1,507 results
Search Results
2. A randomised controlled intervention study investigating the efficacy of carotenoid-rich fruits and vegetables and extra-virgin olive oil on attenuating sarcopenic symptomology in overweight and obese older adults during energy intake restriction: protocol paper.
- Author
-
Villani, Anthony, Wright, Hattie, Slater, Gary, and Buckley, Jonathan
- Subjects
HEALTH of older people ,CAROTENOID content in vegetables ,CAROTENOID content of fruit ,OLIVE oil ,OBESITY ,SYMPTOMS ,REDUCING diets ,CAROTENOIDS ,COMPARATIVE studies ,DIET therapy ,EXERCISE ,FRUIT ,HEALTH surveys ,INGESTION ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,QUALITY of life ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,RESEARCH ,VEGETABLES ,WEIGHT loss ,EVALUATION research ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,SARCOPENIA ,METABOLISM - Abstract
Background: Weight loss interventions have not been advocated for overweight/obese older adults due to potential loss of skeletal muscle and strength impacting on physical function with potential loss of independence. Carotenoids and polyphenols are inversely associated with sarcopenic symptomology. This paper reports the protocol of a study evaluating the efficacy of a high-protein, energy restricted diet rich in carotenoids and polyphenols on body composition, muscle strength, physical performance and quality of life in overweight and obese older adults.Methods: This randomised controlled clinical trial will recruit community-dwelling, healthy overweight and obese older adults (≥60 years) for a 12-week weight loss intervention. Seventy-three participants will be recruited and randomized to an energy restricted (~30% restriction), isocaloric diet (30% protein; 30% carbohydrate; 40% fat) enriched with either: a) 375 g/d of high carotenoid vegetables, 300 g/d high carotenoid fruit, and 40-60 ml extra-virgin olive oil (EVOO); or b) 375 g/d of lower carotenoid vegetables, 300 g/d lower carotenoid fruit, and 40-60 ml Polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) based oil. All participants will receive individual dietary counselling each fortnight for the duration of the study and will be asked to maintain their habitual level of physical activity throughout the study. The primary outcome will be appendicular skeletal muscle (ASM) assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Secondary outcomes will include body weight, fat-free mass (FFM), fat mass (FM), muscle strength (Isometric hand-grip strength), physical performance (Short Physical Performance Battery), physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) and health related quality of life (SF-36). Outcomes will be measured at baseline and at week 12.Discussion: The results of this study will provide a novel insight relating to the potential influence of high carotenoid and polyphenol intakes on attenuation of ASM during dietary energy-restricted weight loss in overweight and obese older adults.Trial Registration: The trial was registered on the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Register ( ACTRN12616001400459 ); Trial registration date: 10th October, 2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Evaluation of a physical activity intervention for new parents: protocol paper for a randomized trial.
- Author
-
Quinlan, Alison, Rhodes, Ryan E., Beauchamp, Mark R., Downs, Danielle Symons, Warburton, Darren E. R., Blanchard, Chris M., and Symons Downs, Danielle
- Subjects
FIRST-time parents ,PHYSICAL activity measurement ,SELF regulation ,FAMILY planning ,HEALTH promotion ,PARENTS ,HEALTH care intervention (Social services) ,HEALTH ,COMPARATIVE studies ,EXERCISE ,LONGITUDINAL method ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,PSYCHOLOGY of parents ,PSYCHOLOGY ,RESEARCH ,THEORY ,EVALUATION research ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,ACCELEROMETRY ,EVALUATION of human services programs - Abstract
Background: Identifying critical life transitions in people's physical activity behaviors may illuminate the most opportune intervention apertures for chronic disease prevention. A substantive evidence base now indicates that parenthood is one of these critical transition points for physical activity decline. This study will examine whether a brief theory-based intervention can prevent a decline in physical activity among new parents over 6 months following intervention. This study protocol represents the first dyad-based physical activity initiative in the parenthood literature involving both mothers and fathers; prior research has focused on only mothers or only fathers (albeit limited), and has shown only short-term changes in physical activity. This study will be investigating whether a theory-based physical activity intervention can maintain or improve moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity measured via accelerometry of new parents over a 6 month period following intervention compared to a control group.Methods: This study is a 6-month longitudinal randomized controlled trial. Parents are measured at baseline (2 months postpartum) with two assessment points at 6 weeks (3.5 months postpartum) and 3 months (5 months postpartum) and a final follow-up assessment at 6 months (8 months postpartum). The content of the theory-based intervention was derived from the results of our prior longitudinal trial of new parents using an adapted theory of planned behavior framework to predict changes in physical activity.Results: A total of 152 couples have been recruited to date. Sixteen couples dropped out after baseline and a total of 88 couples have completed their 6-month measures.Discussion: If the intervention proves successful, couple-based physical activity promotion efforts among parents could be a promising avenue to pursue to help mitigate the declines of physical activity levels during parenthood. These findings could inform public health materials and practitioners.Trial Registration: This trial has been registered with the Clinical Trials Registry maintained by the National Library of Medicine at the National Institutes of Health on April 19, 2014. The registration ID is NCT02290808 . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Stakeholder-informed pragmatic trial protocol of the TabCAT-BHA for the detection of cognitive impairment in primary care.
- Author
-
Sideman, Alissa Bernstein, Nguyen, Huong Q., Langer-Gould, Annette, Lee, Eric A., Borson, Soo, Shen, Ernest, Tsoy, Elena, Macias, Mayra, Goode, Collette, Rankin, Katherine, Kramer, Joel, and Possin, Katherine L.
- Subjects
COGNITION disorders diagnosis ,DIAGNOSIS of dementia ,PRIMARY health care ,POCKET computers ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,COMPUTER-aided diagnosis ,RESEARCH methodology - Abstract
Background: Cognitive impairment and dementia are frequently under-recognized. Health system strategies anchored in primary care are essential to address gaps in timely, comprehensive diagnosis. The goal of this paper is to describe the adaptation of a tablet-based brain health assessment (TabCAT-BHA) intervention and the study protocol to test its effectiveness in improving the detection of cognitive impairment, including dementia. Methods: This mixed-methods, pragmatic, cluster randomized, hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial is being conducted in two 18-month waves with 26 Kaiser Permanente Southern California primary care clinics, with 13 serving as intervention clinics and 13 as usual care clinics. Patients 65 years and older with memory concerns (n ~ 180,000) receiving care at the 26 clinics will be included in the analyses. Primary care clinics are provided the following practice supports as part of the TabCAT-BHA intervention: brief education and training on neurocognitive disorders and study workflows; digital tools to assess cognitive function and support clinician decision making and documentation; and registered nurse support during the work-up and post-diagnosis periods for primary care providers, patients, and families. The intervention was adapted based on engagement with multiple levels of clinical and operational leaders in the healthcare system. Effectiveness outcomes include rates of cognitive impairment diagnosis in primary care and rates of completed standardized cognitive assessments and specialist referrals with incident diagnoses. Implementation outcomes include acceptability-appropriateness-feasibility, adoption, and fidelity. Results: We identified seven themes organized by system-, provider-, and patient-level domains that were used to adapt the TabCAT-BHA intervention. Accordingly, changes were made to the provider education, diagnostic work-up, and post-diagnostic support. Results will be reported in fall of 2027. Conclusions: Our engagement with multiple primary and specialty care clinical and operational leaders to adapt the TabCAT-BHA intervention to these primary care clinics has informed the protocol to evaluate the intervention's effectiveness for improving the detection of cognitive impairment, including dementia, in an integrated healthcare system. Trial Registation: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06090578 (registered 10/24/23). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Offering vegetables to children at breakfast time in nursery and kindergarten settings: the Veggie Brek feasibility and acceptability cluster randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
McLeod, Chris J., Haycraft, Emma, and Daley, Amanda J.
- Subjects
PILOT projects ,SCHOOL health services ,VEGETARIANISM ,VEGETABLES ,RESEARCH methodology ,SCHOOL administrators ,INTERVIEWING ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,PRESCHOOLS ,PHOTOGRAPHY ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,RESEARCH funding ,BREAKFASTS ,ELEMENTARY schools ,STATISTICAL sampling ,CLUSTER analysis (Statistics) - Abstract
Background: In many Westernised countries, children do not consume a sufficient amount of vegetables for optimal health and development. Child-feeding guidelines have been produced to address this, but often only promote offering vegetables at midday/evening meals and snack times. With guidance having limited success in increasing children's vegetable intake at a population level, novel approaches to address this must be developed. Offering vegetables to children at breakfast time in nursery/kindergarten settings has the potential to increase children's overall daily vegetable consumption as children typically attend nursery/kindergarten and many routinely eat breakfast there. However, the feasibility and acceptability of this intervention (Veggie Brek) to children and nursery staff has not been investigated. Methods: A feasibility and acceptability cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) was undertaken in eight UK nurseries. All nurseries engaged in one-week baseline and follow-up phases before and after an intervention/control period. Staff in intervention nurseries offered three raw carrot batons and three cucumber sticks alongside children's main breakfast food each day for three weeks. Control nurseries offered children their usual breakfast. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment data and nursery staff's ability to follow the trial protocol. Acceptability was assessed by children's willingness to eat the vegetables at breakfast time. All primary outcomes were assessed against traffic-light progression criteria. Staff preference for collecting data via photographs versus using paper was also assessed. Further views about the intervention were obtained through semi-structured interviews with nursery staff. Results: The recruitment of parents/caregivers willing to provide consent for eligible children was acceptable at 67.8% (within the amber stop–go criterion) with 351 children taking part across eight nurseries. Both the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention to nursery staff and the willingness of children to consume the vegetables met the green stop–go criteria, with children eating some part of the vegetables in 62.4% (745/1194) of instances where vegetables were offered. Additionally, staff preferred reporting data using paper compared to taking photographs. Conclusions: Offering vegetables to children at breakfast time in nursery/kindergarten settings is feasible and acceptable to children and nursery staff. A full intervention evaluation should be explored via a definitive RCT. Trial registration: NCT05217550. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Effectiveness of reminders to sustain practice change among direct care providers in residential care facilities: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
- Author
-
Slaughter, Susan E., Eliasziw, Misha, Ickert, Carla, Jones, C. Allyson, Estabrooks, Carole A., and Wagg, Adrian S.
- Subjects
RESIDENTIAL care ,CLUSTER randomized controlled trials ,RESIDENTIAL mobility ,FACTORIAL experiment designs ,AFFINITY groups ,RESEARCH ,HEALTH care reminder systems ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL personnel ,MEDICAL cooperation ,EVALUATION research ,SOCIAL context ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,PSYCHOSOCIAL factors ,MEDICAL research - Abstract
Background: The study purpose was to compare the effectiveness of monthly or quarterly peer reminder knowledge translation interventions, with monthly or quarterly paper-based reminders, to sustain a mobility innovation, the sit-to-stand activity.Method: A cluster RCT using a stratified 2 × 2 factorial design was conducted in 24 Canadian residential care facilities with 416 residents and 54 peer reminder care aides. The 1-year intervention included two intensities of reminders (high: socially based peer reminders delivered by volunteer care aides to other care aides; low: paper-based reminders posted in residents' rooms), at two frequencies (monthly; every 3 months). Intervention fidelity was assessed using questionnaires and observations. Monthly sustainability rate of the sit-to-stand activity was calculated as the percentage of opportunities that residents successfully completed the activity in 30 days. Residents' sustainability rates were analyzed using a linear mixed model that mirrored the clustered repeated-measures factorial trial design. The model included a random intercept to account for clustering within sites. An unstructured covariance structure characterized the interdependence of repeated measures over time.Results: Twenty-four sites were randomized. One site was excluded because of falsifying data, leaving 23 sites and 349 residents for intention-to-treat analysis. Paper reminders were implemented with high fidelity across all arms (91.5% per protocol), while the peer reminders were implemented with moderate fidelity in the monthly group (81.0% per protocol) and poor fidelity in the quarterly group (51.7% per protocol). At month 1, mean sustainability ranged from 40.7 to 47.2 per 100 opportunities, across the four intervention arms (p = 0.43). Mean rate of sustainability in the high intensity, high frequency group diverged after randomization, yielding statistically significant differences among the groups at 4 months which persisted for the remainder of the trial. After 12 months, the mean sustainability in the high intensity, high frequency group was approximately twice that of the other three groups combined (64.1 versus 37.8 per 100 opportunities, p < 0.001).Conclusions: A monthly peer reminder intervention was more effective than a quarterly peer reminder intervention, a monthly paper-based reminder intervention, and a quarterly paper-based reminder intervention, in supporting care aides to sustain a mobility innovation in residential care facilities over 1 year.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01746459. Registered 11 December 2012: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01746459 . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Participant and workplace champion experiences of an intervention designed to reduce sitting time in desk-based workers: SMART work & life.
- Author
-
Edwardson, Charlotte L, Maylor, Benjamin D, Biddle, Stuart J H, Clarke-Cornwell, Alexandra M, Clemes, Stacy A, Davies, Melanie J, Dunstan, David W, Granat, Malcolm H, Gray, Laura J, Hadjiconstantinou, Michelle, Healy, Genevieve N, Wilson, Panna, Munir, Fehmidah, Yates, Thomas, and Eborall, Helen
- Subjects
SEDENTARY lifestyles ,WORK environment ,EMPLOYEE attitudes ,FOCUS groups ,WHITE collar workers ,RESEARCH methodology ,MOTIVATION (Psychology) ,WORK-life balance ,INTERVIEWING ,SITTING position ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,PSYCHOSOCIAL factors ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,RESEARCH funding ,INTERPROFESSIONAL relations ,STATISTICAL sampling ,DATA analysis software ,FATIGUE (Physiology) ,BEHAVIOR modification - Abstract
Background: A cluster randomised controlled trial demonstrated the effectiveness of the SMART Work & Life (SWAL) behaviour change intervention, with and without a height-adjustable desk, for reducing sitting time in desk-based workers. Staff within organisations volunteered to be trained to facilitate delivery of the SWAL intervention and act as workplace champions. This paper presents the experiences of these champions on the training and intervention delivery, and from participants on their intervention participation. Methods: Quantitative and qualitative feedback from workplace champions on their training session was collected. Participants provided quantitative feedback via questionnaires at 3 and 12 month follow-up on the intervention strategies (education, group catch ups, sitting less challenges, self-monitoring and prompts, and the height-adjustable desk [SWAL plus desk group only]). Interviews and focus groups were also conducted at 12 month follow-up with workplace champions and participants respectively to gather more detailed feedback. Transcripts were uploaded to NVivo and the constant comparative approach informed the analysis of the interviews and focus groups. Results: Workplace champions rated the training highly with mean scores ranging from 5.3/6 to 5.7/6 for the eight parts. Most participants felt the education increased their awareness of the health consequences of high levels of sitting (SWAL: 90.7%; SWAL plus desk: 88.2%) and motivated them to change their sitting time (SWAL: 77.5%; SWAL plus desk: 85.77%). A high percentage of participants (70%) reported finding the group catch up session helpful and worthwhile. However, focus groups highlighted mixed responses to the group catch-up sessions, sitting less challenges and self-monitoring intervention components. Participants in the SWAL plus desk group felt that having a height-adjustable desk was key in changing their behaviour, with intrinsic as well as time based factors reported as key influences on the height-adjustable desk usage. In both intervention groups, participants reported a range of benefits from the intervention including more energy, less fatigue, an increase in focus, alertness, productivity and concentration as well as less musculoskeletal problems (SWAL plus desk group only). Work-related, interpersonal, personal attributes, physical office environment and physical barriers were identified as barriers when trying to sit less and move more. Conclusions: Workplace champion and participant feedback on the intervention was largely positive but it is clear that different behaviour change strategies worked for different people indicating that a 'one size fits all' approach may not be appropriate for this type of intervention. The SWAL intervention could be tested in a broader range of organisations following a few minor adaptations based on the champion and participant feedback. Trial registration: ISCRCTN registry (ISRCTN11618007). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Evaluating the QUIT-PRIMO clinical practice ePortal to increase smoker engagement with online cessation interventions: a national hybrid type 2 implementation study.
- Author
-
Houston, Thomas K., Sadasivam, Rajani S., Allison, Jeroan J., Ash, Arlene S., Ray, Midge N., English, Thomas M., Hogan, Timothy P., and Ford, Daniel E.
- Subjects
SMOKING cessation ,INTERNET in medicine ,PHYSIOLOGICAL effects of tobacco ,MEDICAL practice ,FOLLOW-up studies (Medicine) ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,COMPARATIVE studies ,EMPLOYEE orientation ,INTERNET ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,MEDICAL referrals ,MOTIVATION (Psychology) ,RESEARCH ,SUPPORT groups ,USER interfaces ,SOCIOECONOMIC factors ,EVALUATION research - Abstract
Background: Effective web-assisted tobacco interventions (WATIs) have been underutilized by smokers; moreover, despite practice guideline recommendations, clinical teams do not routinely refer smokers to WATIs. Our goal was to test a clinical practice innovation, an ePortal designed to change practice and patient behavior. Our hypotheses were that the integrated system would result in increased smoker referrals, with an automated follow-up system resulting in more smoker registrations and finally augmentations of the WATI would result in more smokers quitting at 6 months.Methods: Practice ePortal Implementation Trial: Practices (n = 174) were randomized to an online practice ePortal with an "e-referral tool" to the WATI (e-referred smokers received automated email reminders from the practice) and with practice feedback reports with patient tracking and practice-to-patient secure messaging versus comparison (a paper "referral prescription"). Implementation success was measured by the number of smokers referred and smokers registering. Clinical Effectiveness Trial: To estimate the effectiveness of the WATI components on 6-month smoking cessation, registered smokers were randomized into three groups: a state-of-the-art tailored WATI control [control], the WATI enhanced with proactive, pushed tailored email motivational messaging (messaging), and the WATI with messaging further enhanced with personal secure messaging with a tobacco treatment specialist and an online support group (personalized).Results: Practice ePortal Trial results: A total of 4789 smokers were referred. The mean smokers referred per practice was not statistically different by group (ePortal 24.89 (SD 22.29) versus comparison 30.15 (SD 25.45), p = 0.15). The e-referral portal implementation program resulted in nearly triple the rate of smoker registration (31 % of all smokers referred registered online) versus comparison (11 %, p < 0.001). Clinical Effectiveness Trial results: Active smokers randomized to the personalized group had a 6-month cessation rate of 25.2 %, compared with the messaging group (26.7 %) and the control (17 %). Next, when using an inverse probability weighted selection model to account for attrition, those randomized to the two groups that received motivational messaging (messaging or personalized) were more likely to quit than those in the control (p = 0.04).Conclusions: Among all smokers referred, the e-referral resulted in nearly threefold greater registrants (31 %) than paper (11 %). The practice ePortal smokers received multiple reminders (increasing registration opportunities), and the practices could track patient progress. The result was more smokers registering and, thus, more cessation opportunities. Combining the proactive referral and the WATI resulted in higher rates of smoking cessation.Trial Registration: Web-delivered Provider Intervention for Tobacco Control (QUIT-PRIMO) - a randomized controlled trial: NCT00797628 . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. A framework for cross-cultural development and implementation of complex interventions to improve palliative care in nursing homes: the PACE steps to success programme.
- Author
-
Hockley, Jo, Froggatt, Katherine, Van den Block, Lieve, Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje, Kylänen, Marika, Szczerbińska, Katarzyna, Gambassi, Giovanni, Pautex, Sophie, Payne, Sheila Alison, on behalf of PACE, Arrue, Borja, Baranska, Ilona, Deliens, Luc, Engels, Yvonne, Finne-Soveri, Harriet, Kijowska, Viola, ten Koppel, Maud, Kylanen, Marika, Mammarella, Federica, and Smets, Tinne
- Subjects
PALLIATIVE treatment ,NURSING home care ,NURSING home employees ,NURSING care facilities ,NURSING interventions ,UNIVERSAL language ,LONG-term care facilities ,CLUSTER randomized controlled trials ,QUALITY assurance standards ,COMPARATIVE studies ,LONG-term health care ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH funding ,TERMINAL care ,ETHNOLOGY research ,EVALUATION research ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials - Abstract
Background: The PACE Steps to Success programme is a complex educational and development intervention to improve palliative care in nursing homes. Little research has investigated processes in the cross-cultural adaptation and implementation of interventions in palliative care across countries, taking account of differences in health and social care systems, legal and regulatory policies, and cultural norms. This paper describes a framework for the cross-cultural development and support necessary to implement such an intervention, taking the PACE Steps to Success programme as an exemplar.Methods: The PACE Steps to Success programme was implemented as part of the PACE cluster randomised control trial in seven European countries. A three stage approach was used, a) preparation of resources; b) training in the intervention using a train-the-trainers model; and c) cascading support throughout the implementation. All stages were underpinned by cross-cultural adaptation, including recognising legal and cultural norms, sensitivities and languages. This paper draws upon collated evidence from minutes of international meetings, evaluations of training delivered, interviews with those delivering the intervention in nursing homes and providing and/or receiving support.Results: Seventy eight nursing homes participated in the trial, with half randomized to receive the intervention, 3638 nurses/care assistants were identified at baseline. In each country, 1-3 trainers were selected (total n = 16) to deliver the intervention. A framework was used to guide the cross-cultural adaptation and implementation. Adaptation of three English training resources for different groups of staff consisted of simplification of content, identification of validated implementation tools, a review in 2 nursing homes in each country, and translation into local languages. The same training was provided to all country trainers who cascaded it into intervention nursing homes in local languages, and facilitated it via in-house PACE coordinators. Support was cascaded from country trainers to staff implementing the intervention.Conclusions: There is little guidance on how to adapt complex interventions developed in one country and language to international contexts. This framework for cross-cultural adaptation and implementation of a complex educational and development intervention may be useful to others seeking to transfer quality improvement initiatives in other contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. The impact of self-interviews on response patterns for sensitive topics: a randomized trial of electronic delivery methods for a sexual behaviour questionnaire in rural South Africa.
- Author
-
Harling, Guy, Gumede, Dumile, Mutevedzi, Tinofa, McGrath, Nuala, Seeley, Janet, Pillay, Deenan, Bärnighausen, Till W., and Herbst, Abraham J.
- Subjects
SOUTH Africans ,RURAL population ,SOCIAL desirability ,COGNITIVE interviewing ,META-analysis ,HUMAN sexuality ,COMPARATIVE studies ,EMOTIONS ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH funding ,SELF-evaluation ,EVALUATION research ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials - Abstract
Background: Self-interviews, where the respondent rather than the interviewer enters answers to questions, have been proposed as a way to reduce social desirability bias associated with interviewer-led interviews. Computer-assisted self-interviews (CASI) are commonly proposed since the computer programme can guide respondents; however they require both language and computer literacy. We evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of using electronic methods to administer quantitative sexual behaviour questionnaires in the Somkhele demographic surveillance area (DSA) in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.Methods: We conducted a four-arm randomized trial of paper-and-pen-interview, computer-assisted personal-interview (CAPI), CASI and audio-CASI with an age-sex-urbanicity stratified sample of 504 adults resident in the DSA in 2015. We compared respondents' answers to their responses to the same questions in previous surveillance rounds. We also conducted 48 cognitive interviews, dual-coding responses using the Framework approach.Results: Three hundred forty (67%) individuals were interviewed and covariates and participation rates were balanced across arms. CASI and audio-CASI were significantly slower than interviewer-led interviews. Item non-response rates were higher in self-interview arms. In single-paper meta-analysis, self-interviewed individuals reported more socially undesirable sexual behaviours. Cognitive interviews found high acceptance of both self-interviews and the use of electronic methods, with some concerns that self-interview methods required more participant effort and literacy.Conclusions: Electronic data collection methods, including self-interview methods, proved feasible and acceptable for completing quantitative sexual behaviour questionnaires in a poor, rural South African setting. However, each method had both benefits and costs, and the choice of method should be based on context-specific criteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Risk-based stratified primary care for common musculoskeletal pain presentations: qualitative findings from the STarT MSK cluster randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Saunders, Benjamin, Chudyk, Adrian, Protheroe, Joanne, Cooper, Vincent, Bartlam, Bernadette, Birkinshaw, Hollie, Foster, Nadine E, and Hill, Jonathan C
- Subjects
FAMILY medicine ,RESEARCH methodology ,INTERVIEWING ,PRIMARY health care ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,QUALITATIVE research ,CONCEPTUAL structures ,MUSCULOSKELETAL pain ,RESEARCH funding ,STATISTICAL sampling ,THEMATIC analysis - Abstract
Background: The STarT MSK cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigated the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of risk-based stratified primary care versus usual care for patients with back, neck, shoulder, knee or multi-site pain. Trial quantitative results showed risk-based stratified care was not superior to usual care for patients' clinical outcomes, but the intervention led to some changes in GP clinical decision-making. This paper reports a linked qualitative study exploring how risk-based stratified care was perceived and used in the trial, from the perspectives of clinicians and patients. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 patients, and focus groups and interviews with 20 clinicians (GPs and physiotherapists) in the intervention arm of the trial. Data were analysed thematically and findings explored using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) and the COM-B model. Main findings: Risk-based stratified care (subgrouping and matching treatments) was found to have 'coherence' (i.e. made sense) to several clinicians and patients, in that it was well-integrated in practice, and supported clinical decision-making. However, for some GPs stratified care was less 'meaningful', as the risk-stratification tool did not fit with usual ways of consulting and added to already time-pressured consultations. GPs reported giving more patients written information/advice due to easier access to electronic information leaflets through the trial template and were motivated to refer patients to physiotherapy as they believed the trial resulted in faster physiotherapy access (although this was not the case). Patients and clinicians reported that risk-based stratified care influenced conversations in the consultation, prompting greater attention to psychosocial factors, and facilitating negotiation of treatment options. Physiotherapists saw benefits in receiving information about patients' risk subgroup on referral forms. Conclusion: These findings provide context for interpreting some of the trial outcomes, particularly in relation to changes in clinical decision-making when risk-based stratified care was used. Findings also indicate potential reasons for lack of GP engagement with risk-based stratified care. Positive outcomes were identified that were not captured in the quantitative data, specifically that risk-based stratified care positively influenced some GP-patient conversations and facilitated negotiation of treatment options. Trial registration: ISRCTN15366334 (26/04/2016). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. The role of qualitative research in adding value to a randomised controlled trial: lessons from a pilot study of a guided e-learning intervention for managers to improve employee wellbeing and reduce sickness absence.
- Author
-
Russell, Jill, Berney, Lee, Stansfeld, Stephen, Lanz, Doris, Kerry, Sally, Chandola, Tarani, and Bhui, Kamaldeep
- Subjects
QUALITATIVE research ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,JOB stress ,EXECUTIVES ,MIXED methods research ,EMPLOYEE well-being ,SICK leave ,PERFORMANCE standards ,PREVENTION of psychological stress ,COMPARATIVE studies ,HEALTH promotion ,LEARNING ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,MENTAL health ,OCCUPATIONAL health services ,RESEARCH ,PILOT projects ,EVALUATION research - Abstract
Background: Despite the growing popularity of mixed-methods studies and considerable emphasis on the potential value of qualitative research to the trial endeavour, there remains a dearth of published studies reporting on actual contribution. This paper presents a critically reflective account of our experience of the actual value of undertaking qualitative research alongside a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of a guided e-learning intervention for managers in an NHS Mental Health Trust to improve employee wellbeing and reduce sickness absence. For the qualitative study we undertook 36 in-depth interviews with key informants, managers and employees. We observed and took in-depth field notes of 10 meetings involving managers and employees at the Trust, and the two qualitative researchers acted as participant observers at steering committee and monthly research team meetings. We adopted a narrative methodological orientation alongside a thematic approach to data analysis, eliciting a rich account of the complexities of managing stress at work.Results: We identified two key overarching roles played by the qualitative research: 'problematising' and 'contextualising'. Specifically, the qualitative data revealed and challenged assumptions embedded in the trial about the nature of the learning process, and exposed the slippery and contested nature of abstracted variables, on which a trial depends. The qualitative data challenged the trial's logic model, and provided a rich understanding of the context within which the trial and intervention took place.Conclusions: While acknowledging the ever-present tension in mixed-methods research between the requirements of quantitative research to represent the social world as abstracted variables, and the goal of qualitative research to explore and document the complexity of social phenomena, we adopted a pragmatic position that enabled us to engage with this tension in a productive and partially integrative way. Our critically reflective account of the praxis of integration illuminated opportunities and challenges for maximising the value of qualitative research to a trial. This paper sets out tangible illustrative lessons for other mixed-methods researchers endeavouring to get the most from qualitative research.Trial Registration: This study is registered as ISRCTN58661009 . Registration was submitted on 22 April 2013 and completed on 17 June 2013. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Reversal Of Arterial Disease by modulating Magnesium and Phosphate (ROADMAP-study): rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial assessing the effects of magnesium citrate supplementation and phosphate-binding therapy on arterial stiffness in moderate chronic kidney disease.
- Author
-
Vermeulen, Emma A., Eelderink, Coby, Hoekstra, Tiny, van Ballegooijen, Adriana J., Raijmakers, Pieter, Beulens, Joline W., de Borst, Martin H., and Vervloet, Marc G.
- Subjects
CHRONIC kidney failure complications ,CHRONIC kidney failure ,RESEARCH ,CARDIOVASCULAR system physiology ,INFLAMMATION ,RESEARCH methodology ,ARTHRITIS Impact Measurement Scales ,CITRATES ,EVALUATION research ,ORGANOMETALLIC compounds ,DIETARY supplements ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,CALCINOSIS ,MAGNESIUM ,RESEARCH funding ,VASCULAR diseases ,PHOSPHATES ,DISEASE complications - Abstract
Background: Arterial stiffness and calcification propensity are associated with high cardiovascular risk and increased mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Both magnesium and phosphate are recognized as modulators of vascular calcification and chronic inflammation, both features of CKD that contribute to arterial stiffness. In this paper, we outline the rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating whether 24 weeks of oral magnesium supplementation with or without additional phosphate-binding therapy can improve arterial stiffness and calcification propensity in patients with stage 3-4 CKD.Methods: In this multi-center, placebo-controlled RCT, a total of 180 participants with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 15 to 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 without phosphate binder therapy will be recruited. During the 24 weeks intervention, participants will be randomized to one of four intervention groups to receive either magnesium citrate (350 mg elemental magnesium/day) or placebo, with or without the addition of the phosphate binder sucroferric oxyhydroxide (1000 mg/day). Primary outcome of the study is the change of arterial stiffness measured by the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity over 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes include markers of calcification and inflammation, among others calcification propensity (T50) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. As explorative endpoints, repeated 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF PET-scans will be performed in a subset of participants (n = 40). Measurements of primary and secondary endpoints are performed at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks.Discussion: The combined intervention of magnesium citrate supplementation and phosphate-lowering therapy with sucroferric oxyhydroxide, in stage 3-4 CKD patients without overt hyperphosphatemia, aims to modulate the complex and deregulated mineral metabolism leading to vascular calcification and arterial stiffness and to establish to what extent this is mediated by T50 changes. The results of this combined intervention may contribute to future early interventions for CKD patients to reduce the risk of CVD and mortality.Trial Registration: Netherlands Trial Register, NL8252 (registered December 2019), EU clinical Trial Register 2019-001306-23 (registered November 2019). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Puberty health intervention to improve menstrual health and school attendance among adolescent girls in The Gambia: study methodology of a cluster-randomised controlled trial in rural Gambia (MEGAMBO TRIAL).
- Author
-
Shah, Vishna, Phillips-Howard, Penelope, Hennegan, Julie, Cavill, Sue, Sonko, Bakary, Sinjanka, Edrisa, Camara Trawally, Nyima, Kanteh, Abdou, Mendy, Francois, Bah, Amadou B., Saar, Momodou, Ross, Ian, Schmidt, Wolf, and Torondel, Belen
- Subjects
BIOMARKERS ,SOCIAL support ,JOB absenteeism ,RESEARCH methodology ,URINARY tract infections ,MENSTRUATION ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,HEALTH literacy ,SCHOOLS ,WOMEN'S health - Abstract
Background: Menstrual health (MH) is a recognised global public health challenge. Poor MH may lead to absence from school and work, and adverse health outcomes. However, reviews suggest a lack of rigorous evidence for the effectiveness of MH interventions on health and education outcomes. The objective of this paper is to describe the methods used in a cluster-randomised controlled trial to estimate the effect of a multi-component intervention to improve MH and school attendance in The Gambia. Methods: The design ensured half the schools (25) were randomised to receive the intervention which comprised of the following components: (i) Peer education camps and menstrual hygiene laboratories in schools, (ii) Mother's outreach sessions, (iii) Community meetings, and (iv) minor improvements of school Water Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) facilities and maintenance. The intervention was run over a three-month period, and the evaluation was conducted at least three months after the last intervention activity was completed in the school or community. The other 25 schools acted as controls. Of these 25 control schools one Arabic school dropped out due to COVID-19. The primary outcome was the prevalence of girls missing at least one day of school during their last period. Secondary outcomes included: Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) symptoms, biochemical markers of UTI in urine, Reproductive Tract Infection symptoms, self-reported menstruation related wellbeing, social support and knowledge, perceptions and practices towards menstruation and MH in target school girls. In addition, a process evaluation using observations, routine monitoring data, survey data and interviews was undertaken to assess dose and reach (quantitative data) and assess acceptability, fidelity, context and possible mechanisms of impact (qualitative data). Cost and cost-effectiveness of the intervention package will also be assessed. Conclusion: Results will add to scarce resources available on effectiveness of MH interventions on school attendance. A positive result may encourage policy makers to increase their commitment to improve operation and maintenance of school WASH facilities and include more information on menstruation into the curriculum and help in the reporting and management of infections related to adolescent menstruation. Trial Registration PACTR, PACTR201809769868245, Registered 14th August 2018, https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=3539 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Improving health-related quality of life in women with breast, blood, and gynaecological Cancer with an eHealth-enabled 12-week lifestyle intervention: the women's wellness after Cancer program randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Seib, Charrlotte, Anderson, Debra, McGuire, Amanda, Porter-Steele, Janine, McDonald, Nicole, Balaam, Sarah, Sapkota, Diksha, and McCarthy, Alexandra L.
- Subjects
LIFESTYLES ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH methodology ,EVALUATION research ,HEALTH surveys ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,QUALITY of life ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,FEMALE reproductive organ tumors ,TELEMEDICINE - Abstract
Background: The residual effects of cancer and its treatment can profoundly affect women's quality of life. This paper presents results from a multisite randomized controlled trial that evaluated the clinical benefits of an e-health enabled health promotion intervention (the Women's Wellness after Cancer Program or WWACP) on the health-related quality of life of women recovering from cancer treatment.Methods: Overall, 351 women previously treated for breast, blood or gynaecological cancers were randomly allocated to the intervention (WWACP) or usual care arms. The WWACP comprised a structured 12-week program that included online coaching and an interactive iBook that targeted physical activity, healthy diet, stress and menopause management, sexual wellbeing, smoking cessation, alcohol intake and sleep hygiene. Data were collected via a self-completed electronic survey at baseline (t0), 12 weeks (post-intervention, t1) and 24 weeks (to assess sustained behaviour change, t2). The primary outcome, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), was measured using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).Results: Following the 12-week lifestyle program, intervention group participants reported statistically significant improvements in general health, bodily pain, vitality, and global physical and mental health scores. Improvements were also noted in the control group across several HRQoL domains, though the magnitude of change was less.Conclusions: The WWACP was associated with improved HRQoL in women previously treated for blood, breast, and gynaecological cancers. Given how the synergy of different lifestyle factors influence health behaviour, interventions accounting for the reciprocity of multiple health behaviours like the WWACP, have real potential for immediate and sustainable change.Trial Registration: The protocol for this randomised controlled trial was submitted to the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on 15/07/2014 and approved on 28/07/2014 ( ACTRN12614000800628 ). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Using a modified nominal group technique to develop complex interventions for a randomised controlled trial in children with symptomatic pes planus.
- Author
-
Backhouse, Michael R., Parker, Daniel J., Morison, Stewart C., Anderson, Jenny, Cockayne, Sarah, and Adamson, Joy A.
- Subjects
FLATFOOT ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,ARM exercises ,FOOT orthoses ,MEDICAL personnel ,CHILD care ,STRETCH (Physiology) ,HEALTH education ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH methodology ,EVALUATION research ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RESEARCH funding ,EXERCISE therapy ,ORTHOPEDIC apparatus - Abstract
Background: Children with symptomatic flat feet (pes planus) frequently present for care but there remains uncertainty about how best to manage their condition. There is considerable variation in practice between and within professions. We intend to conduct a three-arm trial to evaluate three frequently used interventions for pes planus (exercise and advice, exercise and advice plus prefabricated orthoses, and exercise and advice plus custom made orthoses). Each of these interventions are complex and required developing prior to starting the trial. This paper focusses on the development process undertaken to develop the interventions.Methods: We used a modified Nominal Group Technique combining an electronic survey with two face-to-face meetings to achieve consensus on the final logic model and menu of options for each intervention. Using the Nominal Group Technique across consecutive meetings in combination with a questionnaire is novel, and enabled us to develop complex interventions that reflect contemporary clinical practice.Results: In total 16 healthcare professionals took part in the consensus. These consisted of 11 podiatrists, two orthotists, two physiotherapists, and one orthopaedic surgeon. Both meetings endorsed the logic model with amendments to reflect the wider psychosocial impact of pes planus and its treatment, as well as the increasing use of shared decision making in practice. Short lists of options were agreed for prefabricated and custom made orthoses, structures to target in stretching and strengthening exercises, and elements of health education and advice.Conclusions: Our novel modification of the nominal group technique produced a coherent logic model and shortlist of options for each of the interventions that explicitly enable adaptability. We formed a consensus on the range of what is permissible within each intervention so that their integrity is kept intact and they can be adapted and pragmatically applied. The process of combining survey data with face-to-face meetings has ensured the interventions mirror contemporary practice and may provide a template for other trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Barriers to the conduct of randomised clinical trials within all disease areas.
- Author
-
Djurisic, Snezana, Rath, Ana, Gaber, Sabrina, Garattini, Silvio, Bertele, Vittorio, Ngwabyt, Sandra-Nadia, Hivert, Virginie, Neugebauer, Edmund A. M., Laville, Martine, Hiesmayr, Michael, Demotes-Mainard, Jacques, Kubiak, Christine, Jakobsen, Janus C., and Gluud, Christian
- Subjects
RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,CLINICAL medicine research ,MEDICAL research ,RESEARCH methodology ,INTERNATIONAL cooperation ,RESEARCH & economics ,RESEARCH laws ,CLINICAL trial laws ,SYMPTOMS ,ATTITUDE (Psychology) ,CLINICAL trials ,COOPERATIVENESS ,DIET therapy ,ENDOWMENT of research ,EXPERIMENTAL design ,HEALTH attitudes ,MEDICAL cooperation ,MEDICAL ethics ,MEDICAL personnel ,PRIVACY ,RESEARCH ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,EVIDENCE-based medicine ,EQUIPMENT & supplies ,RESEARCH personnel ,ECONOMICS ,THERAPEUTICS ,MEDICAL laws - Abstract
Background: Randomised clinical trials are key to advancing medical knowledge and to enhancing patient care, but major barriers to their conduct exist. The present paper presents some of these barriers.Methods: We performed systematic literature searches and internal European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (ECRIN) communications during face-to-face meetings and telephone conferences from 2013 to 2017 within the context of the ECRIN Integrating Activity (ECRIN-IA) project.Results: The following barriers to randomised clinical trials were identified: inadequate knowledge of clinical research and trial methodology; lack of funding; excessive monitoring; restrictive privacy law and lack of transparency; complex regulatory requirements; and inadequate infrastructures. There is a need for more pragmatic randomised clinical trials conducted with low risks of systematic and random errors, and multinational cooperation is essential.Conclusions: The present paper presents major barriers to randomised clinical trials. It also underlines the value of using a pan-European-distributed infrastructure to help investigators overcome barriers for multi-country trials in any disease area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. MYPLAN -mobile phone application to manage crisis of persons at risk of suicide: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
- Author
-
Andreasson, Kate, Krogh, Jesper, Bech, Per, Frandsen, Hanne, Buus, Niels, Stanley, Barbara, Kerkhof, Ad, Nordentoft, Merete, and Erlangsen, Annette
- Subjects
SUICIDE prevention ,SUICIDAL ideation ,CLINICAL trials ,SUPPORTIVE psychotherapy ,SUICIDAL behavior ,COMPARATIVE studies ,EXPERIMENTAL design ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,RESEARCH protocols ,PSYCHOTHERAPY ,RESEARCH ,STATISTICAL sampling ,EVALUATION research ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,RELATIVE medical risk ,MOBILE apps - Abstract
Background: Persons with a past episode of self-harm or severe suicidal ideation are at elevated risk of self-harm as well as dying by suicide. It is well established that suicidal ideation fluctuates over time. Previous studies have shown that a personal safety plan can assist in providing support, when a person experiences suicide ideation, and help seeking professional assistance if needed. The aim of the trial is to determine whether a newly developed safety mobile app is more effective in reducing suicide ideation and other symptoms, compared to a safety plan on paper.Methods/design: The trial is designed as a two-arm, observer-blinded, parallel-group randomized clinical superiority trial, where participants will either receive: (1) Experimental intervention: the safety plan provided as the app MyPlan, or (2) Treatment as Usual: the safety plan in the original paper format. Based on a power calculation, a total of 546 participants, 273 in each arm will be included. They will be recruited from Danish Suicide Prevention Clinics. Both groups will receive standard psychosocial therapeutic care, up to 8-10 sessions of supportive psychotherapy. Primary outcome will be reduction in suicide ideation after 12 months. Follow-up interviews will be conducted at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after date of inclusion.Discussion: A safety plan is a mandatory part of the treatment in the Suicide Prevention Clinics in Demark. There are no studies investigating the effectiveness of a safety plan app compared to a safety plan on paper on reducing suicide ideation in patients with suicide ideation and suicidal behavior. The trial will gain new knowledge of whether modern technology can augment the effects of traditional personalized safety planning.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02877316 . Registered on 19 August 2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Exploring the efficacy of an electronic symptom assessment and self-care intervention to preserve physical function in individuals receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy.
- Author
-
Knoerl, Robert, Weller, Edie, Halpenny, Barbara, and Berry, Donna
- Subjects
TREATMENT of peripheral neuropathy ,NEUROTOXIC agents ,CHEMOTHERAPY complications ,QUALITY of life ,PERIPHERAL neuropathy ,INSOMNIA ,FATIGUE (Physiology) ,MENTAL health ,ANTINEOPLASTIC agents ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,NEUROTOXICOLOGY ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH funding ,HEALTH self-care ,SELF-report inventories ,SYNDROMES ,SYMPTOMS ,EVALUATION research ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,SELF diagnosis ,PSYCHOLOGY ,THERAPEUTICS - Abstract
Background: Impaired physical function due to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) symptoms may lead to diminished quality of life. However, even with the knowledge of the effects of CIPN on physical function, clinicians infrequently assess and manage CIPN. Interventions that prioritize the early identification of CIPN to provide prompt treatment may reduce the impact of CIPN on physical function. The purpose of this paper is to compare self-reported physical function in individuals receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy between Electronic Symptom Assessment-Cancer (ESRA-C) intervention group (e.g., opportunity for symptom screening, self-care recommendations, communication coaching, and symptom tracking) and control group participants (i.e., electronic assessment alone). Secondary outcomes include pain intensity, sensory/motor CIPN, depression, fatigue, and insomnia.Methods: The data used in this paper are a subset of a randomized controlled trial that examined the impact of the ESRA-C intervention on symptom distress in individuals receiving cancer treatment. Since the interest in this analysis is on the effects of neurotoxic chemotherapy on physical function, subjects were included if they received platinum and/or taxane-based chemotherapy and completed the baseline and end-of-treatment measures. Participants completed standardized questionnaires of physical function, CIPN, fatigue, depression, pain intensity, and insomnia prior to treatment, 3-6 weeks after treatment initiation, and after the completion of treatment. Changes in mean scores are compared between groups using linear mixed models adjusting for age.Results: Intervention group participants reported significantly less reduction in physical functioning (baseline: 87.4/100; end-of-treatment: 84.5/100) relative to the control (baseline: 90.2/100; end-of-treatment: 81.8/100) (p = 0.011). For secondary measures, significantly less depression (p = 0.005) was observed in the intervention group as compared to the control, but otherwise, there were no between-group differences. Among participants who received high cumulative doses of neurotoxic chemotherapy, the intervention group reported significantly less severe sensory (p = 0.007) and motor CIPN (p = 0.039) relative to the control.Conclusion: Use of the ESRA-C intervention led to less reduction in physical function in comparison to the control in individuals receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy. Further research is needed to confirm our findings and to identify how electronic symptom assessment technology may mediate physical function preservation.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT00852852 . Registered 27 February 2009. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Evaluating the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the 'strengthening families, strengthening communities' group-based parenting programme: study protocol and initial insights.
- Author
-
Lodder, Annemarie, Mehay, Anita, Pavlickova, Hana, Hoare, Zoe, Box, Leandra, Butt, Jabeer, Weaver, Tim, Crawford, Mike J., Clutterbuck, Donna, Westbrook, Nicola, Manning, Karlet, Karlsen, Saffron, Morris, Steve, Brand, Andrew, Ramchandani, Paul, Kelly, Yvonne, Heilmann, Anja, and Watt, Richard G.
- Subjects
PARENTING ,FAMILY relations ,CHILD welfare ,FAMILIES ,DISCRIMINATION in medical care ,MEDICAL care of minorities ,RESEARCH ,MINORITIES ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,EVALUATION research ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,QUALITY of life ,COST effectiveness ,RESEARCH funding ,ETHNIC groups ,PARENTS - Abstract
Background: Up to 20% of UK children experience socio-emotional difficulties which can have serious implications for themselves, their families and society. Stark socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in children's well-being exist. Supporting parents to develop effective parenting skills is an important preventive strategy in reducing inequalities. Parenting interventions have been developed, which aim to reduce the severity and impact of these difficulties. However, most parenting interventions in the UK focus on early childhood (0-10 years) and often fail to engage families from ethnic minority groups and those living in poverty. Strengthening Families, Strengthening Communities (SFSC) is a parenting programme designed by the Race Equality Foundation, which aims to address this gap. Evidence from preliminary studies is encouraging, but no randomised controlled trials have been undertaken so far.Methods/design: The TOGETHER study is a multi-centre, waiting list controlled, randomised trial, which aims to test the effectiveness of SFSC in families with children aged 3-18 across seven urban areas in England with ethnically and socially diverse populations. The primary outcome is parental mental well-being (assessed by the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale). Secondary outcomes include child socio-emotional well-being, parenting practices, family relationships, self-efficacy, quality of life, and community engagement. Outcomes are assessed at baseline, post intervention, three- and six-months post intervention. Cost effectiveness will be estimated using a cost-utility analysis and cost-consequences analysis. The study is conducted in two stages. Stage 1 comprised a 6-month internal pilot to determine the feasibility of the trial. A set of progression criteria were developed to determine whether the stage 2 main trial should proceed. An embedded process evaluation will assess the fidelity and acceptability of the intervention.Discussion: In this paper we provide details of the study protocol for this trial. We also describe challenges to implementing the protocol and how these were addressed. Once completed, if beneficial effects on both parental and child outcomes are found, the impact, both immediate and longer term, are potentially significant. As the intervention focuses on supporting families living in poverty and those from minority ethnic communities, the intervention should also ultimately have a beneficial impact on reducing health inequalities.Trial Registration: Prospectively registered Randomised Controlled Trial ISRCTN15194500 . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. An analysis of the complementarity of ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-3 L in an adult population of patients with knee pain.
- Author
-
Keeley, T., Coast, J., Nicholls, E., Foster, N. E., Jowett, S., and Al-Janabi, H.
- Subjects
KNEE pain ,DISEASES in older people ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,RANK correlation (Statistics) ,TARIFF ,PAIN & psychology ,QUALITY of life ,MENTAL health ,PAIN measurement ,COMPARATIVE studies ,KNEE ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH funding ,EVALUATION research ,EQUIPMENT & supplies - Abstract
Background: The ICECAP measures potentially offer a broader assessment of quality of life and well-being, in comparison to measures routinely used in economic evaluation, such as the EQ-5D-3 L. This broader assessment may allow measurement of the full effects of an intervention or treatment. Previous research has indicated that the ICECAP-O (for older people) and EQ-5D-3 L measure provide complementary information. This paper aims to determine similar information for the ICECAP-A (for the entire adult population) in terms of whether the measure is a substitute or complement to the EQ-5D-3 L.Methods: Data from the BEEP trial - a multi-centre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial - were used. Spearman rank correlations and exploratory factor analytic methods were used to assess whether ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-3 L are measuring the same, or different, constructs.Results: A correlation of 0.49 (p < 0.01) was found between the ICECAP-A tariff score and the EQ-5D-3 L index. Using the pooled items of the EQ-5D-3 L and the ICECAP-A a two factor solution was optimal, with the majority of EQ-5D-3 L items loading onto one factor and the majority of ICECAP-A items onto another.Conclusion: The results presented in this paper indicate that ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-3 L are measuring two different constructs and provide largely different, complementary information. Results showed a similarity to results presented by Davis et al. using the ICECAP-O.Trial Registration: ISRCTN 93634563. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Detailed statistical analysis plan for the short-term versus long-term mentalisation-based therapy for outpatients with subthreshold or diagnosed borderline personality disorder randomised clinical trial (MBT-RCT).
- Author
-
Juul, Sophie, Simonsen, Sebastian, Poulsen, Stig, Lunn, Susanne, Sørensen, Per, Bateman, Anthony, and Jakobsen, Janus Christian
- Subjects
BORDERLINE personality disorder ,CLINICAL trials ,SOCIAL adjustment ,QUALITY of life ,GROUP psychotherapy ,OUTPATIENTS ,TREATMENT of borderline personality disorder ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,EVALUATION research ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,RESEARCH funding ,PSYCHOTHERAPY - Abstract
Background: Psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder is often extensive and resource-intensive. Mentalisation-based therapy is a psychodynamically oriented treatment option for borderline personality disorder, which includes a case formulation, psychoeducation, and group and individual therapy. The evidence on short-term compared with long-term mentalisation-based therapy is currently unknown.Methods/design: The Short-Term MBT Project (MBT-RCT) is a single-centre, parallel-group, investigator-initiated, randomised clinical superiority trial in which short-term (20 weeks) will be compared with long-term (14 months) mentalisation-based therapy for outpatients with subthreshold or diagnosed borderline personality disorder. Outcome assessors, data managers, the data safety and monitoring committee, statisticians, and decision-makers will be blinded to treatment allocation. Participants will be assessed before randomisation and at 8, 16, and 24 months after randomisation. The primary outcome will be the severity of borderline symptomatology assessed with the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder. Secondary outcomes will be functional impairment (Work and Social Adjustment Scale), quality of life (Short-Form Health Survey 36-mental component), global functioning (Global Assessment of Functioning), and proportion of participants with severe self-harm. In this paper, we present a detailed statistical analysis plan including a comprehensive explanation of the planned statistical analyses, methods to handle missing data, and assessments of the underlying statistical assumptions. Final statistical analyses will be conducted independently by two statisticians following the present plan.Discussion: We have developed this statistical analysis plan before unblinding of the trial results in line with the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization of Good Clinical Practice Guidelines, which should increase the validity of the MBT-RCT trial by mitigation of analysis bias.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03677037 . Registered on 19 September 2018. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. The development of a theory and evidence-based intervention to aid implementation of exercise into the prostate cancer care pathway with a focus on healthcare professional behaviour, the STAMINA trial.
- Author
-
Turner, Rebecca R., Arden, Madelynne A., Reale, Sophie, Sutton, Eileen, Taylor, Stephanie J. C., Bourke, Liam, Greenfield, Diana M., Morrissey, Dylan, Brown, Janet, Doherty, Patrick, Rosario, Derek J., and Steed, Liz
- Subjects
MEDICAL personnel ,PROSTATE cancer ,CANCER treatment ,NURSE practitioners ,UROLOGISTS ,ANDROGEN deprivation therapy ,NURSING consultants ,PROSTATE tumors treatment ,RESEARCH ,ANTIANDROGENS ,RESEARCH methodology ,EVIDENCE-based medicine ,MEDICAL care ,MEDICAL cooperation ,EVALUATION research ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,QUALITY of life - Abstract
Background: Twice-weekly supervised aerobic and resistance exercise for 12 weeks reduces fatigue and improves quality of life in men on Androgen Deprivation Therapy for prostate cancer. Despite the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) proposing this as standard of care, it does not routinely take place in practice. Healthcare professionals are in a prime position to deliver and integrate these recommendations. A change in the behaviour of clinical teams is therefore required. In this paper, we describe the development of a training package for healthcare professionals using theory and evidence to promote delivery of such recommendations as standard care.Methods: The intervention development process was guided by the Medical Research Council guidance for complex interventions and the Behaviour Change Wheel. Target behaviours were identified from the literature and thirty-five prostate cancer care healthcare professionals (including oncologists, consultant urologists, clinical nurse specialists, physiotherapists, general practitioners and commissioners) were interviewed to understand influences on these behaviours. The Theoretical Domains Framework was used to identify theoretical constructs for change. Behaviour change techniques were selected based on theory and evidence and were translated into intervention content. The intervention was refined with the input of stakeholders including healthcare professionals, patients, and exercise professionals in the form of rehearsal deliveries, focus groups and a workshop.Results: Seven modifiable healthcare professional target behaviours were identified to support the delivery of the NICE recommendations including identifying eligible patients suitable for exercise, recommending exercise, providing information, exercise referral, providing support and interpret and feedback on progress. Ten domains from the Theoretical Domain's Framework were identified as necessary for change, including improving knowledge and skills, addressing beliefs about consequences, and targeting social influences. These were targeted through twenty-two behaviour change techniques delivered in a half-day, interactive training package. Based on initial feedback from stakeholders, the intervention was refined in preparation for evaluation.Conclusions: We designed an intervention based on theory, evidence, and stakeholder feedback to promote and support the delivery of NICE recommendations. Future work will aim to test this training package in a multi-centre randomised trial. If proven effective, the development and training package will provide a template for replication in other clinical populations, where exercise has proven efficacy but is insufficiently implemented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Process evaluation of the implementation of a decision support system to prevent and treat disease-related malnutrition in a hospital setting.
- Author
-
Paulsen, Mari Mohn, Varsi, Cecilie, and Andersen, Lene Frost
- Subjects
DECISION support systems ,MALNUTRITION ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,NURSES as patients ,INFORMED consent (Medical law) ,PREVENTION of malnutrition ,HOSPITALS ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL care ,MEDICAL cooperation ,EVALUATION research ,COMPARATIVE studies - Abstract
Background: Malnutrition is present in 30% of hospitalized patients and has adverse outcomes for the patient and the healthcare system. The current practice for nutritional care is associated with many barriers. The MyFood decision support system was developed to prevent and treat malnutrition.Methods: This paper reports on a process evaluation that was completed within an effectiveness trial. MyFood is a digital tool with an interface consisting of an app and a website. MyFood includes functions to record and evaluate dietary intake. It also provides reports to nurses, including tailored recommendations for nutritional treatment. We used an effectiveness-implementation hybrid design in a randomized controlled trial. The RE-AIM (Reach, Efficiency, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework was used to perform a process evaluation alongside the randomized controlled trial, using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. An implementation plan, including implementation strategies, was developed to plan and guide the study.Results: Reach: In total, 88% of eligible patients consented to participate (n = 100). Adoption: Approximately 75% of the nurses signed up to use MyFood and 50% used the reports.Implementation: MyFood empowered the patients in their nutritional situation and acted as a motivation to eat to reach their nutritional target. The compliance of using MyFood was higher among the patients than the nurses. A barrier for use of MyFood among the nurses was different digital systems which were not integrated and the log-in procedure to the MyFood website. Despite limited use by some nurses, the majority of the nurses claimed that MyFood was useful, better than the current practice, and should be implemented in the healthcare system.Conclusions: This study used a process evaluation to interpret the results of a randomized controlled trial more in-depth. The patients were highly compliant, however, the compliance was lower among the nurses. MyFood empowered the patients in their nutritional situation, the usability was considered as high, and the experiences and attitudes towards MyFood were primarily positive. Focus on strategies to improve the nurses' compliance may in the future improve the MyFood system's potential.Trial Registration: The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov 26/01/2018 ( NCT03412695 ). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Efficacy of an enhanced linkage to HIV care intervention at improving linkage to HIV care and achieving viral suppression following home-based HIV testing in rural Uganda: study protocol for the Ekkubo/PATH cluster randomized controlled trial.
- Author
-
Kiene, Susan M., Kalichman, Seth C., Sileo, Katelyn M., Menzies, Nicolas A., Naigino, Rose, Chii-Dean Lin, Bateganya, Moses H., Lule, Haruna, Wanyenze, Rhoda K., and Lin, Chii-Dean
- Subjects
HOME diagnostic tests ,DIAGNOSIS of HIV infections ,THERAPEUTICS ,HIV infections ,MEDICAL care of HIV-positive persons ,HEALTH counseling ,PUBLIC health ,HIV infections & psychology ,COMPARATIVE studies ,COUNSELING ,HEALTH services accessibility ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,MEDICAL referrals ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH funding ,RURAL health services ,RURAL population ,EVALUATION research ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,HIV seroconversion ,ANTI-HIV agents - Abstract
Background: Though home-based human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) counseling and testing (HBHCT) is implemented in many sub-Saharan African countries as part of their HIV programs, linkage to HIV care remains a challenge. The purpose of this study is to test an intervention to enhance linkage to HIV care and improve HIV viral suppression among individuals testing HIV positive during HBHCT in rural Uganda.Methods: The PATH (Providing Access To HIV Care)/Ekkubo Study is a cluster-randomized controlled trial which compares the efficacy of an enhanced linkage to HIV care intervention vs. standard-of-care (paper-based referrals) at achieving individual and population-level HIV viral suppression, and intermediate outcomes of linkage to care, receipt of opportunistic infection prophylaxis, and antiretroviral therapy initiation following HBHCT. Approximately 600 men and women aged 18-59 who test HIV positive during district-wide HBHCT in rural Uganda will be enrolled in this study. Villages (clusters) are pair matched by population size and then randomly assigned to the intervention or standard-of-care arm. Study teams visit households and participants complete a baseline questionnaire, receive HIV counseling and testing, and have blood drawn for HIV viral load and CD4 testing. At baseline, standard-of-care arm participants receive referrals to HIV care including a paper-based referral and then receive their CD4 results via home visit 2 weeks later. Intervention arm participants receive an intervention counseling session at baseline, up to three follow-up counseling sessions at home, and a booster session at the HIV clinic if they present for care. These sessions each last approximately 30 min and consist of counseling to help clients: identify and reduce barriers to HIV care engagement, disclose their HIV status, identify a treatment supporter, and overcome HIV-related stigma through links to social support resources in the community. Participants in both arms complete interviewer-administered questionnaires at six and 12 months follow-up, HIV viral load and CD4 testing at 12 months follow-up, and allow access to their medical records.Discussion: The findings of this study can inform the integration of a potentially cost-effective approach to improving rates of linkage to care and HIV viral suppression in HBHCT. If effective, this intervention can improve treatment outcomes, reduce mortality, and through its effect on individual and population-level HIV viral load, and decrease HIV incidence.Trial Registration: NCT02545673. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. The design and development of a complex multifactorial falls assessment intervention for falls prevention: The Prevention of Falls Injury Trial (PreFIT).
- Author
-
Bruce, Julie, Ralhan, Shvaita, Sheridan, Ray, Westacott, Katharine, Withers, Emma, Finnegan, Susanne, Davison, John, Martin, Finbarr C., Lamb, Sarah E., PreFIT Intervention (MFFP) Group, and PreFIT Study Group
- Subjects
ACCIDENTAL falls ,MEDICAL screening ,INTERVENTIONAL radiology ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,ACCIDENTAL fall prevention ,BONE fracture prevention ,GERIATRIC assessment ,COMPARATIVE studies ,COST effectiveness ,POSTURAL balance ,EXERCISE therapy ,BONE fractures ,GAIT in humans ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,ORGANIZATIONAL effectiveness ,PRIMARY health care ,PUBLIC health ,RESEARCH ,RISK assessment ,VISION testing ,EVALUATION research ,INDEPENDENT living - Abstract
Background: This paper describes the design and development of a complex multifactorial falls prevention (MFFP) intervention for implementation and testing within the framework of a large UK-based falls prevention randomised controlled trial (RCT).Methods: A complex intervention was developed for inclusion within the Prevention of Falls Injury Trial (PreFIT), a multicentre pragmatic RCT. PreFIT aims to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of three alternative primary care falls prevention interventions (advice, exercise and MFFP), on outcomes of fractures and falls. Community-dwelling adults, aged 70 years and older, were recruited from primary care in the National Health Service (NHS), England.Results: Development of the PreFIT MFFP intervention was informed by the existing evidence base and clinical guidelines for the assessment and management of falls in older adults. After piloting and modification, the final MFFP intervention includes seven falls risk factors: a detailed falls history interview with consideration of 'red flags'; assessment of balance and gait; vision; medication screen; cardiac screen; feet and footwear screen and home environment assessment. This complex intervention has been fully manualised with clear, documented assessment and treatment pathways for each risk factor. Each risk factor is assessed in every trial participant referred for MFFP. Referral for assessment is based upon a screening survey to identify those with a history of falling or balance problems. Intervention delivery can be adapted to the local setting.Conclusion: This complex falls prevention intervention is currently being tested within the framework of a large clinical trial. This paper adheres to TIDieR and CONSORT recommendations for the comprehensive and explicit reporting of trial interventions. Results from the PreFIT study will be published in due course. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the PreFIT MFFP intervention, compared to advice and exercise, on the prevention of falls and fractures, will be reported at the conclusion of the trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Open-label versus double-blind placebo treatment in irritable bowel syndrome: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
- Author
-
Ballou, Sarah, Kaptchuk, Ted J., Hirsch, William, Nee, Judy, Iturrino, Johanna, Hall, Kathryn T., Kelley, John M., Vivian Cheng, Kirsch, Irving, Jacobson, Eric, Conboy, Lisa, Lembo, Anthony, Davis, Roger B., and Cheng, Vivian
- Subjects
PLACEBOS ,TRAINING manuals ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,IRRITABLE colon ,PEOPLE with visual disabilities ,IRRITABLE colon diagnosis ,COMPARATIVE studies ,EXPERIMENTAL design ,GASTROINTESTINAL agents ,INTERVIEWING ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,RESEARCH protocols ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH funding ,TIME ,EVALUATION research ,VEGETABLE oils ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,BLIND experiment ,THERAPEUTICS - Abstract
Background: Placebo medications, by definition, are composed of inactive ingredients that have no physiological effect on symptoms. Nonetheless, administration of placebo in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and in clinical settings has been demonstrated to have significant impact on many physical and psychological complaints. Until recently, conventional wisdom has suggested that patients must believe that placebo pills actually contain (or, at least, might possibly contain) active medication in order to elicit a response to placebo. However, several recent RCTs, including patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), chronic low back pain, and episodic migraine, have demonstrated that individuals receiving open-label placebo (OLP) can still experience symptomatic improvement and benefit from honestly described placebo treatment.Methods and Design: This paper describes an innovative multidisciplinary trial design (n = 280) that attempts to replicate and expand upon an earlier IBS OLP study. The current study will compare OLP to double-blind placebo (DBP) administration which is made possible by including a nested, double-blind RCT comparing DBP and peppermint oil. The study also examines possible genetic and psychological predictors of OLP and seeks to better understand participants' experiences with OLP and DBP through a series of extensive interviews with a randomly selected subgroup.Discussion: OLP treatment is a novel strategy for ethically harnessing placebo effects. It has potential to re-frame theories of placebo and to influence how physicians can optimize watch-and-wait strategies for common, subjective symptoms. The current study aims to dramatically expand what we know about OLP by comparing, for the first time, OLP and DBP administration. Adopting a unique, multidisciplinary approach, the study also explores genetic, psychological and experiential dimensions of OLP. The paper ends with an extensive discussion of the "culture" of the trial as well as potential mechanisms of OLP and ethical implications.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02802241 . Registered on 14 June 2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Integrated solutions for sustainable fall prevention in primary care, the iSOLVE project: a type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation design.
- Author
-
Clemson, Lindy, Mackenzie, Lynette, Roberts, Chris, Poulos, Roslyn, Tan, Amy, Lovarini, Meryl, Sherrington, Cathie, Simpson, Judy M., Willis, Karen, Lam, Mary, Tiedemann, Anne, Pond, Dimity, Peiris, David, Hilmer, Sarah, Pit, Sabrina Winona, Howard, Kirsten, Lovitt, Lorraine, and White, Fiona
- Subjects
ACCIDENTAL fall prevention ,PRIMARY care ,GENERAL practitioners ,PHYSICIAN training ,SOCIAL network theory ,SUSTAINABILITY ,COLLECTIVE action ,CLUSTER analysis (Statistics) ,COMPARATIVE studies ,COST effectiveness ,ACCIDENTAL falls ,INTERPROFESSIONAL relations ,FAMILY medicine ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,RESEARCH ,SOCIAL support ,EVALUATION research ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,ECONOMICS - Abstract
Background: Despite strong evidence giving guidance for effective fall prevention interventions in community-residing older people, there is currently no clear model for engaging general medical practitioners in fall prevention and routine use of allied health professionals in fall prevention has been slow, limiting widespread dissemination. This protocol paper outlines an implementation-effectiveness study of the Integrated Solutions for Sustainable Fall Prevention (iSOLVE) intervention which has developed integrated processes and pathways to identify older people at risk of falls and engage a whole of primary care approach to fall prevention.Methods/design: This protocol paper presents the iSOLVE implementation processes and change strategies and outlines the study design of a blended type 2 hybrid design. The study consists of a two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial in 28 general practices and recruiting 560 patients in Sydney, Australia, to evaluate effectiveness of the iSOLVE intervention in changing general practitioner fall management practices and reducing patient falls and the cost effectiveness from a healthcare funder perspective. Secondary outcomes include change in medications known to increase fall risk. We will simultaneously conduct a multi-methodology evaluation to investigate the workability and utility of the implementation intervention. The implementation evaluation includes in-depth interviews and surveys with general practitioners and allied health professionals to explore acceptability and uptake of the intervention, the coherence of the proposed changes for those in the work setting, and how to facilitate the collective action needed to implement changes in practice; social network mapping will explore professional relationships and influences on referral patterns; and, a survey of GPs in the geographical intervention zone will test diffusion of evidence-based fall prevention practices. The project works in partnership with a primary care health network, state fall prevention leaders, and a community of practice of fall prevention advocates.Discussion: The design is aimed at providing clear direction for sustainability and informing decisions about generalization of the iSOLVE intervention processes and change strategies. While challenges exist in hybrid designs, there is a potential for significant outcomes as the iSOLVE pathways project brings together practice and research to collectively solve a major national problem with implications for policy service delivery.Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinial Trials Registry ACTRN12615000401550. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Process evaluation of the data-driven quality improvement in primary care (DQIP) trial: active and less active ingredients of a multi-component complex intervention to reduce high-risk primary care prescribing.
- Author
-
Grant, Aileen, Dreischulte, Tobias, and Guthrie, Bruce
- Subjects
PRIMARY care ,DRUG prescribing ,NONSTEROIDAL anti-inflammatory agents ,PLATELET aggregation inhibitors ,MONETARY incentives ,ATTITUDE (Psychology) ,CLINICAL competence ,CLUSTER analysis (Statistics) ,COMPARATIVE studies ,FAMILY medicine ,RESEARCH methodology ,EVALUATION of medical care ,MEDICAL cooperation ,MEDICAL personnel ,MEDICAL prescriptions ,MOTIVATION (Psychology) ,PATIENT safety ,PRIMARY health care ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH funding ,RISK management in business ,UNNECESSARY surgery ,EVALUATION research ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,ECONOMICS ,THERAPEUTICS - Abstract
Background: Two to 4% of emergency hospital admissions are caused by preventable adverse drug events. The estimated costs of such avoidable admissions in England were £530 million in 2015. The data-driven quality improvement in primary care (DQIP) intervention was designed to prompt review of patients vulnerable from currently prescribed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and anti-platelets and was found to be effective at reducing this prescribing. A process evaluation was conducted parallel to the trial, and this paper reports the analysis which aimed to explore response to the intervention delivered to clusters in relation to participants' perceptions about which intervention elements were active in changing their practice.Methods: Data generation was by in-depth interview with key staff exploring participant's perceptions of the intervention components. Analysis was iterative using the framework technique and drawing on normalisation process theory.Results: All the primary components of the intervention were perceived as active, but at different stages of implementation: financial incentives primarily supported recruitment; education motivated the GPs to initiate implementation; the informatics tool facilitated sustained implementation. Participants perceived the primary components as interdependent. Intervention subcomponents also varied in whether and when they were active. For example, run charts providing feedback of change in prescribing over time were ignored in the informatics tool, but were motivating in some practices in the regular e-mailed newsletter. The high-risk NSAID and anti-platelet prescribing targeted was accepted as important by all interviewees, and this shared understanding was a key wider context underlying intervention effectiveness.Conclusions: This was a novel use of process evaluation data which examined whether and how the individual intervention components were effective from the perspective of the professionals delivering changed care to patients. These findings are important for reproducibility and roll-out of the intervention.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01425502 . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. The role of evidence, context, and facilitation in an implementation trial: implications for the development of the PARIHS framework.
- Author
-
Rycroft-Malone, Jo, Seers, Kate, Chandler, Jackie, Hawkes, Claire A., Crichton, Nicola, Allen, Claire, Bullock, Ian, and Strunin, Leo
- Subjects
RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,CLINICAL medicine research ,MEDICAL research methodology ,RESEARCH methodology ,CONTENT analysis - Abstract
Background: The case has been made for more and better theory-informed process evaluations within trials in an effort to facilitate insightful understandings of how interventions work. In this paper, we provide an explanation of implementation processes from one of the first national implementation research randomized controlled trials with embedded process evaluation conducted within acute care, and a proposed extension to the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework. Methods: The PARIHS framework was prospectively applied to guide decisions about intervention design, data collection, and analysis processes in a trial focussed on reducing peri-operative fasting times. In order to capture a holistic picture of implementation processes, the same data were collected across 19 participating hospitals irrespective of allocation to intervention. This paper reports on findings from data collected from a purposive sample of 151 staff and patients pre- and post-intervention. Data were analysed using content analysis within, and then across data sets. Results: A robust and uncontested evidence base was a necessary, but not sufficient condition for practice change, in that individual staff and patient responses such as caution influenced decision making. The implementation context was challenging, in which individuals and teams were bounded by professional issues, communication challenges, power and a lack of clarity for the authority and responsibility for practice change. Progress was made in sites where processes were aligned with existing initiatives. Additionally, facilitators reported engaging in many intervention implementation activities, some of which result in practice changes, but not significant improvements to outcomes. Conclusions: This study provided an opportunity for reflection on the comprehensiveness of the PARIHS framework. Consistent with the underlying tenant of PARIHS, a multi-faceted and dynamic story of implementation was evident. However, the prominent role that individuals played as part of the interaction between evidence and context is not currently explicit within the framework. We propose that successful implementation of evidence into practice is a planned facilitated process involving an interplay between individuals, evidence, and context to promote evidence-informed practice. This proposal will enhance the potential of the PARIHS framework for explanation, and ensure theoretical development both informs and responds to the evidence base for implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Does growth hormone supplementation improve oocyte competence and IVF outcomes in patients with poor embryonic development? A randomized controlled trial.
- Author
-
Li, Jingyu, Chen, Qiaoli, Wang, Jiang, Huang, Guoning, and Ye, Hong
- Subjects
PHYSIOLOGICAL effects of somatotropin ,FERTILIZATION in vitro ,OVUM physiology ,HUMAN embryology ,MITOCHONDRIAL DNA ,CHILDBIRTH ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,CUMULUS cells (Embryology) ,RESEARCH ,BIRTH rate ,OVUM ,RESEARCH methodology ,FETAL development ,EVALUATION research ,MEDICAL cooperation ,HUMAN growth hormone ,PREGNANCY outcomes ,EMBRYO transfer ,COMPARATIVE studies ,HUMAN reproductive technology ,RESEARCH funding ,INDUCED ovulation ,LONGITUDINAL method - Abstract
Background: Many studies have demonstrated the benefits of the addition of growth hormone (GH) to the controlled ovarian stimulation protocol in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in poor-respond patients, but the effect of GH on patients with poor embryonic development remain unclear. This paper was designed to investigate the efficacy of GH co-treatment during IVF for the patients with poor embryonic development.Method: A randomized controlled trial including 158 patients with poor embryo development was conducted between July 2017 and February 2019. One hundred and seven patients were randomized for GH treatment (GH group) and 51 patients for untreated (control group). The primary end-points were the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in the two groups. The oocyte competence were assessed through calculating the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number in corresponding cumulus granulosa cells (CGCs). Quantitative PCR were used for calculation of mtDNA copy number.Results: Relative to the control group, GH co-treatment resulted in a significantly higher number of retrieved oocytes (10.29 ± 5.92 versus 8.16 ± 4.17, P = 0.023) and cleaved embryos (6.73 ± 4.25 versus 5.29 ± 3.23, P = 0.036). The implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rates per cycle, and live birth rate per cycle were higher in the GH group than in the control group (36.00% versus 17.86%, P = 0.005; 43.93% versus 19.61%, P = 0.005; 41.12% versus 17.65%, P = 0.006). CGCs of the GH group had significantly higher mtDNA copy numbers than CGCs of the control group (252 versus 204, P < 0.001).Conclusions: These data provided further evidence to indicate that GH supplementation may support more live births during IVF, in patients with poor embryonic development. It also appears that oocytes generated under GH co-treatment have a better developmental competence.Trial Registration: ChiCTR1900021992 posted March 19, 2019 (retrospectively registered). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Group problem management plus (gPM+) in the treatment of common mental disorders in Syrian refugees in a Jordanian camp: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
- Author
-
Akhtar, Aemal, Giardinelli, Luana, Bawaneh, Ahmad, Awwad, Manar, Naser, Hadeel, Whitney, Claire, Jordans, Mark J. D., Sijbrandij, Marit, Bryant, Richard A., and STRENGTHS Consortium
- Subjects
MENTAL illness treatment ,MENTAL health services ,MENTAL health of refugees ,SYRIANS ,PSYCHOTHERAPY ,RESEARCH ,PSYCHOLOGY of refugees ,RESEARCH methodology ,EVALUATION research ,MEDICAL cooperation ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,MEDICAL protocols ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,BLIND experiment ,REFUGEES ,RESEARCH funding ,GROUP psychotherapy - Abstract
Background: Accessing quality mental health care poses significant challenges for persons affected by adversity, especially in low- and middle-income countries where resources are scarce. To mitigate this, the World Health Organization has developed group problem management plus (gPM+), a low-intensity psychological intervention for adults experiencing psychological distress. gPM+ is a group-based intervention consisting of five-sessions, and can be delivered by non-specialist providers. This paper outlines the study protocol for a trial of gPM+ in Jordan.Methods: We will conduct a single-blind, two-arm, randomized controlled trial in a Syrian refugee camp in Jordan. We aim to enrol 480 adults into the trial. Participants will be eligible for the trial if they screen positive for levels of psychological distress. Following screening, those eligible will be randomly assigned to receive the gPM+ intervention or enhanced treatment as usual. The primary outcome is reduction in levels of psychological distress at 3-months post-treatment. Secondary outcomes include anxiety, depression, prodromal psychotic symptoms, posttraumatic stress disorder, prolonged grief, daily functioning, economic effectiveness, and change in parenting behaviour. Secondary outcomes also include the reduction in psychological distress of the participant's child.Discussion: The trial aims to deliver a template for affordable and scalable psychosocial interventions that can readily be implemented in refugee settings, and that can benefit both the participant and their child.Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12619001386123. Registered prospectively on 10/10/2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics.
- Author
-
Jelicic Kadic, Antonia, Kovacevic, Tanja, Runjic, Edita, Simicic Majce, Ana, Markic, Josko, Polic, Branka, Mestrovic, Julije, and Puljak, Livia
- Subjects
RESEARCH methodology ,SCIENTIFIC literature ,PEDIATRICS ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,CITATION analysis - Abstract
Background: One of the frequently used methods for assessing research trends and the impact of published scientific literature in a particular discipline is citation analysis. Journals may strive to improve their metrics by choosing manuscripts and study designs that are more likely to be cited. The aim of this study was to identify the 50 most-cited articles in the field of pediatrics, analyze their study design and other characteristics of those articles, and assess the prevalence of systematic reviews among them.Methods: In December 2017, we searched Web of Science (WoS) for all articles published in the field of pediatrics. Two authors screened articles independently and in the further analysis included 50 articles with the highest number of citations. To avoid bias for scientific papers published earlier, the citation density was calculated. We also analyzed Journal Impact Factor (JIF) of journals where citation classics were published.Results: The citation density in top 50 cited articles in the field of pediatrics ranged from 33.16 to 432.8, with the average of 119.95. Most of the articles reported clinical science. Median 2016 JIF for journals that published them was 6.226 (range: 2.778 to 72.406). Half of the top 10 highly cited articles in pediatrics were published in a journal with JIF below 5. Most of the studies among the citation classics in pediatrics were cross-sectional studies (N = 22), followed by non-systematic narrative reviews (N = 10), randomized controlled trials (N = 5), cohort studies (N = 5), systematic reviews (N = 2), case-control studies (N = 2), case reports (N = 2), and there was one study protocol and one expert opinion.Conclusion: Few randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews were among citation classics in the field of pediatrics. Articles that use observational research methodology, and are published in journals with lower impact factors, can become citation classics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Variations in factors associated with healthcare providers' intention to engage in interprofessional shared decision making in home care: results of two cross-sectional surveys.
- Author
-
Adekpedjou, Rhéda, Haesebaert, Julie, Stacey, Dawn, Brière, Nathalie, Freitas, Adriana, Rivest, Louis-Paul, and Légaré, France
- Subjects
OCCUPATIONAL therapists ,MEDICAL personnel ,DECISION making ,LINEAR statistical models ,FRAIL elderly ,COGNITION disorders ,RESEARCH ,HOME care services ,CROSS-sectional method ,RESEARCH methodology ,EVALUATION research ,MEDICAL cooperation ,SURVEYS ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,PSYCHOSOCIAL factors ,RESEARCH funding ,INTENTION - Abstract
Background: DOLCE (Improving Decision making On Location of Care with the frail Elderly and their caregivers) was a post-intervention clustered randomised trial (cRT) to assess the effect of training home care teams on interprofessional shared decision-making (IP-SDM). Alongside the cRT, we sought to monitor healthcare providers' level of behavioural intention to engage in an IP-SDM approach and to identify factors associated with this intention.Methods: We conducted two cross-sectional surveys in the province of Quebec, Canada, one each at cRT entry and exit. Healthcare providers (e.g. nurses, occupational therapists and social workers) in the 16 participating intervention and control sites self-completed an identical paper-based questionnaire at entry and exit. Informed by the Integrated model for explaining healthcare professionals' clinical behaviour by Godin et al. (2008), we assessed their behavioural intention to engage in IP-SDM to support older adults and caregivers of older adults with cognitive impairment to make health-related housing decisions. We also assessed psychosocial variables underlying their behavioural intention and collected sociodemographic data. We used descriptive statistics and linear mixed models to account for clustering.Results: Between 2014 and 2016, 271 healthcare providers participated at study entry and 171 at exit. At entry, median intention level was 6 in a range of 1 (low) to 7 (high) (Interquartile range (IQR): 5-6.5) and factors associated with intention were social influence (β = 0.27, P < 0.0001), beliefs about one's capabilities (β = 0.43, P < 0.0001), moral norm (β = 0.31, P < 0.0001) and beliefs about consequences (β = 0.21, P < 0.0001). At exit, median intention level was 5.5 (IQR: 4.5-6.5). Factors associated with intention were the same but did not include moral norm. However, at exit new factors were kept in the model: working in rehabilitation (β = - 0.39, P = 0.018) and working as a technician (β = - 0.41, P = 0.069) (compared to as a social worker).Conclusion: Intention levels were high but decreased from entry to exit. Factors associated with intention also changed from study entry to study exit. These findings may be explained by the major restructuring of the health and social care system that took place during the 2 years of the study, leading to rapid staff turnover and organisational disturbance in home care teams. Future research should give more attention to contextual factors and design implementation interventions to withstand the disruption of system- and organisational-level disturbances.Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02244359). Registered on September 19th, 2014. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Dental professionals' experiences of managing children with carious lesions in their primary teeth – a qualitative study within the FiCTION randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Marshman, Zoe, Kettle, Jennifer E., Holmes, Richard D., Cunningham, Kathryn B., Freeman, Ruth, Gibson, Barry J., McColl, Elaine, Maguire, Anne, Douglas, Gail V. A., Clarkson, Janet E., and Innes, Nicola P. T.
- Subjects
CAVITY prevention ,TREATMENT of dental caries ,ATTITUDE (Psychology) ,CLINICAL competence ,CONCEPTUAL structures ,DENTISTRY ,DENTISTS' attitudes ,INTERVIEWING ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL practice ,THERAPEUTICS ,QUALITATIVE research ,LABELING theory ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,DECIDUOUS dentition (Tooth development) ,CHILDREN - Abstract
Background: The lack of evidence for the effective management of carious lesions in children's primary teeth has caused uncertainty for the dental profession and patients. Possible approaches include conventional and biological management alongside best practice prevention, and best practice prevention alone. The FiCTION trial assessed the effectiveness of these options, and included a qualitative study exploring dental professionals' (DPs) experiences of delivering the different treatment arms. This paper reports on how DPs managed children with carious lesions within FiCTION and how this related to their everyday experiences of doing dentistry. Methods: Overall, 31 DPs from FiCTION-trained dental surgeries in four regions of the UK participated in semi-structured interviews about their experiences of the three treatment arms (conventional management of carious lesions and prevention (C + P), biological management of carious lesions and prevention (B + P) or prevention alone (PA)). A theoretical framework, drawing on social practice theory (SPT), was developed for analysis. Results: Participants discussed perceived effectiveness of, and familiarity with, the three techniques. The C + P arm was familiar, but some participants questioned the effectiveness of conventional restorations. Attitudes towards the B + P arm varied in terms of familiarity, but once DPs were introduced to the techniques, this was seen as effective. While prevention was familiar, PA was described as ineffective. DPs manage children with carious lesions day-to-day, drawing on previous experience and knowledge of the child to provide what they view as the most appropriate treatment in the best interests of each child. Randomisation undermined these normal choices. Several DPs reported deviating from the trial arms in order to treat a patient in a particular way. Participants valued evidence-based dentistry, and expect to use the results of FiCTION to inform future practice. They anticipate continuing to use the full range of treatment options, and to personally select appropriate strategies for individual children. Conclusions: RCTs take place in the context of day-to-day practices of doing dentistry. DPs employ experiential and interpersonal knowledge to act in the best interests of their patients. Randomisation within a clinical trial can present a source of tension for DPs, which has implications for assuring individual equipoise in future trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. A clinical decision support system improves antibiotic therapy for upper urinary tract infection in a randomized single-blinded study.
- Author
-
Neugebauer, M., Ebert, M., and Vogelmann, R.
- Subjects
DECISION support systems ,PHYSICIANS ,MEDICAL students ,URINARY tract infections ,RESIDENTS (Medicine) ,DRUG resistance in bacteria ,ANTIBIOTICS ,PSYCHOLOGY of medical students ,RESEARCH ,MEDICAL databases ,INFORMATION storage & retrieval systems ,RESEARCH methodology ,EVALUATION research ,MEDICAL cooperation ,MEDICAL care research ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,BLIND experiment ,PSYCHOLOGY of physicians - Abstract
Background: Due to increasing bacterial resistance rates choosing a correct empiric antibiotic therapy is getting more and more complex. Often medical doctors use information tools to make the right treatment choice.Methods: One hundred sixty six participants (77 medical doctors and 89 medical students) were asked to provide a diagnosis and antibiotic therapy in a simple fictive paper case of upper urinary tract infection (UTI) in a randomized single-blinded study. Participants were randomized to one of four information tools they were allowed to use in the study or control: 1. free internet access, 2. pharmaceutical pocket guide, 3. pocket guide antibiotic therapy, 4. clinical decision support system (CDSS), and control (no information tool). The CDSS was designed for the study. The adherence to the national German UTI guideline was evaluated.Results: Only 27.1% (n = 45/166) provided a correct diagnosis of upper UTI and 19.4% (n = 32/166) an antibiotic treatment recommended by national German treatment guidelines indicating their need for information tools. This result was not significantly different between medical doctors and medical students, residents and medical specialists or level of working experience. Using CDSS improved results significantly compared to conventional tools (diagnosis 57.1%; treatment recommendation 40.5%; p < 0,01). Processing time was not different between the use of CDSS and conventional information tools. CDSS users based their decision making on their assigned information tool more than users of conventional tools (73.8% vs. 48.0%; p < 0.01). Using CDSS improved the confidence of participants in their recommendation significantly compared to conventional tools (p < 0.01).Conclusions: Our study suggests that medical professionals require information tools in diagnosing and treating a simple case of upper UTI correctly. CDSS appears to be superior to conventional tools as an information source. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. The cost of the training and supervision of community health workers to improve exclusive breastfeeding amongst mothers in a cluster randomised controlled trial in South Africa.
- Author
-
George, Gavin, Mudzingwa, Takunda, and Horwood, Christiane
- Subjects
BREASTFEEDING ,PUBLIC health ,PRENATAL care ,RURAL health services ,COST analysis ,RESEARCH ,FERRANS & Powers Quality of Life Index ,PSYCHOLOGY of mothers ,RESEARCH methodology ,RETROSPECTIVE studies ,EVALUATION research ,MEDICAL cooperation ,EMPLOYEE orientation ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,QUALITY assurance ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,RESEARCH funding ,ECONOMICS - Abstract
Background: Interventions targeting community health workers (CHWs) aim to optimise the delivery of health services to underserved rural areas. Whilst interventions are evaluated against their objectives, there remains limited evidence on the economic costs of these interventions, and the practicality and value of scale up. The aim of this paper is to undertake a cost analysis on a CHW training and supervision intervention using exclusive breastfeeding rates amongst mothers as an outcome measure.Methods: This is a retrospective cost analysis, from an implementer's perspective, of a cluster randomised controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement (CQI) intervention aimed at CHWs providing care and support to pregnant women and women with babies aged < 1 year in South Africa.Results: One of the outcomes of the RCT revealed that the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) significantly improved, with the cost per mother EBF in the control and intervention arm calculated at US$760,13 and US$1705,28 respectively. The cost per additional mother practicing EBF was calculated to be US$7647, 88, with the supervision component of the intervention constituting 64% of the trial costs. In addition, women served by the intervention CHWs were more likely to have received a CHW visit and had significantly better knowledge of childcare practices.Conclusion: Whilst the cost of this intervention is high, adapted interventions could potentially offer an economical alternative for achieving selected maternal and child health (MCH) outcomes. The results of this study should inform future programmes aimed at providing adapted training and supervision to CHWs with the objective of improving community-level health outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Group reminiscence for hope and resilience in care-seekers who have attempted suicide.
- Author
-
Hashemi-Aliabadi, Somayeh, Jalali, Amir, Rahmati, Mahmoud, and Salari, Nader
- Subjects
SUICIDAL behavior treatment ,GROUP psychotherapy ,HELP-seeking behavior ,HOPE ,RESEARCH methodology ,REMINISCENCE therapy ,PSYCHOLOGICAL resilience ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,TREATMENT effectiveness - Abstract
Background: The rate of attempting suicide is growing due to the increasing social and economic problems and a variety of stresses taken by individuals in their lives. Helping people, boosting hope, and improving resilience to life hardships might be helpful in this area. This paper is an attempt to determine the effects of group reminiscence on hope and resilience in care-seekers who have attempted suicide. Method: The study was carried out as a quasi-experimental interventional study. The participants were 57 care-seekers with a history of attempting suicide who met the inclusion criteria. The sampling was done through convenience sampling and the participants were grouped into control (n = 29) and experimental (n = 28) groups randomly. The experimental group received integrated reminiscence sessions (eight sessions; 60–90 min). Hope and resilience of the subjects were measured using Schneider's Hope Scale and Connor and Davidson's Resilience Scale. The scales were filled out by the subjects before, immediately after, and 4 weeks after the intervention. Results: The mean scores of hope in the experimental and control groups were 34.60 and 38.04, respectively, before the intervention. These figures immediately after the intervention were 44.07 and 35.96 in the experimental and control groups, respectively. 4 weeks after the intervention, the mean scores of hope in the experimental and control groups were 44.39 and 35.79, respectively, which is a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). In terms of resilience, the mean scores in the experimental and control groups before the intervention were 48.17 and 57.51, respectively; and immediately after the intervention, these figures were 67.71 and 52.75, respectively. 4 weeks of the intervention, the mean scores of resilience were 59.17 and 52.24, respectively, which is a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Group reminiscence has a positive effect on boosting hope and resilience in care-seekers who have attempted suicide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. A randomized controlled efficacy trial of an electronic screening and brief intervention for alcohol misuse in adolescents and young adults vulnerable to HIV infection: step up, test up study protocol.
- Author
-
Kuhns, Lisa M., Karnik, Niranjan, Hotton, Anna, Muldoon, Abigail, Donenberg, Geri, Keglovitz, Kristin, McNulty, Moira, Schneider, John, Summersett-Williams, Faith, and Garofalo, Robert
- Subjects
HIV infections ,TRANSGENDER people ,ALCOHOL ,YOUNG adults ,HIV prevention ,HIV infection epidemiology ,PREVENTION of alcoholism ,BRIEF psychotherapy ,EXPERIMENTAL design ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL screening ,EVALUATION research ,MEDICAL cooperation ,HOMOSEXUALITY ,RISK assessment ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,AT-risk people - Abstract
Background: Young people account for more than a quarter of new HIV infections in the US, with the majority of cases among young men who have sex with men; young transgender women are also vulnerable to infection. Substance use, particularly alcohol misuse, is a driver of sexual transmission and a potential barrier to engagement in the HIV prevention and care continuum, however vulnerable youth are difficult to reach for substance use services due, in part, to complex social and structural factors and limited access to health care. The Community Prevention Services Task Force recommends electronic screening and brief intervention as an evidence-based intervention for the prevention of excessive alcohol consumption; however, no prior studies have extended this model to community-based populations of youth that are susceptible to HIV infection. This paper describes the study protocol for an electronic screening and brief intervention to reduce alcohol misuse among adolescents and young adults vulnerable to HIV infection in community-based settings.Methods: This study, Step Up, Test Up, is a randomized controlled trial of an electronic alcohol screening and brief intervention among youth, ages 16-25, who are vulnerable to HIV infection. Individuals who present for HIV testing at one of three community-based locations are recruited for study participation. Eligibility includes those aged 16-25 years, HIV-negative or unknown HIV status, male or trans female with a history of sex with men, and English-speaking. Participants who screen at moderate to high risk for alcohol misuse on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) are randomized (1:1) to either an electronic brief intervention to reduce alcohol misuse or a time-and attention-matched control. The primary outcome is change in the frequency/quantity of recent alcohol use at 1, 3, 6 and 12-month follow-up.Discussion: Testing of evidence-based interventions to reduce alcohol misuse among youth vulnerable to HIV infection are needed. This study will provide evidence to determine feasibility and efficacy of a brief electronically-delivered intervention to reduce alcohol misuse for this population.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02703116, registered March 9, 2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Use of mobile data collection systems within large-scale epidemiological field trials: findings and lessons-learned from a vector control trial in Iquitos, Peru.
- Author
-
Elson, William H., Kawiecki, Anna B., Donnelly, Marisa A. P., Noriega, Arnold O., Simpson, Jody K., Syafruddin, Din, Rozi, Ismail Ekoprayitno, Lobo, Neil F., Barker, Christopher M., Scott, Thomas W., Achee, Nicole L., and Morrison, Amy C.
- Subjects
EXPERIMENTAL design ,PEST control ,RESEARCH ,FERRANS & Powers Quality of Life Index ,DENGUE ,ANIMAL experimentation ,RESEARCH methodology ,ACQUISITION of data ,EVALUATION research ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,IMPACT of Event Scale ,RESEARCH funding ,MOSQUITOES - Abstract
Vector-borne diseases are among the most burdensome infectious diseases worldwide with high burden to health systems in developing regions in the tropics. For many of these diseases, vector control to reduce human biting rates or arthropod populations remains the primary strategy for prevention. New vector control interventions intended to be marketed through public health channels must be assessed by the World Health Organization for public health value using data generated from large-scale trials integrating epidemiological endpoints of human health impact. Such phase III trials typically follow large numbers of study subjects to meet necessary power requirements for detecting significant differences between treatment arms, thereby generating substantive and complex datasets. Data is often gathered directly in the field, in resource-poor settings, leading to challenges in efficient data reporting and/or quality assurance. With advancing technology, mobile data collection (MDC) systems have been implemented in many studies to overcome these challenges. Here we describe the development and implementation of a MDC system during a randomized-cluster, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the protective efficacy of a spatial repellent intervention in reducing human infection with Aedes-borne viruses (ABV) in the urban setting of Iquitos, Peru, as well as the data management system that supported it. We discuss the benefits, remaining capacity gaps and the key lessons learned from using a MDC system in this context in detail. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Measuring and understanding the effects of a performance based financing scheme applied to nutrition services in Burundi--a mixed method impact evaluation design.
- Author
-
Nimpagaritse, Manassé, Korachais, Catherine, Roberfroid, Dominique, Kolsteren, Patrick, Eddine El Idrissi, Moulay Driss Zine, and Meessen, Bruno
- Subjects
PREVENTION of malnutrition ,FOCUS groups ,INTERVIEWING ,RESEARCH methodology ,STATISTICAL sampling ,GOVERNMENT aid ,PILOT projects ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,NUTRITION services ,HEALTH impact assessment - Abstract
Background: Malnutrition is a huge problem in Burundi. In order to improve the provision of services at hospital, health centre and community levels, the Ministry of Health is piloting the introduction of malnutrition prevention and care indicators within its performance based financing (PBF) scheme. Paying for units of services and for qualitative indicators is expected to enhance provision and quality of these nutrition services, as PBF has done, in Burundi and elsewhere, for several other services. Methods: This paper presents the protocol for the impact evaluation of the PBF scheme applied to malnutrition. The research design consists in a mixed methods model adopting a sequential explanatory design. The quantitative component is a cluster-randomized controlled evaluation design: among the 90 health centres selected for the study, half receive payment related to their results in malnutrition activities, while the other half get a budget allocation. Qualitative research will be carried out both during the intervention period and at the end of the quantitative evaluation. Data are collected from 1) baseline and follow-up surveys of 90 health centres and 6,480 households with children aged 6 to 23 months, 2) logbooks filled in weekly in health centres, and 3) in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. The evaluation aims to provide the best estimate of the impact of the project on malnutrition outcomes in the community as well as outputs at the health centre level (malnutrition care outputs) and to describe quantitatively and qualitatively the changes that took place (or did not take place) within health centres as a result of the program. Discussion: Although PBF schemes are blooming in low in-come countries, there is still a need for evidence, especially on the impact of revising the list of remunerated indicators. It is expected that this impact evaluation will be helpful for the national policy dialogue in Burundi, but it will also provide key evidence for countries with an existing PBF scheme and confronted with malnutrition problems on the appropriateness to extend the strategy to nutrition services. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov PRS Identifier: NCT02721160; registered March 2016 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Perceived quality of physiotherapist-led orthopaedic triage compared with standard practice in primary care: a randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Samsson, Karin S., Bernhardsson, Susanne, and Larsson, Maria E. H.
- Subjects
PHYSICAL therapists ,ORTHOPEDICS ,PRIMARY care ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,PHYSICAL therapy ,MEDICAL decision making ,TREATMENT of musculoskeletal system diseases ,MUSCULOSKELETAL system diseases ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL quality control ,MEDICAL care research ,MEDICAL cooperation ,MEDICAL referrals ,PATIENT compliance ,SENSORY perception ,PRIMARY health care ,RESEARCH ,MEDICAL triage ,EVALUATION research ,PATIENT-centered care ,DIAGNOSIS - Abstract
Background: Physiotherapist-led orthopaedic triage, where physiotherapists diagnose and determine management plans, aims to enhance effectiveness and provide the best care. However, scientific evidence for the effectiveness of this model of care remains limited, and there are few studies reporting on patients' perceptions of the care provided. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients' perceived quality of care in a physiotherapist-led orthopaedic triage in primary care, compared with standard practice.Methods: In a randomised controlled trial, patients of working age referred for orthopaedic consultation at a primary healthcare clinic in Sweden received either physiotherapist-led triage (n = 102) or standard practice (orthopaedic surgeon assessment) (n = 101). Neither subjects nor clinicians were blinded. The questionnaire Quality from the Patient's Perspective (QPP) was used to evaluate perceived quality of care focusing on the caregivers' medical-technical competence and identity-orientated approach. Also, to what extent patients' expectations were met, and their intention to follow advice was evaluated.Results: For this study, 163 patients (80 %) were analysed (physiotherapist-led triage (n = 83), standard practice (n = 80)). Participants perceived significantly higher quality of care with the triage than with the standard practice in regards to receiving best possible examination and treatment (medical-technical competence) (p < 0.001). This was also found in regards to receiving information about examination and treatment (p < 0.001), results (p < 0.001), and self-care (p < 0.001), the caregiver's understanding (p < 0.001), respect (p < 0.001) and commitment (p < 0.001) as well as the opportunity to participate in decision-making (p = 0.01) (identity-orientated approach). Participants in the physiotherapist-led triage group reported to a significantly higher extent that their expectations of the treatment were met (p < 0.001), as well as the intent to follow the advice and instructions received (p = 0.019).Conclusions: This paper reports on patients' perceptions of quality of care in a physiotherapist-led orthopaedic triage compared with standard practice. Patients in both groups reported that they perceived good quality of care, with the patients in the physiotherapist-led triage reporting significantly higher perceived quality of care than those in the standard practice group. This model of care seems to meet patients' expectations and result in a greater intention to follow advice and instructions for self-management. Our findings are in line with existing literature that this model of care provides an opportunity to shape patient-centered care that can improve access and offer care on the most appropriate level, with maintained good quality of care.Trial Registration: Clinical Trials NCT02265172 . Registered 10 June 2014. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Recruitment of young adults for weight gain prevention: randomized comparison of direct mail strategies.
- Author
-
Crane, Melissa M., Gokee LaRose, Jessica, Espeland, Mark A., Wing, Rena R., Tate, Deborah F., and LaRose, Jessica Gokee
- Subjects
WEIGHT gain prevention ,PATIENT selection ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,OBESITY treatment ,HUMAN research subjects ,PREVENTION of obesity ,COMPARATIVE studies ,EXPERIMENTAL design ,HUMAN reproduction ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,POSTAL service ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH funding ,STATISTICAL sampling ,TELEPHONES ,WEIGHT gain ,EVALUATION research - Abstract
Background: Recruiting young adults (ages 18-35 years) into weight gain prevention intervention studies is challenging and men are particularly difficult to reach. This paper describes two studies designed to improve recruitment for a randomized trial of weight gain prevention interventions. Study 1 used a quasi-experimental design to test the effect of two types of direct mailings on their overall reach. Study 2 used a randomized design to test the effect of using targeted messages to increase recruitment of men into the trial.Methods: For Study 1, 60,000 male and female young-adult households were randomly assigned to receive either a recruitment brochure or postcard. Visits to recruitment websites during each mailing period were used to assess response to each mailing. Study 2 focused on postcard recruitment only. These households received either a targeted or generic recruitment postcard, where targeted postcards included the word "Men" in the headline text. Response rates to each type of card were categorized based on participant report of mailing received.Results: The reach of the postcards and brochures were similar (421 and 386 website visits, respectively; P = 0.22). Individuals who received the brochure were more likely to initiate the online screener than those who received a postcard (P = 0.01). In Study 2, of those who completed the telephone screening, 60.9 % of men (n = 23) had received the targeted postcard as compared to the generic postcard (39.1 %, P = 0.30). The reverse was true for women (n = 62, 38.7 vs. 61.3 %, P = 0.08).Conclusions: These studies suggest there was little difference in the reach of postcards versus brochures. However, recipients of brochures were more likely to continue to the next stage of study participation. As expected, men's response to the weight gain prevention messages was lower than women's response; but using targeted messages appears to have modestly increased the proportion of male respondents. These studies add to the limited experimental literature on recruitment messaging and provide further indication for using targeted messages to reach underrepresented populations while providing initial evidence on the effect of mailing type on message reach.Trial Registration: The Study of Novel Approaches to Weight Gain Prevention was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT01183689 ) on 13 August 2010. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. Juvenile Justice-Translational Research on Interventions for Adolescents in the Legal System (JJ-TRIALS): a cluster randomized trial targeting system-wide improvement in substance use services.
- Author
-
Knight, Danica K., Belenko, Steven, Wiley, Tisha, Robertson, Angela A., Arrigona, Nancy, Dennis, Michael, Bartkowski, John P., McReynolds, Larkin S., Becan, Jennifer E., Knudsen, Hannah K., Wasserman, Gail A., Rose, Eve, DiClemente, Ralph, Leukefeld, Carl, and JJ-TRIALS Cooperative
- Subjects
JUVENILE justice administration ,TRANSLATIONAL research ,TEENAGERS ,CLUSTER randomized controlled trials ,SUBSTANCE-induced disorders ,SUBSTANCE abuse treatment ,CLUSTER analysis (Statistics) ,COMPARATIVE studies ,CRIMINOLOGY ,HEALTH planning ,JUVENILE delinquency ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,MEDICAL research ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH funding ,EVALUATION research ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials - Abstract
Background: The purpose of this paper is to describe the Juvenile Justice-Translational Research on Interventions for Adolescents in the Legal System (JJ-TRIALS) study, a cooperative implementation science initiative involving the National Institute on Drug Abuse, six research centers, a coordinating center, and Juvenile Justice Partners representing seven US states. While the pooling of resources across centers enables a robust implementation study design involving 36 juvenile justice agencies and their behavioral health partner agencies, co-producing a study protocol that has potential to advance implementation science, meets the needs of all constituencies (funding agency, researchers, partners, study sites), and can be implemented with fidelity across the cooperative can be challenging. This paper describes (a) the study background and rationale, including the juvenile justice context and best practices for substance use disorders, (b) the selection and use of an implementation science framework to guide study design and inform selection of implementation components, and (c) the specific study design elements, including research questions, implementation interventions, measurement, and analytic plan.Methods/design: The JJ-TRIALS primary study uses a head-to-head cluster randomized trial with a phased rollout to evaluate the differential effectiveness of two conditions (Core and Enhanced) in 36 sites located in seven states. A Core strategy for promoting change is compared to an Enhanced strategy that incorporates all core strategies plus active facilitation. Target outcomes include improvements in evidence-based screening, assessment, and linkage to substance use treatment.Discussion: Contributions to implementation science are discussed as well as challenges associated with designing and deploying a complex, collaborative project.Trial Registration: NCT02672150 . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Process evaluation of the Bristol girls dance project.
- Author
-
Sebire, S. J., Edwards, M. J., Kesten, J. M., May, T., Banfield, K. J., Bird, E. L., Tomkinson, K., Blair, P., Powell, J. E., and Jago, R.
- Subjects
DANCE ,SCHOOLGIRLS ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,PHYSICAL activity ,ACQUISITION of data ,PSYCHOLOGY of dance ,COMPARATIVE studies ,EXERCISE ,FOCUS groups ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,PLEASURE ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH funding ,SCHOOL health services ,STUDENTS ,QUALITATIVE research ,EVALUATION research ,EVALUATION of human services programs - Abstract
Background: The Bristol Girls Dance Project was a cluster randomised controlled trial that aimed to increase objectively measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) levels of Year 7 (age 11-12) girls through a dance-based after-school intervention. The intervention was delivered in nine schools and consisted of up to forty after-school dance sessions. This paper reports on the main findings from the detailed process evaluation that was conducted.Methods: Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from intervention schools. Dose and fidelity were reported by dance instructors at every session. Intervention dose was defined as attending two thirds of sessions and was measured by attendance registers. Fidelity to the intervention manual was reported by dance instructors. On four randomly-selected occasions, participants reported their perceived level of exertion and enjoyment. Reasons for non-attendance were self-reported at the end of the intervention. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with all dance instructors who delivered the intervention (n = 10) and school contacts (n = 9) in intervention schools. A focus group was conducted with girls who participated in each intervention school (n = 9).Results: The study did not affect girls' MVPA. An average of 31.7 girls participated in each school, with 9.1 per school receiving the intervention dose. Mean attendance and instructors' fidelity to the intervention manual decreased over time. The decline in attendance was largely attributed to extraneous factors common to after-school activities. Qualitative data suggest that the training and intervention manual were helpful to most instructors. Participant ratings of session enjoyment were high but perceived exertion was low, however, girls found parts of the intervention challenging.Conclusions: The intervention was enjoyed by participants. Attendance at the intervention sessions was low but typical of after-school activities. Participants reported that the intervention brought about numerous health and social benefits and improved their dance-based knowledge and skills. The intervention could be improved by reducing the number of girls allowed to participate in each school and providing longer and more in-depth training to those delivering the intervention.Trial Registration: ISRCTN52882523 Registered 25th April 2013. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) increases women's satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care: results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Forster, Della A., McLachlan, Helen L., Davey, Mary-Ann, Biro, Mary Anne, Farrell, Tanya, Gold, Lisa, Flood, Maggie, Shafiei, Touran, and Waldenström, Ulla
- Subjects
CONTINUUM of care ,MATERNAL health services ,POSTNATAL care ,MIDWIVES ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,COMPARATIVE studies ,LONGITUDINAL method ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,PATIENT satisfaction ,PRENATAL care ,RESEARCH ,STATISTICAL sampling ,MIDWIFERY ,EVALUATION research ,PSYCHOLOGY - Abstract
Background: Continuity of care by a primary midwife during the antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum periods has been recommended in Australia and many hospitals have introduced a caseload midwifery model of care. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the effect of caseload midwifery on women's satisfaction with care across the maternity continuum.Methods: Pregnant women at low risk of complications, booking for care at a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia, were recruited to a randomised controlled trial between September 2007 and June 2010. Women were randomised to caseload midwifery or standard care. The caseload model included antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care from a primary midwife with back-up provided by another known midwife when necessary. Women allocated to standard care received midwife-led care with varying levels of continuity, junior obstetric care, or community-based general practitioner care. Data for this paper were collected by background questionnaire prior to randomisation and a follow-up questionnaire sent at two months postpartum. The primary analysis was by intention to treat. A secondary analysis explored the effect of intrapartum continuity of carer on overall satisfaction rating.Results: Two thousand, three hundred fourteen women were randomised: 1,156 to caseload care and 1,158 to standard care. The response rate to the two month survey was 88% in the caseload group and 74% in the standard care group. Compared with standard care, caseload care was associated with higher overall ratings of satisfaction with antenatal care (OR 3.35; 95% CI 2.79, 4.03), intrapartum care (OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.78, 2.57), hospital postpartum care (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.32, 1.85) and home-based postpartum care (OR 3.19; 95% CI 2.64, 3.85).Conclusion: For women at low risk of medical complications, caseload midwifery increases women's satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care.Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012607000073404 (registration complete 23rd January 2007). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Development of an e-supported illness management and recovery programme for consumers with severe mental illness using intervention mapping, and design of an early cluster randomized controlled trial.
- Author
-
Beentjes, Titus A. A., van Gaal, Betsie G. I., Goossens, Peter J. J., and Schoonhoven, Lisette
- Subjects
RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,MENTAL illness treatment ,ELECTRONIC health records ,PATIENT compliance ,SELF-management (Psychology) ,HEALTH self-care ,ADAPTABILITY (Personality) ,CHRONIC diseases ,CLUSTER analysis (Statistics) ,COMPARATIVE studies ,INTERNET ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL consultation ,MEDICAL cooperation ,NEEDS assessment ,QUALITY of life ,RESEARCH ,TELEMEDICINE ,AFFINITY groups ,EVALUATION research ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,PSYCHOLOGY - Abstract
Background: E-mental health is a promising medium to keep mental health affordable and accessible. For consumers with severe mental illness the evidence of the effectiveness of e-health is limited. A number of difficulties and barriers have to be addressed concerning e-health for consumers with severe mental illness. One possible solution might be to blend e-health with face-to-face delivery of a recovery-oriented treatment, like the Illness Management & Recovery (IMR) programme. This paper describes the development of an e-health application for the IMR programme and the design of an early clustered randomized controlled trial.Method/design: We developed the e-IMR intervention according to the six-step protocol of Intervention Mapping. Consumers joined the development group to address important and relevant issues for the target group. Decisions during the six-step development process were based on qualitative evaluations of the Illness Management & Recovery programme, structured interviews, discussion in the development group, and literature reviews on qualitative papers concerning consumers with severe mental illness, theoretical models, behavioural change techniques, and telemedicine for consumers with severe mental illness. The aim of the e-IMR intervention is to help consumers with severe mental illness to involve others, manage achieving goals, and prevent relapse. The e-IMR intervention consists of face-to-face delivery of the Illness Management & Recovery programme and an e-health application containing peer-testimonials on videos, follow up on goals and coping strategies, monitoring symptoms, solving problems, and communication opportunities. We designed an early cluster randomized controlled trial that will evaluate the e-IMR intervention. In the control condition the Illness Management & Recovery programme is provided. The main effect-study parameters are: illness management, recovery, psychiatric symptoms severity, self-management, quality of life, and general health. The process of the IMR program will be evaluated on fidelity and feasibility in semi-structured interviews with participants and trainers.Discussion: Intervention Mapping provided a systematic procedure for the development of this e-health intervention for consumers with severe mental illness and the preparation of an early randomized controlled trial.Trial Registration: The trial is registered in the Dutch Trial Register: NTR4772 . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Study protocol for "Study of Practices Enabling Implementation and Adaptation in the Safety Net (SPREAD-NET)": a pragmatic trial comparing implementation strategies.
- Author
-
Gold, Rachel, Hollombe, Celine, Bunce, Arwen, Nelson, Christine, Davis, James V., Cowburn, Stuart, Perrin, Nancy, DeVoe, Jennifer, Mossman, Ned, Boles, Bruce, Horberg, Michael, Dearing, James W., Jaworski, Victoria, Cohen, Deborah, and Smith, David
- Subjects
RESEARCH protocols ,MEDICAL practice ,TREATMENT of diabetes ,CLINICAL trials ,PUBLIC health ,EVIDENCE-based medicine ,CARDIOVASCULAR diseases ,CLINICAL medicine ,COMMUNITY health services ,COMPARATIVE studies ,DIABETES ,DIFFUSION of innovations ,EMPLOYEE orientation ,EXPERIMENTAL design ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,RESEARCH ,TIME series analysis ,PROFESSIONAL practice ,EVALUATION research ,KEY performance indicators (Management) ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,HEALTH care reminder systems ,EVALUATION of human services programs ,ELECTRONIC health records ,STANDARDS - Abstract
Background: Little research has directly compared the effectiveness of implementation strategies in any setting, and we know of no prior trials directly comparing how effectively different combinations of strategies support implementation in community health centers. This paper outlines the protocol of the Study of Practices Enabling Implementation and Adaptation in the Safety Net (SPREAD-NET), a trial designed to compare the effectiveness of several common strategies for supporting implementation of an intervention and explore contextual factors that impact the strategies' effectiveness in the community health center setting.Methods/design: This cluster-randomized trial compares how three increasingly hands-on implementation strategies support adoption of an evidence-based diabetes quality improvement intervention in 29 community health centers, managed by 12 healthcare organizations. The strategies are as follows: (arm 1) a toolkit, presented in paper and electronic form, which includes a training webinar; (arm 2) toolkit plus in-person training with a focus on practice change and change management strategies; and (arm 3) toolkit, in-person training, plus practice facilitation with on-site visits. We use a mixed methods approach to data collection and analysis: (i) baseline surveys on study clinic characteristics, to explore how these characteristics impact the clinics' ability to implement the tools and the effectiveness of each implementation strategy; (ii) quantitative data on change in rates of guideline-concordant prescribing; and (iii) qualitative data on the "how" and "why" underlying the quantitative results. The outcomes of interest are clinic-level results, categorized using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, within an interrupted time-series design with segmented regression models. This pragmatic trial will compare how well each implementation strategy works in "real-world" practices.Discussion: Having a better understanding of how different strategies support implementation efforts could positively impact the field of implementation science, by comparing practical, generalizable methods for implementing clinical innovations in community health centers. Bridging this gap in the literature is a critical step towards the national long-term goal of effectively disseminating and implementing effective interventions into community health centers.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02325531. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Experiences of patients with advanced chronic diseases and their associates with a structured palliative care nurse visit followed by an interprofessional case conference in primary care – a deductive-inductive content analysis based on qualitative interviews (KOPAL-Study)
- Author
-
Pohontsch, Nadine Janis, Weber, Jan, Stiel, Stephanie, Schade, Franziska, Nauck, Friedemann, Timm, Janina, Scherer, Martin, and Marx, Gabriella
- Subjects
TREATMENT of dementia ,HEART failure treatment ,CHRONIC disease treatment ,OBSTRUCTIVE lung disease treatment ,HOME care services ,PROXY ,QUALITATIVE research ,RESEARCH funding ,INTERPROFESSIONAL relations ,HUMAN research subjects ,PRIMARY health care ,CONTENT analysis ,INTERVIEWING ,NURSING assessment ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,JUDGMENT sampling ,CONFERENCES & conventions ,MOTIVATION (Psychology) ,RESEARCH methodology ,ATTITUDES of medical personnel ,QUALITY of life ,PHYSICIAN-patient relations ,COMMUNICATION ,PALLIATIVE care nurses ,EXTENDED families ,DATA analysis software ,PATIENTS' attitudes ,DEMENTIA patients ,INTEGRATED health care delivery ,PSYCHOSOCIAL factors ,HEALTH care teams - Abstract
Background: Chronic, non-malignant diseases (CNMD) like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and dementia in advanced stages are very burdensome for patients. Timely palliative care with strong collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and specialist palliative home care (SPHC) teams can reduce symptom burden, hospitalization rates, hospitalization costs and overall healthcare costs. The KOPAL-study on strengthening interprofessional collaboration for patients with palliative care needs tested the effect of an intervention comprising of a SPHC nurse assessment and an interprofessional case conference. This qualitative evaluative study explores patients', proxies' and their associates' motivation to participate in the KOPAL-study and views on the (benefits of the) intervention. Methods: We interviewed 13 male and 10 female patients as well as 14 proxies of patients with dementia and six associates of study participants using a semi-structured interview guide. All interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed with deductive-inductive qualitative content analysis. Results: Motivation for participation was driven by curiosity, the aim to please the GP or to support research, respectively to help other patients. Few interviewees pointed out to have expected positive effects for themselves. The nurse visit was evaluated very positively. Positive changes concerning health care or quality of life were reported sparsely. Most study participants did not prepare for the SPHC nurse assessment. They had no expectations concerning potential benefits of such an assessment, the interdisciplinary case conference and an early integration of palliative care. The majority of interviewees reported that they did not talk about the nurse visit and the interprofessional case conference with their GPs. Conclusion: Our results lead to the conclusion that SPHC nurses can serve as an advocate for the patient and thereby support the patients' autonomy. GPs should actively discuss the results of the interdisciplinary case conference with patients and collaboratively decide on further actions. Patient participation in the interdisciplinary case conference could be another way to increase the effects of the intervention by empowering patients to not just passively receive the intervention. Trial registration: DRKS00017795 German Clinical Trials Register, 17Nov2021, version 05. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Two-year clinical performance of indirect resin composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth with different cavity preparation designs: a randomized clinical trial.
- Author
-
Fouda, Hoda, Hassanein, Olfat Elsayed, Saber, Shehabeldin, Haridy, Mohamed Fouad, Baz, Maha El, Ahmed, Hend Sayed, and Abuelezz, Ahmed
- Subjects
TREATMENT of dental caries ,DENTAL resins ,DENTAL fillings ,ENDODONTICS ,MOLARS ,DENTAL discoloration ,INLAYS (Dentistry) ,COMPUTER-aided design ,DENTAL pulp diseases ,STATISTICAL sampling ,BLIND experiment ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,CONTROL groups ,PRE-tests & post-tests ,DENTISTRY ,MEDICAL appointments ,RESEARCH methodology ,ROOT canal treatment ,COMPARATIVE studies ,TOOTH fractures - Abstract
Trial design: This is a randomized, controlled, superiority, double-blinded, parallel-group, two-arms trial with an allocation ratio of 1:1. This study aimed to assess whether the cavity design could affect the clinical performance of the CAD/CAM generated indirect resin composite restoration in endodontically treated teeth (ETT) evaluated using the Modified USPHS criteria after a two-year follow up. Methods: A total of 30 participants who underwent endodontic treatment for MOD cavities in permanent molars were divided randomly into two parallel groups (n = 30 restorations) according to the performed cavity design to group 1 in which there was no cuspal reduction (inlay) and group 2 in which cuspal reduction was performed (overlay). All pulp chambers were filled with bulk fill flowable composite, and the cavities were prepared following the criteria of the cavities for indirect restorations and restored using nano-hybrid composite resin blocks (Brilliant, Coltene, Switzerland). The restorations were evaluated using the modified USPHS criteria at baseline, six months, one-year and two years follow-up visits. For qualitative data, frequencies (n) and percentages (%) were used to display the data, while mean and standard deviation (SD) were used for quantitative data. The normality of the data was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. For every test, P ≤ 0.05 was used as the significance threshold. Results: Twenty-six individuals completed the follow-up period after receiving the assigned intervention.The inter-group comparison showed that, at the 6- months and 12- months observation points, the overlay design had significantly better marginal adaptation, less incidence of discoloration or tooth/restoration fracture, and similar marginal integrity and caries incidence to the inlay design. After 24- months, the overlay design still had better marginal adaptation, less incidence of discoloration or tooth/restoration fracture and less caries incidence in comparison to the inlay design, while there was no difference in the marginal integrity between either design. Conclusions and clinical relevance: Cuspal reduction in endodontically treated teeth showed better clinical performance than the cusp preservation thus, the former is more reliable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.