1. Erlotinib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer: real-world analysis of Korean national database.
- Author
-
Sangjin Shin, Chan Mi Park, Hanbyeol Kwon, Kyung-Hun Lee, Shin, Sangjin, Park, Chan Mi, Kwon, Hanbyeol, and Lee, Kyung-Hun
- Subjects
- *
CANCER patients , *PANCREATIC cancer , *PANCREATIC cancer diagnosis , *PANCREATIC cancer treatment , *ERLOTINIB , *KOREAN national character , *CLINICAL trials , *CANCER chemotherapy , *MEDICAL care costs , *THERAPEUTICS , *ANTINEOPLASTIC agents , *COMPARATIVE studies , *COST effectiveness , *RESEARCH methodology , *MEDICAL cooperation , *PANCREATIC tumors , *RESEARCH , *SURVIVAL , *EVALUATION research , *TREATMENT effectiveness , *RETROSPECTIVE studies , *DEOXYCYTIDINE , *ECONOMICS - Abstract
Background: A randomized clinical trial has found that the addition of erlotinib to gemcitabine (GEM-E) for pancreatic cancer led to a modest increase in survival. The aim of this national population-based retrospective study was to compare the effectiveness of GEM-E to GEM alone for pancreatic cancer patients in real clinical practice.Methods: Patients with pancreatic cancer (ICD-10: C25) with prescription claims of gemcitabine or erlotinib between Jan 1, 2007 and Dec 31, 2012 were retrospectively identified from the Korean Health Insurance claims database. To be included in the study population, patients were required to have had a histological or cytological diagnosis within one year before chemotherapy. Patients treated with prior radiotherapy, surgery, or chemotherapy were excluded to reduce heterogeneity. Overall survival from the initiation of therapy and the medical costs of GEM-E and GEM were compared.Results: A total of 4,267 patients were included in the analysis. Overall survival was not significantly longer in patients treated with GEM-E (median 6.77 months for GEM-E vs. 6.68 months for GEM, p = 0.0977). There was also no significant difference in the respective one-year survival rates (27.0 % vs. 27.3 %; p = 0.5988). Multivariate analysis using age, gender, and comorbidities as covariates did not reveal any significant differences in survival. Based on this relative effectiveness, the incremental cost per life year gained over GEM was estimated at USD 70,843.64 for GEM-E.Conclusions: GEM-E for pancreatic cancer is not more effective than GEM in a real-world setting, and it does not provide reasonable cost-effectiveness over GEM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF