17 results on '"Kuyken, Willem"'
Search Results
2. Evaluating Augmented Depression Therapy (ADepT): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
- Author
-
Dunn, Barnaby D., Widnall, Emily, Reed, Nigel, Taylor, Rod, Owens, Christabel, Spencer, Anne, Kraag, Gerda, Kok, Gerjo, Geschwind, Nicole, Wright, Kim, Moberly, Nicholas J., Moulds, Michelle L., MacLeod, Andrew K., Handley, Rachel, Richards, David, Campbell, John, and Kuyken, Willem
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Assessing the effectiveness of Enhanced Psychological Care for patients with depressive symptoms attending cardiac rehabilitation compared with treatment as usual (CADENCE): a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
- Author
-
Richards, Suzanne H., Dickens, Chris, Anderson, Rob, Richards, David A., Taylor, Rod S., Ukoumunne, Obioha C., Turner, Katrina M., Gandhi, Manish, Kuyken, Willem, Gibson, Andrew, Davey, Antoinette, Warren, Fiona, Winder, Rachel, and Campbell, John
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Evaluation of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for life and a cognitive behavioural therapy stress-management workshop to improve healthcare staff stress: study protocol for two randomised controlled trials
- Author
-
Strauss, Clara, Gu, Jenny, Pitman, Nikki, Chapman, Cavita, Kuyken, Willem, and Whittington, Adrian
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a mindfulness training programme in schools compared with normal school provision (MYRIAD): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- Author
-
Kuyken, Willem, Nuthall, Elizabeth, Byford, Sarah, Crane, Catherine, Dalgleish, Tim, Ford, Tamsin, Greenberg, Mark T., Ukoumunne, Obioha C., Viner, Russell M., and Williams, J. Mark G.
- Subjects
Male ,Mental Health Services ,Time Factors ,Adolescent ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,Emotions ,Child Behavior ,Study Protocol ,Risk Factors ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Humans ,Child ,Social Behavior ,School Health Services ,Schools ,Resilience ,Depression ,Prevention ,Health Care Costs ,Resilience, Psychological ,United Kingdom ,Adolescence ,Psychotherapy ,Mental Health ,Treatment Outcome ,Adolescent Behavior ,Research Design ,Female ,Mindfulness - Abstract
Background Mindfulness-based approaches for adults are effective at enhancing mental health, but few controlled trials have evaluated their effectiveness or cost-effectiveness for young people. The primary aim of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a mindfulness training (MT) programme to enhance mental health, wellbeing and social-emotional behavioural functioning in adolescence. Methods/design To address this aim, the design will be a superiority, cluster randomised controlled, parallel-group trial in which schools offering social and emotional provision in line with good practice (Formby et al., Personal, Social, Health and Economic (PSHE) Education: A mapping study of the prevalent models of delivery and their effectiveness, 2010; OFSTED, Not Yet Good Enough: Personal, Social, Health and Economic Education in schools, 2013) will be randomised to either continue this provision (control) or include MT in this provision (intervention). The study will recruit and randomise 76 schools (clusters) and 5700 school students aged 12 to 14 years, followed up for 2 years. Discussion The study will contribute to establishing if MT is an effective and cost-effective approach to promoting mental health in adolescence. Trials registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials, identifier: ISRCTN86619085. Registered on 3 June 2016. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1917-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
- Published
- 2017
6. Researching complex interventions in health: the state of the art
- Author
-
Craig, Peter, Rahm-Hallberg, Ingalill, Britten, Nicky, Borglin, Gunilla, Meyer, Gabriele, Köpke, Sascha, Noyes, Jane, Chandler, Jackie, Levati, Sara, Sales, Anne, Thabane, Lehana, Giangregorio, Lora, Feeley, Nancy, Cossette, Sylvie, Taylor, Rod, Hill, Jacqueline, Richards, David A., Kuyken, Willem, von Essen, Louise, Williams, Andrew, Hemming, Karla, Lilford, Richard, Girling, Alan, Taljaard, Monica, Dimairo, Munyaradzi, Petticrew, Mark, Baird, Janis, Moore, Graham, Odendaal, Willem, Atkins, Salla, Lutge, Elizabeth, Leon, Natalie, Lewin, Simon, Payne, Katherine, van Achterberg, Theo, Sermeus, Walter, Pitt, Martin, and Monks, Thomas
- Subjects
Abstracts ,Health Policy ,RA - Abstract
Table of contents KEYNOTE PRESENTATIONS K1 Researching complex interventions: the need for robust approaches Peter Craig K2 Complex intervention studies: an important step in developing knowledge for practice Ingalill Rahm-Hallberg K3 Public and patient involvement in research: what, why and how? Nicky Britten K4 Mixed methods in health service research – where do we go from here? Gunilla Borglin SPEAKER PRESENTATIONS S1 Exploring complexity in systematic reviews of complex interventions Gabriele Meyer, Sascha Köpke, Jane Noyes, Jackie Chandler S2 Can complex health interventions be optimised before moving to a definitive RCT? Strategies and methods currently in use Sara Levati S3 A systematic approach to develop theory based implementation interventions Anne Sales S4 Pilot studies and feasibility studies for complex interventions: an introduction Lehana Thabane, Lora Giangregorio S5 What can be done to pilot complex interventions? Nancy Feeley, Sylvie Cossette S6 Using feasibility and pilot trials to test alternative methodologies and methodological procedures prior to full scale trials Rod Taylor S7 A mixed methods feasibility study in practice Jacqueline Hill, David A Richards, Willem Kuyken S8 Non-standard experimental designs and preference designs Louise von Essen S9 Evaluation gone wild: using natural experimental approaches to evaluate complex interventions Andrew Williams S10 The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: an opportunity to increase the quality of evaluations of service delivery and public policy interventions Karla Hemming, Richard Lilford, Alan Girling, Monica Taljaard S11 Adaptive designs in confirmatory clinical trials: opportunities in investigating complex interventions Munyaradzi Dimairo S12 Processes, contexts and outcomes in complex interventions, and the implications for evaluation Mark Petticrew S13 Processes, contexts and outcomes in complex interventions, and the implications for evaluation Janis Baird, Graham Moore S14 Qualitative evaluation alongside RCTs: what to consider to get relevant and valuable results Willem Odendaal, Salla Atkins, Elizabeth Lutge, Natalie Leon, Simon Lewin S15 Using economic evaluations to understand the value of complex interventions: when maximising health status is not sufficient Katherine Payne S16 How to arrive at an implementation plan Theo van Achterberg S17 Modelling process and outcomes in complex interventions Walter Sermeus S18 Systems modelling for improving health care Martin Pitt, Thomas Monks
- Published
- 2016
7. Assessing the validity of the ICECAP-A capability measure for adults with depression.
- Author
-
Mitchell, Paul Mark, Al-Janabi, Hareth, Byford, Sarah, Kuyken, Willem, Richardson, Jeff, Iezzi, Angelo, and Coast, Joanna
- Subjects
MENTAL health services ,CONCEPT mapping ,REGRESSION analysis ,MENTAL depression ,MEDICAL care cost control - Abstract
Background: Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are increasingly important considerations in determining which mental health services are funded. Questions have been raised concerning the validity of generic health status instruments used in economic evaluation for assessing mental health problems such as depression; measuring capability wellbeing offers a possible alternative. The aim of this study is to assess the validity of the ICECAP-A capability instrument for individuals with depression. Methods: Hypotheses were developed using concept mapping. Validity tests and multivariable regression analysis were applied to data from a cross-sectional dataset to assess the performance of ICECAP-A in individuals who reported having a primary condition of depression. The ICECAP-A was collected alongside instruments used to measure: 1. depression using the depression scale of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-D of DASS-21); 2. mental health using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10); 3. generic health status using a common measure collected for use in economic evaluations, the five level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Results: Hypothesised associations between the ICECAP-A (items and index scores) and depression constructs were fully supported in statistical tests. In the multivariable analysis, instruments designed specifically to measure depression and mental health explained a greater proportion of the variation in ICECAP-A than the EQ-5D-5L. Conclusion: The ICECAP-A instrument appears to be suitable for assessing outcome in adults with depression for resource allocation purposes. Further research is required on its responsiveness and use in economic evaluation. Using a capability perspective when assessing cost-effectiveness could potentially re-orientate resource provision across physical and mental health care services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. The prevalence of depressive symptoms among fathers and associated risk factors during the first seven years of their child's life: findings from the Millennium Cohort Study.
- Author
-
Nath, Selina, Psychogiou, Lamprini, Kuyken, Willem, Ford, Tamsin, Ryan, Elizabeth, and Russell, Ginny
- Subjects
MENTAL depression risk factors ,FATHER-child relationship ,CHILD behavior ,COHORT analysis ,DATA analysis ,AGE distribution ,MENTAL depression ,EMPLOYMENT ,PSYCHOLOGY of fathers ,HOUSING ,INCOME ,LONGITUDINAL method ,MOTHERS ,PSYCHOLOGY of mothers ,POSTPARTUM depression ,SOCIOECONOMIC factors ,DISEASE prevalence ,PSYCHOLOGICAL factors ,PSYCHOLOGY - Abstract
Background: Increasing evidence suggests that postnatal paternal depression is associated with adverse emotional, behavioural and cognitive outcomes in children. Despite this, few studies have determined the prevalence of fathers' depressive symptoms during the first few years of their children's lives and explored what factors are related to these symptoms. We estimated the prevalence and examined associated risk factors of paternal depressive symptoms in a nationally representative sample of fathers with children aged between 9 months and 7 years old from the Millennium cohort study. The risk factors examined were maternal depressive symptoms, marital conflict, child temperament, child gender, paternal education, fathers' ethnic background, fathers' employment status, family housing, family income and paternal age.Methods: Secondary data analysis was conducted using the UK Millennium cohort study, which consisted of data from England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland of families with infants born in the year 2000/2001. Data from four sweeps were used from when children in the cohort were aged 9 months, 3, 5 and 7 years old (n = 5155-12,396).Results: The prevalence of paternal depressive symptoms over time was 3.6 % at 9 months, 1.2 % at 3 years old, 1.8 % at 5 years and 2.0 % at 7 years (using Kessler cut-off points to categorise high depressive symptoms vs low depressive symptoms). Linear regression trends (using continuous measures of depressive symptoms) indicated that both paternal and maternal depressive symptoms decreased over time, suggesting similar patterns of parents' depressive symptoms after the birth of a child, but the decrease was more evident for mothers. Paternal depressive symptoms were consistently associated with fathers' unemployment, maternal depressive symptoms and marital conflict. Socioeconomic factors such as rented housing when child was 9 months and low family income when child was 5 and 7 years were also associated with higher paternal depressive symptoms.Conclusions: Paternal depressive symptoms decreased among fathers when their children were aged between 9 months to 3 years old. Paternal unemployment, high maternal depressive symptoms and high marital conflict were important risk factors for paternal depressive symptoms. In light of our findings, we would recommend a more family centred approach to interventions for depression in the postnatal period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Assessing the effectiveness of enhanced psychological care for patients with depressive symptoms attending cardiac rehabilitation compared with treatment as usual (CADENCE): study protocol for a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Richards, Suzanne H., Dickens, Chris, Anderson, Rob, Richards, David A., Taylor, Rod S., Ukoumunne, Obioha C., Kessler, David, Turner, Katrina, Kuyken, Willem, Gandhi, Manish, Knight, Luke, Gibson, Andrew, Davey, Antoinette, Warren, Fiona, Winder, Rachel, Wright, Christine, and Campbell, John
- Subjects
PATIENT psychology ,THERAPEUTICS ,MENTAL depression ,CARDIAC rehabilitation ,MEDICAL care ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,ACUTE coronary syndrome ,ANTIDEPRESSANTS ,COGNITIVE therapy ,COMPARATIVE studies ,COST effectiveness ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,RESEARCH protocols ,HEALTH outcome assessment ,PATIENT safety ,RESEARCH ,QUALITATIVE research ,SAMPLE size (Statistics) ,PILOT projects ,EVALUATION research ,ACQUISITION of data ,PATIENT selection ,PSYCHOLOGY - Abstract
Background: Around 17% of people eligible for UK cardiac rehabilitation programmes following an acute coronary syndrome report moderate or severe depressive symptoms. While maximising psychological health is a core goal of cardiac rehabilitation, psychological care can be fragmented and patchy. This study tests the feasibility and acceptability of embedding enhanced psychological care, composed of two management strategies of proven effectiveness in other settings (nurse-led mental health care coordination and behavioural activation), within the cardiac rehabilitation care pathway.Methods/design: This study tests the uncertainties associated with a large-scale evaluation by conducting an external pilot trial with a nested qualitative study. We aim to recruit and randomise eight comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation teams (clusters) to intervention (embedding enhanced psychological care into routine cardiac rehabilitation programmes) or control (routine cardiac rehabilitation programmes alone) arms. Up to 64 patients (eight per team) identified with depressive symptoms upon initial assessment by the cardiac rehabilitation team will be recruited, and study measures will be administered at baseline (before starting rehabilitation) and at 5 months and 8 months post baseline. Outcomes include depressive symptoms, cardiac mortality and morbidity, anxiety, health-related quality of life and service resource use. Trial data on cardiac team and patient recruitment, and the retention and flow of patients through treatment will be used to assess intervention feasibility and acceptability. Qualitative interviews will be undertaken to explore trial participants' and cardiac rehabilitation nurses' views and experiences of the trial methods and intervention, and to identify reasons why patients declined to take part in the trial. Outcome data will inform a sample size calculation for a definitive trial.Discussion: The pilot trial and qualitative study will inform the design of a fully powered cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the provision of enhanced psychological care within cardiac rehabilitation programmes.Trial Registration: ISRCTN34701576 (Registered 29 May 2014). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Developing stepped care treatment for depression (STEPS): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Hill, Jacqueline J., Kuyken, Willem, and Richards, David A.
- Subjects
- *
MENTAL depression , *THERAPEUTICS , *MIXED methods research , *RANDOMIZED controlled trials , *COST effectiveness , *CLINICAL trials , *MENTAL health services - Abstract
Background Stepped care is recommended and implemented as a means to organise depression treatment. Compared with alternative systems, it is assumed to achieve equivalent clinical effects and greater efficiency. However, no trials have examined these assumptions. A fully powered trial of stepped care compared with intensive psychological therapy is required but a number of methodological and procedural uncertainties associated with the conduct of a large trial need to be addressed first. Methods/design STEPS (Developing stepped care treatment for depression) is a mixed methods study to address uncertainties associated with a large-scale evaluation of stepped care compared with high-intensity psychological therapy alone for the treatment of depression. We will conduct a pilot randomised controlled trial with an embedded process study. Quantitative trial data on recruitment, retention and the pathway of patients through treatment will be used to assess feasibility. Outcome data on the effects of stepped care compared with high-intensity therapy alone will inform a sample size calculation for a definitive trial. Qualitative interviews will be undertaken to explore what people think of our trial methods and procedures and the stepped care intervention. A minimum of 60 patients with major depressive disorder will be recruited from an Increasing Access to Psychological Therapies service and randomly allocated to receive stepped care or intensive psychological therapy alone. All treatments will be delivered at clinic facilities within the University of Exeter. Quantitative patient-related data on depressive symptoms, worry and anxiety and quality of life will be collected at baseline and 6 months. The pilot trial and interviews will be undertaken concurrently. Quantitative and qualitative data will be analysed separately and then integrated. Discussion The outcomes of this study will inform the design of a fully powered randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of stepped care. Qualitative data on stepped care will be of immediate interest to patients, clinicians, service managers, policy makers and guideline developers. A more informed understanding of the feasibility of a large trial will be obtained than would be possible from a purely quantitative (or qualitative) design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Update to the study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing mindfulness-based cognitive therapy with maintenance anti-depressant treatment depressive relapse/recurrence: the PREVENT trial.
- Author
-
Kuyken, Willem, Byford, Sarah, Byng, Richard, Dalgleish, Tim, Lewis, Glyn, Taylor, Rod, Watkins, Edward R., Hayes, Rachel, Lanham, Paul, Kessler, David, Morant, Nicola, and Evans, Alison
- Subjects
- *
MENTAL depression , *THERAPEUTICS , *RANDOMIZED controlled trials , *MINDFULNESS-based cognitive therapy , *ANTIDEPRESSANTS , *HEALTH outcome assessment , *QUALITY of life ,DISEASE relapse prevention - Abstract
Background Depression is a common and distressing mental health problem that is responsible for significant individual disability and cost to society. Medication and psychological therapies are effective for treating depression and maintenance antidepressants (m-ADM) can prevent relapse, whereas, r psychological help can help them recover from depression in the longterm. A recently developed treatment, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), shows potential as a brief group program for people with recurring depression.. This trial asks the policy research question; is MBCT with support to taper/discontinue antidepressant medication (MBCT-TS) superior to m-ADM in terms of: a primary outcome of preventing depressive relapse/recurrence over 24 months; and secondary outcomes of (a) depression free days, (b) residual depressive symptoms, (c) antidepressant medication (ADM) usage, (d) (d) psychiatric and medical co-morbidity, (e) quality of life, and (f) cost effectiveness? An explanatory research question also asks whether an increase in mindfulness skills is the key mechanism of change. The design is a single-blind, parallel randomized controlled trial examining MBCT-TS versus m-ADM with an embedded process study. To answer the main policy research question the proposed trial compares MBCT-TS with m-ADM for patients with recurrent depression. Four hundred and twenty patients with recurrent major depressive disorder in full or partial remission will be recruited through primary care. Results Depressive relapse/recurrence over two years is the primary outcome variable. Analyses will be conducted following CONSORT standards and overseen by the trial's Data Monitoring and Safety Committee. Initial analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis, with subsequent analyses being per protocol. The explanatory question will be addressed in two mutually informative ways: quantitative measurement of potential mediating variables pre-and post-treatment and a qualitative study of service users' views and experiences. Conclusions If the results of our exploratory trial are extended to this definitive trial, MBCT-TS will be established as an alternative approach to maintenance antidepressants for people with a history of recurrent depression. The process studies will provide evidence about the effective components which can be used to improve MBCT and inform theory as well as other therapeutic approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Accessibility and implementation in UK services of an effective depression relapse prevention programme – mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT): ASPIRE study protocol.
- Author
-
Rycroft-Malone, Jo, Anderson, Rob, Crane, Rebecca S., Gibson, Andy, Gradinger, Felix, Griffiths, Heledd Owen, Mercer, Stewart, and Kuyken, Willem
- Subjects
MENTAL depression ,COGNITIVE therapy ,STAKEHOLDERS ,FACILITATORS (Persons) ,PERFORMANCE standards - Abstract
Background Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) is a cost-effective psychosocial prevention programme that helps people with recurrent depression stay well in the long term. It was singled out in the 2009 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Depression Guideline as a key priority for implementation. Despite good evidence and guideline recommendations, its roll-out and accessibility across the UK appears to be limited and inequitably distributed. The study aims to describe the current state of MBCT accessibility and implementation across the UK, develop an explanatory framework of what is hindering and facilitating its progress in different areas, and develop an Implementation Plan and related resources to promote better and more equitable availability and use of MBCT within the UK National Health Service. Methods/Design This project is a two-phase qualitative, exploratory and explanatory research study, using an interview survey and in-depth case studies theoretically underpinned by the Promoting Action on Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework. Interviews will be conducted with stakeholders involved in commissioning, managing and implementing MBCT services in each of the four UK countries, and will include areas where MBCT services are being implemented successfully and where implementation is not working well. In-depth case studies will be undertaken on a range of MBCT services to develop a detailed understanding of the barriers and facilitators to implementation. Guided by the study's conceptual framework, data will be synthesized across Phase 1 and Phase 2 to develop a fit for purpose implementation plan. Discussion Promoting the uptake of evidence-based treatments into routine practice and understanding what influences these processes has the potential to support the adoption and spread of nationally recommended interventions like MBCT. This study could inform a larger scale implementation trial and feed into future implementation of MBCT with other long-term conditions and associated co-morbidities. It could also inform the implementation of interventions that are acceptable and effective, but are not widely accessible or implemented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Cost and outcome of behavioural activation versus cognitive behaviour therapy for depression (COBRA): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Rhodes, Shelley, Richards, David A., Ekers, David, McMillan, Dean, Byford, Sarah, Farrand, Paul A., Gilbody, Simon, Hollon, Steven D., Kuyken, Willem, Martell, Christopher, O'Mahen, Heather A., O'Neill, Emer, Reed, Nigel, Taylor, Rod S., Watkins, Ed R., and Wright, Kim A.
- Subjects
COGNITIVE therapy ,MENTAL depression ,THERAPEUTICS ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,SCALABILITY ,MENTAL health personnel - Abstract
Background Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for depression. However, CBT is a complex therapy that requires highly trained and qualified practitioners, and its scalability is therefore limited by the costs of training and employing sufficient therapists to meet demand. Behavioural activation (BA) is a psychological treatment for depression that may be an effective alternative to CBT and, because it is simpler, might also be delivered by less highly trained and specialised mental health workers. Methods COBRA is a two-arm, non-inferiority, patient-level randomised controlled trial, including clinical, economic, and process evaluations comparing CBT delivered by highly trained professional therapists to BA delivered by junior professional or para-professional mental health workers to establish whether the clinical effectiveness of BA is non-inferior to CBT and if BA is cost effective compared to CBT. Four hundred and forty patients with major depressive disorder will be recruited through screening in primary care. We will analyse for non-inferiority in per-protocol and intention-to-treat populations. Our primary outcome will be severity of depression symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) at 12 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes will be clinically significant change and severity of depression at 18 months, and anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder-7 questionnaire) and health-related quality of life (Short-Form Health Survey-36) at 12 and 18 months. Our economic evaluation will take the United Kingdom National Health Service/Personal Social Services perspective to include costs of the interventions, health and social care services used, plus productivity losses. Costeffectiveness will explored in terms of quality-adjusted life years using the EuroQol-5D measure of health-related quality of life. Discussion The clinical and economic outcomes of this trial will provide the evidence to help policy makers, clinicians and guideline developers decide on the merits of including BA as a firstline treatment of depression. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN27473954. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Preventing relapse in recurrent depression using mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, antidepressant medication or the combination: trial design and protocol of the MOMENT study.
- Author
-
Huijbers, Marloes J., Spijker, Jan, Donders, A. Rogier T., van Schaik, Digna JF, van Oppen, Patricia, Ruh‚, Henricus G., Blom, Marc B.J., Nolen, Willem A., Ormel, Johan, van der Wilt, Gert Jan, Kuyken, Willem, Spinhoven, Philip, and Speckens, Anne E.M.
- Subjects
MENTAL depression ,DISEASE relapse ,COGNITIVE therapy ,PSYCHOTHERAPY ,ANTIDEPRESSANTS ,CLINICAL trials - Abstract
Background: Depression is a common psychiatric disorder characterized by a high rate of relapse and recurrence. The most commonly used strategy to prevent relapse/recurrence is maintenance treatment with antidepressant medication (mADM). Recently, it has been shown that Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) is at least as effective as mADM in reducing the relapse/recurrence risk. However, it is not yet known whether combination treatment of MBCT and mADM is more effective than either of these treatments alone. Given the fact that most patients have a preference for either mADM or for MBCT, the aim of the present study is to answer the following questions. First, what is the effectiveness of MBCT in addition to mADM? Second, how large is the risk of relapse/recurrence in patients withdrawing from mADM after participating in MBCT, compared to those who continue to use mADM after MBCT? Methods/design: Two parallel-group, multi-center randomized controlled trials are conducted. Adult patients with a history of depression (3 or more episodes), currently either in full or partial remission and currently treated with mADM (6 months or longer) are recruited. In the first trial, we compare mADM on its own with mADM plus MBCT. In the second trial, we compare MBCT on its own, including tapering of mADM, with mADM plus MBCT. Follow-up assessments are administered at 3-month intervals for 15 months. Primary outcome is relapse/recurrence. Secondary outcomes are time to, duration and severity of relapse/recurrence, quality of life, personality, several process variables, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Discussion: Taking into account patient preferences, this study will provide information about a) the clinical and cost-effectiveness of mADM only compared with mADM plus MBCT, in patients with a preference for mADM, and b) the clinical and cost-effectiveness of withdrawing from mADM after MBCT, compared with mADM plus MBCT, in patients with a preference for MBCT.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00928980 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing mindfulness-based cognitive therapy with maintenance anti-depressant treatment in the prevention of depressive relapse/recurrence: the PREVENT trial.
- Author
-
Kuyken, Willem, Byford, Sarah, Byng, Richard, Dalgleish, Tim, Lewis, Glyn, Taylor, Rod, Watkins, Edward R., Hayes, Rachel, Lanham, Paul, Kessler, David, Morant, Nicola, and Evans, Alison
- Subjects
- *
MENTAL depression , *THERAPEUTICS , *DEPRESSED persons , *CLINICAL trials , *MEDICAL care , *MENTAL health - Abstract
Background: Depression is a common and distressing mental health problem that is responsible for significant individual disability and cost to society. Medication and psychological therapies are effective for treating depression and maintenance anti-depressants (m-ADM) can prevent relapse. However, individuals with depression often express a wish for psychological help that can help them recover from depression in the long-term. We need to develop psychological therapies that prevent depressive relapse/recurrence. A recently developed treatment, Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT, see http://www.mbct.co.uk) shows potential as a brief group programme for people with recurring depression. In two studies it has been shown to halve the rates of depression recurring compared to usual care. This trial asks the policy research question, is MBCT superior to m-ADM in terms of: a primary outcome of preventing depressive relapse/recurrence over 24 months; and, secondary outcomes of (a) depression free days, (b) residual depressive symptoms, (c) antidepressant (ADM) usage, (d) psychiatric and medical co-morbidity, (e) quality of life, and (f) cost effectiveness? An explanatory research question asks is an increase in mindfulness skills the key mechanism of change? Methods/Design: The design is a single blind, parallel RCT examining MBCT vs. m-ADM with an embedded process study. To answer the main policy research question the proposed trial compares MBCT plus ADM-tapering with m-ADM for patients with recurrent depression. Four hundred and twenty patients with recurrent major depressive disorder in full or partial remission will be recruited through primary care. Depressive relapse/recurrence over two years is the primary outcome variable. The explanatory question will be addressed in two mutually informative ways: quantitative measurement of potential mediating variables pre/post-treatment and a qualitative study of service users' views and experiences. Discussion: If the results of our exploratory trial are extended to this definitive trial, MBCT will be established as an alternative approach to maintenance anti-depressants for people with a history of recurrent depression. The process studies will provide evidence about the effective components which can be used to improve MBCT and inform theory as well as other therapeutic approaches. Trial registration number: ISRCTN26666654 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Erratum to: Researching Complex Interventions in Health: The State of the Art.
- Author
-
Craig, Peter, Rahm-Hallberg, Ingalill, Britten, Nicky, Borglin, Gunilla, Meyer, Gabriele, Köpke, Sascha, Noyes, Jane, Chandler, Jackie, Levati, Sara, Sales, Anne, Thabane, Lehana, Giangregorio, Lora, Feeley, Nancy, Cossette, Sylvie, Taylor, Rod, Hill, Jacqueline, Richards, David A, Kuyken, Willem, von Essen, Louise, and Williams, Andrew
- Published
- 2016
17. Update to the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a mindfulness training programme in schools compared with normal school provision (MYRIAD): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Montero-Marin J, Nuthall E, Byford S, Crane C, Dalgleish T, Ford T, Ganguli P, Greenberg MT, Ukoumunne OC, Viner RM, Williams JMG, and Kuyken W
- Subjects
- Adolescent, COVID-19, Humans, Mental Health, Mindfulness economics, Pandemics, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Mindfulness education, Schools
- Abstract
Background: MYRIAD (My Resilience in Adolescence) is a superiority, parallel group, cluster randomised controlled trial designed to examine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a mindfulness training (MT) programme, compared with normal social and emotional learning (SEL) school provision to enhance mental health, social-emotional-behavioural functioning and well-being in adolescence. The original trial protocol was published in Trials (accessible at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1917-4 ). This included recruitment in two cohorts, enabling the learning from the smaller first cohort to be incorporated in the second cohort. Here we describe final amendments to the study protocol and discuss their underlying rationale., Methods: Four major changes were introduced into the study protocol: (1) there were changes in eligibility criteria, including a clearer operational definition to assess the degree of SEL implementation in schools, and also new criteria to avoid experimental contamination; (2) the number of schools and pupils that had to be recruited was increased based on what we learned in the first cohort; (3) some changes were made to the secondary outcome measures to improve their validity and ability to measure constructs of interest and to reduce the burden on school staff; and (4) the current Coronavirus Disease 2019 (SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19) pandemic both influences and makes it difficult to interpret the 2-year follow-up primary endpoint results, so we changed our primary endpoint to 1-year follow-up., Discussion: These changes to the study protocol were approved by the Trial Management Group, Trial Steering Committee and Data and Ethics Monitoring Committees and improved the enrolment of participants and quality of measures. Furthermore, the change in the primary endpoint will give a more reliable answer to our primary question because it was collected prior to the COVID-19 pandemic in both cohort 1 and cohort 2. Nevertheless, the longer 2-year follow-up data will still be acquired, although this time-point will be now framed as a second major investigation to answer some new important questions presented by the combination of the pandemic and our study design., Trial Registration: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials ISRCTN86619085 . Registered on 3 June 2016.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.