17 results on '"Braunack-Mayer, Annette"'
Search Results
2. Community perspectives on the benefits and risks of technologically enhanced communicable disease surveillance systems: a report on four community juries
- Author
-
Degeling, Chris, Carter, Stacy M., van Oijen, Antoine M., McAnulty, Jeremy, Sintchenko, Vitali, Braunack-Mayer, Annette, Yarwood, Trent, Johnson, Jane, and Gilbert, Gwendolyn L.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Assessing the quality of health research from an Indigenous perspective: the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander quality appraisal tool
- Author
-
Harfield, Stephen, Pearson, Odette, Morey, Kim, Kite, Elaine, Canuto, Karla, Glover, Karen, Gomersall, Judith Streak, Carter, Drew, Davy, Carol, Aromataris, Edoardo, and Braunack-Mayer, Annette
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Who drinks sugar sweetened beverages and juice? An Australian population study of behaviour, awareness and attitudes
- Author
-
Miller, Caroline, Wakefield, Melanie, Braunack-Mayer, Annette, Roder, David, O’Dea, Kerin, Ettridge, Kerry, and Dono, Joanne
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Constructions of alcohol consumption by non-problematised middle-aged drinkers: a qualitative systematic review
- Author
-
Muhlack, Emma, Carter, Drew, Braunack-Mayer, Annette, Morfidis, Nicholas, and Eliott, Jaklin
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. HPV.edu study protocol: a cluster randomised controlled evaluation of education, decisional support and logistical strategies in school-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination of adolescents.
- Author
-
Rachel Skinner, S., Davies, Cristyn, Cooper, Spring, Stoney, Tanya, Marshall, Helen, Jones, Jane, Collins, Joanne, Hutton, Heidi, Parrella, Adriana, Zimet, Gregory, Regan, David G., Whyte, Patti, Brotherton, Julia M. L., Richmond, Peter, McCaffrey, Kirsten, Garland, Suzanne M., Leask, Julie, Kang, Melissa, Braunack-Mayer, Annette, and Kaldor, John
- Subjects
PAPILLOMAVIRUSES ,COMMUNICABLE diseases ,TEENAGERS ,VACCINATION ,IMMUNIZATION ,PAPILLOMAVIRUS disease prevention ,COMPARATIVE studies ,DECISION making ,EMOTIONS ,EXPERIMENTAL design ,HEALTH attitudes ,HEALTH education ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,RESEARCH protocols ,PAPILLOMAVIRUS diseases ,PARENTS ,RESEARCH ,STATISTICAL sampling ,SCHOOLS ,SELF-efficacy ,STUDENTS ,HUMAN papillomavirus vaccines ,EVALUATION research ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,EVALUATION of human services programs ,PATIENTS' attitudes - Abstract
Background: The National Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Program in Australia commenced in 2007 for females and in 2013 for males, using the quadrivalent HPV vaccine (HPV 6,11,16,18). Thus far, we have demonstrated very substantial reductions in genital warts and in the prevalence of HPV among young Australian women, providing early evidence for the success of this public health initiative. Australia has a long history of school-based vaccination programs for adolescents, with comparatively high coverage. However, it is not clear what factors promote success in a school vaccination program. The HPV.edu study aims to examine: 1) student knowledge about HPV vaccination; 2) psycho-social outcomes and 3) vaccination uptake.Methods/design: HPV.edu is a cluster randomised trial of a complex intervention in schools aiming to recruit 40 schools with year-8 enrolments above 100 students (approximately 4400 students). The schools will be stratified by Government, Catholic, and Independent sectors and geographical location, with up to 20 schools recruited in each of two states, Western Australia (WA) and South Australia (SA), and randomly allocated to intervention or control (usual practice). Intervention schools will receive the complex intervention which includes an adolescent intervention (education and distraction); a decisional support tool for parents and adolescents and logistical strategies (consent form returns strategies, in-school mop-up vaccination and vaccination-day guidelines). Careful process evaluation including an embedded qualitative evaluation will be undertaken to explore in depth possible mechanisms for any observed effect of the intervention on primary and secondary outcomes.Discussion: This study is the first to evaluate the relative effectiveness of various strategies to promote best practice in school-based vaccination against HPV. The study aims to improve vaccination-related psychosocial outcomes, including adolescent knowledge and attitudes, decision-making involvement, self-efficacy, and to reduce fear and anxiety. The study also aims to improve school vaccination program logistics including reduction in time spent vaccinating adolescents and increased number of consent forms returned (regardless of decision). Less anxiety in adolescents will likely promote more efficient vaccination, which will be more acceptable to teachers, nurses and parents. Through these interventions, it is hoped that vaccination uptake will be increased.Trial Registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12614000404628 , 14.04.2014. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Disinvestment policy and the public funding of assisted reproductive technologies: outcomes of deliberative engagements with three key stakeholder groups.
- Author
-
Hodgetts, Katherine, Hiller, Janet E., Street, Jackie M., Carter, Drew, Braunack-Mayer, Annette J., Watt, Amber M., Moss, John R., and Elshaug, Adam G.
- Subjects
REPRODUCTIVE technology ,DISINVESTMENT ,STAKEHOLDERS ,BIOTECHNOLOGY ,FINANCE - Abstract
Background Measures to improve the quality and sustainability of healthcare practice and provision have become a policy concern. In addition, the involvement of stakeholders in health policy decision-making has been advocated, as complex questions arise around the structure of funding arrangements in a context of limited resources. Using a case study of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), deliberative engagements with a range of stakeholder groups were held on the topic of how best to structure the distribution of Australian public funding in this domain. Methods Deliberative engagements were carried out with groups of ART consumers, clinicians and community members. The forums were informed by a systematic review of ART treatment safety and effectiveness (focusing, in particular, on maternal age and number of treatment cycles), as well as by international policy comparisons, and ethical and cost analyses. Forum discussions were transcribed and subject to thematic analysis. Results Each forum demonstrated stakeholders' capacity to understand concepts of choice under resource scarcity and disinvestment, and to countenance options for ART funding not always aligned with their interests. Deliberations in each engagement identified concerns around 'equity' and 'patient responsibility', culminating in a broad preference for (potential) ART subsidy restrictions to be based upon individual factors rather than maternal age or number of treatment cycles. Community participants were open to restrictions based upon measures of body mass index (BMI) and smoking status, while consumers and clinicians saw support to improve these factors as part of an ART treatment program, as distinct from a funding criterion. All groups advocated continued patient co-payments, with measures in place to provide treatment access to those unable to pay (namely, equity of access). Conclusions Deliberations yielded qualitative, socially-negotiated evidence required to inform ethical, accountable policy decisions in the specific area of ART and health care more broadly. Notably, reductionist, deterministic characterizations of stakeholder 'self-interest' proved unfounded as each group sought to prioritise universal values (in particular, 'equity' and 'responsibility') over specific, within-group concerns. Our results - from an emotive case study in ART - highlight that evidence-informed disinvestment decision-making is feasible, and potentially less controversial than often presumed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Healthcare providers' knowledge, experience and challenges of reporting adverse events following immunisation: a qualitative study.
- Author
-
Parrella, Adriana, Braunack-Mayer, Annette, Gold, Michael, Marshall, Helen, and Baghurst, Peter
- Subjects
- *
IMMUNIZATION complications , *QUALITATIVE research , *MEDICAL personnel , *VACCINATION complications ,REPORTING of drug side effects - Abstract
Background: Healthcare provider spontaneous reporting of suspected adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) is central to monitoring post-licensure vaccine safety, but little is known about how healthcare professionals recognise and report to surveillance systems. The aim of this study was explore the knowledge, experience and attitudes of medical and nursing professionals towards detecting and reporting AEFI. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study, using semi-structured, face to face interviews with 13 Paediatric Emergency Department consultants from a tertiary paediatric hospital, 10 General Practitioners, 2 local council immunisation and 4 General Practice nurses, recruited using purposive sampling in Adelaide, South Australia, between December 2010 and September 2011. We identified emergent themes related to previous experience of an AEFI in practice, awareness and experience of AEFI reporting, factors that would facilitate or impede reporting and previous training in vaccine safety. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Results: AEFI reporting was infrequent across all groups, despite most participants having reviewed an AEFI. We found confusion about how to report an AEFI and variability, according to the provider group, as to the type of events that would constitute a reportable AEFI. Participants' interpretation of a "serious" or "unexpected" AEFI varied across the three groups. Common barriers to reporting included time constraints and unsatisfactory reporting processes. Nurses were more likely to have received formal training in vaccine safety and reporting than medical practitioners. Conclusions: This study provides an overview of experience and beliefs of three healthcare professional groups in relation to identifying and reporting AEFI. The qualitative assessment reveals differences in experience and awareness of AEFI reporting across the three professional groups. Most participants appreciated the importance of their role in AEFI surveillance and monitoring the ongoing safety of vaccines. Future initiatives to improve education, such as increased training to health care providers, particularly, medical professionals, are required and should be included in both undergraduate curricula and ongoing, professional development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Understanding the school community's response to school closures during the H1N1 2009 influenza pandemic.
- Author
-
Braunack-Mayer, Annette, Tooher, Rebecca, Collins, Joanne E., Street, Jackie M., and Marshall, Helen
- Subjects
- *
H1N1 influenza , *PUBLIC health , *SCHOOLS , *COMMUNICABLE diseases , *PANDEMICS - Abstract
Background: During the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, Australian public health officials closed schools as a strategy to mitigate the spread of the infection. This article examines school communities' understanding of, and participation in, school closures and the beliefs and values which underpinned school responses to the closures. Methods: We interviewed four school principals, 25 staff, 14 parents and 13 students in five schools in one Australian city which were either fully or partially closed during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Results: Drawing on Thompson et al's ethical framework for pandemic planning, we show that considerable variation existed between and within schools in their attention to ethical processes and values. In all schools, health officials and school leaders were strongly committed to providing high quality care for members of the school community. There was variation in the extent to which information was shared openly and transparently, the degree to which school community members considered themselves participants in decision-making, and the responsiveness of decision-makers to the changing situation. Reservations were expressed about the need for closures and quarantine and there was a lack of understanding of the rationale for the closures. All schools displayed a strong duty of care toward those in need, although school communities had a broader view of care than that of the public health officials. Similarly, there was a clear understanding of and commitment to protect the public from harm and to demonstrate responsible stewardship. Conclusions: We conclude that school closures during an influenza pandemic represent both a challenge for public health officials and a litmus test for the level of trust in public officials, government and the school as institution. In our study, trust was the foundation upon which effective responses to the school closure were built. Trust relations within the school were the basis on which different values and beliefs were used to develop and justify the practices and strategies in response to the pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Identifying the quality of life effects of urinary incontinence with depression in an Australian population.
- Author
-
Avery, Jodie C., Stocks, Nigel P., Duggan, Paul, Braunack-Mayer, Annette J., Taylor, Anne W., Goldney, Robert D., and MacLennan, Alastair H.
- Subjects
QUALITY of life ,URINARY incontinence ,MENTAL depression ,AUSTRALIANS ,COMORBIDITY ,HEALTH surveys ,DISEASES - Abstract
Background: To explore the additive effect of urinary incontinence, in people with comorbid depression, on health related quality of life. Methods: Males and females, 15 to 95 years (n = 3010, response rate 70.2%) were interviewed face to face in the 1998 Autumn South Australian Health Omnibus Survey. Results: Self-reported urinary incontinence was found in 20.3% (n=610), and depression as defined by the PRIMEMD in 15.2% (n=459) of the survey population. Urinary incontinence with comorbid depression was found in 4.3% of the overall population. Univariate analysis showed that respondents with urinary incontinence and comorbid depression were more likely to be aged between 15 and 34 years and never married when compared to those with incontinence only. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that in people with incontinence, the risk of having comorbid depression was increased by an overall health status of Fair or Poor, or the perception that their incontinence was moderately or very serious. Respondents reporting that they experienced incontinence with comorbid depression scored significantly lower than those experiencing incontinence without depression on all dimensions of the SF-36. The interaction of the presence of incontinence and the presence of depression was significantly associated with the dimensions of physical functioning. Conclusions: Depression and incontinence both reduce QOL. When they occur together there appears to be an additive effect which affects both physical and mental health, perhaps by increasing a person's negative perceptions of their illness. Clinicians should identify and manage comorbid depression when treating patients who have incontinence to improve their overall QOL. B [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. The ASTUTE Health study protocol: Deliberative stakeholder engagements to inform implementation approaches to healthcare disinvestment.
- Author
-
Watt, Amber M., Hiller, Janet E., Braunack-Mayer, Annette J., Moss, John R., Buchan, Heather, Wale, Janet, Riitano, Dagmara E., Hodgetts, Katherine, Street, Jackie M., and Elshaug, Adam G.
- Subjects
STOCKHOLDERS ,MEDICAL care ,DISINVESTMENT ,COST effectiveness ,DECISION making - Abstract
Background: Governments and other payers are yet to determine optimal processes by which to review the safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of technologies and procedures that are in active use within health systems, and rescind funding (partially or fully) from those that display poor profiles against these parameters. To further progress a disinvestment agenda, a model is required to support payers in implementing disinvestment in a transparent manner that may withstand challenge from vested interests and concerned citizens. Combining approaches from health technology assessment and deliberative democratic theory, this project seeks to determine if and how wide stakeholder engagement can contribute to improved decision-making processes, wherein the views of both vested and non-vested stakeholders are seen to contribute to informing policy implementation within a disinvestment context. Methods/design: Systematic reviews pertaining to illustrative case studies were developed and formed the evidence base for discussion. Review findings were presented at a series of deliberative, evidence-informed stakeholder engagements, including partisan (clinicians and consumers) and non-partisan (representative community members) stakeholders. Participants were actively facilitated towards identifying shared and dissenting perspectives regarding public funding policy for each of the case studies and developing their own funding models in response to the evidence presented. Policy advisors will subsequently be invited to evaluate disinvestment options based on the scientific and colloquial evidence presented to them, and to explore the value of this information to their decision-making processes with reference to disinvestment. Discussion: Analysis of the varied outputs of the deliberative engagements will contribute to the methodological development around how to best integrate scientific and colloquial evidence for consideration by policy advisors. It may contribute to the legitimization of broad and transparent stakeholder engagement in this context. It is anticipated that decision making will benefit from the knowledge delivered through informed deliberation with engaged stakeholders, and this will be explored through interviews with key decision makers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. A randomised controlled trial to compare opt-in and opt-out parental consent for childhood vaccine safety surveillance using data linkage: study protocol.
- Author
-
Berry, Jesia G., Ryan, Philip, Braunack-Mayer, Annette J., Duszynski, Katherine M., Xafis, Vicki, and Gold, Michael S.
- Subjects
VACCINATION of children ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,CLINICAL trials ,SAFETY - Abstract
Background: The Vaccine Assessment using Linked Data (VALiD) trial compared opt-in and opt-out parental consent for a population-based childhood vaccine safety surveillance program using data linkage. A subsequent telephone interview of all households enrolled in the trial elicited parental intent regarding the return or nonreturn of reply forms for opt-in and opt-out consent. This paper describes the rationale for the trial and provides an overview of the design and methods. Methods/Design: Single-centre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial (RCT) stratified by firstborn status. Mothers who gave birth at one tertiary South Australian hospital were randomised at six weeks post-partum to receive an opt-in or opt-out reply form, along with information explaining data linkage. The primary outcome at 10 weeks post-partum was parental participation in each arm, as indicated by the respective return or non-return of a reply form (or via telephone or email response). A subsequent telephone interview at 10 weeks post-partum elicited parental intent regarding the return or non-return of the reply form, and attitudes and knowledge about data linkage, vaccine safety, consent preferences and vaccination practices. Enrolment began in July 2009 and 1,129 households were recruited in a three-month period. Analysis has not yet been undertaken. The participation rate and selection bias for each method of consent will be compared when the data are analysed. Discussion: The VALiD RCT represents the first trial of opt-in versus opt-out consent for a data linkage study that assesses consent preferences and intent compared with actual opting in or opting out behaviour, and socioeconomic factors. The limitations to generalisability are discussed. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000332022. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Including the public in pandemic planning:a deliberative approach.
- Author
-
Braunack-Mayer, Annette J., Street, Jackie M., Rogers, Wendy A., Givney, Rodney, Moss, John R., and Hiller, Janet E.
- Subjects
- *
AVIAN influenza , *PANDEMICS , *EPIDEMIOLOGY , *COMMUNICABLE diseases , *PUBLIC health , *ANTIVIRAL agents - Abstract
Background: Against a background of pandemic threat posed by SARS and avian H5N1 influenza, this study used deliberative forums to elucidate informed community perspectives on aspects of pandemic planning. Methods: Two deliberative forums were carried out with members of the South Australian community. The forums were supported by a qualitative study with adults and youths, systematic reviews of the literature and the involvement of an extended group of academic experts and policy makers. The forum discussions were recorded with simultaneous transcription and analysed thematically. Results: Participants allocated scarce resources of antiviral drugs and pandemic vaccine based on a desire to preserve society function in a time of crisis. Participants were divided on the acceptability of social distancing and quarantine measures. However, should such measures be adopted, they thought that reasonable financial, household and psychological support was essential. In addition, provided such support was present, the participants, in general, were willing to impose strict sanctions on those who violated quarantine and social distancing measures. Conclusions: The recommendations from the forums suggest that the implementation of pandemic plans in a severe pandemic will be challenging, but not impossible. Implementation may be more successful if the public is engaged in pandemic planning before a pandemic, effective communication of key points is practiced before and during a pandemic and if judicious use is made of supportive measures to assist those in quarantine or affected by social isolation measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
14. "It's sort of like being a detective": Understanding how Australian men self-monitor their health prior to seeking help.
- Author
-
Smith, James A., Braunack-Mayer, Annette, Wittert, Gary, and Warin, Megan
- Subjects
- *
PATIENT self-monitoring , *MEDICAL care , *MEN'S health , *HEALTH self-care - Abstract
Background: It is commonly held that men delay help seeking because they are ignorant about and disinterested in their health. However, this discussion has not been informed by men's lay perspectives, which have remained almost entirely absent from scholarship relating to men's help seeking practices. Methods: In this qualitative paper, we draw on semi-structured interviews with 36 South Australian men to examine their understandings of help seeking and health service use. Results & Discussion: We use participants' talk about self-monitoring to challenge the assumption that men are disinterested in their health, arguing instead that the men in our study monitored their health status and made conscious decisions about when and how to seek help. Using an inductive approach during the thematic analysis we were able to identify four key factors that influenced how men monitored their health and explain how these intersect with the way men sought help and used health services. Conclusion: We show that the men in our study were actively engaged in the self-monitoring of their health. We suggest that these findings offer an alternative approach for understanding how we can promote men's interaction with health services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. HPV.edu study protocol: a cluster randomised controlled evaluation of education, decisional support and logistical strategies in school-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination of adolescents.
- Author
-
Skinner SR, Davies C, Cooper S, Stoney T, Marshall H, Jones J, Collins J, Hutton H, Parrella A, Zimet G, Regan DG, Whyte P, Brotherton JM, Richmond P, McCaffrey K, Garland SM, Leask J, Kang M, Braunack-Mayer A, Kaldor J, and McGeechan K
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Australia, Decision Making, Emotions, Female, Health Education, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Male, Papillomavirus Infections virology, Parents, Program Evaluation, Research Design, Self Efficacy, Students psychology, Young Adult, Immunization Programs, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections prevention & control, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Schools, Vaccination
- Abstract
Background: The National Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Program in Australia commenced in 2007 for females and in 2013 for males, using the quadrivalent HPV vaccine (HPV 6,11,16,18). Thus far, we have demonstrated very substantial reductions in genital warts and in the prevalence of HPV among young Australian women, providing early evidence for the success of this public health initiative. Australia has a long history of school-based vaccination programs for adolescents, with comparatively high coverage. However, it is not clear what factors promote success in a school vaccination program. The HPV.edu study aims to examine: 1) student knowledge about HPV vaccination; 2) psycho-social outcomes and 3) vaccination uptake., Methods/design: HPV.edu is a cluster randomised trial of a complex intervention in schools aiming to recruit 40 schools with year-8 enrolments above 100 students (approximately 4400 students). The schools will be stratified by Government, Catholic, and Independent sectors and geographical location, with up to 20 schools recruited in each of two states, Western Australia (WA) and South Australia (SA), and randomly allocated to intervention or control (usual practice). Intervention schools will receive the complex intervention which includes an adolescent intervention (education and distraction); a decisional support tool for parents and adolescents and logistical strategies (consent form returns strategies, in-school mop-up vaccination and vaccination-day guidelines). Careful process evaluation including an embedded qualitative evaluation will be undertaken to explore in depth possible mechanisms for any observed effect of the intervention on primary and secondary outcomes., Discussion: This study is the first to evaluate the relative effectiveness of various strategies to promote best practice in school-based vaccination against HPV. The study aims to improve vaccination-related psychosocial outcomes, including adolescent knowledge and attitudes, decision-making involvement, self-efficacy, and to reduce fear and anxiety. The study also aims to improve school vaccination program logistics including reduction in time spent vaccinating adolescents and increased number of consent forms returned (regardless of decision). Less anxiety in adolescents will likely promote more efficient vaccination, which will be more acceptable to teachers, nurses and parents. Through these interventions, it is hoped that vaccination uptake will be increased., Trial Registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12614000404628 , 14.04.2014.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Including the public in pandemic planning: a deliberative approach.
- Author
-
Braunack-Mayer AJ, Street JM, Rogers WA, Givney R, Moss JR, and Hiller JE
- Subjects
- Adult, Health Care Rationing, Humans, Patient Isolation, Quarantine, South Australia, Community Participation, Disaster Planning, Pandemics prevention & control, Public Opinion
- Abstract
Background: Against a background of pandemic threat posed by SARS and avian H5N1 influenza, this study used deliberative forums to elucidate informed community perspectives on aspects of pandemic planning., Methods: Two deliberative forums were carried out with members of the South Australian community. The forums were supported by a qualitative study with adults and youths, systematic reviews of the literature and the involvement of an extended group of academic experts and policy makers. The forum discussions were recorded with simultaneous transcription and analysed thematically., Results: Participants allocated scarce resources of antiviral drugs and pandemic vaccine based on a desire to preserve society function in a time of crisis. Participants were divided on the acceptability of social distancing and quarantine measures. However, should such measures be adopted, they thought that reasonable financial, household and psychological support was essential. In addition, provided such support was present, the participants, in general, were willing to impose strict sanctions on those who violated quarantine and social distancing measures., Conclusions: The recommendations from the forums suggest that the implementation of pandemic plans in a severe pandemic will be challenging, but not impossible. Implementation may be more successful if the public is engaged in pandemic planning before a pandemic, effective communication of key points is practiced before and during a pandemic and if judicious use is made of supportive measures to assist those in quarantine or affected by social isolation measures.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. The information needs of women diagnosed with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome--implications for treatment and health outcomes.
- Author
-
Avery JC and Braunack-Mayer AJ
- Subjects
- Adult, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand organization & administration, Humans, Internet, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome prevention & control, Quality of Life, South Australia, Surveys and Questionnaires, Women's Health, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Information Dissemination, Patient Education as Topic methods, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome diagnosis, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome therapy
- Abstract
Background: This paper reports the findings of an exploratory study about the information women diagnosed with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) want to know about their condition and the consequences of this information for future treatment and health outcomes., Methods: In-depth qualitative interviews regarding their information needs were undertaken with ten South Australian women diagnosed with PCOS. These women were aged 28-38 years and at differing stages of their fertility experience. The time since diagnosis ranged from 1-17 years. The main outcome measures sought were the identification of the information needs of women diagnosed with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) during different periods of their lives; how and where they obtain this information, and the consequences of this information for future treatment and health outcomes., Results: The women with PCOS in this study preferentially used the Internet for their information needs, as it had the advantages of convenience, privacy and accessibility, when compared with traditional mechanisms of information provision., Conclusion: Giving a name to a collection of symptoms may bring relief and provide recognition that there really is a problem. However, with a diagnosis comes the need to have questions answered. A diagnosis of a chronic condition such as PCOS necessitates decision-making regarding possible treatment strategies and lifestyle choices. Information is needed in order to participate in shared decision making. The Internet proved to be a most versatile and beneficial source of information source for women with PCOS, if its limitations are taken into consideration.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.