Search

Background: Distinguishing reactive atypia from dysplasia in cholecystectomy specimens can be histologically challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of IMP3, p53, and S100P immunostains in differentiating reactive atypia from dysplasia in cholecystectomies., Methods: Fifty-four cholecystectomies were reviewed and characterized into 5 groups: 2 normal, 29 reactive atypia, 16 low-grade dysplasia, 2 high-grade dysplasia, and 5 adenocarcinoma. IMP3, p53, and S100P immunostains were performed and evaluated. IMP3 (nuclear) and S100P (nuclear or nuclear/cytoplasmic) were categorized into negative or positive expression, and p53 was categorized into wild-type and aberrant/mutant expression. Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis., Results: The patients were mostly middle-aged women (mean 44, range 19-87 years, 81% female), with predominantly Hispanic White ethnicity (80%). The majority of the normal and reactive atypia cases showed negative IMP3 (100% and 75.9%, respectively) and wild-type p53 (100% and 89.7%, respectively) staining. Over half (56.3%) of the low-grade dysplasia and all the high-grade dysplasia cases showed IMP3 positivity. Aberrant p53 staining pattern was seen in half of both low and high-grade dysplasia cases. Adenocarcinoma showed IMP3 positivity in 80% and p53 aberrancy in all cases. S100P showed no statistical significance among the diagnostic categories. Significant differences in staining patterns were found between reactive atypia vs. low-grade dysplasia, and reactive atypia vs. low-grade + high-grade dysplasia using a combination of IMP3 and p53 stains (all p < 0.05)., Conclusions: In challenging cholecystectomies, IMP3 positivity or aberrant p53 expression may serve as a useful adjunct to support a diagnosis of dysplasia over reactive atypia., (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Background: Histomorphological differentiation between pancreatic serous cystadenoma (SCA) and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can be challenging. We aimed to study Paired box 8 protein (Pax8) expression profile in cytologic and surgical specimens with pancreatic SCA to assess its utility as a differentiating marker from clear cell RCC., Methods: We characterized Pax8 immunohistochemistry in 33 patients with pancreatic SCA (23 surgical resections and 10 cytology specimens). Nine cytology specimens from metastatic clear cell RCC involving pancreas were used as control tissue. Electronic medical records were reviewed to retrieve clinical information., Results: All 10 pancreatic SCA cytology specimens, and 16 of 23 pancreatic SCA surgical resections showed absent Pax8 immunostaining, while the remaining 7 surgical resection specimens showed 1%-2% immunoreactivities. Islet and lymphoid cells adjacent to the pancreatic SCA expressed Pax8. In contrast, the proportion of Pax8 immunoreactivity ranged from 50 to 90% (average of 76%) in nine cases of metastatic clear cell RCC involving pancreas. Using a 5% immunoreactivity cutoff, all cases of pancreatic SCA are interpreted as negative for Pax8 immunostains while all cases of metastatic clear cell RCC involving pancreas are interpreted as positive for Pax8 immunostains., Conclusions: These results suggest that Pax8 immunohistochemistry staining can be a useful adjunct marker to differentiate pancreatic SCA from clear cell RCC in clinical practice. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first large-scale study of Pax8 immunostaining on surgical and cytology specimens with pancreatic SCA., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Patients with non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (ND-BE) and low-grade dysplasia (LGD) are typically monitored by periodic endoscopic surveillance, while those with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) are usually treated by more aggressive interventions like endoscopic mucosal resection, ablation or surgery. Therefore, the accurate grading of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE) is essential for proper patient care. However, there is significant interobserver and intraobserver variability in the histologic grading of BE dysplasia. The objective of this study was to create an immunohistochemical (IHC) panel that facilitates the grading of BE dysplasia and can be used as an adjunct to histology in challenging cases., Methods: 100 BE biopsies were re-graded for dysplasia independently by 3 subspecialized gastrointestinal pathologists. IHC staining for CDX2, p120ctn, c-Myc and Jagged1 proteins was then performed and assessed by two separate methods of semi-quantitative scoring. Scores were integrated using a principal component analysis (PCA) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve., Results: Principal component analysis demonstrated the ability of this panel of proteins to segregate ND-BE/LGD and HGD/EAC, as the expression of the four proteins is significantly altered between the two subsets. Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve showed that this panel has the potential to aid in the grading of dysplasia in these two subcategories with both high sensitivity and specificity. While not able to discriminate between ND-BE and LGD, this panel of four proteins may be used as an adjunct to help discriminate subsets of ND-BE/LGD from HGD/EAC., Conclusions: We propose that the maximum utility of this IHC panel of CDX2, p120ctn, c-Myc, and Jagged1 proteins would be to distinguish between LGD and HGD in histologically challenging cases, given the aggressive interventions still used for HGD in many institutions, and hence may aid in the optimal patient management. The results of this initial study are promising, though further validation is needed before this panel can be used clinically, including future randomized prospective studies with larger patient cohorts from diverse locations.