sites were screened, consented and randomised. Overall, 771 patients were identified from clinic notes and correspondence as being potential recruits and were sent the Patient Information Leaflet. Of those screened, 284 were deemed eligible, giving an overall 'screen positive' rate of 37%. The numbers screened at individual centres varied between 14 and 399; the 'screen positive' rate varied between 22 and 79% and the percentage of eligible women recruited varied between 55 and 100%. The aim of this additional substudy was to explore why 'screen positive' rates may have varied so widely between apparently similar sites. Results: All 11 trial staff involved in screening in the seven recruiting sites were asked to evaluate a series of 20 identical vignettes, mainly based on actual general practitioner referral letters. Of the vignettes, 16 mentioned one or more definite inclusion criteria; the remainder had possible inclusions. Four had definite exclusions; 12 had possible exclusions. Free-text comments were sought to clarify the screeners' decisions. For six vignettes everyone agreed that the patient was eligible; for one all agreed she was not eligible; the breakdown for the remainder was mixed. Free-text comments illuminated uncertainties that may have led to variability in judging potential eligibility. Conclusions: Variability in judgements about potential trial eligibility highlights the importance of explicit and objective inclusion and exclusion criteria, and of agreed strategies for making judgements when information is missing. During the development and planning of trials, vignettes might be a valuable tool for training those involved in screening and recruiting patients, for identifying potential problems and ensuring greater consistency in the application of eligibility criteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Measuring behaviours for escaping from house fires: use of latent variable models to summarise multiple behaviours.
- Author
-
Ploubidis, G. B., Edwards, P., Kendrick, D., Ablewhite, Joanne, Benford, Penny, Bryan, Clare, Clacy, Rose, Coupland, Carol, Cooper, Nicola, Deave, Toity, Goodenough, Trudy, Hawkins, Adrian, Hayes, Mike, Hindmarch, Paul, Kay, Bryony, Laird-Hopkins, Benita, Majsak-Newman, Gosia, McColl, Elaine, McDaid, Lisa, and Reading, Richard
- Subjects
HOME fires & fire prevention ,LATENT variables ,LOGISTIC regression analysis ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,MULTIVARIATE analysis - Abstract
Background: This paper reports the development and testing of a construct measuring parental fire safety behaviours for planning escape from a house fire. Methods: Latent variable modelling of data on parental-reported fire safety behaviours and plans for escaping from a house fire and multivariable logistic regression to quantify the association between groups defined by the latent variable modelling and parental-report of having a plan for escaping from a house fire. Data comes from 1112 participants in a cluster randomised controlled trial set in children's centres in 4 study centres in the UK. Results: A two class model provided the best fit to the data, combining responses to five fire safety planning behaviours. The first group ('more behaviours for escaping from a house fire') comprised 86 % of participants who were most likely to have a torch, be aware of how their smoke alarm sounds, to have external door and window keys accessible, and exits clear. The second group ('fewer behaviours for escaping from a house fire') comprised 14 % of participants who were less likely to report these five behaviours. After adjusting for potential confounders, participants allocated to the 'more behaviours for escaping from a house fire group were 2.5 times more likely to report having an escape plan (OR 2.48; 95 % CI 1.59-3.86) than those in the "fewer behaviours for escaping from a house fire" group. Conclusions: Multiple fire safety behaviour questions can be combined into a single binary summary measure of fire safety behaviours for escaping from a house fire. Our findings will be useful to future studies wishing to use a single measure of fire safety planning behaviour as measures of outcome or exposure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. The NULevel trial of a scalable, technology-assisted weight loss maintenance intervention for obese adults after clinically significant weight loss: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Evans, Elizabeth H., Araújo-Soares, Vera, Adamson, Ashley, Batterham, Alan M., Brown, Heather, Campbell, Miglena, Dombrowski, Stephan U., Guest, Alison, Jackson, Daniel, Kwasnicka, Dominika, Ladha, Karim, McColl, Elaine, Olivier, Patrick, Rothman, Alexander J., Sainsbury, Kirby, Steel, Alison J., Steen, Ian Nicholas, Vale, Luke, White, Martin, and Wright, Peter
- Abstract
Background: Effective weight loss interventions are widely available but, after weight loss, most individuals regain weight. This article describes the protocol for the NULevel trial evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a systematically developed, inexpensive, scalable, technology-assisted, behavioural intervention for weight loss maintenance (WLM) in obese adults after initial weight loss.Methods/design: A 12-month single-centre, two-armed parallel group, participant randomised controlled superiority trial is underway, recruiting a total of 288 previously obese adults after weight loss of ≥5 % within the previous 12 months. Participants are randomly assigned to intervention or control arms, with a 1:1 allocation, stratified by sex and percentage of body weight lost (<10 % vs ≥10 %). Change in weight (kg) from baseline to 12 months is the primary outcome. Weight, other anthropometric variables and 7-day physical activity (assessed via accelerometer) measures are taken at 0 and 12 months. Questionnaires at 0, 6 and 12 months assess psychological process variables, health service use and participant costs. Participants in the intervention arm initially attend an individual face-to-face WLM consultation with an intervention facilitator and then use a mobile internet platform to self-monitor and report their diet, daily activity (via pedometer) and weight through daily weighing on wirelessly connected scales. Automated feedback via mobile phone, tailored to participants' weight regain and goal progress is provided. Participants in the control arm receive quarterly newsletters (via links embedded in text messages) and wirelessly connected scales. Qualitative process evaluation interviews are conducted with a subsample of up to 40 randomly chosen participants. Acceptability and feasibility of procedures, cost-effectiveness, and relationships among socioeconomic variables and WLM will also be assessed.Discussion: It is hypothesised that participants allocated to the intervention arm will show significantly lower levels of weight regain from baseline than those in the control arm. To date, this is the first WLM trial using remote real-time weight monitoring and mobile internet platforms to deliver a flexible, efficient and scalable intervention, tailored to the individual. This trial addresses a key research need and has the potential to make a vital contribution to the evidence base to inform future WLM policy and provision.Trial Registration: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN14657176 (registration date 20 March 2014). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. A mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing versus clinical assessment and non-invasive tests prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: the INVESTIGATE-I study.
- Author
-
Hilton, Paul, Armstrong, Natalie, Brennand, Catherine, Howel, Denise, Jing Shen, Andrew Bryant, Tincello, Douglas G., Lucas, Malcolm G., Buckley, Brian S., Chapple, Christopher R., Homer, Tara, Vale, Luke, and McColl, Elaine
- Subjects
URODYNAMICS ,FEASIBILITY studies ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,URINARY stress incontinence ,DISEASES in women ,SYSTEMATIC reviews - Abstract
Background: The position of invasive urodynamic testing (IUT) in diagnostic pathways for urinary incontinence is unclear, and systematic reviews have called for further trials evaluating clinical utility. The objective of this study was to inform the decision whether to proceed to a definitive randomised trial of IUT compared to clinical assessment with non-invasive tests, prior to surgery in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). Methods: A mixed methods study comprising a pragmatic multicentre randomised pilot trial, a qualitative face-to face interview study with patients eligible for the trial, an exploratory economic evaluation including value of information study, a survey of clinicians' views about IUT, and qualitative telephone interviews with purposively sampled survey respondents. Only the first and second of these elements are reported here. Trial participants were randomised to either clinical assessment with non-invasive tests (control arm) or clinical assessment with non-invasive tests plus IUT (intervention arm). The main outcome measures of these feasibility studies were confirmation that units can identify and recruit eligible women, acceptability of investigation strategies and data collection tools, and acquisition of outcome data to determine the sample size for a definitive trial. The primary outcome proposed for a definitive trial was ICIQ-FLUTS (total score) 6 months after surgery or the start of nonsurgical treatment. Results: Of 284 eligible women, 222 (78 %) were recruited, 165/219 (75 %) returned questionnaires at baseline, and 125/200 returned them (63 %) at follow-up. Most women underwent surgery; management plans were changed in 19 (19 %) participants following IUT. Participants interviewed were positive about the trial and the associated documentation. Conclusions: All elements of a definitive trial were rehearsed. Such a trial would require between 232 and 922 participants, depending on the target difference in the primary outcome. We identified possible modifications to our protocol for application in a definitive trial including clarity over inclusion/exclusions, screening processes, reduction in secondary outcomes, and modification to patient questionnaire booklets and bladder diaries. A definitive trial of IUT versus clinical assessment prior to surgery for SUI or stress predominant MUI is feasible and remains relevant. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN 71327395, registered 7 June 2010. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Acceptability of financial incentives for breastfeeding: thematic analysis of readers' comments to UK online news reports.
- Author
-
Giles, Emma L., Holmes, Matthew, McColl, Elaine, Sniehotta, Falko F., and Adams, Jean M.
- Subjects
BREASTFEEDING ,MONETARY incentives ,WOMEN'S health ,PUBLIC health ,INVESTMENTS ,MANAGEMENT - Abstract
Background: Whilst it is recommended that babies are breastfed exclusively for the first six months, many mothers do not maintain breastfeeding for this length of time. Previous research confirms that women and midwives value financial incentives for breastfeeding, but limited research has explored the wider acceptability of these interventions to the general public. This paper examines opinion towards financial incentives for breastfeeding using reader responses to UK on-line media coverage of a study undertaken in this area. Methods: This study used netnography to undertake a thematic analysis of 3,373 reader comments posted in response to thirteen articles, published in November 2013, which reported findings from a feasibility study of financial incentives for breastfeeding. All articles were published on one of six UK news websites that achieved a monthly audience of at least five million viewers across laptop and desktop computers and mobile devices during April-May 2013. Results: Nine analytical themes were identified, with a majority view that financial incentives for breastfeeding are unacceptable. These themes cover a range of opinions: from negligent parents unable to take responsibility for their own actions; through to psychologically vulnerable members of society who should be protected from coercion and manipulation; to capable and responsible women who can, and should be allowed to, make their own decisions. Many views focused on the immediate costs of the intervention, concluding that this was something that was currently unaffordable to fund (e.g. by the NHS). Others contrasted the value of the incentive against other 'costs' of breastfeeding. There was some consideration of the issue of cost-effectiveness and cost-saving, where the potential future benefit from initial investment was identified. Many commenters identified that financial incentives do not address the many structural and cultural barriers to breastfeeding. Conclusions: Overall, those commenting on the on-line UK news articles viewed financial incentives for breastfeeding as unacceptable and that alternative, structural, interventions were likely to be more effective. Further consideration of how best to conduct internet-based qualitative research to elicit opinion towards public health issues is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Recruitment and retention strategies and the examination of attrition bias in a randomised controlled trial in children's centres serving families in disadvantaged areas of England.
- Author
-
Hindmarch, Paul, Hawkins, Adrian, McColl, Elaine, Hayes, Mike, Majsak-Newman, Gosia, Ablewhite, Joanne, Deave, Toity, and Kendrick, Denise
- Subjects
REGRESSION analysis ,CLINICAL trials ,WOUNDS & injuries ,FIRES ,CHILD psychology - Abstract
Background: Failure to retain participants in randomised controlled trials and longitudinal studies can cause significant methodological problems. We report the recruitment and retention strategies of a randomised controlled trial to promote fire-related injury prevention in families with pre-school children attending children's centres in disadvantaged areas in England. Methods: Thirty-six children's centres were cluster randomised into one of three arms of a 12-month fire-related injury prevention trial. Two arms delivered safety interventions and there was one control arm. Retention rates compared the numbers of participants responding to the 12-month questionnaire to the number recruited to the trial. Multivariable random effects logistic regression was used to explore factors independently associated with participant retention. Results: The trial exceeded its required sample size through the use of multiple recruitment strategies. All children's centres remained in the study, despite increased reorganisation. Parent retention was 68% at 12 months, ranging from 65% to 70% across trial arms and from 62% to 74% across trial sites. There was no significant difference in the rates of retention between trial arms (p = 0.58) or between trial sites (p = 0.16). Retention was significantly lower amongst mothers aged 16-25 years than older mothers [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.57, 95% CI 0.41, 0.78], those living in non-owner occupied accommodation than in owner occupied accommodation (AOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38, 0.73) and those living in more disadvantaged areas (most versus least disadvantaged quintiles AOR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30, 0.82). Conclusions: Studies recruiting disadvantaged populations should measure and report attrition by socioeconomic factors to enable determination of the extent of attrition bias and estimation of its potential impact on findings. Where differential attrition is anticipated, consideration should be given to over-sampling during recruitment and targeted and more intensive strategies of participant retention in these sub-groups. In transient populations collection of multiple sources of contact information at recruitment and throughout the study may aid retention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Acceptability of financial incentives and penalties for encouraging uptake of healthy behaviours: focus groups.
- Author
-
Giles, Emma L, Sniehotta, Falko F, McColl, Elaine, and Adams, Jean
- Subjects
MONETARY incentives ,FINES (Penalties) ,HEALTH behavior research ,HEALTH promotion ,FOCUS groups - Abstract
Background There is evidence that financial incentive interventions, which include both financial rewards and also penalties, are effective in encouraging healthy behaviours. However, concerns about the acceptability of such interventions remain. We report on focus groups with a cross-section of adults from North East England exploring their acceptance of financial incentive interventions for encouraging healthy behaviours amongst adults. Such information should help guide the design and development of acceptable, and effective, financial incentive interventions. Methods Eight focus groups with a total of 74 adults were conducted between November 2013 and January 2014 in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Focus groups lasted approximately 60 minutes and explored factors that made financial incentives acceptable and unacceptable to participants, together with discussions on preferred formats for financial incentives. Verbatim transcripts were thematically coded and analysed in Nvivo 10. Results Participants largely distrusted health promoting financial incentives, with a concern that individuals may abuse such schemes. There was, however, evidence that health promoting financial incentives may be more acceptable if they are fair to all recipients and members of the public; if they are closely monitored and evaluated; if they are shown to be effective and cost-effective; and if clear health education is provided alongside health promoting financial incentives. There was also a preference for positive rewards rather than negative penalties, and for shopping vouchers rather than cash incentives. Conclusions This qualitative empirical research has highlighted clear suggestions on how to design health promoting financial incentives to maximise acceptability to the general public. It will also be important to determine the acceptability of health promoting financial incentives in a range of stakeholders, and in particular, those who fund such schemes, and policy-makers who are likely to be involved with the design, implementation and evaluation of health promoting financial incentive schemes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Intervention to reduce excessive alcohol consumption and improve comorbidity outcomes in hypertensive or depressed primary care patients: two parallel cluster randomized feasibility trials.
- Author
-
Wilson, Graeme B., Wray, Catherine, McGovern, Ruth, Newbury-Birch, Dorothy, McColl, Elaine, Crosland, Ann, Speed, Chris, Cassidy, Paul, Tomson, Dave, Haining, Shona, Howel, Denise, and Kaner, Eileen F. S.
- Subjects
ALCOHOLISM ,ALCOHOL drinking ,COMORBIDITY ,HYPERTENSION ,MENTAL depression ,PRIMARY care - Abstract
Background Many primary care patients with raised blood pressure or depression drink potentially hazardous levels of alcohol. Brief interventions (BI) to reduce alcohol consumption may improve comorbid conditions and reduce the risk of future alcohol problems. However, research has not established their effectiveness in this patient population. This study aimed to establish the feasibility of definitive trials of BI to reduce excessive drinking in primary care patients with hypertension or mild to moderate depression. Methods Thirteen general practices in North East England were randomized to the intervention or control arm of one of two parallel pilot trials. Adult patients drinking excessively and diagnosed with hypertension or mild-to-moderate depression received the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) by postal survey. Consenting respondents scoring more than 7 on AUDIT (score range 0 to 40) received brief alcohol consumption advice plus an information leaflet (intervention) or an information leaflet alone (control) with follow-up at six months. Measurements included the numbers of patients eligible, recruited, and retained, and the AUDIT score and systolic/diastolic blood pressure of each patient or the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score. Acceptability was assessed via practitioner feedback and patient willingness to be screened, recruited, and retained at followup. Results In the hypertension trial, 1709 of 33,813 adult patients (5.1%) were eligible and were surveyed. Among the eligible patients, 468 (27.4%) returned questionnaires; 166 (9.6% of those surveyed) screened positively on AUDIT and 83 (4.8% of those surveyed) were recruited (50.0% of positive screens). Sixty-seven cases (80.7% of recruited patients) completed follow-up at six months. In the depression trial, 1,044 of 73,146 adult patients (1.4%) were eligible and surveyed. Among these eligible patients, 215 (20.6%) responded; 104 (10.0% of those surveyed) screened positively on AUDIT and 29 (2.8% of those surveyed) were recruited (27.9% of positive screens). Nineteen cases (65.5% of recruited patients) completed follow-up at six months. Conclusions Recruitment and retention rates were higher in the hypertension trial than in the depression trial. A full brief intervention trial appears feasible for primary care patients with hypertension who drink excessively. High AUDIT scores in the depression trial suggest the importance of alcohol intervention in this group. However, future work may require alternative screening and measurement procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. The STRIDE (Strategies to Increase confidence, InDependence and Energy) study: cognitive behavioural therapy-based intervention to reduce fear of falling in older fallers living in the community - study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Parry, Steve W., Deary, Vincent, Finch, Tracy, Bamford, Claire, Sabin, Neil, McMeekin, Peter, O'Brien, John, Caldwell, Alma, Steen, Nick, Whitney, Susan L., Macdonald, Claire, and McColl, Elaine
- Subjects
COGNITIVE therapy ,ANXIETY ,FEAR of falling ,LOGGERS ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,CONFIDENCE ,SOCIAL isolation - Abstract
Background Around 30% to 62% of older individuals fall each year, with adverse consequences of falls being by no means limited to physical injury and escalating levels of dependence. Many older individuals suffer from a variety of adverse psychosocial difficulties related to falling including fear, anxiety, loss of confidence and subsequent increasing activity avoidance, social isolation and frailty. Such 'fear of falling' is common and disabling, but definitive studies examining the effective management of the syndrome are lacking. Cognitive behavioural therapy has been trialed with some success in a group setting, but there is no adequately powered randomised controlled study of an individually based cognitive behavioural therapy intervention, and none using non-mental health professionals to deliver the intervention. Methods/design We are conducting a two-phase study examining the role of individual cognitive behavioural therapy delivered by healthcare assistants in improving fear of falling in older adults. In Phase I, the intervention was developed and taught to healthcare assistants, while Phase II is the pragmatic randomised controlled study examining the efficacy of the intervention in improving fear of falling in community-dwelling elders attending falls services. A qualitative process evaluation study informed by Normalization Process Theory is being conducted throughout to examine the potential promoters and inhibitors of introducing such an intervention into routine clinical practice, while a health economic sub-study running alongside the trial is examining the costs and benefits of such an approach to the wider health economy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating implementation of a fire-prevention Injury Prevention Briefing in children's centres: study protocol.
- Author
-
Deave, Toity, Towner, Elizabeth, McColl, Elaine, Reading, Richard, Sutton, Alex, Coupland, Carol, Cooper, Nicola, Stewart, Jane, Hayes, Mike, Pitchforth, Emma, Watson, Michael, and Kendrick, Denise
- Subjects
FIRE prevention ,PREVENTION of injury ,RESEARCH protocols ,MEDICAL informatics ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,HEALTH outcome assessment - Abstract
Background The UK has one of the highest fatality rates for deaths from fire-related injuries in children aged 0-14 years; these injuries have the steepest social gradient of all injuries in the UK. Children's centres provide children under five years old and their families with a range of services and information, including home safety, but their effectiveness in promoting injury prevention has yet to be evaluated. We developed a fire-prevention intervention for use in children's centres comprising an Injury Prevention Briefing (IPB) which provides evidence on what works and best practice from those running injury prevention programmes, and a facilitation package to support implementation of the IPB. This protocol describes the design and methods of a trial evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the IPB and facilitation package in promoting fire-prevention. Methods/Design Pragmatic, multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial, with a nested qualitative study, in four study centres in England. Children's centres in the most disadvantaged areas will be eligible to participate and will be randomised to one of three treatment arms comprising: IPB with facilitation package; IPB with no facilitation package; usual care (control). The primary outcome measure will be the proportion of families who have a fire escape plan at follow-up. Eleven children's centres per arm are required to detect an absolute difference in the percentage of families with a fire escape plan of 20% in either of the two intervention arms compared with the control arm, with 80% power and a 5% significance level (2-sided), an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.05 and assuming outcomes are assessed on 20 families per children's centre. Secondary outcomes include the assessment of the cost-effectiveness of the intervention, other fire safety behaviours and factors associated with degree of implementation of the IPB. Discussion This will be the first trial to develop and evaluate a fire-prevention intervention for use in children's centres in the UK. Its findings will be generalisable to children's centres in the most disadvantaged areas of the UK and may also be generalisable to similar interventions to prevent other types of injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Movement as Medicine for Type 2 Diabetes: protocol for an open pilot study and external pilot clustered randomised controlled trial to assess acceptability, feasibility and fidelity of a multifaceted behavioural intervention targeting physical activity in primary care
- Author
-
Avery, Leah, Sniehotta, Falko F., Denton, Sarah J., Steen, Nick, McColl, Elaine, Taylor, Roy, and Trenell, Michael I.
- Subjects
TYPE 2 diabetes treatment ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,CLINICAL trials ,BEHAVIOR modification ,PHYSICAL activity ,PRIMARY care - Abstract
Background Physical activity (PA) and nutrition are the cornerstones of diabetes management. Several reviews and meta-analyses report that PA independently produces clinically important improvements in glucose control in people with Type 2 diabetes. However, it remains unclear what the optimal strategies are to increase PA behaviour in people with Type 2 diabetes in routine primary care. Methods This study will determine whether an evidence-informed multifaceted behaviour change intervention (Movement as Medicine for Type 2 Diabetes) targeting both consultation behaviour of primary healthcare professionals and PA behaviour in adults with Type 2 diabetes is both acceptable and feasible in the primary care setting. An open pilot study conducted in two primary care practices (phase one) will assess acceptability, feasibility and fidelity. Ongoing feedback from participating primary healthcare professionals and patients will provide opportunities for systematic adaptation and refinement of the intervention and study procedures. A two-arm parallel group clustered pilot randomised controlled trial patients from participating primary care practices in North East England will assess acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity of the intervention (versus usual clinical care) and trial processes over a 12-month period. Consultation behaviour involving fidelity of intervention delivery, diabetes and PA related knowledge, attitudes/beliefs, intentions and self-efficacy for delivering a behaviour change intervention targeting PA behaviour will be assessed in primary healthcare professionals. We will rehearse the collection of outcome data (with the focus on data yield and quality) for a future definitive trial, through outcome assessment at baseline, one, six and twelve months. An embedded qualitative process evaluation and treatment fidelity assessment will explore issues around intervention implementation and assess whether intervention components can be reliably and faithfully delivered in routine primary care. Discussion Movement as Medicine for Type 2 Diabetes will address an important gap in the evidencebase, that is, the need for interventions to increase free-living PA behaviour in adults with Type 2 diabetes. The multifaceted intervention incorporates an online accredited training programme for primary healthcare professionals and represents, to the best of our knowledge, the first of its kind in the United Kingdom. This study will establish whether the multifaceted behavioural intervention is acceptable and feasible in routine primary care. Trial registration Movement as Medicine for Type 2 Diabetes (MaMT2D) was registered with Current Controlled Trials on the 14th January 2012: ISRCTN67997502. The first primary care practice was randomised on the 5th October 2012. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Vitamin D supplementation in older people (VDOP): Study protocol for a randomised controlled intervention trial with monthly oral dosing with 12,000 IU, 24,000 IU or 48,000 IU of vitamin D₃.
- Author
-
Schoenmakers, Inez, Francis, Roger M., McColl, Elaine, Chadwick, Thomas, Goldberg, Gail R., Harle, Christine, Yarnall, Alison, Wilkinson, Jennifer, Parker, Jennie, Prentice, Ann, and Aspray, Terence
- Subjects
CLINICAL trials ,VITAMIN D ,QUALITY of life ,NUTRITION ,HYPERPARATHYROIDISM ,PARATHYROID gland diseases - Abstract
Unlabelled: The randomised, double blind intervention trial 'Optimising Vitamin D Status in Older People' (VDOP) will test the effect of three oral dosages of vitamin D given for one year on bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of vitamin D metabolism, bone turnover and safety in older people. VDOP is funded by Arthritis Research UK, supported through Newcastle University and MRC Human Nutrition Research and sponsored by the Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.aBackground: Vitamin D insufficiency is common in older people and may lead to secondary hyperparathyroidism, bone loss, impairment of muscle function and increased risk of falls and fractures. Vitamin D supplementation trials have yielded conflicting results with regard to decreasing rates of bone loss, falls and fractures and the optimal plasma concentration of 25 hydroxy vitamin D (25OHD) for skeletal health remains unclear.Method/design: Older (≥70 years) community dwelling men and women are recruited through General Practices in Northern England and 375 participants are randomised to take 12,000 international units (IU), 24,000 IU or 48,000 IU of vitamin D3 orally each month for one year starting in the winter or early spring. Hip BMD and anthropometry are measured at baseline and 12 months. Fasting blood samples are collected at baseline and three-month intervals for the measurement of plasma 25OHD, parathyroid hormone (PTH), biochemical markers of bone turnover and biochemistry to assess the dose-response and safety of supplementation. Questionnaire data include falls, fractures, quality of life, adverse events and outcomes, compliance, dietary calcium intake and sunshine exposure.Discussion: This is the first integrated vitamin D supplementation trial in older men and women using a range of doses given at monthly intervals to assess BMD, plasma 25OHD, PTH and biochemical markers of bone turnover and safety, quality of life and physical performance. We aim to investigate the vitamin D supplementation and plasma 25OHD concentration required to maintain bone health and to develop a set of biochemical markers that reflects the effect of vitamin D on bone. This will aid future studies investigating the effect of vitamin D supplementation on fracture risk.#ISRCTN 35648481 (assigned 16 August 2012), EudraCT 2011-004890-10. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Study protocol for the randomised controlled trial: Antiglucocorticoid augmentation of anti-Depressants in Depression (The ADD Study).
- Author
-
McAllister-Williams, R. Hamish, Smith, Eleanor, Anderson, Ian M., Barnes, Jane, Gallagher, Peter, Grunze, Heinz C. R., Haddad, Peter M., House, Allan O., Hughes, Tom, Lloyd, Adrian J., McColl, Elaine M. M., Pearce, Simon H. S., Siddiqi, Najma, Sinha, Baxi, Speed, Chris, Steen, I. Nick, Wainright, June, Watson, Stuart, Winter, Fiona H., and Ferrier, I. Nicol
- Subjects
THERAPEUTICS ,MENTAL depression ,ANTIDEPRESSANTS ,HORMONE therapy ,ADRENOCORTICAL hormones ,SEROTONIN uptake inhibitors ,PLACEBOS - Abstract
Background: Some patients with depression do not respond to first and second line conventional antidepressants and are therefore characterised as suffering from treatment refractory depression (TRD). On-going psychosocial stress and dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis are both associated with an attenuated clinical response to antidepressants. Preclinical data shows that co-administration of corticosteroids leads to a reduction in the ability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors to increase forebrain 5-hydroxytryptamine, while co-administration of antiglucocorticoids has the opposite effect. A Cochrane review suggests that antiglucocorticoid augmentation of antidepressants may be effective in treating TRD and includes a pilot study of the cortisol synthesis inhibitor, metyrapone. The Antiglucocorticoid augmentation of anti-Depressants in Depression (The ADD Study) is a multicentre randomised placebo controlled trial of metyrapone augmentation of serotonergic antidepressants in a large population of patients with TRD in the UK National Health Service. Methods/design: Patients with moderate to severe treatment refractory Major Depression aged 18 to 65 will be randomised to metyrapone 500 mg twice daily or placebo for three weeks, in addition to on-going conventional serotonergic antidepressants. The primary outcome will be improvement in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale score five weeks after randomisation (i.e. two weeks after trial medication discontinuation). Secondary outcomes will include the degree of persistence of treatment effect for up to 6 months, improvements in quality of life and also safety and tolerability of metyrapone. The ADD Study will also include a range of sub-studies investigating the potential mechanism of action of metyrapone. Discussion: Strengths of the ADD study include broad inclusion criteria meaning that the sample will be representative of patients with TRD treated within the UK National Health Service, longer follow up, which to our knowledge is longer than any previous study of antiglucocorticoid treatments in depression, and the range of mechanistic investigations being carried out. The data set acquired will be a rich resource for a range of research questions relating to both refractory depression and the use of antiglucocorticoid treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Improving the normalization of complex interventions: measure development based on normalization process theory (NoMAD): study protocol.
- Author
-
Finch, Tracy L., Rapley, Tim, Girling, Melissa, Mair, Frances S., Murray, Elizabeth, Treweek, Shaun, McColl, Elaine, Steen, Ian Nicholas, and May, Carl R.
- Subjects
EVIDENCE-based medicine ,MEDICAL practice ,MEDICAL care research ,QUALITATIVE research ,QUANTITATIVE research - Abstract
Background: Understanding implementation processes is key to ensuring that complex interventions in healthcare are taken up in practice and thus maximize intended benefits for service provision and (ultimately) care to patients. Normalization Process Theory (NPT) provides a framework for understanding how a new intervention becomes part of normal practice. This study aims to develop and validate simple generic tools derived from NPT, to be used to improve the implementation of complex healthcare interventions. Objectives: The objectives of this study are to: develop a set of NPT-based measures and formatively evaluate their use for identifying implementation problems and monitoring progress; conduct preliminary evaluation of these measures across a range of interventions and contexts, and identify factors that affect this process; explore the utility of these measures for predicting outcomes; and develop an online users' manual for the measures. Methods: A combination of qualitative (workshops, item development, user feedback, cognitive interviews) and quantitative (survey) methods will be used to develop NPT measures, and test the utility of the measures in six healthcare intervention settings. Discussion: The measures developed in the study will be available for use by those involved in planning, implementing, and evaluating complex interventions in healthcare and have the potential to enhance the chances of their implementation, leading to sustained changes in working practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Brief intervention to prevent hazardous drinking in young people aged 14-15 in a high school setting (SIPS JR-HIGH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
- Author
-
O'Neil, Stephanie, Coulton, Simon, Deluca, Paolo, Deverill, Mark, Drummond, Colin, Gilvarry, Eilish, Graybill, Erin, Harle, Christine, Howel, Denise, Kaner, Eileen, McArdle, Paul, McColl, Elaine, McGovern, Ruth, Speed, Chris, Stamp, Elaine, Tate, Les, and Newbury-Birch, Dorothy
- Subjects
ALCOHOL drinking ,HIGH school students ,MENTAL health ,FIRST sexual experiences ,MENTORS - Abstract
Background: Whilst the overall proportion of young people drinking alcohol in the United Kingdom has decreased in recent years, those who do drink appear to drink a larger amount, and more frequently. Early and heavy drinking by younger adolescents is a significant public health problem linked to intellectual impairment, increased risk of injuries, mental health issues, unprotected or regretted sexual experience, violence, and sometimes accidental death, which leads to high social and economic costs. This feasibility pilot trial aims to explore the feasibility of delivering brief alcohol intervention in a school setting with adolescents aged 14 and 15 and to examine the acceptability of study measures to school staff, young people and parents.Methods and Design: Seven schools across one geographical area in the North East of England will be recruited. Schools will be randomly allocated to one of three conditions: provision of an advice leaflet (control condition, n = 2 schools); a 30-minute brief interactive session, which combines structured advice and motivational interviewing techniques delivered by the school learning mentor (level 1 condition, n = 2 schools); and a 60-minute session involving family members delivered by the school learning mentor (level 2 condition, n = 3 schools). Participants will be year 10 school pupils (aged 14 and 15) who screen positively on a single alcohol screening question and who consent to take part in the trial. Year 10 pupils in all seven schools will be followed up at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcome measures include the ten-question Alcohol-Use Disorders Identification Test. The EQ-5D-Y and a modified short service use questionnaire will inform the health and social resource costs for any future economic evaluation.Young people recruited into the trial will also complete a 28-day timeline follow back questionnaire at 12-month follow-up. A qualitative evaluation (with young people, school staff, learning mentors, and parents) will examine facilitators and barriers to the use of screening and brief intervention approaches in the school setting in this age group.Trial Registration: Trial reference number ISRCTN07073105. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Surgery versus Active Monitoring in Intermittent Exotropia (SamExo): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Buck, Deborah, McColl, Elaine, Powell, Christine J., Jing Shen, Sloper, John, Steen, Nick, Taylor, Robert, Tiffin, Peter, Vale, Luke, and Clark, Michael P.
- Subjects
- *
EYE care , *OPHTHALMIC surgery , *CLINICAL trials , *STRABISMUS , *MEDICAL care - Abstract
Background: Childhood intermittent exotropia [X(T)] is a type of strabismus (squint) in which one eye deviates outward at times, usually when the child is tired. It may progress to a permanent squint, loss of stereovision and/or amblyopia (reduced vision). Treatment options for X(T) include eye patches, glasses, surgery and active monitoring. There is no consensus regarding how this condition should be managed, and even when surgery is the preferred option clinicians disagree as to the optimal timing. Reports on the natural history of X(T) are limited, and there is no randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence on the effectiveness or efficiency of surgery compared with active monitoring. The SamExo (Surgery versus Active Monitoring in Intermittent Exotropia) pilot study has been designed to test the feasibility of such a trial in the UK. Methods: Design: an external pilot patient randomised controlled trial. Setting: four UK secondary ophthalmology care facilities at Newcastle NHS Hospitals Foundation Trust, Sunderland Eye Infirmary, Moorfields Eye Hospital and York NHS Trust. Participants: children aged between 6 months and 16 years referred with suspected and subsequently diagnosed X (T). Recruitment target is a total of 144 children over a 9-month period, with 120 retained by 9-month outcome visit. Randomisation: permuted blocks stratified by collaborating centre, age and severity of X(T). Interventions: initial clinical assessment; randomisation (eye muscle surgery or active monitoring); 3-, 6- and 9-month (primary outcome) clinical assessments; participant/proxy completed questionnaire covering time and travel costs, health services use and quality of life (Intermittent Exotropia Questionnaire); qualitative interviews with parents to establish reasons for agreeing or declining participation in the pilot trial. Outcomes: recruitment and retention rates; nature and extent of participation bias; nature and extent of biases arising from crossover or loss to follow-up; reasons for agreeing/declining participation; variability of cure rates (to inform power calculations for a definitive RCT); completion rates of outcome measures. Discussion: The SamExo pilot trial will provide important pointers regarding the feasibility of a full RCT of immediate surgery versus deferred surgery/active monitoring. The results of this pilot, including differences in cure rates, will inform the design of a definitive RCT. Trial registration: ISRCTN44114892 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Brief intervention to reduce risky drinking in pregnancy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
- Author
-
Wilson, Graeme B., McGovern, Ruth, Anthony, Grace, Cassidy, Paul, Deverill, Mark, Graybill, Erin, Gilvarry, Eilish, Hodgson, Moira, S. Kaner, Eileen F., Laing, Kirsty, McColl, Elaine, Newbury-Birch, Dorothy, and Rankin, Judith
- Subjects
ALCOHOL drinking ,PREGNANT women ,OBSTETRICS ,CLINICAL trials ,WOMEN'S health - Abstract
Background: Risky drinking in pregnancy by UK women is likely to result in many alcohol-exposed pregnancies. Studies from the USA suggest that brief intervention has promise for alcohol risk reduction in antenatal care. However, further research is needed to establish whether this evidence from the USA is applicable to the UK. This pilot study aims to investigate whether pregnant women can be recruited and retained in a randomized controlled trial of brief intervention aimed at reducing risky drinking in women receiving antenatal care. Methods: The trial will rehearse the parallel-group, non-blinded design and procedures of a subsequent definitive trial. Over 8 months, women aged 18 years and over (target number 2,742) attending their booking appointment with a community midwife (n = 31) in north-east England will be screened for alcohol consumption using the consumption questions of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C). Those screening positive, without a history of substance use or alcohol dependence, with no pregnancy complication, and able to give informed concent, will be invited to participate in the trial (target number 120). Midwives will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to deliver either treatment as usual (control) or structured brief advice and referral for a 20-minute motivational interviewing session with an alcohol health worker (intervention). As well as demographic and health information, baseline measures will include two 7-day time line follow-back questionnaires and the EuroQoL EQ-5D-3 L questionnaire. Measures will be repeated in telephone follow-ups in the third trimester and at 6 months postpartum, when a questionnaire on use of National Health Service and social care resources will also be completed. Information on pregnancy outcomes and stillbirths will be accessed from central health service records before the follow-ups. Primary outcomes will be rates of eligibility, recruitment, intervention delivery, and retention in the study population, to inform power calculations for a definitive trial. The health-economics component will establish how cost-effectiveness will be assessed, and examine which data on health service resource use should be collected in a main trial. Participants' views on instruments and procedures will be sought to confirm their acceptability. Discussion: The study will produce a full trial protocol with robust sample-size calculations to extend evidence on effectiveness of screening and brief intervention. Trial Registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN43218782 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Surgical trial in traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (STITCH(Trauma)): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
- Author
-
Gregson, Barbara A, Rowan, Elise N, Mitchell, Patrick M, Unterberg, Andy, McColl, Elaine M, Chambers, Iain R, McNamee, Paul, and Mendelow, A David
- Subjects
HEMORRHAGE ,OPERATIVE surgery ,HEMATOMA ,TUMORS ,CLINICAL trials - Abstract
Background: Intracranial hemorrhage occurs in over 60% of severe head injuries in one of three types: extradural (EDH); subdural (SDH); and intraparenchymal (TICH). Prompt surgical removal of significant SDH and EDH is established and widely accepted. However, TICH is more common and is found in more than 40% of severe head injuries. It is associated with a worse outcome but the role for surgical removal remains undefined. Surgical practice in the treatment of TICHs differs widely around the world. The aim of early surgery in TICH removal is to prevent secondary brain injury. There have been trials of surgery for spontaneous ICH (including the STICH II trial), but none so far of surgery for TICH. Methods/Design: The UK National Institutes of Health Research has funded STITCH(Trauma) to determine whether a policy of early surgery in patients with TICH improves outcome compared to a policy of initial conservative treatment. It will include a health economics component and carry out a subgroup analysis of patients undergoing invasive monitoring. This is an international multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Patients are eligible if: they are within 48 h of injury; they have evidence of TICH on CT scan with a confluent volume of attenuation significantly raised above that of the background white and grey matter that has a total volume >10 mL; and their treating neurosurgeon is in equipoise. Patients will be ineligible if they have: a significant surface hematoma (EDH or SDH) requiring surgery; a hemorrhage/contusion located in the cerebellum; three or more separate hematomas fulfilling inclusion criteria; or severe pre-existing physical or mental disability or severe co-morbidity which would lead to poor outcome even if the patient made a full recovery from the head injury. Patients will be randomized via an independent service. Patients randomized to surgery receive surgery within 12 h. Both groups will be monitored according to standard neurosurgical practice. All patients have a CT scan at 5 days (+/-2 days) to assess changes in hematoma size. Follow-up is by postal questionnaire at 6 and 12 months. The recruitment target is 840 patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testing.
- Author
-
Murdoch, Megan, McColl, Elaine, Howel, Denise, Deverill, Mark, Buckley, Brian S, Lucas, Malcolm, Chapple, Christopher R, Tincello, Douglas G, Armstrong, Natalie, Brennand, Cath, Shen, Jing, Vale, Luke, and Hilton, Paul
- Subjects
- *
RANDOMIZED controlled trials , *URINARY incontinence , *COST effectiveness , *URODYNAMICS - Abstract
Background: Urinary incontinence is an important health problem to the individual sufferer and to health services. Stress and stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence are increasingly managed by surgery due to advances in surgical techniques. Despite the lack of evidence for its clinical utility, most clinicians undertake invasive urodynamic testing (IUT) to confirm a functional diagnosis of urodynamic stress incontinence before offering surgery for this condition. IUT is expensive, embarrassing and uncomfortable for women and carries a small risk. Recent systematic reviews have confirmed the lack of high quality evidence of effectiveness.The aim of this pilot study is to test the feasibility of a future definitive randomised control trial that would address whether IUT alters treatment decisions and treatment outcome in these women and would test its clinical and cost effectiveness.Methods/design: This is a mixed methods pragmatic multicentre feasibility pilot study with four components:-(a) A multicentre, external pilot randomised trial comparing basic clinical assessment with non-invasive tests and IUT. The outcome measures are rates of recruitment, randomisation and data completion. Data will be used to estimate sample size necessary for the definitive trial.(b) Qualitative interviews of a purposively sampled sub-set of women eligible for the pilot trial will explore willingness to participate, be randomised and their overall trial experience.(c) A national survey of clinicians to determine their views of IUT in this context, the main outcome being their willingness to randomise patients into the definitive trial.(d) Qualitative interviews of a purposively sampled group of these clinicians will explore whether and how they use IUT to inform their decisions.Discussion: The pilot trial will provide evidence of feasibility and acceptability and therefore inform the decision whether to proceed to the definitive trial. Results will inform the design and conduct of the definitive trial and ensure its effectiveness in achieving its research aim.Trial Registration Number: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN71327395 assigned 7th June 2010. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. Paramedic Initiated Lisinopril For Acute Stroke Treatment (PIL-FAST): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Shaw, Lisa, Price, Christopher, McLure, Sally, Howel, Denise, McColl, Elaine, and Ford, Gary A
- Subjects
HYPERTENSION ,BLOOD circulation ,BLOOD flow ,HEMODYNAMICS ,CLINICAL trials - Abstract
Background: High blood pressure during acute stroke is associated with poorer stroke outcome. Previous trials have failed to show benefit from lowering blood pressure but treatment may have been commenced too late to be effective. The earliest that acute stroke treatments could be initiated is during contact with the emergency medical services (paramedics). However, experience of pre-hospital clinical trials is limited and logistical challenges are likely to be greater than for trials performed in other settings. We report the protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of paramedic initiated blood pressure lowering treatment for hypertension in acute stroke.Methods: Trial Design: Double blind parallel group external pilot randomised controlled trial.Setting: Participant recruitment and initial treatment by North East Ambulance Service research trained paramedics responding to the emergency call. Continued treatment in three study hospitals.Participants: Target is recruitment of 60 adults with acute arm weakness due to suspected stroke (within 3 hours of symptom onset) and hypertension (systolic BP>160 mmHg).Intervention: Lisinopril 5-10 mg (intervention group), matched placebo (control group), daily for 7 days. Randomisation: Study medication contained within identical pre-randomised "trial packs" carried by research trained paramedics.Outcomes: Study feasibility (recruitment rate, compliance with data collection) and clinical data to inform the design of a definitive randomised controlled trial (blood pressure monitoring, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, Barthel ADL Index, Modified Rankin Scale, renal function).Discussion: This pilot study is assessing the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of paramedic initiated lisinopril for hypertension early after the onset of acute stroke. The results will inform the design of a definitive RCT to evaluate the effects of very early blood pressure lowering in acute stroke.Trial Registration: EudraCT: 2010-019180-10ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01066572ISRCTN: 54540667. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Study protocol: ICONS: identifying continence options after stroke: a randomised trial.
- Author
-
Thomas, Lois H, Watkins, Caroline L, French, Beverley, Sutton, Christopher, Forshaw, Denise, Cheater, Francine, Roe, Brenda, Leathley, Michael J, Burton, Christopher, McColl, Elaine, Booth, Jo, ICONS Project Team, and ICONS Patient, Public and Carer Involvement Group
- Subjects
CLINICAL medicine research ,URINATION disorders ,URINARY incontinence ,CLINICAL trials ,CEREBROVASCULAR disease - Abstract
Background: Urinary incontinence following acute stroke is common, affecting between 40%-60% of people in hospital after a stroke. Despite the availability of clinical guidelines for urinary incontinence and urinary incontinence after stroke, national audit data suggest incontinence is often poorly managed. Conservative interventions (e.g. bladder training, pelvic floor muscle training and prompted voiding) have been shown to have some effect with participants in Cochrane systematic reviews, but have not had their effectiveness demonstrated with stroke patients.Methods/design: A cluster randomised controlled pilot trial designed to assess the feasibility of a full-scale cluster randomised trial and to provide preliminary evidence of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a systematic voiding programme for the management of continence after stroke. Stroke services will be randomised to receive the systematic voiding programme, the systematic voiding programme plus supported implementation, or usual care. The trial aims to recruit at least 780 participants in 12 stroke services (4 per arm). The primary outcome is presence/absence of incontinence at six weeks post-stroke. Secondary outcomes include frequency and severity of incontinence, quality of life and cost-utility. Outcomes will be measured at six weeks, three months and (for participants recruited in the first three months) twelve months after stroke. Process data will include rates of recruitment and retention and fidelity of intervention delivery. An integrated qualitative evaluation will be conducted in order to describe implementation and assist in explaining the potential mediators and modifiers of the process.Trial Registration: ISRCTN: ISRCTN08609907 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. A checklist for clinical trials in rare disease: obstacles and anticipatory actions—lessons learned from the FOR-DMD trial
- Author
-
Bryan Burnette, W., Ciafaloni, Emma, Bushby, Kate, Roper, Helen, Hart, Kimberly A, Wilichowski, Ekkehard, Mongini, Tiziana, Spinty, Stefan, Herr, Barbara E, Howard, James F, Finkel, Richard S, Shieh, Perry B, von der Hagen, Maja, Horrocks, Iain, Lochmuller, Hanns, Thangarajh, Mathula, Tawil, Rabi, Schara, Ulrike, Flanigan, Kevin M, Pegoraro, Elena, Straub, Volker, Martens, William B, McMillan, Hugh J, Kirschner, Janbernd, Wilkinson, Jennifer, Hughes, Imelda, King, Wendy M, Mah, Jean K, Guglieri, Michela, Griggs, Robert C, Morrison, Leslie, Manzur, Adnan Y, Hirtz, Deborah, Crow, Rebecca A, Butterfield, Russell J, Campbell, Craig, Wicklund, Matthew, Brown, Mary W, McDonald, Craig M, Barohn, Richard J, Darras, Basil T, McDermott, Michael P, Kuntz, Nancy L, Morandi, Lucia, Eagle, Michele, McColl, Elaine, Childs, Anne-Marie, and Vita, Giuseppe
- Subjects
3. Good health - Abstract
Background Trials in rare diseases have many challenges, among which are the need to set up multiple sites in different countries to achieve recruitment targets and the divergent landscape of clinical trial regulations in those countries. Over the past years, there have been initiatives to facilitate the process of international study set-up, but the fruits of these deliberations require time to be operationally in place. FOR-DMD (Finding the Optimum Steroid Regimen for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy) is an academic-led clinical trial which aims to find the optimum steroid regimen for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for 5 years (July 2010 to June 2015), anticipating that all sites (40 across the USA, Canada, the UK, Germany and Italy) would be open to recruitment from July 2011. However, study start-up was significantly delayed and recruitment did not start until January 2013. Method The FOR-DMD study is used as an example to identify systematic problems in the set-up of international, multi-centre clinical trials. The full timeline of the FOR-DMD study, from funding approval to site activation, was collated and reviewed. Systematic issues were identified and grouped into (1) study set-up, e.g. drug procurement; (2) country set-up, e.g. competent authority applications; and (3) site set-up, e.g. contracts, to identify the main causes of delay and suggest areas where anticipatory action could overcome these obstacles in future studies. Results Time from the first contact to site activation across countries ranged from 6 to 24 months. Reasons of delay were universal (sponsor agreement, drug procurement, budgetary constraints), country specific (complexity and diversity of regulatory processes, indemnity requirements) and site specific (contracting and approvals). The main identified obstacles included (1) issues related to drug supply, (2) NIH requirements regarding contracting with non-US sites, (3) differing regulatory requirements in the five participating countries, (4) lack of national harmonisation with contracting and the requirement to negotiate terms and contract individually with each site and (5) diversity of languages needed for study materials. Additionally, as with many academic-led studies, the FOR-DMD study did not have access to the infrastructure and expertise that a contracted research organisation could provide, organisations often employed in pharmaceutical-sponsored studies. This delay impacted recruitment, challenged the clinical relevance of the study outcomes and potentially delayed the delivery of the best treatment to patients. Conclusion Based on the FOR-DMD experience, and as an interim solution, we have devised a checklist of steps to not only anticipate and minimise delays in academic international trial initiation but also identify obstacles that will require a concerted effort on the part of many stakeholders to mitigate.
47. GestationaL Obesity Weight management: Implementation of National Guidelines (GLOWING): a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of a guideline implementation intervention for the management of maternal obesity by midwives.
- Author
-
Heslehurst, Nicola, Rankin, Judith, McParlin, Catherine, Sniehotta, Falko F., Howel, Denise, Rice, Stephen, and McColl, Elaine
- Subjects
REGULATION of body weight ,PHYSIOLOGICAL control systems ,OBESITY ,PREGNANCY complications ,OBSTETRICAL emergencies ,PHYSIOLOGY - Abstract
Background: Weight management in pregnancy guidelines exist, although dissemination alone is an ineffective means of implementation. Midwives identify the need for support to overcome complex barriers to practice. An evaluation of an intervention to support midwives’ guideline implementation would require a large-scale cluster randomised controlled trial. A pilot study is necessary to explore the feasibility of delivery and evaluation prior to a definitive trial. The GestationaL Obesity Weight management: Implementation of National Guidelines (GLOWING) trial aims to test whether it is feasible and acceptable to deliver a behaviour change intervention to support midwives’ implementation of weight management guidelines. Methods: GLOWING is a multi-centre parallel group pilot cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the delivery of a behaviour change intervention for midwives versus usual practice. Four NHS Trusts (clusters) will be randomised to intervention and control arms, stratified by size of maternity services. The intervention uses social cognitive theory and consists of face-to-face midwifery training plus information resources for routine practice. The main outcomes are whether the intervention and trial procedures are feasible and acceptable to participants and the feasibility of recruitment and data collection for a definitive trial. Target recruitment involves all eligible midwives in the intervention arm recruited to receive the intervention, 30 midwives and pregnant women per arm for baseline and outcome questionnaire data collection and 20 midwives and women to provide qualitative data. All quantitative and qualitative analyses will be descriptive with the purpose of informing the development of the definitive trial. Discussion: This pilot study has been developed to support community midwives’ implementation of guidelines. Community midwives have been selected as they usually carry out the booking appointment which includes measuring and discussing maternal body mass index. A cluster design is the gold standard in implementation research as there would be a high risk of contamination if randomisation was at individual midwife level: community midwives usually work in locality-based teams, interact on a daily basis, and share care of pregnant women. The results of the pilot trial will be used to further develop and refine GLOWING prior to a definitive trial to evaluate effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Trial registration: ISRCTN46869894 ; retrospectively registered 25th May 2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Interventions to change maternity healthcare professionals' behaviours to promote weight-related support for obese pregnant women: a systematic review.
- Author
-
Heslehurst, Nicola, Crowe, Lisa, Robalino, Shannon, Sniehotta, Falko F, McColl, Elaine, and Rankin, Judith
- Abstract
Background: There has been a rapid increase in the publication of guidelines for managing obesity and weight gain during pregnancy over the past five years. Healthcare professionals have identified multiple barriers to this area of practice, including the need to improve their communication skills, beliefs that pregnant women will have negative reactions to weight-related discussions, and a lack of weight management knowledge. This systematic review aimed to identify: the effectiveness of interventions in changing healthcare professionals' practice relating to maternal obesity or weight management during pregnancy; and which behaviour change techniques and modes of intervention delivery have been used in interventions to date.Findings: The search strategy included searching electronic databases, trial registers, and citation searching. Inclusion criteria were intervention studies targeted towards changing healthcare professionals' practice in relation to maternal obesity or weight management. The searches identified 3,608 studies. However, no eligible completed studies were identified. One registered Canadian randomised controlled trial was identified. The trial includes a training intervention for family physicians with the aim of supporting adherence to gestational weight gain guidelines. The trial had not yet commenced therefore no effectiveness data were available.Conclusions: The current focus of maternal obesity and weight management research is targeted towards changing pregnant women's behaviours. These interventions do not address the multiple healthcare professionals' barriers to maternal obesity and weight management practice. Further research is required to identify the most effective approaches to support healthcare professionals to implement maternal obesity and weight management guidelines into practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials [on behalf of the PAFS consensus group*]
- Author
-
Eldridge, SM, Chan, CL, Campbell, MJ, Bond, CM, Hopewell, S, Thabane, L, Lancaster, GA, Altman, Doug, Bretz, Frank, Campbell, Marion, Cobo, Erik, Craig, Peter, Davidson, Peter, Groves, Trish, Gumedze, Freedom, Hewison, Jenny, Hirst, Allison, Hoddinott, Pat, Lamb, Sarah E., Lang, Tom, McColl, Elaine, O'Cathain, Alicia, Shanahan, Daniel R., Sutton, Chris J, Tugwell, Peter, Lamb, Sarah E, and Shanahan, Daniel R
- Subjects
G350 ,G300 ,G200 ,G290 ,G190 ,G390 - Abstract
The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement is a guideline designed to improve the transparency and quality of the reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). In this article we present an extension to that statement for randomised pilot and feasibility trials conducted in advance of a future definitive RCT. The checklist applies to any randomised study in which a future definitive RCT, or part of it, is conducted on a smaller scale, regardless of its design (eg, cluster, factorial, crossover) or the terms used by authors to describe the study (eg, pilot, feasibility, trial, study). The extension does not directly apply to internal pilot studies built into the design of a main trial, non-randomised pilot and feasibility studies, or phase II studies, but these studies all have some similarities to randomised pilot and feasibility studies and so many of the principles might also apply.\ud \ud The development of the extension was motivated by the growing number of studies described as feasibility or pilot studies and by research that has identified weaknesses in their reporting and conduct. We followed recommended good practice to develop the extension, including carrying out a Delphi survey, holding a consensus meeting and research team meetings, and piloting the checklist.\ud \ud The aims and objectives of pilot and feasibility randomised studies differ from those of other randomised trials. Consequently, although much of the information to be reported in these trials is similar to those in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing effectiveness and efficacy, there are some key differences in the type of information and in the appropriate interpretation of standard CONSORT reporting items. We have retained some of the original CONSORT statement items, but most have been adapted, some removed, and new items added. The new items cover how participants were identified and consent obtained; if applicable, the prespecified criteria used to judge whether or how to proceed with a future definitive RCT; if relevant, other important unintended consequences; implications for progression from pilot to future definitive RCT, including any proposed amendments; and ethical approval or approval by a research review committee confirmed with a reference number.\ud \ud This article includes the 26 item checklist, a separate checklist for the abstract, a template for a CONSORT flowchart for these studies, and an explanation of the changes made and supporting examples. We believe that routine use of this proposed extension to the CONSORT statement will result in improvements in the reporting of pilot trials.\ud \ud Editor’s note: In order to encourage its wide dissemination this article is freely accessible on the BMJ and Pilot and Feasibility Studies journal websites.
- Published
- 2016
50. Feasibility of an incentive scheme to promote active travel to school: a pilot cluster randomised trial.
- Author
-
Ginja S, Arnott B, Araujo-Soares V, Namdeo A, and McColl E
- Abstract
Background: In Great Britain, 19% of trips to primary school within 1 mile, and 62% within 1-2 miles, are by car. Active travel to school (ATS) offers a potential source of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). This study tested the feasibility of an intervention to promote ATS in 9-10 year olds and associated trial procedures., Methods: A parallel cluster randomised pilot trial was conducted over 9 weeks in two schools from a low-income area in northeast England. Measures included daily parental ATS reports (optionally by SMS) and child ATS reports, as well as accelerometry (ActiGraph GT3X+). At baseline, all children were asked to wear the accelerometer for the same week; in the post-randomisation phase, small subsamples were monitored each week. In the 2 weeks when a child wore the accelerometer, parents also reported the start and finish times of the journey to school. The intervention consisted of a lottery-based incentive scheme; every ATS day reported by the parent, whether by paper or SMS, corresponded to one ticket entered into a weekly £5 voucher draw. Before each draw session, the researcher prepared the tickets and placed them into an opaque bag, from which one was randomly picked by the teacher at the draw session., Results: Four schools replied positively (3.3%, N = 123) and 29 participants were recruited in the two schools selected (33.0%, N = 88). Participant retention was 93.1%. Most materials were returned on time: accelerometers (81.9%), parental reports (82.1%) and child reports (97.9%). Draw sessions lasted on average 15.9 min (IQR 10-20) and overall session attendance was 94.5%. Parent-child report agreement regarding ATS was moderate ( k = 0.53, CI 95% 0.45; 0.60). Differences in minutes of accelerometer-assessed MVPA between parent-reported ATS and non-ATS trips were assessed during two timeframes: during the journey to school based on the times reported by the parent ( U = 390.5, p < 0.05, 2.46 ( n = 99) vs 0.76 ( n = 13)) and in the hour before classes ( U = 665.5, p < 0.05, 4.99 ( n = 104) vs 2.55 ( n = 19)). Differences in MVPA minutes between child-reported ATS and non-ATS trips were also significant for each of the timeframes considered ( U = 596.5, p < 0.05, 2.40 ( n = 128) vs 0.81 ( n = 15) and U = 955.0, p < 0.05, 4.99 ( n = 146) vs 2.59 ( n = 20), respectively)., Conclusions: Data suggest the feasibility of an ATS incentive scheme and of most trial procedures. School recruitment stood out as requiring further piloting., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02282631. Registered 5th September 2014.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.