Search

Background: Diagnosing myocarditis relies on multimodal data, including cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), clinical symptoms, and blood values. The correct interpretation and integration of CMR findings require radiological expertise and knowledge. We aimed to investigate the performance of Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4), a large language model, for report-based medical decision-making in the context of cardiac MRI for suspected myocarditis., Methods: This retrospective study includes CMR reports from 396 patients with suspected myocarditis and eight centers, respectively. CMR reports and patient data including blood values, age, and further clinical information were provided to GPT-4 and radiologists with 1 (resident 1), 2 (resident 2), and 4 years (resident 3) of experience in CMR and knowledge of the 2018 Lake Louise Criteria. The final impression of the report regarding the radiological assessment of whether myocarditis is present or not was not provided. The performance of Generative pre-trained transformer 4 (GPT-4) and the human readers were compared to a consensus reading (two board-certified radiologists with 8 and 10 years of experience in CMR). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated., Results: GPT-4 yielded an accuracy of 83%, sensitivity of 90%, and specificity of 78%, which was comparable to the physician with 1 year of experience (R1: 86%, 90%, 84%, p = 0.14) and lower than that of more experienced physicians (R2: 89%, 86%, 91%, p = 0.007 and R3: 91%, 85%, 96%, p < 0.001). GPT-4 and human readers showed a higher diagnostic performance when results from T1- and T2-mapping sequences were part of the reports, for residents 1 and 3 with statistical significance (p = 0.004 and p = 0.02, respectively)., Conclusion: GPT-4 yielded good accuracy for diagnosing myocarditis based on CMR reports in a large dataset from multiple centers and therefore holds the potential to serve as a diagnostic decision-supporting tool in this capacity, particularly for less experienced physicians. Further studies are required to explore the full potential and elucidate educational aspects of the integration of large language models in medical decision-making., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: David Maintz received speaker’s honoraria from Philips Healthcare. Jan Borggrefe received speaker’s honoraria from Siemens Healthineers. Simon Lennartz is a member of Editorial Board of Radiology and a Senior Deputy Editor of Radiology in Training. Otherwise, the authors declare no conflicts of interest and had full control over all data, and guarantee correctness., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)