Search

Monitoring tumor evolution and predicting survival using non-invasive liquid biopsy is an unmet need for glioblastoma patients. The era of proteomics and metabolomics blood analyzes, may help in this context. A case-control study was conducted. Patients were included in the GLIOPLAK trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02617745), a prospective bicentric study conducted between November 2015 and December 2022. Patients underwent biopsy alone and received radiotherapy and temozolomide. Blood samples were collected at three different time points: before and after concomitant radiochemotherapy, and at the time of tumor progression. Plasma samples from patients and controls were analyzed using metabolomics and proteomics, generating 371 omics features. Descriptive, differential, and predictive analyses were performed to assess the relationship between plasma omics feature levels and patient outcome. Diagnostic performance and longitudinal variations were also analyzed. The study included 67 subjects (34 patients and 33 controls). A significant differential expression of metabolites and proteins between patients and controls was observed. Predictive models using omics features showed high accuracy in distinguishing patients from controls. Longitudinal analysis revealed temporal variations in a few omics features including CD22, CXCL13, EGF, IL6, GZMH, KLK4, and TNFRSP6B. Survival analysis identified 77 omics features significantly associated with OS, with ERBB2 and ITGAV consistently linked to OS at all timepoints. Pathway analysis revealed dynamic oncogenic pathways involved in glioblastoma progression. This study provides insights into the potential of plasma omics features as biomarkers for glioblastoma diagnosis, progression and overall survival. Clinical implication should now be explored in dedicated prospective trials., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The clinical implications of plasmatic cell-free and tumor DNA (cfDNA and ctDNA) are challenging in glioblastoma. This prospective study included 52 consecutive newly diagnosed glioblastoma (n = 49) or gliosarcoma (n = 3) patients treated with concomitant temozolomide and radiotherapy (RT-TMZ), followed by a TMZ maintenance phase. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, before RT-TMZ (pre-RT-TMZ) and at the end of adjuvant TMZ, or at the time of progression in cases of progressive disease (PD). The cfDNA concentration was measured with a fluorometric method, and ctDNA was detected using targeted droplet digital PCR. The main objectives were to analyze the associations between cfDNA and ctDNA measurements during the course of treatment with PD and survival. There was a significant decrease in median cfDNA concentration from baseline to pre-RT-TMZ-19.4 versus 9.7 ng/mL (p < 0.0001)-in the entire cohort. In patients with PD, a significant increase in cfDNA concentration from pre-RT-TMZ to time of PD was observed, from 9.7 versus 13.1 ng/mL (p = 0.037), respectively, while no difference was observed for nonprogressive patients. Neither the cfDNA concentration at baseline nor its kinetics correlated with survival. ctDNA was detected in 2 patients (3.8%) and only in gliosarcoma subtypes.Trial registration ClinicalTrial, NCT02617745. Registered 1 December 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02617745?term=glioplak&draw=2&rank=1 .

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification and EGFR variant III (EGFRvIII, deletion of exons 2-7) are of clinical interest for glioblastoma. The aim was to develop a digital PCR (dPCR)-based method using locked nucleic acid (LNA)-based hydrolysis probes, allowing the simultaneous detection of the EGFR amplification and EGFRvIII variant. Sixty-two patients were included. An exploratory cohort (n = 19) was used to develop the dPCR assay using three selected amplicons within the EGFR gene, targeting intron 1 (EGFR1), junction of exon 3 and intron 3 (EGFR2) and intron 22 (EGFR3). The copy number of EGFR was estimated by the relative quantification of EGFR1, EGFR2 and EGFR3 amplicon droplets compared to the droplets of a reference gene. EGFRvIII was identified by comparing the copy number of the EGFR2 amplicon to either the EGFR1 or EGFR3 amplicon. dPCR results were compared to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and next-generation sequencing for amplification; and to RT-PCR-based method for EGFRvIII. The dPCR assay was then tested in a validation cohort (n = 43). A total of 8/19 EGFR-amplified and 5/19 EGFRvIII-positive tumors were identified in the exploratory cohort. Compared to FISH, the EGFR3 dPCR assay detected all EGFR-amplified tumors (8/8, 100%) and had the highest concordance with the copy number estimation by NGS. The concordance between RT-PCR and dPCR was also 100% for detecting EGFRvIII using an absolute difference of 10.8 for the copy number between EGFR2 and EGFR3 probes. In the validation cohort, the sensitivity and specificity of dPCR using EGFR3 probes were 100% for the EGFR amplification detection compared to FISH (19/19). EGFRvIII was detected by dPCR in 8 EGFR-amplified patients and confirmed by RT-PCR. Compared to FISH, the EGFR2/EGFR3 dPCR assay was estimated with a one-half cost value. These results highlight that dPCR allowed the simultaneous detection of EGFR amplification and EGFRvIII for glioblastoma.