Search

Intrahepatic interruption of the inferior vena cava (IVC) with continued hemizygous is a very rare abnormality and sometimes it may be accompanied by other cardiovascular abnormalities. Continuation of the hemizygous vein draining into the right atrium through the left superior vena cava (LSVC) is much rarer. In this paper, we have presented a patient who had simultaneous IVC interrupted with persistent LSVC and suffered from Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Finally, radiofrequencies (RF) catheter ablation for AVNRT was successfully performed through a left subclavian vein access. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Post-cardiac injury syndrome (PCIS) is an inflammatory condition following myocardial or pericardial damage. In response to catheter ablation, PCIS most frequently occurs after extensive radiofrequency (RF) ablation of large areas of atrial myocardium. Minor myocardial injury from right septal slow pathway ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is not an established cause of the syndrome.Case Presentation: A 62-year-old women with a 6-year history of symptomatic narrow-complex tachycardia was referred to perform an electrophysiological study. During the procedure AVNRT was recorded and a total of two RF burns were applied to the region between the coronary sinus and the tricuspid annulus. Pericardial effusion was routinely ruled out by focused cardiac ultrasound. In the following days, the patient developed fever, elevated inflammatory and cardiac markers, new-onset pericardial effusion, characteristic ECG changes, and complained of pleuritic chest pain. An extensive workup for infectious, metabolic, rheumatologic, neoplastic, and toxic causes of pericarditis and myocarditis was unremarkable. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed no signs of ischemia, infiltrative disease or structural abnormalities. The patient was diagnosed with PCIS and initiated on aspirin and low-dose colchicine. At a 1-month follow-up visit the patient was free of symptoms but still had a small pericardial effusion. After three  months of treatment the pericardial effusion had resolved completely.Conclusions: Inflammatory pericardial reactions can occur after minor myocardial damage from RF ablation without involvement of structures in close proximity to the pericardium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A new zero-fluoroscopy technique for electrophysiology catheter navigation relying on intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has been recently reported (Ice&ICE trial). We investigated potential differences in efficacy, safety or procedural performance between conventional fluoroscopy- and ICE-guided cryothermal ablation (CA) in symptomatic AVNRT patients.Methods: Clinical and electrophysiological data of AVNRT patients included in the Ice&ICE trial (22 patients, 16 females; =zero-fluoroscopy group) were compared to those of consecutive AVNRT patients, who underwent fluoroscopy-guided CA (25 patients, 17 females; = fluoroscopy group) during the last 2 years in our institution.Results: Slow pathway ablation or modulation was successful in all patients. Fluoroscopy time and radiation dose in the fluoroscopy group were 11.2 ± 9.0 min and 20.3 ± 16.2Gycm2, whereas no fluoroscopy was used in the opposite group (p <  0.001, respectively). EPS duration was not different between the groups (zero-fluoroscopy:101.6 ± 40.2 min, fluoroscopy:99.4 ± 37.2 min, p = n.s.). Catheter placement time was significantly shorter in the fluoroscopy group (2.2 ± 1.6 min vs. 12.0 ± 7.5 min, p <  0.05), whereas cryo-application duration (from the first cryo-mapping to the last CA) was significantly shorter in the zero-fluoroscopy group (27.5 ± 37.0 min vs. 38.1 ± 33.9 min, p <  0.05). Mean cryo-mapping and CA applications were numerically lower in the zero-fluoroscopy group (CM:7.5 ± 5.7 vs. 8.8 ± 6.2; CA:3.1 ± 1.7 vs. 3.2 ± 2.0, p = n.s.). No major adverse events occurred in both groups. After 15.0 ± 4.2 months, arrhythmia recurrence was not different between the groups (4.5% vs. 8.0%, p = n.s.).Conclusions: Zero-fluoroscopy ICE-guided EP catheter navigation shows comparable efficacy and safety to fluoroscopic guidance during CA in AVNRT patients. ICE visualization of catheters and endocardial structures within the triangle of Koch shortens the cryo-application duration, though time needed for catheter placement is longer, when compared with conventional fluoroscopic guidance, which results in similar mean EPS duration with both navigation techniques.Trial Registration: (German Clinical Trials Register ID: DRKS00011360 ; Registration Date 14.12.2016). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Catheter ablation of slow-pathway (CaSP) has been reported to be effective in patients with dual atrioventricular nodal conduction properties (dcp-AVN) and clinical ECG documentation but without the induction of tachycardia during electrophysiological studies (EPS). However, it is unknown whether CaSP is beneficial in the absence of pre-procedural ECG documentation and without the induction of tachycardia during EPS. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term results after a "pure" empirical CaSP (peCaSP). Methods: 334 consecutive patients who underwent CaSP (91 male, 47.5 ± 17.6 years) were included in this study. Sixty-three patients (19%) who had no pre-procedural ECG documentation, and demonstrated dcp-AVN with a maximum of one echo-beat were assigned to the peCaSP group. The remaining 271 patients (81%) were assigned to the standard CaSP group (stCaSP). Clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared, based on ECG documented recurrence or absence of tachycardia and patients' recorded symptoms. Results: CaSP was performed in all patients without any major complications including atrioventricular block. During follow-up (909 ± 435 days), 258 patients (77%) reported complete cessation of clinical symptoms. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of AVNRT recurrence between the peCaSP and stCaSP groups (1/63 [1.6%] vs 3/271 [1.1%], P = 0.75). Complete cessation of clinical symptoms was noted significantly less frequently in patients after peCaSP (39/63 [62%] vs 219/271 [81%], P = 0.0013). The incidence of non-AVNRT atrial tachyarrhythmias (AT) was significantly higher in patients after peCaSP (5/63 [7.9%] vs 1/271 [0.4%], P = 0.0011). Conclusion: A higher incidence of other AT and subjective symptom persistence are demonstrated after peCaSP, while peCaSP improves clinical symptoms in 60% of patients with non-documented on-off tachycardia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]